Comments by "" (@Picklemedia) on "Alberta feed shop forced to hide livestock medication being touted as COVID-19 cure" video.
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ec6052 would you take a horse dose of aspirin? If you can't tell this is a straw man argument, I don't know what else to say to you.
Also, you also haven't made an answer yet.
Ivermectin has been used over 4 decades, over 3.7 billion doses administered. (To humans)
It is has an outstanding track record, and is on the world health organizations list of safe essential medicines.
Pertaining to covid, there has been a large-scale meta-analysis (among others) published in the American journal of therapeutics.
Would you like a link?
All of this is covered on JRE 1671 with Bret Weinstein and Pierre Kory. I have actually done my research, and I am literally spoon feeding you the answers but you will not listen.
No, I don't get my medical information from Joe Rogan, just the experts he hosted on this particular episode.
I have listened to Bret Weinstein for years because I enjoy evolutionary biology.
You're not trying to do what's right, you're trying to be right.
You don't have ideas, ideas have you.
How much time have you spent researching Ivermectin?
Would you listen to JRE 1671?
What's the worst thing that could happen?
If you haven't done any research, how are you so steadfast in your position?
Surrounding yourself with people you agree with is like being in a desert. You already know what they think, because they agree with you.
This was conceptualized in the children's book Peter Pan. The problem with being king of Neverland is, Neverland doesn't exist, so you are the king of nothing.
You're probably thinking this was a 20 minute comment, but it only took 30 seconds because I actually know what I'm talking about.
You might want to listen to people that annoy you on the off chance that if you do, you might gain something rather than dying.
You are not even close to my level, that's why you can't answer such a straightforward question, you obscure with gaslighting, ad hominin attacks, and strawman arguments. That's why you won't listen to the episode, it's too much work for you and your ego can't bear it.
This was also a conceptualized in the children's book Pinocchio. You do what's comfortable, but on pleasure Island you lose your voice and become a braying jackass.
You haven't done the research, and you don't have an argument, only personal attacks.
Try to make an answer, not an insult.
How many hours have you spent researching ivermectin?
Will you listen to JRE 1671?
1
-
@ec6052 no, I'm talking about how there is a safe effective repurposed drug with a 40-year proven track record, that is highly effective in treating covid, discussed in the podcast you refuse to listen to, highlighted in the peer-reviewed meta-analysis I provided you.
It's $1 a dose, out of patent so not very profitable....
The pharmaceutical companies stand to earn 100 billion dollars in profits this year.
Government lobbyists largest contributors are pharmaceutical lobbyists, even bigger than big oil.
Even a cursory glance at commercials in America can tell you there's a large profit margin since 90% of their commercials are about some kind of 'new drug'.
There is a smear campaign happening to you, you are being manipulated, and I am sounding the alarms but you refuse to listen to the clear ring of the bells.
If you can't listen to a 2-hour podcast then you don't have a moral position, just an egotistical one.
I don't think you believe that: telling people they "shouldn't be taking a horse dose" of ANY drug is news. Just as much as I think the tide pod stories were'nt news.
Some people drink bleach FFS.
This is obviously a smear campaign against the competitor, but you won't know that, because you haven't done the research. I've been kind enough to hand it to you like a dozen times but you just can't I guess.
I actually don't think you should listen to the podcast now. I think you are just perfect the way you are.
1
-
1
-
1