Comments by "Technolus" (@technolus5742) on "The Wall Street Journal" channel.

  1. I remember hearing that the kidnapped people were unharmed.
    2
  2. "where's the proof" the whole thing is well known, men trained by alqaida, whose leader was bin laden, committed those attacks. What u on about?!
    2
  3. They are brave, it's pretty impressive. They are counting on the taliban wanting to seem as moderate as possible to outsiders. Still, incredibly brave.
    2
  4. You can, but people don't have to like it. And you might be infringing on other people's trademarks. Let's face it, people were very used to words such as tweet. It was a very strongly branded company. Now I hear people just saying post instead of tweet, which is much more generic.
    2
  5. ​ @fightforfreedomneversurren8610 wtf why not trump?
    2
  6. So make sure they are not manipulating the market, like that people in wall street bets were doing.
    2
  7. Death and suffering is not boring, it's rather sad and alarming. Just like the people who promote it.
    2
  8. Exactly they came in strong mentioning quiet quitting repeatedly at the start, but then the whole story had nothing to do with it. Quiet quitting has nothing to do with productivity. Productivity has to do with your output per hour worked, not with how many extra hours we work.
    2
  9.  SmashStomp Inc  On one hand its good that you're ignorant of poverty, on the other hand its bad that you're ignorant. Your c9mment is pure condensed ignorance.
    2
  10.  @nolanmedley8047  lol scammers get banned all the time so theire used to having multiple accounts. This is kinda clever tbh, but it's old news now so it just looks ridiculous. Don't forget to report as spam!
    2
  11.  @donaldrayprine5153  wow I glossed over that. you're absolutely right
    2
  12. ​ @harkmay  if it's anything like autopilot, that gun will take a long time to fire and then miss 😂
    2
  13. one seized power via terrorism, the other did not. One being bad does not excuse the other.
    2
  14.  @brandonburns5365  thats not how it works, proce of shares don't make the company go bankrupt, what causes bankruptcies is online purchases replacing physical stores. Thats why gamestop is such a shorted stock
    2
  15.  @brandonburns5365  I'm saying it's illegal to consert buying action geez. ......... it was people consciously participating in a group scheme to pump a stock. ......................... ¯\(°_o)/¯ your narrative is a complete denial of the central matter of this story
    2
  16. I understand putting Lula back in place due to bolsonaro being worse and still corrupt. But someone who isn't corrupt needs to be put in power to replace both of these people.
    2
  17. This is preciselly a pump and dump scheme. As far as I know this is illegal.
    1
  18. His integrity certainly gained him the respect of many.
    1
  19.  @janeznovak2408  lol just cause you don't like it doesn't make it a scam.
    1
  20. FB, Twitter, TikTok, Youtube
    1
  21. Despite all all money, Musk's ego is fragile. Zuckerberg probably has nothing to lose, and another chunk of social media to win.
    1
  22. Not really, just people getting manipulated by a corrupt right wing politician into thinking blatantly false things. So many people voted for bolsonaro to rid the country from corruption, when it turns out that besides his bad personal characteristics he is also at the heart of corruption scandals...
    1
  23. ​ donk8105 not necessarily in school, but it was the subject of constant international mockery
    1
  24. These algorithms model relations between anything. You're overcomplicating something that is rather simple: these algorithms just give people whatever gets their attention.
    1
  25. @ToddNakamura  "nope" - this was literally confirmed. A sighting that was making making rounds on social media was tracked down and it was literally a helicopter.
    1
  26. It's only disappointing if that ending doesn't come true 😂
    1
  27.  @cacosartto  "they made him president" THEY are the voters. This is a democracy. Can't throw democracy out the window when you dont like peoples choice.....
    1
  28.  @cacosartto  The people elected him..... You can request recounts what you cannot do is impose your ideology by force.
    1
  29.  @cacosartto  People have elected the guy. Independent and international observers widely agree. You can contest if you have evidence of fraud, which you do not.
    1
  30.  @cacosartto  0 evidence and multiple international watchdogs confirm the elelectionnwas free and fair. All we have is a vote that doesn't support you. So yeah. Imposing your will be force against the will of the people doesn't
    1
  31.  @cacosartto  He got off on a technicality. People voted for him. It's the vote of the people. This is a democracy, you don't have to like the decision of the majority, but their decision is what counts.
    1
  32.  @cacosartto  and the court does allow people to contest the results, but is also allowed to fine them for bad faith litigation that has no basis in the facts.
    1
  33.  @cacosartto  People voted and now you want to cease power by force because you don't like the choice people made. Bolsonaro isn't any better. Regardless: this is the choice of the people.
    1
  34.  @justtwobuns_nighta1352  requesting a recount requires valid grounds and credible evidence of fraud or irregularities, which has not been presented.... being under the rain is not exactly valid ground. Also, I'm not a leftist, and it's appalling that you think that imposing a non-elected leader by force is somehow equivalent to being "two months into lvl4". Brazil is not good with lula, but somehow bolsonaro still managed to be worse than lula. It's quite a feat... That should be a wake up call for a lot of people.
    1
  35. ​ @justtwobuns_nighta1352  Lack of evidence, because there is none, just typical disinformation. Lula is better because bolsonaro manages to be even more corrupt having been involved in various corruption scandals already... and still having the shamelessness of declaring that there is no more corruption when he is making the problem worse. And yeah correlation is not causation economy is better now just like it has boomed periods of lula's leadership too. Nothing to do with bolsonaro... Wanted to end corruption? Choosing bolsonaro was a bad choice. Wanted good leadership? It was an antiscientific choice. Wanted freedom? authoritarianism and hate was a bad choice. Wanted to not take power by force? invading the democratic institutions by force was a bad choice.
    1
  36. Yeah, cause its totally not going bankrupt like video rental stores. This company is hevily shorted because its going out of business due to online sales replacing physical stores. Plus you're risking jail for engaging in market manipulation.
    1
  37. "the US", no the league of nations, cause it was a whole lot of countries who backed this. But everyone is evil. The taliban are here to save the day.
    1
  38. They weren't the ones spreading lies about election fraud 😂
    1
  39.  @alireact1827  women have their own minds to decide how they want to dress. And if people decided it is fine to walk naked, who are you to impose your will on people who are minding their own business?! If you weren't being closeminded, you would acknowledge that there is plenty of middle terms between being covered from head to toe and being nude.
    1
  40. No room for mislead people trying to disrupt democracy...
    1
  41.  @sharpenedge  lol I think they need something from an actual authority that they can actually use to run a billion dollar business
    1
  42.  @sharpenedge  lol that's bs, lawyers were talking about need for extensive regulation after ftx and even writting papers on the that very subject...
    1
  43.  SmashStomp Inc  what are you talking about, there was ongoing market manipulation by redditors, they would be breaking the law if they knew of market manipulation going on in their platform and did nothing........
    1
  44.  @brandonburns5365  people got together and coordinated action to change the price of gamestop. If you heard people in wallstreet were doing something like this you'd expect someone to go to jail if justice was served.
    1
  45.  @brandonburns5365  yeah, thats like a thieve saying they just "borrowed it". Thats something you say to a friend as a quip, not something that you'd expect to hold up in court
    1
  46.  @brandonburns5365  it is, mass crime does not cease to be a crime and shouldn't e too hard to trace this back to individual investors, thought it's most likely that big fish (prominent instigators) would be the primary targets of any investigation.
    1
  47.  @dstblj5222  The difference is cause and effect. It was that people banded together to drive the price of the stock.
    1
  48.  @dstblj5222  no, it was people going on reddit, and following the instructions to buy buy buy. It's a crime dude. (and big short positions is not reason to think something is going to rise lol, get a better excuse just in case...)
    1
  49.  @dstblj5222  if cnbc told people to target a stock and caused a massive frenesim on it it would be a crime.
    1
  50.  @dstblj5222  no, they targeted a specific stock and directly got it's price inflated. Money was to be made there because a crime was being committed.
    1