General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

SCINTILLAM DEI
Metatron
comments

Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Can a Real Suit of Armor Stop a Bullet?!?!Debunking Video" video.

Did you know that the Mecca stadium has an implied Templar cross (if you connect the pillars to the cube in the middle), and that the Templar cross is a reference to the Star of Ishtar (both having 8 points), and that in turn it refers to the Tower of Babel when mankind united against God? Templars have become masons, and I explain more in my series on the history of atheism.
18
Diabetes is a funny word because to say it, you have to say "die."
11
@Narxes I give evidence, and you reject evidence.
8
@VanderWallStronghold98 I'm not finished uploading "The Politically Incorrect History of atheism + Refutations of atheist Myths" which you can see in recent uploads. If you mean a link to the Star of Ishtar in Mecca's stadium, just go to google images and type Mecca building, and then connect the dots yourself. Everything is deliberate there.
5
@Narxes You want to make fun of me but all you do is turn a blind eye to the evidence I gave such as the fact that there are 8 points in the Mecca building around the Kaaba. Your AD HOMINEM fallacy shows you have no power against my argument, since that's the best you can do. You didn't even scratch my armour. :-)
5
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 You insult me without proving me wrong. That's both malicious and irrational. See the documentary exposing that pseudo-science you fell for: "Psychiatry: Industry of Death."
5
@Narxes And are you a Muslim? That would explain your being upset that Islam was exposed. Your profile pic looks like it's of a Muslim guy.
4
@darkushippotoxotai9536 So defending myself makes me a bot? But of course, if YOU do it, then you're not a bot, because you have a double standard. All of you drug addicts can't deal with my evidence. All of you combined aren't able to deliver a logical argument against mine.
4
@Narxes Why have what I'm "smoking" when you can take the originality drug? Your joke required no intelligence because you regurgitated it. If you're going to be irrational, at least be creative.
2
@shinkiro403 What mask?
2
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 Thank you for insulting me again, because this gives me the opportunity to turn the other cheek. I'd rather let you guys abuse my name than to dishonour Jesus by hypocrisy again. SIGH
2
@Narxes Youtube doesn't always notify me. Thanks for the heads up, my dear enemy.
2
@shinkiro403 Yes, shit is holy only to Hindus. By fell off, do you mean people marked it as spam? Can't take the truth, can they? I would never delete that comment because there's nothing wrong with it, if that's what you implied. Did you think I'm afraid of admitting to it? SHIT IS HOLY ONLY TO HINDUS. There. In capital letters. No shame because there is no shame in it.
1
@dangersnail5839 Learn what the word advertising means, because I don't make any money from anything I do on youtube.
1
@The_Evil_Eye Ben Shapiro is a Zionist who throws logic out the window to defend Israhell. I used to be a Zionist. People like Ben Shapiro are intellectually brilliant only contrasted with random feminazis who don't know that the word boy is in "boy scout." I do admit his wit is fast, but the first to print a newspaper isn't necessarily closer to the truth.
1
@The_Evil_Eye What do you mean I won't reply to you? :-) I'm teaching English in Asia, and I need to work certain hours. I'm not always free to read your psychoanalysis mumbo jumbo and argument from incredulity fallacy: "e ridiculous symbolic connections between babylon and other cultures" It's ridiculous only from the point of view of your ignorance. I didn't even give more than the tip of the tip of the iceberg of evidence I have, and you haven't given a better explanation for the evidence I gave. Your "just a coincidence" explanation is a non-explanation with no logic involved. It's like saying these words are just a coincidence typed by a cat walking on a keyboard. Intention is behind high levels of order.
1
@The_Evil_Eye I'm glad you're interested. I have more evidence. I plan to add one more piece of the puzzle, and see how you respond. I'll see you stack up "just a coincidence" upon "just a coincidence" until you have a skyscraper of "coincidences," but first I want to know if you consider an "SOS" on the beach to be necessarily intended, or if that's just a coincidence. :-)
1
@shinkiro403 "S**t" ...Sort? Shot? Seat? Don't leave me hanging! :-)
1
@shinkiro403 I'm deranged? Why are you a jerk? I never insulted you and you attack me for nothing. Such low standards atheists have.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 How much intelligence did it take you to parrot the "take your meds schizo" line? Calling someone crazy for pointing out a fact... makes you crazy. :-)
1
@shinkiro403 " Shinkiro 1 hour ago @SCINTILLAM DEI of course, judging by your channel" Thanks for checking out my channel in a desperate attempt to find dirt on me. I will never click on your username though, because you are not remarkable at all, just a guy putting someone down for saying the truth, which makes you as common as.... unvaluable things.
1
@Shadow_Cell If you attack atheism, the angry atheists will swarm. :-) They can't take criticism.
1
He won't reply to me. Or if he will he will do something like commit the argument from incredulity fallacy again. Or maybe offer up some more ridiculous denial of proven connections between something ancient Satan uses, and something medieval Satan uses. Or perhaps use some of this hyper-irrational deny-all-facts argumentation to misconstrue what I'm saying into a straw-man he can better attack.
1
@peterii3512 Psychiatry is pseudo-science I refute in my series on the history of atheism. Please man, get it questioned because you never questioned what you were taught as also could be told from your refusal to think outside the box, and your clinging to a superficial version of history akin to a Disney version of a Grimm tale.
1
@darmok42 I never said I know even half of everything, so congratulations on taking down that strawman. You must feel like you accomplished something. :-)
1
@darmok42 (Hey! I'm miserable inside, so I know how to feel like I belong! I will bully the guy everyone is attacking! I'm so courageous and confident!") LOL
1
@darmok42 I love putting my bullies in their place. You guys need a herd to feel safe. I pity your minds that they are so feeble. You need the establishment to approve of every thought you possess. Glad I'm a free thinker, not like you bullies whom I forgive but God isn't going to save you just because one of your victims in lie-f forgave you.
1
@vhandarsh51 The difference being?
1
@darmok42 So you commit an AD VERECVNDIAM fallacy because you're gullible, and pretend that's a good argument which it is only to other gullible non-free-thinkers. :-) "holds all the answers!" Again you commit the same strawman fallacy. I never said that, so you're a liar. Don't pretend to have integrity. You clearly are a bad person with nothing worth reading. You think you were the first to call for gullibility? No.... Far from it. You are just another statistic. :-)
1
@darmok42 "It was only YOU a FREE THINKER who holds all the answers!" I never said that. You can't beat the real me, so you put words in my mouth. Liars are so... ugh. "Seriously dude, take a few courses on formal logic," Follow your own advice. :-)
1
@darmok42 You also committed the bandwagon fallacy: "countless." You're no better than someone during the days of black and white television saying: "Countless doctors recommend smoking!" LOL!!! You're no better than them.
1
@darmok42 I'm not a flat-earther. Again you commit a strawman fallacy. You are extremely irrational.
1
@darmok42 "their evidence is false" What evidence? No one here gave contrary evidence, so don't pretend I reject evidence, you liar.
1
@darmok42 You came. You pooped out fallacies. You left. Call it a day. Now you can be happy you belong to the bully atheist club. The bandwagon to hell.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 You're complaining because I defend myself from lying, malicious and irrational bullies, which means you are another one of them. Barely even bother responding? They can't refute anything I say, so all they do is come by for a drive-through shit slinging attack which is the height of their debate skills.
1
@darmok42 You assert no purpose to our existence. You haven't proven that there is no God. Prove it. Your PETITIO PRINCIPII fallacy is more proof you are not logical, atheist. I already proved atheism is wrong and without any merit, in my series on its history. I give arguments, and atheists ignore them. That's because they can't beat the army, so they run away while slinging shit and claiming victory. :-) LOL!
1
@darmok42 If I were just a statistic, I would have succumbed to atheist propaganda when I was subjected to it for most of my youth in public schools. But I question what I'm taught which I know vexes you. My parents taught me to be one way, but I excommunicated them. If I just followed their religion, I would have stayed with them. But I carry my cross to follow Jesus. It would be so easy to be an atheist like you being a jerk and wishing that you can get away with it when you die, which is why atheism is so appealing to the selfish, but I prefer truth above comfort.
1
@darmok42 Atheism is more irrational than saying this thread was typed by cats walking on keyboards. Atheism is shit! :-)
1
@darmok42 I'm an "asshole" to you by pointing out you're lying about me? So if a guys steals your money, and then you say: "You're a messed-up thief;" he has as much right to call you an asshole as you do him? Don't pretend we're on the same level. All you do is fallacies. I never came to you to insult you, but you came to insult me because you're evil.
1
@daanvanrijn4117 Yeah. Putting atheists in their place despite their numerical advantage and home turf is very satisfying but it is annoying to have to point out the obvious fallacies they keep committing, like if they have no shame in being illogical.
1
@HerrStrackenausf1 Splitting hairs.
1
@Narxes (Hey! I know! If I distract with absurd jokes revealing my addiction to a plant because of how weak my mind is and how easily I succumb to peer pressure, then people will forget i'm running away from his arguments!)
1
@HerrStrackenausf1 You split hairs and now you do an AD HOMINEM fallacy. Irrational plus irrational equals more atheist activity for ya, multiplied by all of your comrades here equals a shitstorm of bad atheist arguments. You are deceived because you believe the brain has the ability to be free from physics in order to think. The mind can be free to think because it isn't a slave to physics; it isn't physical; I just proved spirit exists, and this implies the Great Spirit we all come from.
1
@HerrStrackenausf1 You're not one to speak of calmness when you're "yelling" in all caps. :-)
1
@HerrStrackenausf1 Catholics worship Mary so they're not Christians. Protestants branch out from a corrupt tree, so they are also corrupt, and hypocrites too. Me, I failed in this thread by insulting back when i was insulted first, but Jesus said to turn the other cheek. I reasoned that I was being gentle despite fighting back but it wasn't gentle enough. So now I'm trying to be more merciful, and prefer to be silent as a lamb than to fight back again with insults. Pointing out fallacies is still fair game, but I'll try to not seek to humiliate the malicious enemies. God will deal with them in due time.
1
abis8 alpha8 I'm not a slave to any plant and never will be. I have to clap for atheist China that it executes drug addicts. It isn't bad in every way, that China. That's what the Opium wars led to.
1
abis8 alpha8 Jesus was paying for your and my guilt on the cross, willingly letting his enemies win for the short term so God could win in the long (eternal) term by redeeming the elect who would be saved. Jesus was defeating Satan by letting Satan destroy him, just like how Samson destroyed the lords of the Philistines by spreading his arms out and pushing the pillars upon which the top of the building depended. :-) In his death he was more victorious than in his life. And Jesus resurrected as I proved in my sereis on atheism, and in my series on how I know Jesus is the Way.
1
abis8 alpha8 "He took up his sword and went all out" Jesus' second coming will be DIES IRÆ (the Day of Wrath). His approximately 0 AD incarnation was to pay for sins, not to punish sinners. You don't understand my religion.
1
@shinkiro403 Why do atheists who believe in the alchemy of slime becoming Frankenslime mock me as deranged? :-) You have more magic in your paradigm than I do! :-) Hahaha ! Atheists love attacking but when it comes to defense, they vanish because their paradigm is indefensible.
1
abis8 alpha8 Symptoms for coronavirus are things common like a fever, so all mason-controlled hospitals have to do is relabel an ordinary illness as "coronavirus" and the gullible masses go crazy. There are plenty of predictive programming videos showing it was preplanned. For example, the London Olympics with many kids on hospital beds, and Mary Poppins clones coming down from the sky a la fallen angels to give the kids vaccines (where the real damage will come). In the video "This is America" you have a foreshadowing of the quarantine theatre we see today, because of face masks worn by a couple of onlookers. The coronavirus exaggeration or hoax was created to get people eager to go to nuclear war with China because no one wants war without a crisis or PERCEIVED crisis.
1
abis8 alpha8 I take it you also believed TV when it said Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. I did as a naive boy, and I regret trusting TV. CNN's logo has two C's next to each other (and the NN doubling also but appearing as just static as it were). A is 1, B is 2 and C is 3. So CNN's logo implies the number 33. Masonry has 33 degrees. Disney has a Club 33. Count the number of lashes in devil-worshipper Mel Gibson's The Passion of the (Anti) Christ. (EDIT: I forgot to add that the UN logo has 33 sections). FOX News is 666 News because if you put a number to every letter 1 to 9 repeating, you get F is 6, O is 6 and X is 6. Satan rules this world. Repent or perish.
1
abis8 alpha8 Then we have something in common. We hate youtube even though we love it.
1
@BlackJar72 If you see an SOS on the beach, you would just call that a bunch of coincidences? You're equivalent to someone insulting as deranged the rational person calling the SOS written instead of eroded into existence. You then commit a strawman fallacy. I never said everyone here is a conspiring enemy. I never even said any of you are conspiring, so you're lying about me to try to make atheists look good.
1
abis8 alpha8 "pedo priests." I'm not a Catholic. Those are heretics. You missed and continue to show you don't know what Christianity is. You fell for Satan's false flag operation.
1
@Einygmar Many Buddhists are atheists, so you don't understand Buddhism. You committed a strawman fallacy with "Atheists don't believe in my god thus they are 100% against my moral values" You omit my actual reasoning and ignore ALL of my arguments. That shows you are not honest, and you don't want the truth.
1
MinutemanSam A guy here claimed there is no purpose, so he claimed there is no God indirectly. "Basic logic 101." You should take that course since you didn't use deduction. And I already proved my religion right and your paradigm extremely wrong, in my series on both.
1
MinutemanSam Gautama contradicted himself with his "desire non-desire" message. Gautama taught people to be ingrates, to not care about God. He was a bad example, and he never practiced what he preached since he always desired to eat to survive, which meant the risk of suffering from not getting a meal he wanted and needed, so he was never liberated, so he was a fraud claiming to have been liberated from suffering.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 You should be original if you want to be funny, and you should refute something I say if you want to be right.
1
@Shadow_Cell Atheists have no glory in history. Vikings were creationists. Crusaders were creationists. Saracens were creationists. Mughals were creationists. Mongols were creationists. Samurais who were Shinto were creationists. Koreans were creationists. The ancient Chinese were creationists. Aztecs were creationists. Incas were creationists. Los conquistadores eran creacionistas. Zulus were creationists. Ancient Egyptians were creationists. Hittites were creationists. Assyrians were creationists. Babylonians were creationists. Sumerians were creationists. Spartans were creationists. Athenians were creationists. Macedonians were creationists. Lakota were creationists. Atheists have communist mass murderers to look to.
1
abis8 alpha8 "I would absolutely destroy you with arguments" No one here has refuted anything I said. All of you run away from my arguments and lie about them. Your blaming youtube for not beating my arguments is obviously a pretext.
1
@Einygmar "that's why we have quantum physics." I refute Quandumb in my series.
1
@Einygmar "ou're trying to debunk the fundamental scientific concepts" If the big bang is scientific, give a plausible falsification scenario for it, as falsifiability is a criterion for a scientific explanation. You will fail. :-)
1
@Einygmar If the common descent of all species myth is scientific, give a plausible falsification scenario for it, as falsifiability is a criterion for a scientific explanation.
1
@Einygmar If your atheist myth of slime becoming Frankenslime is a scientific explanation, then give a plausible falsification scenario to prove it is a scientific explanation. When you fail, don't keep pretending you have the right to call it scientific. Atheist fables are anti-science. Life comes from life. You have no exception, deceived atheist.
1
@Einygmar Quantum is so illogical it says a cat is both dead and alive at the same time. Quandumb is so stupid it says that Quandumb is right and wrong at the same time! LOL!!! It defeats itself! LOLL!!!!!!!!!!!
1
@Einygmar Gautama was equivalent to a brat telling other kids that parents are totally irrelevant. "Buddha" was evil, a self-centered, pseudo-intellectual, self-contradicting charlatan.
1
@Einygmar You haven't proven my religion is man-made. Your circular reasoning isn't a logical argument. Your argument from incredulity fallacy also.
1
@BlackJar72 Jared Blackburn and I are in the same beach. We both spot a sandcastle between us. I say "Who wrote that?" and then Jared Blackburn, the angry atheist number statistic 9666 says: "YOU'RE DERANGED! THIS WAS OBVIOUSLY ERODED INTO EXISTENCE!" Hahaha!!!! You act like you're right but you know you are the irrational one, atheist. There is no merit in your position whatsoever. You are deluded. You love the lies because atheism promises you don't have to be accountable in the long run. Atheism is the opium of criminals who wish to get away with selfishness like your bullying me, when you die. You are not a criminal by your low, opinionated standards but God doesn't abide by your rules. He's gonna judge you by HIS! Your short life is vanishing before your eyes, and then what will you say when called to account? I wanted to fit in? It's too difficult to be a creationist in a sea of non-freethinkers? There is no excuse for being an atheist except for babies who don't know anything, which is why they lack belief in God. :-)
1
@Komod0_arg.8.0 The brain is physical so it is ruled by physics. That also means it is not the mind because being ruled by physics means it is in SLAVERY to physics. It has no freedom to do anything just as a domino in a domino chain can never choose where or when it falls. Since the brain is a total slave, it has no freedom to think, so it cannot be the thinker. The mind is clearly free from slavery, so it is not in slavery to physics, so it is not physical. Correlation is not causation, so brain scans don't prove that the brain is the mind.
1
@HerrStrackenausf1 "belligerent" accuses the foaming-at-the-mouth atheist. My original post was very calm and non-belligerent but then I get attacked by atheists, and you don't care, because you have a double standard.
1
@Einygmar Your opinion that i am wrong has no worth. If you could refute my argument that proves your self-contradicting quandumb fiction is nonsense, that would be great. According to quandum, you are a youtuber but also not a youtuber, at the same time. That's one example of how irrational it is.
1
@Narxes The Metatron doesn't exist. He is just pixels accidentally forming into consistent positions and accidentally matching the accidentally ut name "Metatron." you religious nut. What drugs are you on? :-)
1
 @Einygmar "that Atheists don’t belie in love" I didn't say they don't believe in love. Love is a vague term anyway.
1
@Einygmar I challenged you to give a plausible falsification scenario for abiogenesis, the big bang and other atheist myths but you failed. :-) So you have no right to call them scientific theories, as those must be falsifiable. Everyone can see your long post of ranting against me did not include any of what you need. :-)
1
@Einygmar "strawman arguments and sophism. Like the example with sandcastle," Prove it. Atheists believe no intelligence is necessary for great order, and that's just like rejecting the fact that the ordered sand that is a sandcastle was necessarily intelligently-designed.
1
@Einygmar In my series, I proved the twitter logo DOES have an implied and subtle 666 in it, and that the Microsoft logo has an implied triangle anyone can see which refers to the pyramid and thereby the Tower of Babel, for all pyramids from Mesoamerica to Indonesia to Egypt are memories of when mankind was united in Mesopotamia. Your argument from incredulity fallacy doesn't cut it.
1
@Einygmar " the chance of it to happen and for us to see it is extremely low. " Here you are ignoring my argument in I think the first video of my series, where I proved that chance has no chance, and your blind faith is unwarranted. Wait for infinity and regressive mindless forces will keep being regressive mindless forces, silly atheist. :-) That means they will always destroy the little bit of order they can muster, always going back to square one, because they're MINDLESS, and have no intention to advance. Your alternative to God is literally dumber than the dumbest thing that ever lived. Mindlessness is not the answer, atheist. Stop having blind faith in it.
1
@HerrStrackenausf1 I didn't call you "split hairs." I said "splitting hairs." That's the fallacy of making distinctions of no importance.
1
@Einygmar I covered the cosmic microwave background radiation in my series section on the big explosion myth you believe without any proof, and I proved that the Flying Spaghetti Monster's aura is a better explanation than your unfalsifiable fiction that has more illogical premises as I explained there. You still did not give a plausible falsification scenario for your "time exploded" myth, so you have no right to call it science. You keep failing to show that it's a scientific theory. It's not falsifiable ergo isn't a scientific explanation. Everyone including on your side can see you have not provided what you need. You just keep talking random distracting things.
1
@Einygmar "After all, a theory that is true is not going to be falsifiable, is it? Because it is true, therefore it cannot be false, in relative terms of course." So you admit it's not a falsifiable explanation? :-) Diffraction beats the shit out of the big bang for explaining red-shift because diffraction NECESSARIILY means red-shift will happen, so the big bang is TOTALLY UNNECESSARY! :-) LOL!
1
@Einygmar Your speculating life from non-life is fiction. Science doesn't care about your imagination. It cares about what you can prove, and you can't prove anything. The establishment can't prove anything. They say the universe expands, but then why are constellations INTACT after THOUSANDS OF YEARS!? They would have been ruined within ONE YEAR!
1
@Einygmar Your talk about chaos "theory" is like seeing someone taking Metroid seriously. I proved that Quandumb isn't science in my series you apparently saw much of, yet you ignore all of my arguments that prove that quandumb is dumb. :-) It is so STUPID it says that LOGIC IS NOT RELIABLE! How can you seriously consider as even possible that maybe logic is stupid!?
1
@Einygmar "As for abiogenesis itself. It was observed" No. It has never been observed. Show me the youtube video where non-life becamse life, your atheist ALCHEMY myth! :-) And if it's a long video, don't make me watch the whole propaganda Give me the time mark for this supposed proof for your atheist paradigm. "that the simple biological molecules carbon-hydrogen positive ion (CH+) and the carbon ion (C+)—are largely the result of ultraviolet light from stars." Are these molecules life from non-life? No. Then it's not abiogenesis at all. It's a red herring fallacy. Amino acids are 100% non-life. When your "proof" for non-life becoming life is something that has absolutely no life whatsoever.... then you know you're extremely wrong. "Complex molecules, including organic molecules, form naturally both in space and on planets." So it is that amino acids can form in a world set up by a Creator that you get materials from to cheat since you can't account for any of the premises for the amino acids at all. But that's irrelevant since, again, amino acids aren't abiogenesis at all. If they are evidence of life from non-life, then you may as well FART and call that evidence, since farts are also found in living thigns. :-) HAHA°!
1
@Einygmar "Anyways it has nothing to do with the existence of Gods. " It has a lot to do with atheism versus theism because you use the big explosion myth to try to explain nature without a God. And you fail miserably, since 1. you STILL haven't given, nor any of your comrades in the entire world, a plausible falsification scenario for the big bang to prove that it is a scientific explanation, and 2. you can't explain how stars magically formed in the big bang when things were SEPARATING FROM EACH OTHER IN A VOID meaning NO STAR WOULD FORM BECAUE THEY'RE SEPARATING FROM EACH OTHER IN A VOID! Nothing can bounce around! Gravity, being too weak to keep the gases together, is not going to suddenly become a thousand times stronger and pull the farther apart conveniently-there particles together to form stars in your atheist mythology full of plot devices and miracles, AD HOC nonsense. You can't even account for there being a void or for there being a primordial energy ball. It's all fiction! The universe doesn't expand, and constellations never breaking for thousands of years proves this.
1
@Einygmar "the overexaggerated example with hypocritical atheists who state that nature determines mind thus Loyalty and Love have no meaning or value" I didn't say all atheists are like him. He is however, consistent with his materialism, unlike you who pretend guilt exists when your atheistic materialistic paradigm doesn't allow for guilt because it doesn't allow for choice because it means "nature made me do it."
1
@Einygmar Why do you talk about imaginary dark energy when it doesn't matter, and it's distracting from your total impotence to prove anything you say? You make extraordinary claims such as that life has been observed to come from non-life. Where is your proof? Stop lying.
1
@Einygmar Don't forget this question. Quandumb "is so STUPID it says that LOGIC IS NOT RELIABLE! How can you seriously consider as even possible that maybe logic is stupid!?"
1
@Einygmar Don't forget this other question: "They say the universe expands, but then why are constellations INTACT after THOUSANDS OF YEARS!? They would have been ruined within ONE YEAR!"
1
@Einygmar And don't forget this other question: 19 minutes ago @Einygmar "After all, a theory that is true is not going to be falsifiable, is it? Because it is true, therefore it cannot be false, in relative terms of course." So you admit it's not a falsifiable explanation? :-)
1
21 hours ago @Darmok You assert no purpose to our existence. You haven't proven that there is no God. Prove it. He ran away! Atheists talk the talk but don't walk the walk.
1
@Einygmar Relatively? So you're equivocating. If it's not falsifiable EMPIRICALLY, then it's not scientific. The atheist myths have already been falsified by me in my series via logic, but not empirically. So clarify: Is the big bang empirically falsifiable? Is abiogenesis empirically falsifiable? Is the common descent of all species story empirically falsifiable? And you didn't answer my other questions. Checkmate, checkmate, checkmate. "no sources." Sources for constellations never changing? You seriously need me to prove that constellations mentioned in antiquity and the Middle Ages are still relevant today? Besides, citing is for people who don't think for themselves. In college they told my essays had to cite for every little thing, which is another way of saying I'm not allowed to have my own ideas.... Pa ha!
1
@Einygmar You use the word "sophism" a lot without actually finding a flaw in any of my arguments. For example, you falsely accused me of saying that atheists don't believe in love, when I never said that with my parody showing an atheist who is consistent unlike you, and who therefore calls love mere chemicals akin to a fart which is what your paradigm reduces love to, the same paradigm that justifies rapists because "nature made them do it." That's what you're defending: a paradigm that literally justifies all evil possible. Why so clingy to an evil-justifying mythology? It also includes racism since your macro-evolutionary premise of genes determining intelligence means that since genes vary by race, that therefore SOME RACES ARE SUPERIOR TO OTHERS INTELLECTUALLY. You know we justify killing animals because they're of inferior intelligence, right? Well, guess why the macro-evolutionist Brits murdered Tasmanians they called "missing links." Your myths are dangerous when taken seriously. They are a threat to mankind, and a threat to your eternal well-being. I'm trying to help. No one seems to see that, but you will when it's too late.
1
"10 hours ago @Jared Blackburn If you see an SOS on the beach, you would just call that a bunch of coincidences? You're equivalent to someone insulting as deranged the rational person calling the SOS written instead of eroded into existence. " Another atheist who ran away. :-) You guys are paper tigers.
1
@Einygmar Let's not forget... 2 hours ago @Einygmar "As for abiogenesis itself. It was observed" No. It has never been observed. Show me the youtube video where non-life became life, your atheist ALCHEMY myth! :-) WHERE'S THE VIDEO!? Clearly the atheist was LYING, which is typical of atheists.
1
@Einygmar "Those ideas are not exclusively based on your religious morals." Strawman fallacy. I didn't say they were.
1
@zaganim3813 They are not students, and I never considered myself their teacher. They don't want the truth, and I I don't want to patronize them by acting like a teacher when I'm just someone trying to help them see how they were lied to, but you all love the lies, so you will all accumulate guilt until the Day of Wrath. You, for instance, decide to turn a blind eye to my bullies and criticize me for nothing. That shows a double standard, and malice.
1
abis8 alpha8 "20 hours ago @SCINTILLAM DEI I would absolutely destroy you with arguments But this Accursed Youtube is Deleting all my comment " Another atheist runs away. Do you see a pattern of chest-beating and shit-slinging followed by fearful flight? LOL!
1
@zaganim3813 Your last name is Baltzersen which reminds me of Nordic names ending in "sen" which reminds me that Vikings were creationists which reminds me that Vikings would be ashamed of and go berserk at their descendants being atheist liberals who believe time exploded and that slime became Frankenslime. LOL!
1
@Einygmar "Then you say that atheists don't question scientific authorities," I never accused the self-appointed authorities of being scientific. "which is flase,scientific authority is always relative and never absolute." It isn't false. You clearly cling to their lies even after I prove them wrong because you're not a free thinker. You refuse to question them. You cling to them like a Muslim clings to Mohammed. :-) "It is hypocritical because religion is based on dogmas which can not be questioned." You don't know my religion. Ecclesiastes says "And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven" so the Bible is not against philosophical questioning. "God's authority is absolute." Yes but he doesn't mind philosophically questioning his existence. He minds only bratty ingrate-rebellion like when Adam stole from his tree or when atheists spit at heaven. The spit comes back, you know. You commit a false equivalency fallacy between God and your establishment, since God is supposed to be a perfect being, so if that is proven, then questioning him is dumb, but treating your fallible mortal biased group of people as infallible is obviously folly.
1
@Einygmar "those concepts are social, not religious" Strawman, since I didn't say atheists can't have ethics. I made it very clear how atheists cherry-pick ethics and crown themselves "righteous" as if nature cares about their opinions. "and the optimal value of them is the one that makes the society stable enough to allow development." Stable is subjective. Its value is also subjectively determined. You're saying that your opinion of "stable" is the basis of morality. :-) What makes your opinion the best? That's narcissism and circular reasoning. You're just imposing your opinions onto others implying they are bad people if they do not abide by your opinion of what "stable" is. Development? Nature doesn't care if mankind survives or not, don't you know? Even DNA doesn't care if it passes on to the next generation because it doesn't have a mind. Like your comrade said earlier, there is no (OBJECTIVE) purpose if there is no God. So if an atheist cannibal rapes and murders, he can say "nature made me do it. There is no god to send me to a hell.. I will get away with it if society doesn't catch me, or if society condones of my behaviour (like Aztecs on cannibalism)."
1
abis8 alpha8 You implied Jesus isn't historic, but I proved the "historic" Jesus exists by proving that the Divine Jesus exists. :-) Refute my series on how I know Jesus is the Way. I also prove my religion right in "The Politically-Incorrect History of atheism + Refutations of atheist Myths."
1
@Komod0_arg.8.0 "You can think yes as long as you have a brain. You can think freely with that brain as long as you keep it fed no?" You confuse expression of the mind, with existence of the mind. The word "dumb" originally meant "unable to speak" but became associated with lack of intelligence by people assuming that if someone does not express their mind, that therefore they don't have one, pretty much. Autists are not actually stupid. They are just normal people trapped in bodies that are incapable of expressing their intelligence due to brain damage from vaccines or some other poison input. I already proved that the brain isn't the mind because the slave (to physics) isn't free (to think), but TO EXPRESS ITSELF IN THE PHYSICAL WORLD, the mind DOES need the brain, just as for a gamer to express themselves in Super Mario World, they need the video game controller. That's a distinction you should make.
1
@Einygmar "I'm not going to reply anymore." Another atheist who attacked me is now routing. Good. :-) I'll dismantle your latest post if God permits.
1
@Einygmar "Justifying rapists? Do you even read my replies." You don't have to be explicit or even aware of any of your materialism's (atheism's) implications for me to conclude their existence. The fact that you believe only nature exists means "nature made me do it" is an implication of your paradigm, and that means rapists are innocent because physics forced them to grab the woman and do their thing. That most atheists are hypocrites who cherry-pick rape to be a "crime" in their opinion popular though it may be, doesn't change the fact that their paradigm justifies rape and anything else man can possibly do. Or does a Muslim being peaceful mean that the Quran is a peaceful book? "The fact that love is biochemistry doesn't justify rape." There is more than one type of love, but you probably mean all types. If love is just biochemistry as you claim, then that means rape WOULD BE justified because we can't determine our chemicals all or most of the time. Do you blame men for being men? No, because men don't choose to be men. We are born males with a penis made for a vagina after puberty, which proves, by the way, that homosexuality is wrong, although your liberal corrupt society including Jewtube are pushing for corruption further and further, lower and lower. Will Lie the Sci-Fi Guy said that there are more than two genders. That's a supposed scientist! Crazy atheist world. "Rape is a crime independently from how natural its causes are. It's illegal because it is an offence against another person and social stability in general." Social stability? What makes your opinion or your corrupt society's opinion of "social stability" correct? That's circular reasoning, self-righteous and bigoted. Atheist China considers drug addicts to be worthy of death but drug addict atheists in the west and in this comment section disagree, and nature doesn't care either way... because she isn't a mind. So if there is no god, then "Might makes right," period. Funny though, because one day God, the Almighty, will make right. :-) Heh heh. I deal with the "problem of evil" in my series.
1
@Einygmar "This doscussion although being quite entertaining has no real value. " What a "coincidence" you decide there is no value in continuing when I corner you multiple times over at the same time. :-) You underestimated me, just like all the rest. Another statistic.
1
@Einygmar "Falsifiable doesn't mean that it shoud always be falsified, it means it can be tested whether it is correct or not." Strawman fallacy. I never said that falsifiable means "that it should always be falsified." You lie once again, here putting words in my mouth.
1
@Einygmar "Everything you say without any proof is just your subjective opinion and has no constructive value." So when I said constellations today are just like in antiquity, that was just an opinion? Another shameless lie you'll have to pay for in the after-life which I proved exists because the mind is free so it's not the slave-to-physics brain, so brain death isn't the end of you, and the Creator will put you where you belong, and he hates liars. Abhors them, actually. "The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity. Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing: the LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man." DIES IRÆ DIES ILLA SOLVET SÆCLVM IN FAVILLA TESTE DAVID CVM SIBYLLA QVANTVS TREMOR EST FVTVRVS CVANDO IVDEX EST VENTVRVS CVNCTA STRICTE DISCVSSVRVS!
1
@Einygmar "Rape is a crime" Where does nature say that? What law of science says that? Don't act like you're scientific, sci-fi boy. You believe in Quandumb physics... which is so irrational it implies that something exists and doesn't, simultaenously! :-) So your fiction says that logic is illogical even though it's logical. Do you see how insane that notion is!? I mean, really... you have no integrity when you cling to that notion. Let alone the justifying-all-evil implication of atheism. In the end you said: "God Bless." Are you just mocking or do you claim to not be an atheist? Because if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and shits like a duck, it's probably a duck. You defend atheist myths and attack the idea of needing God, so you're an atheist. I was one as a baby. I grew up. :-)
1
@Einygmar "The real everyday world is comlex it doesn't revolve around Theism or Atheism." This thread focuses on that. Threads can't focus on everything at once. Your point has no point. And capitalizing atheism is like capitalizing Cannibalism or Rape.
1
abis8 alpha8 Mohammed: "Attributing human limitations to god is evil." Also Mohammed: "I attribute to God the human limitation of not being able to have an Avatar." What a fraud.
1
abis8 alpha8 Muslims bow to the cross because the cube is a cross folded up. :-) Heh heh. Both refer to the hexagon (which a cube depicts from a certain angle), and the hexagon refers to Saturn which has a hexagon shape on it, and the planet represents the king of the Roman or whatever pantheon, which in turn represents the king of fallen angels, for pagans sacrifice to demons. So why do the Muslims go around the symbol of Saturn? Because they are the rings of Saturn. :-) I have more evidence ,but everyone here attacks me when I give evidence. Why give pearls to those who don't value them?
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 When Templars were said to go bye-bye, the masons appeared in history. What a "coincidence." Masons use the Templar cross. What a "coincidence." Both are obsessed with the Temple of Solomon. What a "coincidence." The Templars' symbol was a guy rubbing on another guy on a horse. They were right to be accused of homosexuality. You think they couldn't afford a horse per man? They called themselves paupers yet they were filthy stinking rich. They were hypocrites. Their version of the cross is a reference to the pagan Star of Ishtar, so they WERE into the occult and Kabbala junk which is satanic. The masons celebrate their revenge for what happened on Friday the 13th in the Tarot card called "Death" which depicts death on a horse with a banner having the Roman numeral XIII (13, "what a coincidence"!) and a dead king lying before him ("what a coincidence"). I could go on, but you are the type of person to see an S.O.S. on the beach and conclude erosion did it. You throw logic out the window because you don't want the Bible to be right.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 I didn't say everything is a conspiracy. Strawman fallacy.
1
abis8 alpha8 Mohammed preached against attributing to God human limitations. Then Mohammed preached that God had the human limitation of not being able to have an Avatar. What a hypocrite. :-)
1
abis8 alpha8 The Bible says God was walking in the Garden of Eden, so God has legs. It says in Hebrew Elohim, which is accurately translated as "Gods," not the singular. God is one, but the Hebrew word for that is "echad," not "yachid," and "echad" means "one" in the sense of unity, for it also says that when a man shall cleave to his wife, they shall become one flesh. Does that mean a single being? No. They are still separate, but united nonetheless, as "one." The Jews have misinterpreted the Bible as the Talmud teaches against the Trinity but the Trinity is the only way to make sense of the Bible saying God is plural yet singular.
1
Xiuh For what exactly? I give evidence for everything. None is blinder than the people here refusing to see.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Your newest attempt to discourage me fails because if no one is convinced, that's to your eternal loss. I gain from seeing the lies exposed, because I love seeing lies exposed. It makes me happy. And if just one person sees how cowardly atheists here are for running away from all of my arguments and questions, then my mission is a success.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 PS The truth doesn't need your recognition, nor does the truth care about popularity contests, vain superficial atheist.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 I wonder how long it's gonna take until you realize I have already put many atheists on the run, even though it's just me versus the world here. You have contributed nothing. All you do is try to put me down with empty attacks. Prove something for once.
1
abis8 alpha8 Jesus never bowed to a rock, Muslim or atheist pretending to be a Muslim. That's idolatry. Muslims idolize that cube representing Saturn and thereby Satan as I already explained in this thread.
1
abis8 alpha8 Abraham never bowed to a rock. He wasn't an idolater like the false prophet Mohammed taught. Ishmael is the son of Hagar and Abraham, but Isaac is the true son of the promise. Arabs put their race on a pedestal, but God chose the Jews, not the Arabs. Then God rejected Israel for always rebelling against him, though a remnant shall be saved.
1
@azathoz AD HOMINEM fallacy. Your best attack in the field of logic is equivalent to falling into a pit in a real battlefield while attempting to throw something at your opponent. :-) The banana missed.
1
@azathoz Look at my enemies complaining I keep defending myself. I keep getting attacked maliciously by people running away from all of my arguments and evidence, but you have a double standard, because you're not a real noble one.
1
@azathoz At least two times I have been told I am not supposed to defend myself. HAHAHHA! You guys are funny. You want to bully me without consequences. Being exposed as fallacious and hypocritical is the price to pay for attacking me. Everyone can see I'm right. No one is honest enough to admit it though.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 "Go ahead and reply again, keep this going " Oh, it troubles you so much that the Christian defends himself, doesn't it? :-) How DARE I keep defending myself when malicious atheist liars keep attacking me. You love the bandwagon because you suffer from the herd mentality and can't think for yourself. I love being a free thinker. I'm so glad I'm not an atheist, an ingrate against the Creator who shall show everyone on Judgment Day that I am right and you are all wrong.
1
@azathoz "I rather laugh at them" Ha! You want to act superior when you can't refute ANYTHING I say? Nor your comrades, COMBINED! LOL! I will get the last laugh even if here I don't.
1
@azathoz You bullies try to "win" by overwhelming me with numbers of liars trying to drown out the truth, but the Spartan does not ask how many, but where¿ :-)
1
Xiuh Can you try to give a logical argument instead of just circular reasoning?
1
Xiuh You're lying since I always give evidence. For example, the mind is free to think so it's not a slave, so it's not a slave to physics, so it's not physical, so the brain is not the mind, so brain death doesn't mean the end of the mind's existence, which proves an afterlife exists. Refute me.
1
@Narxes I'm a genius atheist, so I know you don't exist because science says a cat could have typed on a keyboard to type your distractions and non-arguments.
1
@Dynamo33 Do you have proof for your atheist alchemy myth of life from non-life? Your AD HOMINEM fallacy proves you're irrational. You have no right to speak about reality when you believe in the atheist myth of slime becoming Frankenslime. One of your comrades ran away because I challenged him to give a plausible falsification scenario for abiogenesis, and he couldn't deliver. All of you never fail to disappoint.
1
@Dynamo33 Y qué bueno que el Imperio español era creacionista, no macro-evolucionista como los genocidas contra los tasmanos. :-) Tú has caído por la propaganda racista de los piratas anti-españoles. Si eres español, has deshonrado España.
1
@Narxes The troll thinks he can prey on me but the predator is become the prey. :-) Of course, the troll doesn't exist. My atheist indoctrination taught me to dismiss intelligent design as an explanation for significant order, and I do so consistently unlike hypocritical atheists. Atheism: 1. Logic: 0.
1
Xiuh 2 hours ago @Xiuh You're lying since I always give evidence. For example, the mind is free to think so it's not a slave, so it's not a slave to physics, so it's not physical, so the brain is not the mind, so brain death doesn't mean the end of the mind's existence, which proves an afterlife exists. Refute me. You're not getting away with running away, liar. Everyone can see you didn't refute me. Atheists lying through their teeth is the same as snakes slithering and lions roaring. They know nothing else.
1
@Narxes Metatron is funnier than you because you can never top his joke of calling you atheists "noble ones." :-)
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Your reverse psychology isn't working. :-) You actually complain the victim defends himself. That's very silly to put it gently.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 "keep doing it to everyone here for time unending Johnny test whip crack SFX Reply harder, farm tool" You forgot the laugh track to indicate when I'm supposed to laugh at that hilarious joke.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Thanks to you bullies complaining that I defend myself, I am encouraged to do so more and more, knowing how much it ruins your day. :-) Every time an atheist has to come here, they have to dig through many sections of the thread to get to the part where they can input a new comment. That means you dug a lot just to say nothing worth reading. Come on, man! LOL!
1
@thereisnomeme9258 So far we have 204 comments. I don't mind going to the bittersweet end. 500 is the limit, I think. You think I'm going to just let you have the last word? You'll have to earn it, slacker. :-)
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Oh, how cute. The atheist thinks he can outwit me by his reverse psychology. Telling me I'm your slave as if you WANT me to comment when it's obvious you want me to throw my shield down in surrender, is pretty funny. :-) I love to see my enemies so frustrated that they can't control me nor beat anything I say. All you do is lie. You have no power except to distract, but I expose you for it, which means you have virtually zero power here, despite you all being the majority.
1
@azathoz For you to lie takes no effort. For me to dismantle and explain takes more posts. You are whining that I explain things and defend myself. You have not refuted ANYTHING I said! :-) You are an IMPOTENT atheist. :-)
1
@azathoz Parrot describes atheists like you who say whatever the establishment tells them to believe. :-) I actually have my own arguments, and you're afraid to face them. You pretend to be right. You are just a paper tiger. You have only the bandwagon that will fall into hell, on your side, like if truth depended on votes. It doesn't care about your vote. It doesn't need your recognition.
1
@azathoz The atheist whines that I say a lot. If I didn't say anything, he would be singing a different tune: that I don't say enough (to answer challenges). Damned if I do, and damned if I don't. They damn me no matter what I do or don't do. They actually damn themselves by suppressing the truth, since that means the Truth will suppress them FOREVER in the lake of fire where liars will be thrown down into.
1
@azathoz Everyone can see you're afraid of debate, and you are just pretending to be superior, because if you really WERE smarter like you pretend, you would have proven me wrong on one thing or another. You don't even TRY! You're THAT weak. :-) But keep bluffing and talking the talk without walking the walk, you paper tiger! Hehehehe!
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Curious? Nope. You're just hoping for a superhero atheist to come and save the day by "proving me wrong." I easily took down all challengers despite being outnumbered. They keep running away after I corner them. This guy who preaches Mohammed while acting like a troll ignores my points such as when I proved Mohammed contradicted himself by saying attribution is sin yet he attributed to God the human limitation of not being able to have an Avatar, which proves Mohammed was a hypocrite and a fraud.
1
abis8 alpha8 You ran away from this, scaredy cat. 22 hours ago @abis8 alpha8 Muslims bow to the cross because the cube is a cross folded up. :-) Heh heh. Both refer to the hexagon (which a cube depicts from a certain angle), and the hexagon refers to Saturn which has a hexagon shape on it, and the planet represents the king of the Roman or whatever pantheon, which in turn represents the king of fallen angels, for pagans sacrifice to demons. So why do the Muslims go around the symbol of Saturn? Because they are the rings of Saturn. :-)
1
abis8 alpha8 You ignored this evidence also, suppressor of the truth. 11 hours ago @abis8 alpha8 The Bible says God was walking in the Garden of Eden, so God has legs. It says in Hebrew Elohim, which is accurately translated as "Gods," not the singular. God is one, but the Hebrew word for that is "echad," not "yachid," and "echad" means "one" in the sense of unity, for it also says that when a man shall cleave to his wife, they shall become one flesh. Does that mean a single being? No. They are still separate, but united nonetheless, as "one." The Jews have misinterpreted the Bible as the Talmud teaches against the Trinity but the Trinity is the only way to make sense of the Bible saying God is plural yet singular.
1
abis8 alpha8 You don't understand my religion because you accuse Jesus of being against war altogether when my religion is clear Jesus first' coming was to pay for sins which required being murdered as prophesied, but he resurrected and shall come back to use the sword and unleash his angels to punish the wicked, so you don't even know what you're attacking which makes you no better than a drunkard punching in the darkness. :-)
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 The Templar cross was used by the Spanish on their ships and by Hitler, so the Templars never died out entirely. They moved to Scotland which explains the Scottish Rite. In Resident Evil the logo for the Umbrella Corporation is the Templar cross. Such games are made by masonic companies. When Europe conquered the world, masons did. When Europe lost its grip, masons solidified theirs.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 Oh, and you know what else uses the Templar cross which is masons' way to explain their history and mock the world? The Red Ribbon Army from Dragonball (with an implied one), and the heretic leader of the Roman church. https://rosamondpress.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/pope-installation-new.jpg Just look at this libtarded f4k-enabling piece of shit heretic using a symbol referring to the Tower of Babel which represents rebellion against God. Satan rules this world, clearly, and the fact that most people hate even the idea of God here, corroborates with the Bible predicting it.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 :-) Did you know that the British flag has 8 rays just like the Star of Ishtar? Oh, would you look at that! Yet ANOTHER "coincidene"! Haha! You have a skyscraper of coincidences, and I barely scratched the surface. IS AN SOS IN THE BEACH WRITTEN OR ERODED INTO EXISTENCE? WHICH IS THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION?
1
abis8 alpha8 The cube IS a cross folded up. So easy to pull the wool over your blind eyes. Why don't you attack atheists, troll? It's because you're not really a Muslim, are you? You're an atheist with a thin veil. Lets see you seriously attack atheism for the stupid blind faith in mindlessness as if it could create the Mona Lisa by a tornado, that it is. If you refuse to attack atheism and atheists like you attack me for saying the truth, then that will confirm you are a miserable atheist. :-)
1
abis8 alpha8 Jesus called Jews a brood of vipers and hellbound snakes. Once again you show your ignorance. :-) Read the Bible before pretending to know what it says.
1
abis8 alpha8 Oh, so you want to be the chosen one! You want to be the "champion" atheist who takes me down! LOL! That's why you try so hard, yet fail with everything like when you attack Roman Catholicism thereby missing me by the span of a chasm. Too bad you are just another statistic, another paper tiger, or in your case a paper baboon. :-) Keep screeching and keep not scratching anything I say.
1
abis8 alpha8 Oh, and the "abis8 alpha8" username I didn't pay much attention to until now has non-Arabic words in it, so that's corroboration with your not being a real Muslim but just a westerner raised in a liberal shithole like the US of AIDS. In Arabic transliterated they use numbers next to some letters to represent sounds not in English, iirc.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 The Templars were accused of homosexuality. Their symbol is two of them on a horse, with one rubbing on the other's backside when both were rich enough to have at least a dozen horses each. Something tells a rational observer that the accusation was true. Those who like the idea of Templars being merely cool, and who are the equivalent of people idolizing Nazis pretending they weren't evil, will reject evidence and logic.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 Their name says they're poor: PAVPERES COMMILITONES CHRISTI TEMPLIQVE SALOMONICI. Pauper means poor which you can see in their name. So they claimed to be poor and of Christ, yet they were FILTHY STINKING RICH! Such HYPOCRITES! The fact that they would lie about their wealth means they were dishonourable, which makes every accusation against them more likely to be true.
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 You act like that's the only evidence I have when I gave much more. Also, 8 is as specific as you can get. Star rays aren't 8.666. Don't pretend I'm not hitting the bull's eye. And you didn't answer the question, so you're another running away from my challenges: IS AN SOS IN THE BEACH WRITTEN OR ERODED INTO EXISTENCE? WHICH IS THE LOGICAL CONCLUSION?
1
@schizoidhavingagoodtime2837 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlUBJ5rBcpg&ab_channel=AthosAmo 8 years ago I did this video full of evidence concerning just one facet of the self-styled "ILLVMINATI." People like the youtuber nigahiga do the strawman fallacy of saying "any triangle equals the illuminati to them!" but there is something called context. For example, the vacuum cleaner company Bissell uses a red triangle as its logo. It has nothing to do with vacuum cleaners, but if you know that masons are always in major companies, then you understand its a masonic symbol and a reference to the Tower of Babel since masons build for the New World Order as other evidence proves such as their having a symbol of the Anti Christ on the pyramid in the masonic dollar bill of the masonic US. It's one eye because the Bible says Satan shall lose an eye.
1
@deepossit421 Refute THIS. Over 3,000 slides of evidence proving the Bible right by proving Satan rules the world. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRxGXhC4TFY That's from my other dead channel where I made some mistakes in my attitude because I was treating atheists harshly like they treated me, but I'm way nicer now. You insult my mom, but the joke's on you because I excommunicated her.
1
@UCYu9Sp8jj7hEIFkonP2Xe1Q You also can't answer my question about the SOS being written or eroded into existence. Your troll disguise is no justification for cowardice. Checkmate. Who's next? :-)
1
@deepossit421 So atheists like you ignore over 3,000 slides of evidence proving the Bible right. This proves atheists don't care about evidence nor seek the truth nor are honest nor have any dignity.
1
@azathoz "mate." Oh, so you're British? I'm willing to debate about another thing. The biggest empire in history wasn't the British, but the Spanish during the Iberian Union because while the British sing "Hail Britannia! Britannia rules the waves" thereby showing that waves count in an empire's parameters, Iberia ruled MANY MORE WAVES because the Spanish Emperor under whom were the second-class Portuguese, shared NO waves with any competent rival except three seas with the Turks: the Mediterranean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. The Brits had to share EVERY OCEAN with the French and others like the Spanish who destroyed the British Armada at Cartagena de Indias. Just look at a map of French islands in every ocean in the world, and you'll see that Britannia ruled like half of every ocean while the Spanish Emperor ruled all of the Atlantic, all of the Indian and all of the Spanish lake, the Pacific Ocean! :-) Only hypocrites count wastelands in the British Empire but not the biggest ocean in the world which is so big the Mongol Empire drowned in it, and which has more resources and profitable trade routes than land routes. So the British are always in second place. :-) So good to be Spanish. Thank God I'm Spanish. They didn't commit genocide as the Black Legend propaganda claims, since most Spanish speakers are 100 % Native American. Compare that to what is now US territory where Natives are few and far between due to the racist cowboys who increasingly believed in the atheist myth of macro-evolution. Natives called Seminoles fled from the Brits to Spanish Florida, because Spain is better than England. The Brits would not have had their empire without Spain, so they're ingrates. Both empires were run by the elite Jews though, which explains why the Spanish Emperor sent the Spanish Armada without finishing preparations, and after putting an inexperienced man in command, and forbidding flexibility and maneuverability, and forbidding chasing down pirates even though they could have easily beaten them. Jews rule by dividing to conquer. The Spanish used the Templar cross. The British flag is a variation of the Star of Ishtar (as is the flag of the Basque country and Assyria). My series on atheism covers how Columbus and Hitler and Napoleon were all puppets of the Jews.
1
@zaganim3813 Your name is "David." That's a religious name. Change it to something suitable like "Kim" or "Un" or "Mao."
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Honduran is a nationality. Spanish in my case refers to my Iberian race. Learn the difference between nationality and race. My race is Iberian of the original stock, similar to how Metatron is Italian of the original stock. He has no Germanic or Celtic features. Just today I was arguing with Goths claiming to be the original Romans. What a joke. They're no better than culture vulture blacks claiming to be true Egyptians. And thanks for checking out my channel in a desperate attempt to find dirt on me. This is what you do on Friday night. :-) Aw, shucks.
1
@thereisnomeme9258 Friday night schools aren't teaching, so my job exists whether you like it or not. Defending myself on Friday night is necessary. I know you hate it that I keep my shield up so you losers can't hurt me. If this were a literal debate platform, you would be a mosquito trying to bite me and buzzing louder and louder because I don't let you land on my skin. :-)
1
@David-lu4gq That's because atheists can't handle criticism.
1
Xiuh 1 day ago @Xiuh 2 hours ago @Xiuh You're lying since I always give evidence. For example, the mind is free to think so it's not a slave, so it's not a slave to physics, so it's not physical, so the brain is not the mind, so brain death doesn't mean the end of the mind's existence, which proves an afterlife exists. Refute me. You're not getting away with running away, liar. Everyone can see you didn't refute me.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 You tell me to calm down when everyone bullies me, which makes you just another bully, an accomplice. I never said my religion is the only one. It's just the only right one as I proved in my channel. And I proved atheism wrong in my series on it. :-)
1
@Crspss Because atheists can't take criticism. :-)
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 You picked on me and not the majority here, who bullied me. You are another bully. To attack my religion and side with atheists are evidence you're an atheist. Agnostics are atheists, so you can't use that as pretext. What are you if not an atheist. "no such thing as a right religion" is circular reasoning and the argument from incredulity fallacy. I proved my religion right in my little series on how I know Jesus is the perfect Way.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 No one is bullying me because I have them on the run. :-) Bullies hate one thing above all: when the victim fights back. The reason they attack is because they assume the target is weak. They are cowards attacking something with little to no risk, or so they thought. I hurt only their egos, and they gave me a license to call them out on their nonsense when they accused falsely and attacked my message.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 Yes, Jesus is the best. I'm unworthy to associate myself with him. He demands perfection from his followers, and it is a very difficult goal, but the only one matching justice.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 It's obvious he's perfect, and being the best means that.... Your second round of bullying failed.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 Look at how duplicitous you are: "I ask you my friend." and then the next comment: "you opt for complicated shenanigans." From pretending to be nice, to showing your true colours. If equating perfection with being the best is complicated to you, then you don't know what complexity is. Yes. Jesus is literally perfect. Satisfied? I proved it in my series on how I know Jesus is God. My series on atheism proves there is a God, and also that Jesus is God.
1
 @YTshashmeera "/s" means sarcasm?
1
@YTshashmeera You put a slash and an s for "sarcasm." You're actually against me, eh?
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 You're saying Jesus is perfect if he forces your mind to submit to him? God isn't a cosmic rapist, and rape isn't perfect. God lets us choose, and that means he allows people to reject him, though no one has the right to, but he will set all things in order come Judgment Day. God never said he needed us. That doesn't mean he can't make us. To avoid suffering, God would have to not let us love, since love can't be forced, and so he must allow consequences of lack of love i.e. suffering.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 Cheat sheet? Are you accusing me of cheating? I can never earn heaven. It is a gift from God, but he does not want anyone who disobeys him, so someone who is with God will serve God and not lie like atheists do, serving Satan unwittingly.
1
@YTshashmeera I live in Indochina which your version of Gautamaism influenced greatly. Atheists in communist countries here committed genocide on anyone considered intellectual or a free thinker, who dared question atheism. Atheists can't take criticism, clearly. Desire non-desire is a contradiction. Gautama was not enlightened since he contradicted himself, and always risked suffering by perhaps not eating in due time, since he never died of hunger which means he always wanted to eat when he was very hungry. You can't be liberated from suffering when you have a desire that might not be satisfied, according to his own system. He also was not compassionate because he put his 1 human life above MILLIONS of innocent animal lives, those microbes in his acidic gut he burned alive to death.
1
@YTshashmeera Gautama was also an ingrate who taught others to be ingrates, because he told us not to care about God, and said this by his bad example if not explicitly. Nothing is more important than the Origin of Origins, for our future is determined by our past, yet Gautama was like "Let's ignore our origin, and let's do things MY way. I crown myself enlightened. Follow me!" What PROOF did he have for his supposed enlightenment? The serpent always associated with him, as well as the tree, corroborate with the Bible's story of the Garden of Eden where the serpent was possessed by the most evil spirit, and the tree was the forbidden tree. He is just another representation of Anti-Christ. See the series "Proof Satan Rules The World Ergo The Bible is Right." Over 3,000 slides of evidence proving my religion right.
1
@YTshashmeera Do you speak Tamil? I'm not familiar with your script but I knew it was South Indian. I plan to learn Tamil, Sanskrit and Hindi. :-)
1
@YTshashmeera Whenever I expose "Buddhism," people who follow that guy tell me I don't understand their religion, but they never prove it. Prove I don't understand. It's very simple. He said to be free you need to not be attached to the world (especially material things). He said suffering comes from caring. If you don't care if you die, how can it bother you? If you don't desire to be comfortable and free from pain, how can pain make you suffer? Yet even "Buddha" did not follow his own path because he always was attached to food because he never gave it up entirely. He wanted to run away from the suffering of starvation. He was attached, and therefore he was never free from suffering, by his own standard. He was a fraud.
1
@YTshashmeera The wheel of dharma has 8 spokes matching the Star of Ishtar which is older than even Hinduism because mankind was originally united in Mesopotamia before spreading out, and the Tower of Babel was when mankind united against God. The pyramid on the dollar bill is a reference to the same. The pyramids or towers in India, Indonesia, China, Cambodian dancers' attire, Egypt, Yucatán, Canary Islands and other places are memories of the Tower of Babel. On top of the US dollar bill's pyramid is one eye. The Bible says Anti-Christ shall lose an eye. More evidence the Bible says the truth: Satan rules this world. That's why it's a mess.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 I go to heaven even if all of you go to hell, so I don't need you to join my religion.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 Your false premises are that people are honest and intelligent. Prove your premises.
1
@nikolaytekuchev136 What about his salvation?
1
@Narxes Ironic that you would bet, since betting is for sinners. :-) LOL! I wish everyone were better than me, and we all went to heaven, but most people choose the wide path of selfishness which is easy in the short-term.
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 Can you say something worth reading instead of just mindlessly insulting as if you're superior to me which you never proved?
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 Empty rhetoric and never any substance. I won't read more from you, malicious person who will die and be judged as unworthy of eternal life.
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 I never ask for subscribers. This isn't about my channel. This is about the truth. You're a malicious evil person.
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 So I'm a "bad example" because I defend myself from all of my evil hellbound bullies who pretend to be rational and are only empty-rhetoric users with no substance like you? Nah. I'm supposed to defend my religion from snakes.
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 You don't even know how to spell Catholicism, so your claim about it is already undermined. I have asked Mary-worshipper heretics like them if bowing to a robot Jesus would be idolatry, and the hypocrites say YES even though they do essentially the same thing with their icons and statues. You fell for Satan's false flag operation because you are GULLIBLE. :-)
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 Your regurgitated joke about stupid people doesn't prove I'm stupid. It proves you are the irrational one for your AD HOMINEM and PETITIO PRINCIPII fallacy combination.
1
@pyromaniacjack8294 Ignore who? I dealt with all of my bullies here, and put all of them in their place easily, and anyone can see them routed. You're another corpse in my path behind me. It's just a matter of time until you realize it. DEVS VVLT :-)
1
@fookcensorship820 A comment like yours isn't worth going through 289 replies to find out what you're trying to respond to.
1
"Indian-made" OUCH! That hurts! My 100 dollar Spanish breastplate was from India. Got it on Amazon. I miss it so much. I put it on during a hurricane in Miami, and felt less unsafe. I would have taken it off if I heard thunder. It seemed real but I couldn't afford perfect accuracy, so I had to make do. You can see the armour in a photo of me as a conquistador in one of my videos on one of my realistic maps for Age of Empires 2.
1