Comments by "dark room ambience" (@DarkRoomAmbience) on "" video.

  1. All the technology that they boast about are made from western components and sometimes complete western systems. They gets components and systems from other countries, mainly western countries, then assembles them onto a specially made chassis then calls the final product their own.
    2
  2. Except the 1980s built patriot anti-missile defense system lol
    2
  3. Yeah but wheres Valery Gerasimov?
    1
  4. NATO weapons are superior in every single way, in every scenario. Only 3rd world countries, failed states and african despots buy Russian weapons and even then, its only small arms. But its not just about weapon systems, its about the soldiers operating those systems. NATO forces, with their emphasis on regular, rigorous training and strong logistical support, ensure that their equipment, ranging from personal firearms to advanced jet fighters, remains superior. Sorry Ivan, but not this time
    1
  5.  @hatchxable  You mean the 1990s HIMARS that has obliterated Russian weapons depots and command centres? Or the 1990s Javelins and NLAWs that have obliterated Russian tanks? Or the 1990s Storm Shadow cruise missile that has obliterated Russian command centres. Those weapons? They are certainly burning and no wander Zelensky wants more
    1
  6.  @hatchxable  Western weapons made in the 1990s have caused 300K Russian casualties and destroyed 5K tanks. Youd hate to see what the advanced weapons could do
    1
  7.  @hatchxable  Firstly, the notion that the Ukrainian counter offensive has "failed miserably" does not accurately capture the complexity of warfare, especially in a scenario like the one in Ukraine. Military operations, particularly defensive ones against a larger aggressor, are measured not just by the amount of territory gained but also by strategic objectives met, such as degrading the enemy's capabilities, fortifying defenses and maintaining national cohesion under extreme pressure. Western weapons have been extraordinarily effective in the face of a numerically superior adversary. Regarding territorial gains, Ukraine has successfully recaptured more than half of the areas initially occupied by Russia. This progress became possible after Ukraine received its first batches of Western military aid, which was basically old HIMARS systems. Despite being technology from the 1990s, Russia struggled to counter these systems, underscoring the advancements in military technology over the past three decades. Also, its important to know that the military support provided by the West represents only a fraction of its full capabilities, with Ukraine accessing older variants of sophisticated weaponry such as the Abrams tanks and lacking access to the most advanced Western military assets like F-35 jets, B-2 bombers, Tomahawk missiles, Aegis combat systems, advanced drones, JASSM missiles, warships and submarines etc. It's interesting your double standard in how the territories are described though: areas taken by Ukraine are "villages with cows and farmers," while Russian gains are inflated to "heavily fortified Ukrainian strategic towns." This bias makes it hard to take you seriously.
    1
  8. Well, he came out of nowhere, was a low level operative in western germany, then all of a sudden was anointed successor to Yeltsin who was considerably pro-western. Putin, who had no experience in the military or politics all of a sudden is pushed to the Presidency? He sided with the west when they went into afghanistan, he sided with the west when they took out Gadhafi. If the west wanted to install a person that would completely and permanently destroy Russia forever, Putin seems to be doing it
    1
  9. Not according to the support Australia has given Ukraine. And not according to the security and defensive alliance it has with the US and the west. Australia is totally against Russia. Oh you mean "the people"? Only a small minority of low information citizens, basically a minority of the right wingers support Russia. Thats too insignificant, sorry
    1
  10. Russia have thrown everything they have at Ukraine.
    1
  11. Their economy is over. Theres no coming out of the mess they have created for themselves. The answer is that they will go through decades (20-30 years) of stagnation, thats the best case scenario
    1