Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Over 40 dead and dozens missing in Germany after record rainfall and devastating floods" video.

  1. 22
  2. 7
  3. 6
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7.  @peteredwards338  "You are totally wrong on the number of scientists." You're correct - it's 97% not 95%. Thank you for winning the argument for me. Mike drop. "the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. " https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/ Dunno who William Happer is, but calling him a "proper scientist" because he confirms your opinions is hilarious. By what process do YOU conclude that he is correct in the face of all the contrary expertise? " atmosphere contains 0.04 %CO2. Only 3 % of that tiny amount is the result of human activity" And precisely what percentage rise of CO2 is enough to trigger runaway greenhouse effect? "Don't forget : 99. 06% of the atmosphere is not Co2." Irrelevant. That's like saying the drink you just gave someone was only .04% polonium. "The sun makes up 99.9% of the solar system, look there for answers" The volume of the sun by mass is not the issue, and I might add, another irrelevance borne from ignorance. The distance of the earth, the eccentricity of our orbit, the density and albedo of our atmosphere and the stability of the sun's heat output ARE relevant. Frankly, simply throwing numbers into the conversation with clearly, zero comprehension of their significance serves only to demonstrate that you are either ignorant, or wilfully attempting to mislead.
    2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1