Comments by "Emma Sanders" (@emmasanders6226) on "Inside Edition" channel.

  1. It's called insanely archaic practices that should have evolved as society evolved.
    3
  2. It's reporting like this that sensationalizes only one aspect of the trial. Trivial in comparison to the planting of evidence, cross contamination of DNA testing, crime scene contamination and the like. The glove only had blood evidence with OJs DNA where the analyst signed, nowhere else on the glove. The hair on the beanie did not match simpson. So what you sensationalize is not true. The jurors will tell you the planting of evidence was proved by the defense lawyers. Cross contamination as well as crime scene contamination was also proved.
    2
  3. So do we know where the parents/caregiver/babysitter was at? Who in their right mind takes their eyes or ears off a two year old long enough for her to end up in the woods. Poor baby 💛💛 So glad she was found. Good job guys
    1
  4. There was not much the prosecution could do after knowing full well evidence was planted and crime scene was comprimised from the get go. I am surprised it wasn't thrown out of court
    1
  5. Bronco as well. For such gruesome and bloody murders, common sense should dictate the blood trail would have copious amounts of blood.
    1
  6. The director is desperate. Never heard of peacock. Never will watch it either after they try to make money off a narcissistic lying incubator who murdered a precious child. She should be on death row not on a docuseries.
    1
  7. My guess is one of the older kids put the baby there. No way the baby made it there herself. She couldn't crawl. No excuse for the mother though. Pretty sad no one gave the baby a hug
    1