Comments by "Technolus" (@technolus5742) on "Why AI and Streaming Are Center Stage in the Hollywood Strike | WSJ Tech News Briefing" video.

That is silly, AI improves over time... eventually it will be better than the best human.
5
It's not just them, we all are. The question is how we are going to transition to higher and higher percentage of automation of labor without high and higher percentage of people struggling to survive. I'm all in favor of my work being done by robots. I just still want a share of the things being produced. Considering productivity should at the very least stay constant, I see no reason to not redistribute the products of labor so that everyone can have an increasingly higher standard of living. It would be massively silly to say that a smaller and smaller percentage of the population should own everything and that others should just be left homeless. Now convince a republican of this.... 😂 yeah we're doomed.
4
This is baffling to me. Most of us dislike our jobs. Anyone given the chance to be replaced in their job by a robot should be jumping in excitement! What we do not want is to stop getting our share of the products of this work. That is what we need to focus on: how to automate labor while keeping and improving peoples standard of living. That should be the goal...
4
@dickriggles942 Ah yes, ad hominem. Next time try leveraging actual criticism.
4
@weird-guy Transportation companies will not find it stupid to replace human drivers with AI to increase efficiency and productivity. Same goes for most other sectors.
3
@dickriggles942 When you claim that I'm not the brightest, but then you can't grasp what I'm saying. Obviously what I am saying is that there will have to be a big change in how the economy is organized, and that is the fundamental problem that these strikes do not address. Hopefully not everyone will be as blind as to insist on an economic collapse when the production capability will be the highest it has ever been. (Moreover then this kind of problem of allocation of resources is something AI is suitable for...) You're old but also born yesterday that you somehow haven't seen the incredible progress that's unfolded no matter what timescale you're looking at. And yet you can't see anything past how things currently work? That's 0 foresight.
3
They just produce more of what they already know people like. Too much money at play to risk on something new, so they just rehash the same movies.
1
Limit automation? I disagree. I think automation should be a goal. And companies should be free to pursuit profit. It's the job of the governmemt to then manage things appropriately so that companies dont do immoral things in the pursuit of profit and also that people don't struggle as automation yields more and more production.
1
@josepha.r5839 left would be unto thar it's the right that doesn't usually like regulation.
1