Comments by "Dorian Shades of gray" (@dorianshadesofgray2981) on "Anderson Cooper makes sense of key impeachment inquiry witness testimonies" video.

  1. What sense? The transcript is out and it’s a complete nothing burger.
    5
  2. This transcripts is 317 pages long. Have you read it?
    4
  3. All the testimony of yovanovitch does is show the world what a snowflake she is. Zelensky didn’t like her , she didn’t suppport Trump and she wonders why she got the sack.
    3
  4. @Doctor Thirteen until all these testimonies take place in an open and fair hearing no witness should show up. Schiff is trying to impeach a duly elected president , the public who voted for Trump have a right to hear all testimony and questioning as opposed to everything being done behind closed doors... the public also need to have all transcripts released not just the ones Schiff think will benefit the Dems position.
    3
  5. @John Gailey point out in the transcript where Trump committed a high crime or treason
    2
  6. @Tyler Mattern what a ridiculous statement
    2
  7. @John Gailey Yovanovitch sounds very much like a disgruntled ex employee. President Zelensky did not get on with her as he stated that she preferred the outgoing President and did not accept him as they new president. It sounds like a good decision to get rid of her when she doesn’t have a positive rapport with the Ukrainian president. With regards to her testimony apart from her feelings , what evidence has she actually presented on wrong doing on anyone’s part?
    1
  8. @John Gailey stop with the BS and tell me what facts you think she presented . As far as Zelensky’s feeling towards her do yourself a favour and read the transcript Here’s an extract from it and it is Zelensky talking “I recall her name was Ivanovich. It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough.”
    1
  9. All GOP member plus 2 Democrats voted against the impeachment inquiry, so there was bipartisanship against impeachment
    1
  10. So shes a snowflake who who lost favour with the president of Ukraine and USA and you wonder why she lost her job.
    1
  11. @Brad Dibble what did he do to her that was corrupt?
    1
  12. @Doctor Thirteen we already have the transcript of the conversation and all you have to do is read the transcript of the call, you do not need Never Trumpers or other witnesses to say what it means or says. The rest of the world understand this and know any other witnesses will add nothing to what is already known in the transcript why can’t you see this?
    1
  13. @Doctor Thirteen , come on you moron, do some research. Every single witness has acknowledged that the transcript represents the heart of the conversation, even Vindman Who actually edited some of the transcript prior to it being released said so
    1
  14. @lady4real75 on review you’re right according to Vindman he was not successful at suggesting an edit of “Burisma” instead of “ the company that you mentioned in this issue.” however apart from this minor change he accepted that the transcript was an accurate representation of the call.
    1
  15. @Doctor Thirteen well that’s a complete lie. Have another look at page 1 of the original document.
    1