Comments by "That Car Guy" (@ThatCarGuy) on "How the Army's getting ready for future conflicts" video.

  1. Hope you guys are doing well, if it comes to it, hope you guys kick some Russian ass
    2
  2. It's not just the army, but the entire armed forces. Need nuclear carriers, need more 5th gen aircraft and even 6th gen prototypes going , need a bomber like the B2/B21, need more destroyers(with real ballistic missile defense) and more QE class as well as submarines. A lot is needed for the future. Basically rejuvenate the armed forces. But the future costs a lot.
    2
  3. Russian tanks are nothing compared to American. Tom Clancy has a non-fiction book about a Abrams that got stuck in the mud, then took out three T72s, then tried to free the tank from the mud and couldn't, then tried blowing up the tank and couldn't, leaving only a sight out of alignment. "Well, in his 1994 non-fiction book, Armored Cav, Tom Clancy recounted a tale of how an M1A1 Abrams got stuck in the mud during the ground war of Desert Storm. It was then set upon by three tanks, Iraqi T-72s specifically. A round fired from roughly a thousand yards away bounced off, and the Abrams responded by blowing the T-72 that fired it to bits. A second round fired from 700 yards, bounced off, and the offending T-72 was blasted. The third T-72, at a range of roughly 400 yards, fired a round, which left a groove in the armor of the Abrams. It, too, was destroyed by a shot fired through a sand berm. These were, supposedly, Russia’s state-of-the-art tanks. Then, when help arrived, and the tank couldn’t be freed from the mud, a platoon of Abrams tanks tried to destroy it. After several rounds, they detonated the onboard ammo, but the blow-out panels functioned as designed. Then, when the tank was retrieved from the mud, they discovered that it was still functional. The only issue? A sight was out of alignment."
    1