Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "What Actually Expands In An Expanding Universe?" video.

@Ramiromasters Sorry. I became an atheist to try to get away with evil when I die, so now I don't believe you exist. You are just the product of a cat walking on a keyboard. Those words are ultimately meaningless. Atheism: 1. Logic: 0. Atheism wins again!
3
He is a scientist? Then why does he believe in alchemy? Life from non-life has no proof, and farts are as good as amino acids since they are both found in living things, and both are not become life.
2
@RichardBarclay Yes, life comes from God.
2
@Ramiromasters So you believe in alchemy. Do you have a plausible falsification scenario for your atheist alchemy to prove that abiogenesis is even a scientific explanation?
1
@Ramiromasters There is no expansion of the visible universe, or constellations would have dissolved thousands of years ago, yet they remain the same. Diffraction explains red shift. The big bang is not only unnecessary, but unscientific since it's unfalsifiable.
1
@Ramiromasters Proven? Show me the video of life from non-life then. You have no plausible falsification scenario for abiogenesis, so it's not science at all.
1
@Ramiromasters Yet the plane can be seen to move, especially in thousands of years in the case of stars. No cigar. The big bang is unfalsifiable, so it's not science. It's an atheist creation myth.
1
@Ramiromasters So you prefer "Mindlessness did it" over "Mind did it." Guess which explanation is rational.
1
@Ramiromasters After what you said, constellations today remain the same as in antiquity. If the universe were expanding, they wouldn't last past a generation. And if stars move ever so slightly, it is in contradicting directions which don't match the big bang's prediction of a single point of expansion, so stars don't support the big bang at all. And diffraction explains redshift. The big bang is totally unnecessary.
1
@RichardBarclay Since you believe the lie that nature is all that exists, by which you can't think outside that box, then do you recognize the implication on morality that that has: all evil is justified because "nature made me do it." Atheism is therefore extremely evil, even when atheists have standards, which most do. The Columbine atheists were consistent with their materialism. Atheism is the opium of escape from accountability after death. Every atheist who dies will see their paradigm shattered, but it will be too late.
1
@Ramiromasters Answer my questions if you want me to address your new post which is you running away from my questions.
1
@Ramiromasters The cat keeps walking on the keyboard. No need for intelligence! Mindlessness-done-it is the psyentifick explanation for EVERYTHING'S ORIGIN! Atheism: 2. Logic: 0. :-)
1
@Ramiromasters The cat keeps walking on a keyboard to type orderly arrangements of letters. Marvelous how mindless events can produce order from scratch! This proves there is no intelligent design necessary for ANYTHING! Atheism wins again! :-)
1
@aarongrooves Oh look. The materialist does an AD HOMINEM fallacy behind my back. How honourable and logical... PA HAHA!
1
@RichardBarclay You commit a strawman fallacy omitting my reasoning entirely. Afraid of reason, describes the atheists. Have some honour in your life.
1
@andoapata2216 I don't hate to burst your bubble of ignorance, but your imagining abiogenesis doesn't count as evidence. An amino acid proves your atheist ALCHEMY as much as farting, because both farts and those are found in living things. You have non-living things that don't become life. No cigar. You are all failures.... forever.
1
@aarongrooves You are proud so you don't admit your regurgitated falsification scenario attempts all failed. So your ALCHEMY is NOT EVEN A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION AT ALL, TO ANY DEGREE! LOL! Abiogenesis is more worthless than a sick and dying pig's turd which an be used as fertilizer. Then again, abiogenesis is good material for comedy...
1
Notice the guy ran away from my question: @Richard Barclay Since you believe the lie that nature is all that exists, by which you can't think outside that box, then do you recognize the implication on morality that that has: all evil is justified because "nature made me do it." Atheism is therefore extremely evil, even when atheists have standards, which most do. The Columbine atheists were consistent with their materialism. Atheism is the opium of escape from accountability after death. Every atheist who dies will see their paradigm shattered, but it will be too late.
1
In case you missed it, reader, this atheist and all of his comrades failed to defeat my response to his supposedly having proven that abiogenesis is falsifiable, with my post starting with: "23 hours ago @AaronGrooves "The Big Bang is easily falsifiable." "Note the velocities of observable galaxies in the universe. If they are all stationary or accelerating towards each other, then that would be evidence against the Big Bang Theory." No. That would not falsify the big bang story, since you can always assume the big bang ended, and the big crunch is next." Notice the atheists just TURN A BLIND EYE to being proven wrong, and LIE THROUGH THEIR TEETH. All for their ridiculous fiction MORE MAGICAL THAN ANY RELIGIOUS STORY EVER: slime got struck by lightning to become Frankenslime! LOL! They also blindly believe in the alchemy of genius being the product of literal mindlessness. Can anything be any stupider than that? Saying logic's origin is the lack of any logic... WOW! That's atheism in a nutshell. I used to be an atheist when I was a baby..... I grew up.
1
@Ramiromasters " it's possible but it's not a chemical transformation but an atomic one that transmutes elements into whatever we want. So..." So you can get lead into gold? No. You can just melt something into a different form. That's a pathetic excuse for "alchemy," not alchemy at all unless you would also call an ice cube melting, "alchemy" LOL!
1
@Ramiromasters Oh look. It's just a matter of understanding statistics says the illusory person who never sees a sandcastle erode into existence nor the lottery won by the same person every single time. I mean, it's just a matter of time until these things happen, right? Let's ignore the overwhelming majority of cases where mindlessness doesn't advance order, and pretend the little order it can achieve, it will UNINTENTIONALLY PRESERVE to build upon it! HA! Such wishful thinking is worse than any religious story. But I am an atheist, so I blindly believe that regardless of it being totally imaginary and against all empiricism and logic.
1
@Ramiromasters Such irony the one preaching against intelligence isn't bashing his head on the keyboard (or paws, I should say) since they say that will produce orderly messages. You'll actually find the cure for all diseases this way. It's "statistically inevitaable! LOL!
1
@Ramiromasters That video you probably desperately looked up doesn't show alchemy at all. The video itself says: "It would cost more than one quadrillion dollars per ounce to produce gold by this experiment." In other words, no gold was created by alchemy, and it is an assumption that gold would be created, since they never carried out that nonsensical experiment, so you didn't prove anything except your desperation and attempts to hide the truth while exaggerating what you can actually achieve in a way called lying. If they "accomplished" that, it would be the same as dumping a huge amount of real gold into the ocean in order to get a dust particle of pseudo-gold. Also, metal into metal is nothing compared to non-life into life. So comparing your atheist magic to conventional imaginary alchemy is an insult to alchemy. :-) LOL!
1
@andoapata2216 Again, sorry I didn't get that. I rushed when I skimmed it, and saw hostility, and thought that if you put a smiley, that it was to mock me and laugh with others at me, not to say you were sarcastic, since they actually believe that nonsense. A guy here is trying to argue for something worse than alchemy for crying out loud, and he's serious...
1
@RichardBarclay REDVCTIO AD ABSVRDVM is "involves characterizing an opposing argument in such a way that it seems to be ridiculous, or the consequences of the position seem ridiculous." This isn't a fallacy in my use because I'm not saying you're wrong because your atheist creation myth is ridiculous. I'm saying you're wrong because you don't have any proof or even any evidence since the Miller Experiment actually counts as evidence AGAINST it since no abiogenesis occurred to any degree since amino acids are totally lifeless (and are akin to farts since both are found in living things, and both don't make life from non-life so the experiment was a red herring fallacy anyway). I remember being in high school in chemistry class when they taught us about that experiment. It's sad that they put magical and nonsensical fiction in chemistry books, but it goes to show the protocols are right: "Materialism replace religion" is the fourth one. Good Goys never question their masters nor what their masters teach them. The truth is you have a herd mentality which explains why none of your arguments are your own, and all of you simply parrot the lies you were taught, which you don't question.
1
@aarongrooves Can you prove antimatter exists?
1
@aarongrooves I'll continue debating with you if you admit those falsification scenarios you repeated from the establishment, didn't work.
1
@Ramiromasters I didn't say winning the lottery. You're the one moving the goalpost. The analogy of a cat typing all of these words in such a perfect fit to the context is like winning the lottery ALL OF THE TIME CONSECUTIVELY. You fail to explain how mindless events can preserve the little order they rarely make, in order to build upon that order. The fact that they are mindless means THEY WON'T PRESERVE THAT ORDER BUT DESTROY IT, which explains why no sandcastle erodes into existence.
1
@aarongrooves Don't worry. You have other people to defend atheist myths for you, including North Koreans of the most atheistic country on earth, where they don't call their leader a literal god. Atheist creation myths are taught as science there, and the North Koreans never question it. Isn't it sad how deluded they are?
1
@RichardBarclay How can I discredit something that was never proven to begin with? You say Intelligence of the gaps. That's far more logical than mindlessness of the gaps. Mind beats mindlessness any day. If we were in a race, I would win because I have a mind, but you would die because you would fall in a ditch. LOL!
1
@Ramiromasters "o far spontaneous life doesn't seem that hard to come about in an enormous galaxy..." If it's not hard, how come it never happens? You atheists commit circular reasoning all the time. You have no footage of aliens. Man is clearly alone in the universe. Blind faith in aliens isn't science. It's FICTION. Science says guilty unless proven innocent. You don't care for the rigours of science. The scientific method cannot apply to aliens that cannot be seen or sensed at all except in your IMAGINATION and HELLYWOOD propaganda. "So much space therefore aliens" is as irrational as "Space therefore Flying Spaghetti Monster aliens." NON SEQVITVR. Only fallacies are used for atheist myths; NEVER a logical argument. Metroid isn't a documentary. It's fiction!
1
@Ramiromasters Keep imagining aliens. Just don't call them science. They're in the same category as leprechauns and the FSM.
1
@Ramiromasters After all of your TALK, you still haven't walked the walk because: 1. Abiogenesis remains unfalsifiable garbage more magical than anything, yet atheists mock magic: DOUBLE STANDARDS. 2. The big bang is also unfalsifiable. None of you offered plausible falsification scenarios. 3. Materialism justifies all evil by the "nature made me do it" implication since if we are just physical things, then physical LAWS forced rapists to rape, making them puppets... innocent. 4. My video refuting Quantum fiction remains standing. 5. Whatever else I missed. It's in the record.
1
@Ramiromasters You're splitting hairs. Magic and sci-fi are the same. Your sci-fi is just magic with a veneer of "science" to veil its lack of substance. Go back to your dreams so you stop talking about your fantasy aliens. You are happy not in the real world. No aliens here. :-)
1
@Ramiromasters Why is the one who treats atheist alchemy as scientific, despite lacking a plausible falsification scenario to prove that abiogenesis is even in the science club, accusing me of being confused? "I love sci-fi magic" I see that. :-) Miracle devices not part of sci-fi? You must not have played Metroid. The fact that Samus Aran rolls into a little compact ball is a miracle plot device.
1
@Ramiromasters "technically he could say Oh I made a mistake" Have some self-esteem. You are not ORIGINALLY a mistake, and your choice to be in error is your own fault, not God's. He lets evil exist because he lets love exist, FOR LOVE CANNOT BE FORCED. Evil is due to lack of love from agents who know between good and evil. Satan tells him we are a mistake, but God has reserved a few chosen ones to be his sheep and not of the goats whom he shall punish. "snap his fingers" He doesn't do that. He speaks things into existence. "and erase everything" If he did that, it would mean he was wrong, and also not ominscient. "or change everyone's mind or show them a better way or ANYTHING AT ALL because he has magic... " You're using magic right now. The mind is free to think ergo is not a slave ergo is not a slave to physics ergo is not physical ergo is metaphysical AKA magical AKA supernatural. And what better way is there? Show me in your profound wisdom how God's infinite wisdom is beneath yours. Make me laugh.
1
@Ramiromasters PS Phantasy Star is a mix of magic and sci-fi. I miss the offline Online Episodes 1 & 2 on the Gamecube. The cube is a reference to Saturn and thereby Satan. See "Proof Satan Rules The World Ergo The Bible is Right" which has over 3,000 slides of evidence.
1
@Ramiromasters So the Bible using magic is a no-no but atheists using magic is a yes-yes. DOUBLE... STANDARD. Enough chit chat. You had your chances, sir. Toodles. I am back to being an atheist, so you don't exist; i haven't seen you. A cat walked on a keyboard to type your orderly words. Intelligent design is for silly folks.
1
@akshaynair8498 The question where did God come from is flawed because the reason we know things have an origin is by the law of cause & effect, but this is a natural law, so it needs to apply to natural things, not a God. No one says God is a scientific explanation. If your alchemy were chemistry, you would have proof. You don't. You don't even have EVIDENCE because the Miller Experiment counts as evidence AGAINST the thing that didn't even begin. It's also unfalsifiable.
1
@akshaynair8498 I didn't say order cannot come from "chaos." An explosion can create a bit of order, such as a thing on top of another. But without a mind, none of that matters because it won't be preserved to be built upon. You always go back to square 1 with mindlessness. So it's utterly hopeless.
1
@RichardBarclay You ignore the fata flaw in your mindless explanations: due to no intention, they will not preserve the little order they can make, so they will always destroy that order, always going back to square 1. That is never progressive. God needs no origin 'cause the law of cause & effect is a natural law; inapplicable.
1
@RichardBarclay Your assertion that mindlesssness will create anything in a matter of time is refuted by erosion which never creates a single sandcastle despite thousands of years to do it and countless beaches. Your wishful thinking doesn't cut it. Nature is always saying "NO WAY."
1
@HBLStar You tell me to shut up as if you have authority because you cannot shut down my argument with logic.
1
CousinEdward BLASPHEMY!!! Don't talk bad about my atheist idol, you KNAVE!!!
1
Science Revolution The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion explains why they have Gentiles believe in fables which the story-tellers know are fables.
1
The universe doesn't expand from the doppler effect, since red shifts are inevitably caused by diffraction, for the longer light from distant stars has to reach earth, the more particles floating around in space get in the way thereby causing diffraction which means less energy for the light that was on the way to earth, and that makes a shift towards the red of the spectrum. No need for an impossible "time exploded" myth. "It's not an explosion, so you don't even KNOW!" Actually, it IS an explosion. Just the name Big Bang implies it, not that it would be an ordinary one. An explosion is a violent expansion of energy and matter. The Big bang myth is of a violent expansion of energy and matter. Time isn't even physical since the mind is FREE to think ergo is NOT A SLAVE such as to physics. So the fact that something metaphysical exists in time, means time is also metaphysical. But atheists refuse to think outside the box of nature, while being unable to even account for thinking which requires freedom as I just explained. See my video proving Quantum so-called "physics" is pseudo-science based on a misinterpretation of the double slit experiment. One of the stupid arguments shat my way is the typical: "If you had a point, you'd get a similar Nobel prize for science. Ignore that Obama got the Nobel prize for peace while he waged war!" That's the AD VERECVNDIAM fallacy saying authorities have to be right. They're as fallible as other mortals. That's also the argument from incredulity fallacy and a bandwagon fallacy. Protocol 4: "Materialism replace religion." You are good Goyim to be believing in the fables you were programmed to believe. See "Proof Satan Rules The World Ergo The Bible is Right" which has over 3,000 slides of evidence.
1
PS A theory in science is falsifiable. The big bang isn't even in the science club. "If it were seen that the universe were not expanding" isn't a falsification scenario since you can always assume it stopped expanding (Not that it was ever proven to expand; that's obviously a lie just looking at the stars and knowing that's how they've been for millennia.)
1