Comments by "evertvdb000" (@evertvdb000) on "Gutfeld: Next stop: Brainwashed Boulevard" video.
-
7
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wmason1961 no! censorship does not exist outside the government.
let me explain AGAIN...🙄sigh
if a writer for a Catholic magazine writes something bad about the Pope, and he gets fired, can he go to court claiming he's 'censored'? NO!!!
The magazine is PROPERTY of the Catholic Church, and they can DO AS THEY LIKE!!!
Same with Twitter ...
Who do you call 'anti free speech crusaders'?? people who believe in property rights?? People who believe in capitalism???
and INDEED, if you do'nt like twitter, DONT GO ON TWITTER!!! build your own! as a capitalist I wish you 100% good luck! honestly!
your mentality is 100% COMMUNISM: its only because Twitter is succesful that you target Twitter. But what you want to do is to swoop in after they have succes, and tell Twitter what you want them to do, while you did zero, took zero risk, and did zero effort. That, my friend is pure communism. the small or big foreign social media (VK, QQ, Weibo) , who do EXACTLY the same as Twitter, you ignore. You target specificly the ones that are the most succesful and make the most money.
its truly disgusting!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@HighDutchMan77 no, im not in school, so i dont do homework. ,I feel for you you still do.
Give me an example of the corruption of a sitting "former vice-president", whatever that means. Give me details, documents...
pedophelia??? wow, that even Fox news didn't mention! more details please! boy? girl victim, how old?
drugs abuse: that is true. so? Mike Lindell is the same. Nobody on the left is whining about that! and its not corruption.
'treachery bussines dealings': that is so vague, you don't have a clue, do'nt you?
Now again: give me ONE example off something damaging on the laptop!
isn't it sad that you have ZERO, nothing, zilch?
And i'm not even a Biden voter, i just hate whiners
1
-
@wmason1961 look, you can't win if you use semantics, and going to wikipedia for 'definitions' is even more ridiculous! I gave you examples, you cant refute them, so you play very predictable the semantic game. 'boohoohoo i'm right because you know what the definition of censorship is boohoohoooo'. Stop the F whining, for gods sake.
You do'nt have to believe me! NO PROBLEM AT ALL! but at least (I know off) 26 times, big tech has been sued for 'censorship' by disgruntled users. Big tech won 26 times, also with trump appointed judges. everytime the verdict is very short: 'a private company has also a 1st amendment right'.
You can't win this argument, because you are (and I always enjoy to write this) 100% WRONG!!!
the whole censorship discussion is totally hypocritical too. trump, the biggest 'censorship whiner' has started his own twitter knock off, and in the TOS is stated, you can't critisize Trump ....
And did you complain about that?? of course not!
But I agree with trump, he can do that! because i'm a capitalist and NOT a communist
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@darthvader5532 yea, yea yea, if I write 'storming the Capitol', you very well know what I mean, and I know you desperately want to re write history, and pretend it was just a touristic day out ...
and thats disgusting, because the video footage is there, and you do'nt want to see it.
the police officers who lost their eye, or their fingers, DO remember that disgusting day, all 100% Trump sycophants, who couldn't accept the fact that their Supreme Leader lost the election to an elderly person, who didn't even needed to hold rallies to win an election from Trump.
and I didn't even vote for Biden.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1