Comments by "ttkoh123" (@ttkoh123) on "Singapore Minister S Iswaran assisting in investigation by anti-graft agency CPIB" video.

  1. Advertisement Time? After the Ridout Saga, I think sacrifice 1 digit in attempt to rescue back "trust" and "wash white". I am not buying.
    13
  2. The KOM Saga, The Ridout Saga, The AMK Saga, MAS lost money, Temasek lost money all these lead to the suspicion of 1 thing - "Incompetence".
    7
  3. After the Ridout Saga, I think sacrifice 1 digit in attempt to rescue back "trust" and "wash white". I am not buying.
    5
  4. Even if this case is proven, does not mean that Singaporeans will forget about the Ridout Saga or the Self-Serving system. Question is; Do you believe when 1 apple is found to be rotting, that the rest is fine? Talking about Self-Serving and the 249,335 sqft with swimming pool and good class GCB at only $26,500 per month; The next Question is; If not 99 million annual salary, then how much? while the rest of the poor Singaporeans struggle to make ends meet?
    4
  5. Question is: If you can't even get this, what can you get? Singaporeans expect the highest standard of conduct for cabinet and senior ministers. CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MINISTERS (3) Financial interests 3.1 A Minister must scrupulously avoid any actual or "apparent conflict of interest" between his office and his private financial interests. Such a conflict, or a perception of conflict, can arise  (a) from the exercise of powers or influence in a way that benefits or may be seen to benefit private interests held; or (b) from using special knowledge acquired in the course of his activities as Minister to bring benefit or avoid loss (or could arouse reasonable suspicion of this) in relation to his private financial interests. 3.2 A Minister therefore must never enter into any transactions whereby his private financial interest might, even conceivably, come into conflict with his public duty.
    4
  6. The KOM Saga, The Ridout Saga, The AMK Saga, MAS lost money, Temasek lost money all these lead to the suspicion of 1 thing - "Incompetence". So, PS is Right. All he wanted is 1/3 for the benefits of Safeguarding Singapore and Singaporeans. I'll say, Give it to him.
    3