Comments by "alex Lo" (@alexlo7708) on "The 4 Planes Challenging Airbus And Boeing For Supremacy" video.

Its mostly Russian tech. Very different.
2
They're all body composite but 929 has wider cabin.
2
If you're banned or sanction by US ,you might love it.
1
@fartingfury Western suppliers were told by its mastermind to separate from 929. So the 929 tech will be all Russian and Chinese. RollsRoyce might have some on its engine.
1
Why not 737 MAX winglet?
1
Its a copy of E190. No future.
1
Because Boeing had compete with it predecessor " McDonell Douglas". So it stay on competing.
1
If I am airline owner in China , I will exactly buy them because we don't know whether another Trump may use its airplane products as a trade weapon. So in view of China, US planes are unreliable products comes with low credibility in term of doing business.
1
Sure when consider MD80.
1
The 1000 is future long extend body.
1
No , its MD80. CRJ has 2-2 seat narrow cabin config. ARJ has 3-2 seat, same cabin to MD. Tail engine mounted on CRJ hinged side incline upward. ARJ it hinges lateral, again same as MD.
1
Wider cabin.
1
Decades ago ,when in good relation. China aviation reg. had asked FAA in providing them all process to airworthiness issuance. Then they have complete learnt it. So the CAAC.FAR.25(China airwothiness license) is a shadow OF FAA.FAR 25 license. By the way, afterward US has aware on China aviation industry influence rise up. So they decie not to co-issue the airworthiness to any jet from China or Russia there on.
1
Because each EU plane makers were demolished by US giant. Vickers, Siddeley , Suds aviation , Fokker etc. So it united to challenge.
1
If you worry on copyright you must force Boeing to expose all their tech to Russian and point out what is being infringed. Ask yourself, Will it happen?
1
@68404 Sam146 engine. The failure of cooperation.
1
@intantarmizi6138 Operating price??
1