Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "Hitler's VAMPIRE ECONOMY | TIK Q&A 17" video.

Yes but if u own a company but u literally have someone else decide everything for u and u don’t even get the profits. Also there is a difference between a response war time economy versus a permanent state control over the private sector. It’s kind like what Hitler said when he stated he doesn’t need to absorb the companies they are completely at the mercy of the state. Because in the United States, companies for better or for worse have protection rights even against the government while in Nazi Germany there wasn’t. The Nazis removed the amendment to German Republic constitution that protected private property. If the United States removed the second amendment then it would become a socialist nation. Because having private property is not the same as being protected to have private property. That’s why anarchy capitalism is impossible. Because if there is no state to protect ur property rights then u might as well not have those rights. Rules are only as good as the ability to enforce them.
3
How does he not know what socialism is?
2
@Paultarco Thats why to me, the Nazi economy wasn't completely socialist but it's not capitalism either. It's more of a hybrid of the two. Yes one could argue that the Nazis were just doing a wartime economy before everyone else. However to me it doesn't explain the price fixes at a point where breaking those policies could see one sent to a concentration camp. Plus using that argument. Germany began trying to build back up it''s military even before the Nazis took power. That was one reason Weimar Republic got along well with the Soviets. It was because they were testing German designed weapons and in particular tanks in the Soviet Union in exchange for a share of the technology.
2
@Paultarco Private owned just not Private Control. I do consider Nazi Germany to lean more left than right though.
2
@TheImperatorKnight True on that point.
1
Depends if the control on the economy was based as a response to for a war time economy or intended as a permanent policy that would take power away from the private sector.
1
Only unified groups can create nations. Problem with modern politics is that we are in a complete divide on how things should be handled. Also a lack of efficiency within nations.
1
D Z he’s not saying that any state intervention is socialist he literally states that just as few countries have full on socialism same goes to full on capitalism. He is saying that it more or less comes down to which one it leans more to. Because just as full on socialism has state ownership of business. Ideal capitalism is the opposite and is suppose to have little to none state intervention. But most countries are hybrids (Mixed Economies, that’s where the term came from) between capitalism and socialism. It comes down to which does the nation lean closer to. National Socialism isn’t ideal socialism but it leans closer to socialism than capitalism.
1
Paul Corcoman I agree that National Socialism wasn’t full on socialism. It’s why I said it was more of a spectrum. When looking up the definition of capitalism it is more than just private ownership, if that was the case then u would literally have to call almost every society in pre 20th century capitalist. But no one goes around saying that a bartering system is capitalist because it operates differently than capitalist. Same applies with socialism. If the Nazis were truly a far right regime like the norm keeps saying then the state would’ve been at the mercy of the companies rather than the other way around. The state gave freedoms to industrial companies because they were needed for the war effort and trying to reorganize them wouldn’t be worth the cost. But the amount of state control that exists in the economy reaches a point that there is no longer private control. I disagree with TIk that’s its full on socialism or even a variant of socialism. But when viewing the amount of state control it’s not capitalism either.
1
Paul Corcoman if anything it would probably be more of an economic fascism.
1
Use of companies for National projects wouldn’t equal socialism unless the state absorbed the company or regulated the corporation policy on how much money it can make and if it overrides the owner’s control of the company.
1