Comments by "Psiberzerker" (@Psiberzerker) on "Bjorgum 1905 Norwegian Prototype Pistol" video.

Or a Revolver, or a throwing knife, or a bow... This is the sign of a Fanboy. "Cocked, and Locked" is what I call a barely safe condition, and yet people still walk around with a cocked and loaded single action pistol, while I can point out all the .45 holes in all the ceilings of every USMC guard shack, from trained Marines carrying in this "Safe" position. There's your problem: It's a single action, with no decocker, and a manual safety. It has nothing to do with Magazine capacity, you can kill someone with 1 shot of .45ACP. Or with a rock. That doesn't prove it's superiority to a modern double action handgun, with modern safeties. The Military isn't even testing any Revolvers as main service arms, either, and it's not just because of magazine capacity. It's because revolvers aren't modern designs. You can still beat someone with a revolver.
4
Someone with a Rock can beat (Kill) someone with any pistol in a fight. That doesn't make a Rock any less of an obsolete weapon, compared to more modern designs. I get it, you like antiques. So does Ian, he competes in shooting matches with a 1907 Roth-Steyr, and beats modern shooters, with modern guns. Left handed, but he's not proving anything except that he really likes shooting antiques. Based on this performance, you'd think the US would seriously consider a Roth-Steyr as their service pistol, by the same logic. Or let's say the M-1 Garand. Some officers carry Swords, too.
3
I would argue that once you accuratize a 1911, add a double stack magazine, decocking lever to prevent ADs, and a transfer bar safety, it's no longer a 1911 Government model, it's a modern .45 auto pistol.. At that point, you might as well buy a Glock .45.
3