Comments by "dark room ambience" (@DarkRoomAmbience) on "" video.
-
3
-
Yes, youre right, losing 100k troops, 300k wounded, losing your largest energy customer, having high inflation, a shrinking economy, 40% of tanks lost, an expansion of NATO, exposing the weakness of your military, losing 50% of the territory you occupied, forcing to mobilize, having 300k men flee the country, ruining your standing in the world, was all part of the plan.
3
-
2
-
@thedeal86 They went for Kyiv, that was the only way for regime change, which was their stated objective. You take the capital to decapitate the military. Thats how its done. You dont use 100k troops and your best troops, the VDV special paratroopers, and lose them as a distraction. A distraction is when you use a few troops to take a town, and you dont sacrifice your special forces as a distraction. They went for the airports around Kyiv, got pushed back, sent a column of tanks that ran out of gas, thats not a distraction. Theres other evidence that proves it wasnt a distraction, such as during the atempted seige of Kyiv, Russia sent in riot squad police units with the military, police units that are trained for crowd control. You dont send riot police as a distraction, you send them in when you captured the capital to manage any crowds.
In the captured Russian tanks, there were soldiers dress uniforms, you dont bring your dress uniforms if its a distraction, you bring them for ceremonies and parades, victory parades. Also, how do you account for the mobilization that Russia was forced to do if everything was going according to plan and the Kyiv push was just a distraction?
1