Comments by "GilbertdeClare0704" (@GilbertdeClare0704) on "J-TV: Jewish Ideas. Global Relevance." channel.

  1. 144
  2. 84
  3. 64
  4. 55
  5. 52
  6. 50
  7. 37
  8. 35
  9. 29
  10. 29
  11. 28
  12. 26
  13. 25
  14. 25
  15. 25
  16. 22
  17. 22
  18. 22
  19. 20
  20. 19
  21. 18
  22. 17
  23. 17
  24. 16
  25. 16
  26. 15
  27. 14
  28. 14
  29. 14
  30. Very well said my friend, and I TOTALLY agree ! Surely the moral legitimacy of a nation state - the moral right of a nation state to exist - is dependent upon the extent to which it RECOGNISES and protects the individual rights of its citizens. On the basis of this inviolable fact of reality, no authoritarian state has any moral right to exist - that is, has absolutely no moral legitimacy. The objective standard for judging the moral legitimacy of a NATION state is the objective principle of individual rights, the principle defining and sanctioning a man's freedom in a social setting, the principle defining and sanctioning a man's rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness. It is by this objective standard alone - the principle of individual rights - that the moral legitimacy of a nation state - ANY nation state - should be judged. A nation state that institutes the recognition and protection of individual rights, or does so largely, as IS the case with Israel, has a moral right to exist. A nation state that institutes the VIOLATION of individual rights as a matter of principle, as any Palestinian state ruled by Hamas, the Palestinian Authority or any Islamist, Marxist or other authoritarian entity would, has NO moral right to exist - no moral legitimacy. Furthermore, it would be morally just for any rights-respecting state or entity such as The U.N. to forcibly remove any rights-violating authoritarian government and replace it with a rights-RESPECTING one. Israel is the ONLY democracy in the Middle East, where people are NOT persecuted for their beliefs and enjoy full, equal human rights to all!
    13
  31. 12
  32. 12
  33. 12
  34. 12
  35. 11
  36. 11
  37. 11
  38. 11
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 10
  42. 10
  43. 10
  44. 10
  45. 10
  46. 9
  47. 9
  48. 9
  49. 9
  50. 8
  51. 8
  52. 8
  53. 8
  54. 7
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 7
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 6
  75. 6
  76. 6
  77. 6
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. I can't help but see all the hyped up Climate Crisis, BLM, then Trans Activism as being some "preamble" Psyops to soften up the most gullible and unstable elements in western society, so they are primed literally to accept black is white and white is black. I only say that as it DOES seem to follow the intent as declared in "The Strategic Memorandum Of The Muslim Brotherhood" to "bring the whole rotten edifice down from within". That as the bedrock intent, followed by well planned and dare I say it, very skilful use of DARVO tactics immediately after 7th October, to first, act as though Oct.7th Hadn't happened, then immediately DENY it, get Aggressive and REVERSE truth, so that the VICTIM becomes the AGGRESSOR when they RIGHTLY react to the savagery of the attack ? In a sick and twisted world, and to those unstable, gullible "twisted" people, Israel then sticking to the TRUTH, restraint and morality gets twisted to be SEEN as PROOF of "guilt" ? ? Like the whole INVERSION of Martin Luther King's ACHIEVEMENT of getting society NOT to "Judge by Skin Colour" has become PROOF of "Racism" ? That is DARVO again, you are Racist if you SEE it, and Unconsciously racist if you DON'T ? It leaves the REAL victim with nowhere RATIONAL to go. That is the same Marxist tactic now deployed on Israel. BUT..... Israel IS winning in the REAL world, and especially with the REALITY based REAL DECENT people all around the world. Just like an ADULT that holds firm with a screaming kicking toddler, who screams "I HATE you" BECAUSE you hold firm to what you KNOW is right. Sadly, the west now has screaming TODDLERS as politicians !
    3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 2
  142. 2
  143. 2
  144. 2
  145. 2
  146. 2
  147. 2
  148. 2
  149. 2
  150. 2
  151. 2
  152. 2
  153. 2
  154. 2
  155. 2
  156. 2
  157. 2
  158. 2
  159. 2
  160. 2
  161. 2
  162. 2
  163. 2
  164. 2
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221.  @malvolio01  There was NO such "identity" as "palestinian" at that time ! Please check the 1922 Census, “Report and General Abstracts of the Census of 1922 by JB Barron” and only found 757,000 people IN TOTAL : including Jews,(83,794), Christians,(73,024), Arabs (590,890) but NO ONE “identifying” AS “palestinian” because THAT was the COLONIAL name and they hated the BRITISH. The KGB CREATED this “Palestinian” identity in 1964 through Yasser Arafat ! Before 1964, NO Arabs even called themselves “Palestinian” because the Holy Land was ALWAYS known to Arabs by the common Arabic name for this region "Yahuda wa - Samara", never “palestine”. Haj Amin Al Husseini, Head of the Arab League and later The Higher Arab Committee said the same in 1937, when approached by the British to discuss a “Palestinian” state. They said war would be declared on any “Palestinian state”, as it was NOT a muslim name, because “Palestinians” did not exist in the Qu'ran etc.. As a result, that term had always been seen by Arabs ONLY as a British/Zionist term used in the late 1800s from the beginnings of “Zionism” as a DESCRIPTOR of the area of Land that had hitherto been the Kingdoms of Israel. The Ottomans had NEVER called it “palestine” or even referred to it as “palestine” at any time in their 400 years of occupation. The area was referred to, ONLY eve,r as the three “Sanjaks of Tripolis, Antiochi and Jerusalem” Before 1964, NO Arabs even called themselves “Palestinian” Only a few years after Arafat had followed KGB advice and re-adopted the British Mandate name of “Palestine”, Zuheir Mohsen a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, declared in his 1977 interview with Trouwe newspaper, "There's no such thing as a separate Palestinian people, there's no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese... the Palestinian “identity” exists ONLY for tactical reasons. The creation of a Palestinian state is a NEW instrument in our ongoing war against the state of Israel and for the purpose of our Arab unity".
    1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. Ollie ? I don't think it is an "either / or" question between "silly" and "Sinister". From psychological studies I read on how susceptible Germans were to N*z* "brainwashing", as well as findings re "The Stockholm Syndrome", it appears a certain level of insecurity coupled with reduced intelligence, is needed FIRST before the more sinister "Propaganda" can take hold or gain traction ? Someone raised to relatively believe and trust in their OWN perceptions, is FAR more likely to have the confidence to resist, or go AGAINST "group pressure" when faced with ideas or acts that ARE "sinister". Someone without that self confidence and trust, is far more likely to go along with something they do not believe in BECAUSE of the group pressure. Then, once one has said or done something to cross that morality line, self justification OF that "line cross" takes over to further and further "excuse/explain" one's actions until you BECOME the actual "sinister" ? Hence most special Forces screen OUT those less secure, as they are a weak link. Patti Hearst was an example of that "silly"/ insecurity, being held HOSTAGE by ter**ists then JOINING them once "freed", The book "Ordinary Men" goes into how "The Sinister" in SS and Police Units would "Initiate" the weak (the silly) by goading them to commit that first step/act, then once committed that self justification process would complete the process ? ? "The sinister" are the Activists who goad and manipulate the silly/weak until they cross their internal threshold by name calling, then once done, silly transmutes INTO the sinister. The ONLY defence is to KNOW good from evil and NOT bow to it....EVER !
    1
  240. 1
  241.  @itaiharshoshanim-ib6kp  do you mean me, sir ? If you're interested, check out The Strategic Memorandum Of The Muslim Brotherhood, available online. Then Cross reference it to Saul Alensky's "Rules For Radicals" (also online) and you can see the basic INTENT and approach that has been used ? Then check Jennifer Freyd, a psychologist who has worked with abusers and used the acronym D.A.R.V.O. to describe the common steps an abuser employs. Those common steps are: "D" - The abuser Denies the abuse ever took place When confronted with evidence, the abuser then, "A" - Attacks the person that was/is being abused (and/or the person's family and/or friends) for attempting to hold the abuser accountable for their actions. finally the abuser claims that they were/are ACTUALLY the victim in the situation, thus, "R" - Reversing the positions of "V" - Victim and "O" - Offender. It often involves not just playing the victim but also victim blaming. A quote from Freyd : "... I have observed that actual abusers threaten, bully and make a nightmare for anyone who holds them accountable or asks them to change their abusive behavior. This attack, intended to chill and terrify, typically includes threats of law suits, overt and covert attacks on the whistle-blower's credibility, and so on. The attack will often take the form of focusing on ridiculing the person who attempts to hold the offender accountable. The offender rapidly creates the impression that the abuser is the wronged one, while the victim or concerned observer is the offender. Figure and ground are completely reversed. The offender is on the offense and the person attempting to hold the offender accountable is put on the defense." The sheer speed with which the "Protest marches" i.e., Hate Marches, were orchestrated to occur BEFORE Israel even "retaliated" shows how well planned it all was. I've seen it time and again in my work, that as Freyd mentioned, the number of susceptible people who are inclined to believe a DARVO response, DECREASES once they understand the tactic. Clearly SEEING who is using DARVO often proves to be difficult, until the abuser and the victim are clearly established. That is why we ALL have a MORAL duty to expose these LIES wherever we see them, Like Bataclan, Charlie Hebdo, October 7th, Annecy.
    1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265.  @maltija1  I totally agree, and find it utterly shameful. My understanding of that is down to the nature of British Society at that time of the late 1800s onwards. Anti semitism was very common place especially amongst the upper classes, hence late 1930s "sympathy" for the naz*s reaching into REALLY high places. I believe there was a "Romantic" sympathy for the Arabs at the end of the 19th Century, among people such as Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway et al in the USA, and the most famous in England, T.E. Lawrence, who seemed to see a "Freedom" amongst the Bedou that had been lost in Industrial societies ? (T.E.Lawrence wrote of that) Then after rallying Arab Nationalists to overthrow the Ottomanns, BECAUSE of that closeness to the Arabs, but ONLY to conduct the Sykes Picot Agreement meetings in SECRET, Hussein ibn Ali, King of the Hejaz is completely betrayed at Britain going back on her word. The McMahon - Hussein letters of 1915 ALSO included amongst the Arab Nationalist intenetions, a desire for an "Arab Caliphate of Islam" ? Then up springs the PAN Arab Nationalist movement who want a SINGLE Arab Nation, and Haj Amin Al Husseni instigates the pogroms against Jews leading to the Hebron Massacre. The British sympathetic to the Arab cause seem to wring their hands in guilt at the 1919 betrayal, and strive to make concessions to the Arabs, DESPITE the 1920 San Remo Agreement having been UNANIMOUSLY ratified by ALL 51 Nations of the League of Nations. That had made it LEGAL to RETURN all of the British Mandate of "palestine AND Transjordan" to the Jewish people, even though the 1922 Mandate backtracked on Transjordan to appease the "betrayed" Hashemites. The British White Papers of 1930 started to further BACKTRACK on that LEGAL recognition of Jewish RIGHT to return, leading to the DISGRACEFUL 1939 White Paper, which in the light of the looming War with Germany was trying to appease Haj Amin Al Husseini and the rise of his Pan Arab Nationalism, for fear he would side with the Naz*s. Which he did anyway. In clause 14. of that 1939 White Paper, Jewish immigration was LIMITED to no more than 75,000 over 5 years to keep Jewish population to only 1/3, to 2/3 Arab ! ! ! This ran completely contrary to THE LEGAL MANDATE where “Palestine” had been INTENTIONALLY intended for JEWISH political control IN FULL RECOGNITION (Balfour Declaration) of the JEWISH Historic Connection to THEIR HOMELAND. The 1939 White Paper was a complete abrogation of Britain’s Internationally Legal Commitment to the Jewish people and the Jewish State. Under the terms of The Mandate , a binding instrument under International Law, ALL returning Jews were legally entitled to return. Yet thousands were deemed as “Illegal immigrants” under clause 14.(I) and interned in British built Internement camps. LEGAL, SAFE return was BLOCKED, and at the most critical time possible...BEFORE THE HOLOCAUST ! ! ! At the end of the war, 6 years after the White Paper, less than HALF of the “allowed” 75,000 quota, had been admitted to THEIR Historic Homeland. A mere 36,000 immigration certificates had been issued ! ! !. That 1919 "betrayal" by the Sykes Picot Agreement was why the Arabs stopped trusting the British, which also laid them open to the poisonous anti semitic / PRO Naz* propaganda of the PAN Arab Nationalists, which has embedded to this day. Haj Amin Al Husseini's nephew was Yasser Arafat who started using the erstwhile "Zionist" name of "Palestine" in 1964 ! !
    1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287.  @lordgigapiller  I'm afraid the ONLY "Colonisers" have been the Arab Muslims who first conquered it in 638 AD and established an Islamic Caliphate, for 1200years ! ! ! 1200 YEARS of ARAB ISLAMIST COLONISTAION and OCCUPATION ! ! Until the collapse of Islamic rule with the end of the Ottoman Empire.. Under the Ottoman Empire (until 1918) most of the land in Israel (only named "MANDATE of palestine" by the UN and British from 1920-47) was owned by people who didn't even live there. The landowners were mainly, but not exclusively, Arabs who lived in Damascus, Beirut etc. The 'local' Arabs were nomadic. The Jews raised money during the British mandate and BOUGHT all their settlement lands from the foreign owners, cleared and irrigated it, created industry, agriculture, ports and railways, sparking a wave of Arab immigration from surrounding Arab countries. Then, of course, the attempt to displace the Jews in 1947 didn't go too well. Arab immigration to Israel from 1920-47 was just a form of failed invasion - similar to what is going on in Europe now. The Arab population, ONLY even started identifying as "Palestinian" in 1967, in the 20th century ! They are the descendants of Arab COLONISERS ! They INVADED in 638AD and completed the ethnic cleansing of the Jews from THEIR land that had been started by the ROMANS ! The "Palestinian" Arabs have never at any time in history owned that territory or any part of it, ....they COLONISED it ! The Jews are INDIGENOUS to that land ! ! The so called “palestinians” are NOT ! "Start a war, you might lose." "Losing a war YOU started doesn't turn you into a victim" A land YOU colonized ISN'T yours. But I guess reading really IS too much of a challenge for you, as you clearly have never even HEARD of the Israeli ARAB MUSLIM Judge who JAILED former President Ehud Barak. Let alone show ANY understanding of the word "Colonisation" or "Occupation". Never mind, habibi, back to your fairy tales🤣🤣🤣
    1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. BRILLIANT video Ollie. Thank you so much for publishing these photos and bring this more into the light. There was also an article in New York Post MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1948 (part of the Washington Post Company) entitled "State Dept. Conceals Promised White Paper Uses Whitewash Instead* about how "On Aug. 28, 1946, Dean Acheson, then Acting Secretary of State, announced that "the State Dept. is preparing a White Paper concerning the activities of the ex-Mufti of Jerusalem." Acheson had said the publication would be in the form of a book, which would cover all the documents concerning the ex-Mufti seized from German files, revealing ALL his activities and contributions to the NSDAP throughout WW2. Al Husseini had worked with Himmler and was pivotal in recruiting the Bosnian Muslim Volunteers for the 13th Waffen SS "Handschar" Division, who committed numerous summary atrocities throughout Yugoslavia In that same New York Post article, there is a passage which states : "By the end of 1943 the ex-Mufti had organized Bosnian "Black Legions" to fight the Allies. He also bears a heavy responsibility for the annihilation of European Jewry, according to Nazi testimony given at Nuremberg. He visited the gas chambers ; he wrote to the Cabinet Ministers of Hungary and Romania asking them to send the Jews from their countries to the concentration camps in Poland." Thus according to the Charter of the International Tribunal at Nuremberg, the ex-Mufti is a criminal on all three counts, for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity." At that time, 1948, that "Dean Acheson White Paper" had not yet been published, and seems to never have been ? ? David Dalen's book also mentions this Dean Acheson white paper, and seems to point to a much greater involvement on Al Husseini's part than has yet been revealed ?
    1
  294.  @Rope_Adope  That WAS actually my POINT, my friend. I DISAGREE with Dawkins for that EXACT REASON ! However I do NOT believe any single religion has it "Right" or has sole claim to THE Truth. That was WHY I used the term "The ALL" to try and describe the Divine spark, endowed BY "God" that we MAY RECOGNISE Him and LISTEN to His voice ? The capacity of "Man" in the very early days of Judaism, Christianity etc would have been OF that era and would "Hear" god to the level OF that era. Which we see still being held onto in Islamism, a 7th Century "understanding" of what they genuinely "hear". The "Tree" of each era HAS to fall and become BOTH the SEED AND the FERTILISER for the NEXT era of a DEEPER "hearing" and thereby a DEEPER understanding OF "God". "GOD" endowed us with that capacity to "KNOW".."HIM" at a deeper and deeper level AS each era "falls". Without that initial JUDAIC "seed", YES, there would have been NO Christianity and therefore NO ENLIGHTENMENT which DEEPENED "scientific" KNOWLEDGE to REVEAL a MUCH deeper level of utter BEAUTY in "God's" ultimate GIFT..i'e the Double Helix and genetic coding ? Unknown to early 3,500bc Humans, but today KNOWN. AS', we KNOW "GOD" at a deeper level, and WILL know MORE of God BECAUSE of that cycle of "Fall" and REBIRTH ? How else do you explain the SIGNIFICANCE of Christ's RESURRECTION ? ? To put it simply my friend, was CHRIST who arose from the Dead, the SAME unchanged Christ as BEFORE Crucifixion, or a DEEPER Christ ? And that is where it starts touching into Eastern ideas such as The Phoenix in China ? ps. I have never heard Dawkins say he, OR "science" knows EVERYTHING which WOULD indicate that closed minded "FIXED" mindset, but any "scientist" who would be so foolish KILLS any claim to scientific enquiry by such arrogance. As do ANY theologians who foolishly claim THEIR beliefs to be FIXED for all eternity. Once and forever and ONLY and you CLOSE your soul to the Divine
    1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305.  @rontyler1234  I think you are rather confused about actual HISTORY, habibi. King ABDULLAH of Jordan was ASSASSINATED on 20 July 1951, while visiting Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, King Abdullah was shot dead BY an Arab Nationalist who worked for the Husseini clan. Second it was on September 17th 1970, AFTER a whole spate of repeated attacks on Jordanian Police outposts and Military Units, BY the newly named "Palestinian Liberation Organisation" under Yasser Arafat, and repeated threats to OVERTHROW the ELECTED King HUSSEIN of Jordan, that King Hussein ordered Brigadier General Zia Ul Haq to deal with this blatant threat to Jordanian stability by destroying the Ter*orist encampments as IDF now do in Gaza. AFTER this event, known as "Black September" these Ter*orists were allowed to RESETTLE in Lebanon, then a thriving christian democracy, and what did they do ? They did EXACTLY the same there, toppled the government, ethnically cleansed the majority Christian population, which Lebanon has NEVER recovered from. NEITHER were ever "tried as war criminals" as King Abdullah had been DEAD for 19 years ! And Brigadier General Zia Ul Haq went on to become Prime Minister of Pakistan ! ! ! "palestine" has never even EXISTED, it was a BRITISH MANDATE to be returned to the JEWISH PEOPLE. The HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN came about on 25th May 1946 AFTER 77% of the BRITISH MANDATED TRANSJORDAN was given TO the Hashemites as the FIRST "Two State Solution" ! You really need to stop lying and read up on the FACTS habibi !
    1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1