Comments by "GilbertdeClare0704" (@GilbertdeClare0704) on "J-TV: Jewish Ideas. Global Relevance."
channel.
-
144
-
98
-
84
-
64
-
58
-
52
-
50
-
TOTALLY agree, my friend !
The moral legitimacy of any nation state - the moral right of a nation state to exist - is dependent upon the extent to which it recognises and protects the individual rights of its citizens. On the basis of this inviolable fact of reality, no authoritarian state has a moral right to exist - that is, has absolutely no moral legitimacy. The objective standard for judging the moral legitimacy of a nation state is the objective principle of individual rights, the principle defining and sanctioning a man's freedom in a social setting, the principle defining and sanctioning a man's rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness. It is by this objective standard alone - the principle of individual rights - that the moral legitimacy of a nation state - any nation state - should be judged.
A nation state that INSTITUTES the recognition and protection of individual rights, or does so largely, as is the case with Israel, has a moral right to exist.
A nation state that institutes the VIOLATION of individual rights as a matter of principle, as any Palestinian state ruled by Hamas, the Palestinian Authority or any Islamist, Marxist or other authoritarian entity DOES and WOULD, has no moral right to exist - no moral legitimacy.
Furthermore, it would be morally just for any rights-respecting state or entity to forcibly remove any rights-violating authoritarian government and replace it with a rights-respecting one.
Israel is the ONLY democracy in the Middle East, where people are NOT persecuted for their beliefs and enjoy full, equal human rights to all!
The Israeli people have no issue with "Palestinians" merely for simply existing, you can’t say the same for the opposite.
50
-
That sounds like Oren of "Travelling Israel". He is absolutely SPOT ON in all his videos, and ALWAYS admits when/IF he makes mistakes. Whenever I've checked with Historical sources, (British Library, Chatham House, Washington Archives, UN Archives, etc) I have NEVER found a single fault in Oren's knowledge. He rates up there with Colonel Kemp, Natasha Hausdorff, Douglas Murray, and of course, Ollie Anisfeld
49
-
37
-
35
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
AND in Theology ! Even the Quran makes NO mention of "palestine". Not a SINGLE reference.
However there ARE over TWENTY Surah all mentioning ISRAEL ! Surah 10:93 even makes it VERY clear that ALL that land was "Allotted unto THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL" i.e., in perpetuity for ALL time ! !
Other Surah ALL mentioning “Children Of Israel” :
2:40, 2:47, 2:83, 2:122, 2:211, 2:246, 3:49, 3:93, 5:12, 5:32, 5:70, 5:72, 5:78, 5:110, 7:105, 7:134, 7:137, 7:138, 10:90, 10:93, 17:2, 17:4, 17:101, 17:104, 20:47, 20:80, 20:94, 26:17, 26:22, 26:59, 26:197, 27:76, 32:23, 40:53, 43:59, 44:30, 45:16, 46:10, 61:6, 61:14
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
22
-
Absolutely spot on ! David Dalen and John Rothman's excellent book outlines his close contacts with Hitler BEFORE WW2 and in 1941 where Hitler promised to give Al Husseini "Jurisdiction and free reign in all Arab Lands" on conclusion of WW2. While living in Berlin from 1943 - 1945 he also visited Auschwitz to watch the gassing and was described by Himmler as "appearing gleeful" ! !
For his role recruiting and "advising" the 13th SS Handschar Division in their "Anti Partisan" and round ups of Jews in the Balkans he was wanted as a War Criminal, but like you rightly said, he mysteriously evaded prosecution
By the way, he didn't just "mentor" Yasser Arafat, he was Arafat's distant Uncle !
There is a Record of the conversation of the Grand Mufti with the Foreign Minister in Berlin on November 28, 1941
* * * * Documents on German Foreign Policy 1918-45, Series D, Vol. XIII, London, 1964, pp. 881
On Aug. 28, 1946, Dean Acheson, then Acting Secretary of State, announced that "the State Dept. is preparing a White Paper concerning the wartime activities of the ex-Mufti of Jerusalem." Acheson said the publication would be in the form of a book, which would cover all the documents concerning the ex-Mufti seized from German files that were relevant to his prosecution.
That White Paper has not yet been published, as far as I know.
22
-
@B49337 No ! There has NEVER been any such distinct ethnic group, OR any such country. EVER ! If there HAD been, it would have been mentioned at least once in the Holy Quran or Bible. There are ZERO mentions !
The KGB created this "Palestinian" identity in 1964 through Yasser Arafat
Before 1964, NO Arabs even called themselves Palestinian because the Holy Land / Levant was known by Arabs as Yahuda wa Samara (land of Judah -the Jews and Samaria).
Only a few years after Arafat re-adopted the British Mandate descriptive name of “Palestine”, Zuheir Mohsen a senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization, declared,
"There's no such thing as a separate Palestinian people, there's no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese... the Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons. The creation of a Palestinian state is a NEW instrument in our ongoing war against the state of Israel and for the purpose of our Arab unity".
- March 1977 interview with Dutch newspaper Trouwe.
22
-
22
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
@kerenkroll Absolutely spot on ! ! The only people NOT calling themselves "palestinian" during the "British Mandated Protectorate of palestine" were the ARAB NATIONALISTS, headed by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin Al Husseini, also Head of The Arab Club and their successor The Higher Arab Committee, who, right from 1920 after San Remo, right up to 1937 Peel Commission declared that they were TOTALLY against use of the term “Palestine” and the whole idea of Palestinians, as it was seen as a British/ZIONIST invention and they would therefore fight ANY Palestinian state as it would split Syria.
Hence in J.B. Barron's 1922 Census “Report and General Abstracts of the Census of 1922 by JB Barron” where there were ONLY 757,000 people IN TOTAL : (including Jews,(83,794), Christians,(73,024), Arabs (590,890)..) but NO ONE “identifying” AS “palestinian” because THAT was the COLONIAL name and they hated the BRITISH, believing them to be PRO-“Zionist”.
It was PURELY a tactical propaganda ploy in 1967 to use that name, which had NEVER even been a country ! ONLY ever a BRITISH protectorate !
14
-
14
-
Very well said my friend, and I TOTALLY agree !
Surely the moral legitimacy of a nation state - the moral right of a nation state to exist - is dependent upon the extent to which it RECOGNISES and protects the individual rights of its citizens. On the basis of this inviolable fact of reality, no authoritarian state has any moral right to exist - that is, has absolutely no moral legitimacy. The objective standard for judging the moral legitimacy of a NATION state is the objective principle of individual rights, the principle defining and sanctioning a man's freedom in a social setting, the principle defining and sanctioning a man's rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness.
It is by this objective standard alone - the principle of individual rights - that the moral legitimacy of a nation state - ANY nation state - should be judged. A nation state that institutes the recognition and protection of individual rights, or does so largely, as IS the case with Israel, has a moral right to exist.
A nation state that institutes the VIOLATION of individual rights as a matter of principle, as any Palestinian state ruled by Hamas, the Palestinian Authority or any Islamist, Marxist or other authoritarian entity would, has NO moral right to exist - no moral legitimacy.
Furthermore, it would be morally just for any rights-respecting state or entity such as The U.N. to forcibly remove any rights-violating authoritarian government and replace it with a rights-RESPECTING one.
Israel is the ONLY democracy in the Middle East, where people are NOT persecuted for their beliefs and enjoy full, equal human rights to all!
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
@C.E.Thomas1952 You are so VERY welcome, my friend. MORE than welcome !
I have been doing exactly the same since Oct. 7th as I have Jewish friends, but especially as when I was 6years old, my best friend was Hannah, who I went everywhere with. She always invited me home for tea with her parents, and vice versa. As a little child I had not fully taken in what the tattoos on both her parents forearms, actually represented ? I just knew that Manny and Frieda made GORGEOUS food, and treated me SO kindly and gently. I moved away at 10yrs, but hooked up with Hannah many years later, by which time I had learned what those Tattoos were. Hannah did her Aliyah when she was 22 and married,.
Oct. 7th hit me a lot as that could have easily been her !
NEVER stop speaking the truth my friend, all those sick, and ignorant lies WITHER in the light of what is TRUE, and the more I read, the more it sickens me how all those lies and inversions OF truth, come from a very dark and twisted place, that it seems they wish to return Humanity to ? (Jahiliyah in Arabic) To LIGHT and LIFE, L'CHAIM and go well my friend.
Am Yisrael CHAI !
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10