Comments by "Dorian Shades of gray" (@dorianshadesofgray2981) on "McGahn meets with Mueller on Russia probe" video.

  1. This shows that Trump has cooperated with the Mueller Probe, of course the MSM are going to try and portray this in a negative light.
    3
  2. Frankie Says come on Frankie , do some research before you comment. Trump has handed over 1000s of documents over to Mueller. However his lawyers are not going to stand for Mueller trying to run roughshod over Trump on things that are out of the scope of the Russia investigation.
    2
  3. It's me, Joolz if Mueller has any hard evidence after a 16 months of thorough investigation, he wouldn’t need to interview Trump. He would just indict him..The interview is obviously a perjury trap. A tactic used by the FBI designed to trip up people on unrelated , possibly embarrassing but not necessarily illegal activities so that they can charge them of the federal crime of lying to the FBI.. any sane person innocent or guilty should never consent to an interview by the FBI if given the choice.
    2
  4. Frankie Says of course he has a choice. He is the President of the United States of America. He has constitutional and legal powers to refuse requests just like he will refuse a request by mueller for an interview. Trump has willingly handed over over a million documents to Mueller.
    2
  5. Richard Darlington McGahn was appointed in 2017 and so he was not around during the supposed collusion timeline. Attorney client privilege applies to official business so what do you think McGahn can divulge to Mueller’s team that is not within the scope of official Whitehouse business? By the way McGahn is one of about 30 White House staff that have been interviewed by Mueller’s team
    1
  6. Richard Darlington firstly the age of the New York Times and Washington Post is irrelevant . They have a well known bias against Trump just as Fox News has a well known bias for Trump. The bottom line is that Trump gave permission to McGahn 9 months ago to talk to Mueller and this to me shows how open and cooperative Trump has been with Mueller and that Trump has nothing to hide. Time will tell but every week there is a new reported smoking gun and I suspect in a week or so the hype about this will die off and the MSM will move onto something else
    1
  7. Richard Darlington all you’ve proven is that you have not even read the New York Times article. It clearly states that Trump chose not to exercise executive privilege ( which a president can do) and allowed McGahn to speak to Mueller. So before you make comments I suggest you do some research first. Also note the passage where it says McGahn said he “cautioned to investigators that he never saw Mr Trump go beyond his legal authorities” something CNN doesn’t seem spend much time on.
    1
  8. Richard Darlington you say you read the article however you have to admit the quote of McGahn basically saying Tump did not do anything illegal is arguably the most important point of this “ “news” article to the point that the headline could quite easily have been “McGahn says Trumps action were all legal” Now surely anyone of intelligence can see the extreme bias in NYT ‘s anti Trump article when arguably the most important piece of information is hidden towards the end of the article and given no prominence..
    1
  9. jpmvidal Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch...an Australian.
    1
  10. It's me, Joolz it’s simple logic.. if Mueller had hard evidence of Russia collusion, why would he just sit on it? He has already made a number of indictments suggesting that when he has enough evidence he acts. The issue of “ if he tells the truth how can he perjury himself” sounds logical but in reality we all lie “ no honey you don’t look fat in those jeans” “ no worries , the check is in the mail” “ the dog ate my homework” These seem like little white lies, however when asked by the FBI about it and the FBI can show you lied, then you have committed a federal crime
    1
  11. It's me, Joolz I gave those examples of lies to highlight that no topic is out of bounds when it comes to lying to the FBI. In terms of Mueller being smart, I don’t think so. Numerous polls show that Mueller’s approval ratings are dropping as time goes on. I’ve seen polls of Mueller favorabilty at 32% in July 2018. If I was mueller I’d wrap this up ASAP before his credibility hits rock bottom.
    1
  12. Jim Alley well, I’ve just learned you’re just an arsehole without the mental capability to understand simple concepts. Now how about pissing of to the kids table and let the adults talk.
    1
  13. El Tigre Clinton was impeached for perjury and not the sexual harassment case for which he was acquitted. What does that tell you about the idea of talking to a special counsel that doesn’t have enough evidence to indict you?
    1