Comments by "Common Sense Craziness" (@commonsensecraziness7595) on "Global National: Dec. 16, 2022 | Twitter faces backlash over suspension of several journalists" video.

  1.  @darlene2709  [Because it's nonsense. See previous comment.] You want it to be nonsense, but there's now a government inquiry into it. Good luck ignoring it as things escalate.
    3
  2. GloBULL.
    3
  3. They're definitely not real journalists. Real journalists don't try to become the story, they just report on it.
    3
  4.  @GeorgeOrwellWasRight  If not, definitely an NPC.
    2
  5.  @darlene2709  [See previous comment. It's nonsense. Sebastian Gorka said so.] The fact that you mentioned Sebastian Gorka as a reliable source (and the fact that YouTube removed my link proving he's unreliable) is further proof how distorted the reality is that you promote.
    2
  6. More and more people these days.
    2
  7. He didn't just track his private jet - he used private (NOT publicly available as claimed) information to do it.
    2
  8. They're doing what they always do - lie. The journalists banned were doxxing. But this is about Musk's hypocrisy but about the critics who thought it was perfectly fine to censor people when it wasn't them.
    1
  9. Because GloBULL is a mouthpiece for the Canadian government, who very much WANTS censorship and knows they won't be able to control Musk.
    1
  10.  @ritchl3262  They expose themselves, but there are still losers that believe them.
    1
  11.  @darlene2709  [ Sebastian Lukács Gorka is a British-born Hungarian-American media personality, military and intelligence analyst, and former government official - serving in the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump as a Deputy Assistant to the President from January 2017 until August 25, 2017.] Yes, another neocon that was part of the Trump administration. That's who you are citing.
    1
  12.  @darlene2709  [Please elaborate with evidence.] Why provide evidence when you roundly ignore it?
    1
  13.  @darlene2709  [ Still waiting for your evidence...] You've been provided with all kinds of evidence. You just ignore it.
    1
  14.  @darlene2709  [Still waiting...] Still lying. Even when a post gets removed or deleted, you still get a message direct to you because you were linked.
    1
  15.  @CassieAngelica  If they keep violating the rules, they will eventually be banned permanently.
    1
  16.  @CassieAngelica  [except they violated no rules. They published what was already publicly available.] That's the lie. It ISN'T publicly available information. He had his plane info de-listed, but they found a tech way around it. Remember phone books? It was publicly available information but you could pay to be de-listed and keep your information private? It's like that for planes. They lied about it being publicly available information.
    1
  17.  @CassieAngelica  [they literally didn't. Elon Musk himself let them stay on the platform at first, which means Elonjet violated no rules even according to the thin-skinned baby that is Elon.] No. They posted to a link that provided the same information the original Twit was banned for, because they thought they had found a way around it (this has been literally proven - and admitted by the people doing it). But it's just considered ban evasion. Yes, Elon doesn't have the thickest skinned, but that doesn't magically make these "journalists" truth tellers. They're just liars, and you've been conned by them.
    1
  18.  @CassieAngelica  [no. You can keep quoting me back to me, but the facts remain there. The info was there before, end of story. They did nothing wrong. But keep defending censorship, though, this is fun.] They doxxed Elon Musk but you keep calling it "censorship". So I take it you're OK with doxxing? Or just when it's Elon Musk?
    1
  19.  @CassieAngelica  [I’m not okay with doxxing. Doxxing is making previously publicly unavailable info public. This was not that.] The tracker revealed the location of Elon Musk's private plane in real-time with information that was not publicly available. It's the literal definition of doxxing. It's way worse then just revealing, say, someone's private address. Even as Elon Musk moves around the world, the tracker could locate his plane accurately.
    1
  20.  @CassieAngelica  His son was stopped by some stranger (probably thinking it was Elon himself) and also proceeded to climb on the roof of the vehicle. The potential threat on his family made him react the way he did. It was a knee jerk reaction by Elon, to be sure, but not totally hard to empathize with. A more mature response would have been to give people more time to understand and follow the new rules.
    1
  21.  @CassieAngelica  Sure it was immature and reactionary, but that wasn't your original point. You said they were innocent and Elon Musk was just being a big meany. They weren't innocent.
    1
  22.  @CassieAngelica  [had they not been innocent, he would have been able to concisely answer the questions asked by reporters...] He did actually. Listen to the Twitter Space audio. It's the guilty journalists that waffled when asked if they had copied a link that enabled doxxing: Pseudo-journalist -"uh, no, I didn't post any address information" Musk - "You posted a link to the banned material. Clever little tricks like this is ban evasion and will still get you banned." Pseudo-journalist-"But muh Hunter Biden's laptop!" Give me a break. [and, as Ben Shapiro called some of them “pseudo-journalists”, calmly and concisely without storming out of the call.] [Also, he reinstated these accounts after two polls he did which slanted the bias strongly in favour leaving them banned, and people still voted to reinstate them.] "Storming" in and out of the call is a matter of interpretation (although I don't think it's an accident Twitter Space went down immediately after. And they ARE pseudo-journalists. They're corporate liars and were already hellbent on writing hit pieces about Musk, so why be nice to them? The very reason they posted the links that got them ban was to needle Elon. Well, mission accomplished. And quite frankly, they're a bunch of whiners - the bans were temporary (Elon put up a poll with either an immediate return or a 7 day ban -- none of the options involved anything permanent or particularly long lasting so where do you get that from?). [Also, I heard that no police report was filed after the incident described. Now, I don’t know whether that’s true, but that has been claimed by many reporting on the incident.] Who cares if there is or isn't a police report? The issue is they were banned for doxxing. Are you now trying to say it isn't doxxing unless additional criminal activity happens? Someone has to get hurt? A police action has to occur? You and I both know that if it comes to that, the doxx has already done the damage and it's too late. The whole reason to ban doxxing is to PREVENT harm. If the police don't ultimately get involved, it's still not proof that the potential for serious violence wasn't there.
    1
  23. Mastodon doesn't offer a blue checkmark. ;)
    1