jim oberg
The New York Times
comments
Comments by "jim oberg" (@jimoberg3326) on "I Was Poised to be the First Black Astronaut. I Never Made it to Space. | 'Almost Famous' by Op-Docs" video.
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
@angelotero7729 - Here's my view, as a spaceflight historian and program veteran, of Dwight's rightful, honorable place in history, and the dishonorable way today's political propagandists have been distorting it:
For the NY Times, they highlighted a story of how a black USAF pilot named Ed Dwight was denied his rightful place on a moon landing mission by fierce racist mistreatment, and ultimately by the assassination of his sponsor, JFK. Along with that story, which was reprinted worldwide, they issued a string of self-congratulatory analyses of their own journalistic awesomeness in finding and spreading the story.
But the historic record contradicts the NY Times on every particular. Dwight was a talented, charismatic young pilot who had had a smooth early career [including being allowed to train as a pilot even though he was an inch below the minimum height requirement] and got into a pair of six-month test pilot classes in 1962-3, from which astronauts for the USAF and NASA were often selected. Somebody in the Kennedy Administration [most accounts point to Robert Kennedy] leaned on the USAF to get a black pilot into the astronaut corps and these classes were the first step.
In later years Dwight complained he had been viciously opposed by the school commandant, the legendary Chuck Yeager, who according to Dwight [based on third-hand hearsay] had instructed the other students to shun and isolate Dwight to drive him out. But not even the NY Times could find a single actual witness to this order, nor any actual actions to implement it [Dwight graduated on schedule]. Yeager vigorously denied ever saying it.
The top two pilots of that class were picked by NASA for its 1963 astronaut group. Dwight indicated to the NY Times that his class standing wasn't so high but he had a legitimate excuse in that the White House wanted him to take three-day weekends all that year to fly around the country giving speeches, while all the other students stayed on base studying and flying [In Dwight's autobiography he blames Yeager for permitting him to go, as a mean trick to sabotage his studies]. According to the NY Times, quoting Dwight, selecting for the highest demonstrated skill levels wasn't really important anyway since the spacecraft was continuously under remote control from Houston and the astronaut was only a passive passenger anyway [which was most emphatically NOT true, something the NY Times failed to notice].
Nevertheless the NY Times implied a cause-and-effect by reporting that after JFK was killed, 'within a month Dwight's career at Edwards AFB was over" [and he was transferred out] when he wasn't picked as one of the candidates that NASA wanted. But that selection had already been made two months BEFORE the assassination, and Dwight's class at the school at Edwards had always been scheduled to end in December. At that point, all the graduates were assigned to test pilot duty in important positions [Dwight was sent to Wright-Patterson AFB as 'Deputy for Flight Test' for the US Bomber Command, hardly a punishment].
But the media representations, taking their cue from the NY Times, carried the fictitious version where Dwight had been all set for NASA astronaut selection and ultimately assignment to a subsequent moon landing mission until racists squashed his chances. It was reported that Deke Slayton, the chief of the astronaut office, "learned that some of the white astronaut candidates had refused to fly with Dwight, and Slayton pushed him out of the program" [no evidence this ever happened, or COULD have happened]. Wikipedia [and other websites] had referred to 'racist hostility from NASA astronauts' although Dwight never even got to NASA or as far as is known ever even visited the astronaut center in Houston.
The NY Times story was full of other technical errors about spaceflight that indicated they had never even tried to fact-check the text with subject-matter experts. For example, it claimed he had an astounding 9000 hours of flight time, which was three times as much as any other pilot accepted by NASA in 1963, when he actually had about 2200 hrs when accepted at the test pilot school, a respectable amount at that point in his career. The opening paragraph presents the preposterous image of ‘gravitational forces’ ripping out a pilot’s eyeballs, when the misunderstood effect of “G forces” are acceleration stresses [measured in units of gravity, but not true gravity]. Clearly, nobody with the slightest familiarity with flying aircraft was ever giving the task of reviewing the manuscript before publication [the author’s bio shows no previous treatment of spaceflight, science, or any sort of aviation, and her Twitter account bio suggests she was actually a free-lancer].
Surveying the media coverage of this story, and the hundreds of reader comments posted that expressed outrage at 'white privilege' and 'whitesplaining' when confronted with verifiable facts contrary to the narrative, was extremely dismaying. But I didn't realize until reading news on the NY Times “1619” editorial policy that such reader reaction was evidently the only real goal of such [mis]reporting. And if respected institutions such as NASA, and respected heroes such as Chuck Yeager and Deke Slayton, need to be falsely smeared to accomplish this, seemingly that's acceptable to them. Sad, and shameful to the media outlets who promulgated these false accusations.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
@edwardhill9620 -- Thanks for the detailed response. Dwight admits his class ranking wasn't top drawer, but he explicitly ascribes it to the three-day weekends he was asked to take by the White House making nationwide speaking tours during the training program, when the other students were doing extra flying and studying. He actually blames Yeager for allowing him to make those tours instead of confining him to base, to study [imagine the complaints if Yeager HAD done that -- he couldn't win, either way]. Dwight also claims that NASA's selection of the top 2 [or the dozen or so] students for the 1963 astronaut class [made two months before the JFK assassination] used an improper skill criterion since actually anybody could fly in space since the vehicle was always remote-controlled from Houston anyway, no piloting skills required [not true]. In the end, Dwight innocently wound up an expendable pawn in the White House political game [if picked, make black voters thank the Dems -- if NOT picked, make black voters hate the Republicans]. Dwight's own performance was skillful and honorable and he did serve as a shining inspiration to others like Robert Lawrence, Guy Bluford, Mae Jemison, and Charlie Bolden [who would up as NASA Administrator], and many other black astronauts too numerous for anybody on this comment thread even remembering their names. Dwight helped immensely to get us all to this point. He deserves all the honor -- and a free 'space tourist' hop next year -- that is flowing his way.
1
1
1
1
The new Smithsonian program 'Black in Space' pays well-deserved tribute to the African-American pioneers of the space program, and to NASA which enabled such pioneering by its own energetic measures in its workforce and in the often reluctant surrounding communities. Some minor factual quibbles suggest the producers were focused on the big picture and didn’t allocate sufficient attention to fastidious fact-checking [like promoting the program by calling astronaut candidate Ed Dwight ‘an ace combat pilot’].
My main ‘big picture’ disagreement is the concept that there was a deliberate ‘race’ to get minorities into space, or even should have been. The Soviets ran with the propaganda strategy of pre-empting spectacular stunts based on knowledge of existing US plans, starting with the ‘woman-in-space’ one-off mission in 1963 and then a new sequence of pre-emptive stunts based on NASA’s announced plans for the new Space Shuttle crew selection in 1977 [to involve women and minorities and international partners]. So another Russian woman was launched, and when a plan for an American woman’s spacewalk was announced by NASA, suddenly the Soviets made one lasting five minutes longer than NASA’s disclosed plan. The ‘one-each’ flights by Soviet bloc nations also began as the Space Shuttle was gearing up for missions, and the gimmicky nature of those missions was demonstrated by the second group being launched in alphabetical order of country. As soon as it was announced in Moscow that Cuba was included on that roster, the opportunity to fly a black pilot was recognized by US space experts and predicted in print three years before it actually happened, since the Soviet go-for-the-gimmick strategy had been so openly followed for many years, with great success among impressionable Westerners who never noticed that each feat was usually done just once and then the barriers dropped back down again. That’s the major difference between Russian and American approaches and the US side deserves a lot more credit for its methodical and skill-based approach and the permanent openings it created.
The nasty racism-accusation about Chuck Yeager needs particular attention, even though Smithsonian curator Smithsonian curator Cathleen Lewis candidly and correctly was seen to say: “We don’t know if Chuck Yeager derailed Ed Dwight’s career. And historians have searched for evidence and haven’t found it.” Uncorroborated third-hand hearsay has no place in jurisprudence or journalism, and in my view its inclusion here was both unfair and cynically pandering for contemporary political motives. There is no first or even second hand corroboration of the shunning command, and no indication it was even followed. Instead, Dwight’s training at Edwards AFB was inadvertently but seriously hindered by White House demands he take three-day weekends traveling the country giving speeches [while other student spent that time studying and flying] and his own attitude at the school could have been harmfully influenced by White House assurances he was a shoo-in for astronaut selection and didn’t really need to get high ratings from instructors [he graduated 8th out of 16, and NASA only picked #1 and #2]. At 5' 03" he was also several inches too short to see out the Lunar Module windows where the pilots stood while flying it down onto and then back up from the moon. Dwight’s honorable role as a space program pioneer was to inspire future black pilots and scientists, which parallels the role of Lt. Dayton Ragland, the black pilot from the Korean War whose newspaper photo Dwight vividly recalls had sparked his own passion for aviation. That’s more than enough valid reason for recognition and gratitude to him.
Other news media coverage included different factual flaws. Russell Contreras’s AP story, very widely reprinted, at first erroneously claimed that “U.S. Air Force officer Robert Henry Lawrence Jr. was chosen. NASA selected the Chicago-born Lawrence as the first African American astronaut, and he may have made it to the moon.” A very few subsequent reprints accurately corrected ‘NASA’ to ‘US Air Force’ but left in the false ‘may have made it to the moon’, untrue since the USAF astronauts were only transferred to NASA in 1969 after all the Apollo crewmen had already been trained and assigned. Other egregious factual errors in recent press stories include the spurious claim first seen in the NY Times last July that Dwight had an astounding 9000 flight hours [he had 2200, a respectable but not outstanding amount].
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
@purplehaze2250 -- Thanks for explaining. The issue that seemed to bother Yeager was that the justifiable criteria that were performance-related were to be set aside. Dwight was caught in the middle, with White House demands for national speaking tours while he was still a Test Pilot School student., which he admits did lower his performance scores relative to the other students. And another factor -- which I think you'll notice was totally omitted in recent press coverage -- was that he happened to be three inches too short to safely fly the Apollo Lunar Module [where the crew flew it standing up while looking out a small face-level window, and used ceiling-mounted navigation instruments]. Sure, he could have used a stool, but what sort of public image would that have portrayed? Soon after he was passed over by NASA, another black pilot, Robert Lawrence, passed all the criteria and was formally selected as an astronaut for the USAF.
Besides, Dwight has recently made it clear he is NOT blaming Yeager. Edward J. Dwight [March 2, 2020] == “I never accused Chuck Yeager of causing my failure to fly in space. It was the political environment of the day that transcended anything that Chuck Yeager had an impact on.”
https://www.facebook.com/NPR/posts/10159027154926756
Also: Smithsonian "Black in Space" documentary, Feb 23, 2020, curator Cathleen Lewis: “We don’t know if Chuck Yeager derailed Dwight’s career. And historians searched for evidence, and haven’t found it.”
https://youtu.be/I7jJ8jEh608
at time 10:58
Maybe the issue is less black-and-white than the media seems to want to make it look?
PS -- I was in uniform in those days, here's me [the tall guy] with my AF officer candidate class and astronaut Gordon Cooper in Feb 1963.
http://www.jamesoberg.com/image/cooper-oberg-feb-1963.jpg
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Re Captain Dwight: NASA never spent a dime on him, he was in the Air Force taking two back-to-back six-month courses in aerospace test piloting. He finished them both and got assigned as chief of test piloting for the branch he' served in, the US Bomber Command.
In later years Dwight complained he had been viciously opposed by the school commandant, the legendary Chuck Yeager, who according to Dwight [based on third-hand hearsay] had instructed the other students to shun and isolate Dwight to drive him out. But not even the NY Times could find a single actual witness to this order, nor any actual actions to implement it [Dwight graduated on schedule]. Yeager vigorously denied ever saying it, and black pilots who actually flew with him vigorously denied he'd shown any indications of racial bias -- want a link?].
The top two pilots of that test pilot [NOT 'astronaut'] class were picked by NASA for its own 1963 astronaut group. Dwight indicated to the NY Times that his class standing wasn't so high but he thought he had a legitimate excuse in that the White House wanted him to take three-day weekends all that year to fly around the country giving speeches, while all the other students stayed on base studying and flying [In Dwight's autobiography he blames Yeager for permitting him to go, as a mean trick to sabotage his studies]. According to the NY Times, quoting Dwight, selecting for the highest demonstrated flying skill levels wasn't really important anyway since the spacecraft was continuously under remote control from Houston and the astronaut was only a passive passenger anyway [which was most emphatically NOT true, something the NY Times failed to notice].
Nevertheless the NY Times implied a cause-and-effect by reporting that after JFK was killed, 'within a month Dwight's career at Edwards AFB was over" [and he was transferred out] when he wasn't picked as one of the candidates that NASA wanted. But that selection had already been made two months BEFORE the assassination, and Dwight's class at the school at Edwards had always been scheduled to end in December. At that point, all the graduates were assigned to test pilot duty in important positions [Dwight was sent to Wright-Patterson AFB as 'Deputy for Flight Test' for the US Bomber Command, hardly a punishment].
So there's serious political spinning going on in this sad story, too, I'm afraid.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
@LucDevine -- I'm looking for real evidence in a very culturally incendiary meme, as a historian. … in exactly the threads where strong believers congregate and engage in productive debate [and thank you for doing so]. As for journalists, the original NY Times story last July was shamefully sloppy, which was regrettable. Probably the worst howler there was endorsement of Dwight's erroneous assertion that test piloting skill and experience really wasn't relevant to astronaut selection, since the capsules were fully remote-controlled from Houston anyway, so the passengers could easily have been picked for symbolic reasons, not technical capabilities. So... are there no direct witness accounts of the third-hand hearsay about Yeager's shunning advice? I'm still looking -- perhaps the most reasonable theory is he made same comment of tolerating Dwight until the course finished nd then he'd be gone. The one-on-one in-your-face suggestions of quitting, BTW, was pretty standard with Yeager's approach to every student, and it's the same in Navy SEAL training. Hand-holding and soothing and participation trophies may be what kids want today, but it's not good prep for professions with death peering over your shoulder.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1