Comments by "XYZ ABC" (@123xyzabccba) on "सावरकर, गांधी और आंबेडकर: कितने दूर, कितने पास?" video.

  1. The one sided analysis of figures like Ambedkar, Savarkar, Gandhi, Nehru indicates how Indians haven’t trained their minds to think analytically. It’s not uncommon to come across many castes-communal-lingual bias-driven viewpoints from their camp followers. There’s no doubt that Savarkar was indeed a fierce freedom fighter but only so long as he was not jailed. Circumstances changed while he was in jail and the Savarkar that came out of jail was diametrically different than the one before. The problem arises only when the Savarkarites try to impose him as a freedom fighter for life when actually all his actions post his release were favourable to the British. Instead of extolling Savarkars contribution towards galvanising Indians till he was jailed and for his contribution towards eradication of blind faith and casteism the Savarkarites are doing great injustice towards Savarkar and also inviting ridicule for justifying his several applications for clemency. If Savarkar is to be honoured with Bharat Ratna award than that should be for his contribution towards freedom struggle before imprisonment and for his social reform movement - which he carried zealously even in the face of fierce opposition from the Hindutva idiots - and for propagating scientific temper. The bammanical lobby however is more interested in magnifying his anti-Muslim ideology which allegedly got shaped during his stint in the Andamans, otherwise how can anybody brand a person as anti Muslim who termed the 1857 revolution as the first war of India’s independence though it was leb by Zafar a Muslim. It is also foolish to expect this same bamman lobby which thrives on blind faith to spot lit savarkars crusade against blind faith n false gods
    3
  2. All the idols of Hindu gods n goddesses are in fact originally from Jainism n Buddhism restructured to propagate bammanism covertly under the garb of Hinduism…even Bhagwat geeta is hugely borrowed from teachings of Jainism n Buddhism except the perverted teachings about castes n casteism. The religious history of India is basically a long standing conflict between Buddhism (based on rationality ) vs bammanism (Hinduism based on blind faith)
    2
  3.  @nirajraut9408  : it was foolish of anyone to hv believed that india could achieve freedom from the mighty English who had tacit support of US as well as the German on account of race . If u desire to know how inferior Hitler thought about Indians than pl read latest book by Purandare ‘Hitlers india’. There’s nothing wrong in begging for clemency but to call such a person as ‘brave’ is a joke. The casteist hindutwawadis need an icon for their ‘New India’ like how ‘old India’ has Gandhi hence this white-washing of Savarkar ….Calling Savarkar ‘veer’ and proposing Bharat Ratna to him is a bad joke on those who preferred the gallows instead of clemency and pension from British …..
    1
  4.  @nirajraut9408  : This Sampat is one of those ‘historians’ who hv been commissioned by the radical rightist to rewrite history….just as Arun Shourie was during the first NDA rule
    1