Comments by "SCINTILLAM DEI" (@scintillam_dei) on "Sen. Rubio on Cubans rallying against communism: ‘Horrifying’" video.

Atheism spread by the bloody French Revolution and communist holocausts, never by reason. And the Synagogue of Satan is behind them, as well as corporations that exploit the poor, from capitalist countries.
2
@majav15mg PS Communism is atheistic, in case you didn't get it.
2
@majav15mg The ideology by Marx is inherently atheistic. The notion of everyone sharing things is not. Marx said religion is the opium of the masses. Atheism is the opiium of people who want to get away with being selfish when they die. Atheism promises no hell, and justifies all evil by the "nature made me do it" implication. If there were no Great Spirit to give us spirits, then we would be only bodies, only physical things in total SLAVERY to physics. That makes choice impossible, and thereby, guilt.
2
@protipskiptoendofvideoandr286 False equivalency fallacy between Santa and God, since Santa is not a necessary explanation for gifts, but at least one Supreme Mind is the only rational explanation for the order in nature ultimately, and its very existence, just as only a mind can explain the order of a sandcastle which science of erosion proves requires intelligence, and cna never be accidental. Atheists like you are very inonsistent sine you believe in more magical things like the ALCHEMY on STEROIDS of slime into Frankenslime. :-)
2
@mortisnoctu Except he ISN'T right since he is saying the equivalent of "Mind did it is not the answer for sandcastles. Mindless erosion did it! is the only rational answer!" Science proves atheism wrong.
2
@ktsig287 For anyone who doesn't know about how evil the US is, I did a video proving that the US funds ISIS.
2
It benefits atheists who claim that atheism is on the rise (since communism is the main reason for that).
1
@mortisnoctu I never equated the two. I said that communism is atheistic. If I say ducks are animals, is that saying all animals are ducks? No.
1
@mortisnoctu I never said you justify evil with atheism. I never accused you of being consistent with atheism's implication on choice. How can you have choice when you're supposedly just natural and therefore a puppet of nature with no choice and therefore no guilt? Rejecting Intelligence as the originn is embracing the only alternative: mindlessness. Denying the implication is like someone saying "I said I don't believe he is innocent. Why do you say I believe he is guilty?" It's one or the other. The implication exists even when you close your eyes to it.
1
@mortisnoctu It is impossible to put words in your mouth claiming you agreed with anything else Rubio said since I didn't even mention him in relation to you.
1
@mortisnoctu You just ignored my argument proving that atheism justifies all evil: "If there were no Great Spirit to give us spirits, then we would be only bodies, only physical things in total SLAVERY to physics. That makes choice impossible, and thereby, guilt." Running from an argument is not how you prove it wrong. It's actually showing it's correct.
1
@mortisnoctu Here's another argument the atheist preachers in this thread run away from: To say God (a powerful Mind) didn't do it, is to say mindlessness did it, which is what is absurd. Science proves atheism wrong since empirical observations of erosion prove that "mind did it" is the only rational explanation for the level of order of a sandcastle, let alone higher levels such as our bodies and trees and orbital systems of planetary bodies. Atheism is blind faith in mindlessness to do what science has already proven it can never do since for every step forward mindless events take (such as erosion), the take many more backwards. That means significant progress is impossible. Why do you have no footage nor reliable accounts of a sandcastle eroding into existence when for thousands of years in countless beaches it shoud have occurred many times if as atheists believe, no intelligence is necessary for high levels of order?
1
@mortisnoctu "All atheism is is a lack of a belief in God. " This is a lie. To reject an Intelligence as the origin means embracing as possible, the only alternative: "Mindlessnesss created nature's order." To say no to mind is to say hyes to mindlessness. Atheism is blind faith in mindlesssness to do what only m ind can do. Sandcastles require a mind for them to come into existence. Science says so. Science shits on atheism. :-)
1
@mortisnoctu If someone said that your posts were typed by a cat walking on a keyboard, and that your profile picture was uploaded randomly by a cat, would that be a rational conclusion?
1
@majav15mg You run from my argument: To say God (a powerful Mind) didn't do it, is to say mindlessness did it, which is what is absurd. Science proves atheism wrong since empirical observations of erosion prove that "mind did it" is the only rational explanation for the level of order of a sandcastle, let alone higher levels such as our bodies and trees and orbital systems of planetary bodies. Atheism is blind faith in mindlessness to do what science has already proven it can never do since for every step forward mindless events take (such as erosion), the take many more backwards. That means significatnn progress is impossible.
1
@majav15mg God doesn't need an origin because the reason we know (natural) things need an origin is by the law of cause & effect. This is a natural law which means it applies only to natural things. Do rugby players have to follow all golf rules? Yes or no? "don't need a creator" Circular reasoning. You're like someone seeing a snow globe and saying: "This is found without a designer, so no designer did this!" Hell means justice, but you think justice is laughable because you are unjust as an ingrate (which atheism is: ingratitude to the Creator). Atheism is indeed the opium of criminals like ingrates who want to get away with living selfishly when they die.
1
@majav15mg Why do you believe in magic? Life from non-life is alchemy. Mind from mindlessness originally, is also alchemy on steroids. Nothing is more magical than atheist mythology. Do you have a plausible falsification scenario for abiogenesis to prove it is even a scientific explanation? Amino acids are totally non-living, so if they are evidence, so is a fart. Both are found in living things, after all.
1
@majav15mg So you're an atheist because you want to be god, and make the rules for others to follow, not submit to reality. Gotcha. Narcissism.
1
@majav15mg Why do you expect others to believe you exist when I at least haven't seen you type your atheist propaganda, and psycence says a cat could have walked on a keyboard to upload a random guy's picture, and type all that you supposedly did? It is hypocrisy to recognize intelligent design only when it suits you.
1
@majav15mg "infinite punishment for a finite wrong or sin is the most viscerally unjust nonsense there is and it’s indefensible." So you're demanding that God grant you freedom from suffering when he kills you and you find yourself in hell for lying and ingratitude and narcissism.... Who do you think you are to pretend you have rights when they exist objectively only if God makes them reality? "Unjust" in your self-righteous opinion is worthless. You don't create reality. HE DOES! And if he gave the wicked rest they DO NOT DESERVE, he would be unjust. You're acting so entitled to what you imagine you have the right to, but nature doens't say you have rights, and rights are worthless bigoted opinions if there is no God! LOL! You're just demanindg you get away with evil when you die. You won't. You never deserve rest because you're an ingrate who spits at heaven, so the spit will come back on your face. Not trying to offend you. Just calling a spade a spade. Atheism is conceit and the insanity of actually beLIEving that the origin of genius is mindlessness! You're like someone saying tornados make houses, and erosion makes sandcastles. That's the level of dishonesty atheist fanatics stoop to in their WISH to escape from total accountability.
1
@majav15mg You saying God's unjust for an endless hell for selfish people who don't deseve the bliss of painlessness of non-existence let alone a heaven, is equivalent to a woman saying: "You divorced me for a year 'cause I rebelled, but now you HAVE TO(!) take me back into your home and let me live again!" The man will tell her: "You don't deserve to live with me. I don't have to give you ANYTHING!" You are dying. God's curse is upon you. You have no power of your own. God is the source of ALL power. You defy him anyway? You are mad. Repent and live forever. Rebel, and burn forever.
1
@majav15mg So you don't even know that "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaciton." That's cause and effect. A law in science is an observation with no known exception. Give me an exception. That the establishment doesn't call it a law is irrelevant. Make your own logical conclusions. You run away from my question. Do rugby players have to follow all golf rules or not? God is not a natural explanation so he doesn't need to abide by natural laws that govern only natural things. Why define what nature is? You already graduated from elmentary school. Nature is all physical things. They are in slavery to (predetermined by) physics, so nothing physical can explain freedom to think, since there is no freedom... in slavery to physics.
1
@majav15mg You believe sense ultimately comes from nonsense when once there was no sense in nature, so you are not qualified to judge on what is or is not nonsensical. "primitive" AD NOVITATEM fallacy. "crude" Your opinion passed off as fact. More narcissism. "And no God is going to give you a hand to figure out what’s rights and wrong." He gave us each a conscience and intelligence. You can't explain either in your materialistic paradigm where all is in slavery to physcs that conveniently supposedly always existed contrary to the law of cause & effect that is a natural law so it does not apply to God.
1
@majav15mg "should be figured out through reason and experience alone." Smokescreen for no objective basis, just your subjective self-righteous bigoted jugments for what is rational, which are of no worth since you aren't fit to judge since you believe that the origin of genius is mindlessness despite having no evidence for that extreme nonsense. Every time you type atheist propaganda, you give more evidence agaisnt atheism because you intelligentliy designed that propaganda.
1
@majav15mg Your notion of nature creating itself is more irrational than saying a woman could be born from her own womb. I already proved that atheism is wrong by pointing to the SCIENCE of the observations of erosion in all beaches in the wrold for thousands of years showing that mindless events like erosion can NEVER make the order of even a puny little sandcastle, let alone higher order like us. So science says that for that level of order, "mind had to do it." This crushes atheism. Mindless events can't rogress order much at all when thyey're always overwhelmingly destructive. Not only do you reject science, but also logic itself, for if illogic created logic; well, that's impossible because that would make illogic logical, so it was never "illogic" to begin with. So the origin of logic always had to be logical (which minds alone are).
1
@majav15mg "You don’t know if erosion is mindless." It's erosion... it has no mind.... Are you Pocahontas' grandmother willow? If erosion has a mind, why wouldn't feces? Makes no sense. You cling to any nonsense to resist the truth. "Stubborn" says the guy stubbornly clinging to atheist fables like the ALCHEMY story of life from non-life. YOu ahve zero evidence. YOu say you want me to go to hell. Why? Because I point out that ingratitude is evil? You asked me what would make someone worthy of eternal hell, so I told you. Don't complain I answered what you asked for.
1
@majav15mg "You keep invoking 'science', " Science is the study of nature. I pointed to observations of ersion, which counts as science. Science means knowledge also. Seeing erosion make no seandcastles is seeing atheism fail because atheism is the bbelief that mindless events are all it takes to make great order. Well, guess what... They can' make even a puny little sancastle! Haha! "very conveniently ignoring that most people responsible for these scientific discoveries " Ancients discovered erosion first, and you commit an AD VERECVNDIAM fallacy as wella s a bandwagon fallacy here. You don't think for yourself nor quesiton the atheist propaganda you were inculcated with. Also, Isaac Newton and many other creationists were the greatest scientists ever, so your argument bakfires.
1
@majav15mg "You don’t know of what we refer to as nature itself or the universe itself has a mind." You resist the fact that mindless events are destructive more than creative of order.... yet you CLING to the absurd lie that poop has desires and thoughts..... This level of delusion is extreme. Yet you call me stubborn. You did not give even 1 good reason to believe that nonsense. Yet with EVERY SINGLE ONE of your posts, you are giving intelligent design MORE eivdence! :-)
1
@majav15mg You ran away from this argument: "Not only do you reject science, but also logic itself, for if illogic created logic; well, that's impossible because that would make illogic logical, so it was never "illogic" to begin with. So the origin of logic always had to be logical (which minds alone are)." Logic destroys atheism. :-)
1
@majav15mg You never said WHY an ingrate would deserve to be free from hell to have the painlessness of non-existence or a heaven. You just DEMAND it be so. That's narcissism and self-righteousness as well as circular reasoning. Liberal extremists like you talk a lot about rights, but where do they come from without God? They're just your bigoted opinions! And anyone who chalenges your narcissism is accused of being unrighteous to you, but that's just YOUR OPINION! :-) If all things were god, then why is god fighting itself with contradicintg views? Makes NO sense!
1
@majav15mg You're a hypocrite when you say I am "Viscerally unwilling to atually listen to my arguments." You meant SUBMIT to your bad arguments. YOU'RE th one unwilling to listen since you typically run from my arguments like this question that checkmated you: "Do rugby players have to follow all golf rules or not? God is not a natural explanation so he doesn't need to abide by natural laws that govern only natural things." The real reason you disengage is that the arguments you can't deal with are piling up.
1
@majav15mg "How do you know what’s mindful and what is mindlessness?" A turd has no mind because it's just a turd with no expression of inteligence EVER.
1
@majav15mg Another argument you didn't defeat: "don't need a creator" Circular reasoning. You're like someone seeing a snow globe and saying: "This is found without a designer, so no designer did this!"
1
@majav15mg I asked another atheist this question which also applies to you: 5 hours ago @mortisnoctu If someone said that your posts were typed by a cat walking on a keyboard, and that your profile picture was uploaded randomly by a cat, would that be a rational conclusion?
1