Comments by "Hercules Koutalidis" (@herculeskoutalidis1369) on "EVERY EU Political Grouping Explained: What Do They Stand For - TLDR News" video.

So there is at least one green party that makes some sense.
26
@eruno_ how are they homophobic?
5
They are not anti Europe. They are anti EU.
3
@DeutschlandMapping were you not yet replaced by darker races in Germany or are you a Turk pretending to be German?
3
Are there still beautiful Dutch people living in the NL? Were you not yet replaced by darker races?
2
what is bad about fascism?
2
@DaDunge yes exactly.
2
@choonbox are you dutch?
2
@eruno_ I see. Then, apart from gay adoption, I believe they are wrong.
2
Oh my dear lord, where the hell are you from with an ideology like that.
1
@AA-bl6sg it is unfortunately, which is why western Europe will be a dystopia in less than 100 years. Close your borders to the south, and make children.
1
We must forbid Immigration from the south to the north.
1
Close your borders to the south. Make children.
1
Pretty much.
1
@pmmeurcatpics what.
1
@memetopia5130 you mean Surinamturkmorrokistandam, also known as Amsterdam untill the mid 20th century, before the NL was colonized by dark races?
1
@memetopia5130 your friends belong to the few reasonable dutch people, apparently.
1
@RealHistorian is letting the dutch people become replaced by darker races right wing?
1
@ChristianIce (I do not support fascism, I just want to see what people answer when asked this question) Fair enough, why is racism bad? Racism will help protect the better elements of a populations.
1
@Marcus_Peppus_ in fascism you do not get to chose the course of your country. If you don't like it (the course) there is pretty much nothing you can do about it. And, most probably, apart from the current population replacement (that I know bothers you/us), you would not agree with the course the fascist dictator chose 😀
1
@Marcus_Peppus_ again, I believe you have only demographics in your mind :) would you agree in the way the fascist government taxes you, and how they would then spend the money? like you didn't have demographic problems in the 1950s, and people still had different worldviews and different opinions on politics. Some wanted a small state. Some wanted a more active state. Some were communists. Some were libertarians. Some were environmentalists. Another question that needs to be answered, is, why is a (fascist/conservative) Dictator better, more wise, and more competent, to govern the World, than the """Capitalists""". :)
1
@ChristianIce I did not say they were. The better elements of a population are physical and mental/intellectual properties. Racism says that you should not allow the slow replacement of a better population by a population less beautiful, less intelligent, and less creative. And so, racism helps protect the better population from being replaced.
1
@Marcus_Peppus_ I have been a fascist in the past, so I can fully understand your thinking. I just wanted to point out that, in contrast to what you feel, people would not feel awesome under fascism, because they could not really discuss politics freely. I just mention this as a drawback of this system, and every system has severe flaws, and there is no perfect system. Fascism is not perfect. It most probably is not ecen better than Capitalism, because if it were, it would be the easiest task for the Capitalists to implement it themselves. Why do the Capitalists promote degeneracy? 🙂 you don't know (yet). Why do the Capitalists want to erase the better races?🙂 you don't know (yet). It is the easiest thing to implement fascist policies. You don't even need fascism to do so. My point is that the Capitalists must have their reasons for not wanting a conservative world for ever. They are insanely intelligent. They do not have a reason to harm the better races, just for the sake of it. They know stuff that you don't know 🙂
1
@Marcus_Peppus_ I believe Capitalists are not after profit. They are after politics. They are wealthy enough to not care about increasing their profits further, at the expense of the quality of civilization. They are pretty much the same as the fascist/conservative Dictator in fascism, or the Monarch in monarchy, without being formally so. They would never cause degeneracy, just for profit. Again, they must be unimaginably intelligent people, who simple people like us take a lifetime to understand...
1
@Marcus_Peppus_ but I never said fascists are after their own benefit, of course they are after the interest of the nation.
1
Precisely because they are more """progressive""".
1
Close your borders to the south. Make children.
1
@atahanoktay2247 why?
1
@DeutschlandMapping so what is the respective percentage going to be in 2050? What is it going to be in 2100? 🙂 The number of Germans in G is decreasing, because you make less than 2 children each, while you have a net immigration rate (of about 300k/year). Germans in G are now 74% of Germany's population, and 50% by 2050, after which they will become 20% by around 2080, before they disappear from History for ever. Same in every western country.
1
@DeutschlandMapping most basic reform, for the EU (and Europe) to work in the future: ban immigration from the south to the north.😉
1
@DeutschlandMapping no. It would be the beginning 🙂 The correct one this time😉
1
@DeutschlandMapping you can't create ""Paneuropa"" with 27 different nations. It will last for 70 years and then it will collapse, because of the differences in nations' identities. You need to create a one nation continent first. The question is then, what this new nation's characteristics (language, phenotype, etc) will be. This is not my own take. There is no such close political union, without a single nation supporting it. And what we are doing now, is just slowly remove northern Europeans from the face of history, replacing them with some southern europeans, and extra-europeans from Asia and Africa. We must first depopulate southern Europe, and then if needed, recolonize it with northern Europeans.
1
@atahanoktay2247 precisely. 👌😉
1
@DeutschlandMapping why what exactly, from all the things I said? 😀
1
@DeutschlandMapping to create a genetically/ethnically homogenous Europe.
1
@DeutschlandMapping your first question is a good one, I admit, though I would not do that. Perhaps just out of aesthetic reasons (because I feel I want the most beautiful to survive), although I have theories about creativity (of north vs south Europeans) as well. The genetic difference between N/S europeans is what it is (small/less small). We need a homogeneous Europe if we want a federal Europe. Without a single nation backing a country, this country is doomed. You can think of the US and what made it the civilization it is today (northern europeans) as a guide.
1
@DeutschlandMapping their genetic differences are small, and also you don't have immigrant movements from one ethnic section to the other (probably because all three sections are comparably wealthy - this is also why there is immigrant balance between Germany and France). But look at the UK, namely England and Scotland. One thousand years of common language, practically the same DNA (by now), and they still do not feel they belong to the same nation (which they more or less do by now!). Belgium. Genetic differences are nearly non existent, yet they still dislike each other. Why? Because they are each stuck in two different identities (at the time they are pretty much the same people by now!). But the ones have one picture of themselves, and the others have a different picture of themselves. Italy. The north is largely of germanic and cltic descent, while the south is largely of greek origins :) While they have managed to keep together until now, their identities are not 100% uniform sadly. Maybe in 200 years. In the US, identity is mostly determined by ethnicity (white/black/brown/latino etc.) by now. So we see genetics is very important in identity. One interesting exeption to this, is France actually, I would say :) Maybe because, just like Switzerland, there are no significant immigrant movements in the south-north axis (except from Paris of course).
1
@DeutschlandMapping you are right, actually, I must admit. Yet with one exception. North and South europeans :) There, genetics are important. Or at least this is the minimum distance, in which genetics starts to become important, as a component of identity. Unfortunately. Yes, Europe is on a way to become a nation, no doubt about that. But which sort of nation will that be? :) This is not necessarily positive. 30% south european, 10% north european, and 60% middle eastern and african? Is this what we get, after 2000 years of this history and toil? How do we know that these new people will be as creative as Germans, English, Dutch, French, Polish, Russians etc. have been? I have the feeling that culture somehow gets intertwined in peoples' DNA. So you maybe can't transform a Nigerian baby, into a German, or a polish, or russian '''''soul'''''. I am afraid western civilization will therefore just lose the ''''''western''''' (or if you like, ''''northern''''') part.
1