Comments by "Amit Kumar" (@AmitKumarAlphaX) on "Allahabad HC order in Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath temple case explained" video.

  1. THAT'S WHY AURANGZEB HAD 40% BRAHMIN-KSHATRIYA MINISTERS???
    1
  2.  @RahulGupta-h7f  No. IF 40% OF NETANYAHU'S PARTY MEMBERS & MINISTERS WERE MUSLIMS, WE COULD CERTAINLY SAY THAT ISRAELI MUSLIMS ARE SUPPORTING NETANYAHU. BUT THAT'S NOT THE CASE. YOU'D BE DISAPPOINTED TO KNOW THAT THERE ARE ONLY 10 MUSLIM MEMBERS IN THE ISRAELI KNESSET OUT OF 120 & ALMOST EVERYONE OF THEM IS OPPOSED TO NETANYAHU & HIS ACTION IN PALESTINE. CONTRARY TO THIS, ALMOST ALL THE KSHATRIYA & BRAHMIN KINGS IN INDIA ACTIVELY SUPPORTED & ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED IN THE MUGHAL RULE IN INDIA. WE SHOULD ACTUALLY SAY THAT MUGHAL-BRAHMIN COALITION WAS RULING INDIA, NOT JUST MUGHALS.
    1