Comments by "Toi Chut Gong Wu" (@ToiChutGongWu) on "Chinese zoo dyes dogs’ fur to make them look like pandas, sparking controversy" video.

  1.  @Hkchinese888  "We"? Which of your many "we" is that?
    2
  2. "Our", “Mohammed Kumar”/“Hkchinese”/”wynn”? "Your", China? Or India? or Pakistan? Or Australia? Or British Columbia? 🤣
    2
  3. Hello Sinophobic bot farm bot.
    1
  4.  @Thakur__RAJPUT__55  Say hello to your ChinaAngVirus PHP Peso paying bot farm for me
    1
  5.  @Nicholas_Foong69  Hello again racist bot.
    1
  6.  @misterbig9025.  It is interesting that this platform will censor any opinion that goes against the narrative of the Global West. While at the same time, it permits racist (for example allowing the use of the term “cheenk”, “small eyes”, “shitguo”, “small sausage”, dog eater”, “go ok” and “subhuman”) Sinophobic posts, particularly on the “South China Morning Post” channel. The Sinophobic bots also spam “1937”, “731” and “1900”, celebrating the deaths of Chinese people. There is an obvious campaign by professional, Sinophobic, posters in action across YouTube. So much for the “community guidelines.
    1
  7. With China National Day here the Sinophobic bot farms have increased their racist comments. Of course, the so-called "community guidelines" do nothing about this kind of racism. Such hypocrisy.
    1
  8.  @wynn3077  Hello again racist.
    1
  9.  @Devildemon74  That is interesting. Thanks. His full moniker is really “Mohammed Kumar”/“Hkchinese”/”wynn” 🤣
    1
  10.  @wynn3077  Hello again racist.
    1
  11.  @misterbig9025.  “Cheenk” is a racist word, but as it is racist towards Chinese and this platform does nothing about its use. Nor does the South China Morning Post, where it appears to be most prevalent.
    1
  12.  @misterbig9025.  Hello again racist.
    1