Comments by "Amit Kumar" (@AmitKumarAlphaX) on "'Large-sized Hindu temples did not exist before 500 AD' : Historian Patrick Olivelle" video.

@hiruzenmonofuke7344 PLACES OF WORSHIP ARE TEMPLES?? REALLY?? BUDDHIST STUPAS, CHAITYAS & VIHARAS ARE NOT TEMPLES, DEAR ANDH BHAKT.
4
BASIC COMMONSENSE. VAISNAVISM, SHAIVUSM & HINDUISM ARE FAIRLY NEW SECTS & RELIGIONS STARTED WITHIN THE LAST 1500 YEARS. HOW CAN THEIR TEMPLES BE ANCIENT??
1
THAT'S HOW STUPID ANDH BHAKT MINDSET WORKS. BECAUSE EGYPTIAN TEMPLES EXISTED 3000 YEARS AGO, THAT MEANS OUR TEMPLES EXISTED 3000 YEARS AGO TOO!😂😂😂 IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT THERE WAS ONLY BUDDHISM & JAINISM IN INDIA AT THAT TIME, BUT WE MUST CLAIM THAT OUR HINDU TEMPLES EXISTED BACK THEN!!
1
BASIC COMMONSENSE. VAISNAVISM, SHAIVUSM & HINDUISM ARE FAIRLY NEW SECTS & RELIGIONS STARTED WITHIN THE LAST 1500 YEARS. HOW CAN THEIR TEMPLES BE ANCIENT??
1
@hiruzenmonofuke7344 LIBRANDU IS CALLING LIBERALS, 'GANDU'. YOU CAN EQUATE IT TO THE TERM 'SANGHI CHAMCHANDU'/ 'CHADDIDHAARI CHINTU'. BUT I HAVEN'T USED ANY OF THEM. CALLING A BLIND SUPPORTER OF UNEVIDENCED PROPAGANDA AS ANDH BHAKT IS 100% LEGITIMATE DESIGNATION. INSTEAD OF SHOWING ANY EVIDENCE OF EXISTENCE OR MENTION OF ANY HINDU TEMPLE BEFORE 500 AD, YOU GUYS ARE TALKING ABOUT EGYPT & GREECE. BECAUSE IT EXISTED IN EGYPT & GREECE, IT MUST HAVE EXISTED IN INDIA!! THAT'S SOME LAUGHABLE ANDH BHAKTI.
1
THAT'S HOW STUPID ANDH BHAKT MINDSET WORKS. BECAUSE EGYPTIAN TEMPLES EXISTED 3000 YEARS AGO, THAT MEANS OUR TEMPLES EXISTED 3000 YEARS AGO TOO!😂😂😂 IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT THERE WAS ONLY BUDDHISM & JAINISM IN INDIA AT THAT TIME, BUT WE MUST CLAIM THAT OUR HINDU TEMPLES EXISTED BACK THEN!!
1