Comments by "Billy Bob" (@davidrobertsemail) on "Trump: Supreme Court ruling a 'witch hunt' and 'hoax' - BBC News" video.

  1. Read both cases. It’s a which hunt. The Supreme Court has ruled on the law not the motives of those chasing his tax records. They only want to hurt him politically.
    6
  2. It isn’t but selective BBC editing made you think that. They ruled on the law not the motives of those chasing his tax records for political reasons.
    5
  3. daily lamah his tax records are private. Nobody is above the law even the President. He’s not below the law either. He has rights. Secondly the separation of powers is important. The executive cant run a country if he’s constantly in court.
    3
  4. Fortitudine Vincimus Biden has Agreed three debates with Trump. Biden doesn’t know where he is. I’m looking forward to them.
    2
  5. Zanzibar Haberdasher before the CCP virus I was enjoying an amazing economy.
    2
  6. Fortitudine Vincimus nobody cares! Biden has been employed by the taxpayer since he left school! Try getting him out of his basement to speak to people. I do care if he’s mentally able to be President. Release his cognitive tests he claims he’s taken.
    1
  7. Nate Higgins the mueller report was based on what? Illegal spying on the Trump campaign. Mueller found nothing but process crimes. Or crimes that happened years ago unrelated to Trump. Why are you not more concerned about the prosecuting District Attorney from NY Vance? Vance the same one that got the sweet heart desk for Epstein? Same guy! No mention of that by the BBC? How odd!
    1
  8. Nate Higgins process crimes are crimes that occurred during the mueller investigation. Eg. People lied or covered something up. Eg General Flynn. Another hoax by the way. Other crimes were found to have been committed unrelated to Trump by other people. You spend $35 million investing people in Washington you are going to find something. So mueller found nothing on Trump. Spying on a presidential political campaign by the opposing political party in power is an incredibly sensitive thing to do. As AG Barr has stated he is not aware of any predicate for that in this case. If you think that the 17 major errors in the FISA process were insignificant then you haven’t read the report. They lied to the FISA courts to get access to the a Trump campaign.
    1
  9. Nate Higgins any evidence of that? Are you ok with Trump spying on the Biden campaign for no reason? Are you ok with Trumps Justice department lying to the fisa court to get wiretaps on the Biden campaign? I’m not. Trump was the victim here and by default the American people who voted for him as well.
    1
  10. Nate Higgins if it was all legal then why is it a criminal investigation? Why have so many lost their jobs and hired lawyers? McCabe lied to the FBI 4 times 3 under oath. Is that legal? The 17 major fisa abuses found including altering documents and fabricating evidence to get wiretaps was that legal? Nobody should be happy with any administration spying on an opposing campaign. You aren’t outraged. You are blinded by Trump hatred. More synthetic outrage over Stone! Yet silence when Obama commuted 1715 times including terrorists, crack dealers and gun criminals.
    1
  11. Nate Higgins you have made up your mind. This is a fishing exercise nothing more. A failed mueller investigation. A failed impeachment and a failed coup. If you don’t like someone vote them out. This is using the courts for political purposes.
    1
  12. Dale Crocker here’s another take. https://youtu.be/zksEsJzIRW8
    1
  13. Nate Higgins we seem to be making progress. Yes it’s politically motivated. If it’s a hoax then let the courts decide and on the face of it that’s fine....but when the grand jury illegally leaks his private tax records will you accept its a witch hunt then.
    1
  14. Jthaw01 01 he’s referring to the case. It’s brought for one reason. To hurt him politically. It’s a hoax.
    1
  15. They want his financial records to hurt him politically. That’s it. The BBC should report both supreme court’s rulings on his taxes this week. One said he didn’t have to comply with the democrat committee to release his taxes. A win for trump and the separation of powers. The second said his details could be given to a grand jury which should be confidential. However someone will break the law and leak them. Pure politics and definitely a which hunt.
    1
  16. daily lamah is that a bumber sticker? This is about separation of powers. You can’t run a country if you spend your days fighting legal battles. This is about hurting him politically using his private tax records. Everyone knows that.
    1
  17. Carosello Show he’s neither above the law or below it. He’s being investigated by politically motivated democrats in NY to hurt him politically. Hence it’s a political hitch hunt. They are allowing the grand jury to see his records as the law states they will be private. However despite it being illegal the grand jury will leak.
    1
  18. daily lamah as president he has already disclosed his finances. He’s broken no laws. However as a billionaire businessman I suspect that his taxes have lots of grey areas that could hurt him politically. For example I pay into a pension which helps to avoid taxes. I’m therefore a tax avoider. That’s legal. Billionaire businessman will have much grander methods which no doubt are legal but could be used against him politically. This case brought against him is politically motivated. The court isn’t ruling on the motives.
    1
  19. daily lamah you have to disclose your finances to become President. You don’t have to release your private taxes.
    1
  20. Carosello Show Clinton isn’t being targeted. Trump is. I believe in the separation of powers. As does the Supreme Court as witnessed by these two rulings. However the release of his taxes to a grand jury is fine as long as they wouldn’t leak. They will leak despite it being illegal. Democrats like those prosecuting this case from NY won’t care about the illegality of grand jury leaks. They will use any information gleaned to attack him politically.
    1
  21. daily lamah that’s not an argument. Activist NY democrat prosecutors aren’t looking to solve crimes! This is about getting Trump. If they were so concerned about crimes shy did they would care about the surge in crime in NY they created with their anti police actions such as the crazy bail “Reform” You know the one that the BBC doesn’t report on.
    1
  22. daily lamah I’ve been following this case. It’s pure politics. Insults instead of arguments.
    1
  23. daily lamah thanks for making my point....again!
    1
  24. daily lamah the last argument you tried was three hours ago.
    1
  25. lch jr my statement stands according to your own comment ;-)
    1