Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Michael Jackson’s alleged child abuse victims speak out" video.

Believed it then. Believe it now. Michael couldn't have been any more obvious short of taking out a billboard in Times Square announcing his guilt.
31
Yeah, because victims always act rationally. That's why women a;lways leave a husband who tries to kill them the second he becomes dangerous right? The real problem are enablers who stick their heads in the sand.
25
@ulfemanuel2028 "they sued the MJ estate for 1.5 billion dollars" ah really? That puts a totally different slant on their accusations.
8
@peterdink5823 Riiiight, which is why he paid Jordy Chandler 20 million not to testify against him, and why he slept naked with young boys. BTW, nice goalpost shifting. "harm" huh?
7
@peterdink5823 They will NEVER be able to prove what happened, but that still doesn't make Jackson innocent. Are they even TRYING to get money?
6
Nonsense. The man was guilty as it was possible to be.
6
@karltanner8047 I'll look it up now. Thanks for the recommendation Karl.
5
You can't KNOW that Jackson is innocent, but if there was any more smoke around him it would cause a global temperature drop.
5
@marcrobert5 If it was my child he was sleeping nude with, I'd gladly have put a bullet in his head.
5
@_Phoenix3 No, what is sickening is enablers like you running interference for a man who was only free because he paid off the first accuser by paying him 20 million dollars. Even the facts that are a matter of public record, are sufficient for any reasonable person to have grave concerns about Jackson, and when you factor in balance of probability, the man was guilty as sin. He was a serial paedophile abuser that people like make excuses for because he was a talented musician. If ANY other person had the same set of facts, you'd have been baying for his blood along with the other sane people.
4
@marcrobert5 You only have to kill three people in a lifetime to be considered a serial killer... But I'm willing to accept that these two were not molested, but all of them? Nope, no way. Jackson WAS a paedophile. Get over it.
4
@manowar5516 Man, with enablers like you on his side, it's no wonder Michael was able to continue sexually abusing boys for 20 years. How much more evidence would you have needed to be suspicious? But I'm gonna bet even YOU would never let Michael baby sit your sons.
2
Phil Jones Butthurt fanboy much Phil? It seems to me that Kiwi offered as lot of pertinent facts on the case, and her own analysis. You on the other hand, brought nothing.
1
@josepht8560 Joseph, there were Catholic priests out there who abused dozens or even hundrreds of boys but only ever got charged with one. Bill Cosby abused dozens of women but he was only held accountable for a single case. There was a murderer in India who killed 100 boys before he was caught! The fact that a serial abuser gets away with it for a long time, or that there are not lots of vocal witnesses, or that there is a long time between incidents, or that any specific person was NOT abused is not an indication of innocence.
1