Comments by "dark room ambience" (@DarkRoomAmbience) on "Explosions In Five Ukrainian Regions, NATO’s Secret Plan To Counter Russia, “Frozen Conflict” Likely" video.

@markbudaden110 The US wont be defaulting, if it did, you would feel it. Wherever you live in the world.
4
@bakedcookiezzz The money we give are long term loans that will be paid back. The equipment we send are earmarked for destruction and would cost more to destroy than to send to Ukraine. Not only are we saving money, but technically we will make money. Now of course, I dont think about this conflict in those terms, because that would be a morally horrendous thing to do.
3
Actually Ukraine has stopped Russia in its tracks. Have you seen the battle map for the last 8 months?
2
Unfortunately the account that you made up, Mikhail Gorbachev denies there was any agreement. Also, thats not how agreements work between two countries. A private handshake between temporary leaders is not an agreement or how countries conduct geopolitical agreements. Show us all the document that were signed by both countries, show us the bill the countries congress voted on to ratify, show us the signing ceremony
2
The US accounting error of $3 billion is the equivalent to Russia's entire Sukhoi Su-57 5th generation Fighter Jet Program
2
@Gia-ye8vq Imagine if Putin pulled out Russian troops inside Ukraine. He could really stick it to the pesky military industrial complex
1
Youre right, so no more saying that NATO started the war, or is prolonging the war, or that Zelensky is a puppet, or the US is fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian. As you said, Russia decided this war and continues to choose to fight it.
1
Russia caused, started and is continuing this war. However I agree with you, god help NATO nations if we are ever attacked because all i've seen is cowardice and politics. The barbarians are at their gates and they chose to throw a few bones at Ukraine. Its pathetic. But Ukraine are not out yet, they will continue to fight even without western support.
1
@davidcox9674 Your analysis is profoundly flawed, with each point you make veering further away from accuracy. Let us begin with NATO's involvement in Ukraine. While it is true that NATO has made efforts to integrate Ukraine's military into its doctrine, your claim that this was driven by an intention to engage in a war with Russia is simply erroneous. In reality, NATO offered President Zelensky a means of evacuation from Kyiv on the day of the Russian invasion, indicating that NATO had no intention of providing direct support to Ukraine and expected it to fall. Youre correct that NATO's assessment of the situation proved to be a miscalculation. They believed that Russia would swiftly overthrow the Ukrainian government, underestimating the sheer incompetence and lack of preparedness on Russia's part. NATO's strategy was to assist Ukraine up to a certain point, carefully avoiding actions that could be perceived by Russia as an escalation. Admittedly, this strategy has proven to be flawed. In hindsight, NATO should have deployed ground forces immediately after the invasion and establish a no-fly zone if necessary. Contrary to your assertion, NATO has not sent its best weapon systems to Ukraine. The weapons provided have been outdated and near the end of their life cycle. It is unclear where you obtained the notion that NATO deployed their top-of-the-line equipment. Moreover, it is worth noting that the United States does not even utilize the HIMARS system, making it surprising how effectively it was employed. The reality is that Ukraine did not receive tanks, advanced aircraft, long missiles, naval support, or the vast majority of NATO's equipment. The sanctions are working and will be increasing. Russia's economy has shrunk and will continue to shrink for some time. Then it will stagnate for decades.
1
@adventureswithlils4331 So, normally second hand equipment, in the end of its life cycle, costs less, is less valuable, holds less value, than brand new equipment. If I need a car, and you have an old 1996 mitsubishi Lancer in your garage and I ask sell me your car, I need one. And you say sure, its going to cost you the equivalent of a brand new 2023 Lancer, whos ripping off who? But, if you sell me your car for its value, then everyone has a fair deal and nobody is being ripped off. Also, the US isnt being charged more, the equipment that is being sent to Ukraine is equipment that was earmarked for destruction. It costs more to destroy old equipment than to send it to Ukraine.
1