Comments by "evertvdb000" (@evertvdb000) on "The most shocking part of Durham report: Byron York" video.

  1. the last 3 months he didn't do anything, except trying to overturn the election
    3
  2. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    2
  3. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  4. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  5. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  6. its 2022, who on earth still believes in satan or witches. in Africa they still do, though
    1
  7. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  8. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  9.  @georgeseco91  yea, right🤣 you are in for another BIG disappointment
    1
  10. so ... has anybody seen the EVIDENCE of the Durham allegation? no ... has anybody seen the allegation? no .....
    1
  11. also nutter conspiracy theories
    1
  12. rightly so! didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  13. no! didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  14. NO! didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  15.  @carloscruz7317  why would i? you make the claim, you have the burden of proof. Did you read anything Durham actually wrote?
    1
  16. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  17. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  18. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories.
    1
  19. accountable for what? you see any evidence? Idurham is just alleging, like he did a few times before, and which resulted in nothing
    1
  20.  @mikefromspace  nah, this will be a nothingburger, like everything before
    1
  21. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  22. yes
    1
  23. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  24. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  25. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  26. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same vague allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Durham just wants to prove that the 3.8 million $ this investigation cost the taxpayers is not a waste of money. but it is Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  27. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories. Do'nt get your hopes up.
    1
  28. because he had nothing
    1
  29. it was a call to zelenski, the president of UKAINE!! god i hate stupidity so much ....
    1
  30. they were right. didn't you read the 2 previous 'indictments' of Durham, the last on nov 15? this is not news. Its just the same allegations over and over again without evidence. you know: conspiracy theories.
    1