Comments by "Mat Broomfield" (@matbroomfield) on "Internet Search is So 2015, with Stefan Weitz | Big Think" video.
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
Luis Dias I think your problem is that your statement was simply too broad a generalisation.
Whether Microsoft buys its way into the future or develops its own products, so long as it is there, it will be relevant so long as it prudently acquires companies that make the whole greater than its parts. With the sort of revenues they have, and their ubiquity in the operating system market, I really think that calling them irrelevant is an overstatement.
Perhaps if you were trying to make the case that Microsoft is no longer at the absolute cutting edge of computing technology, you might have had a better argument, but bickering over the relative importance of office is a massive irrelevance.
It appears to me that the company has perhaps made some missteps, compared to say Apple, but it think it's premature to write them off yet.
It is my understanding that Microsoft is involved in wide ranging research into projects as diverse as data storage, mobile communications, genetics and cosmology.
However, I would be interested if you were to clarify what you mean when you say that the company is NOT relevant, and what sort of companies ARE relevant?
1
-
1
-
1