Comments by "GodsOwnPrototype" (@GodsOwnPrototype) on "Labour’s pork-barrel multiculturalism | The spiked podcast" video.

I agree with your point about pork-barrel politics being present across the parties but if you believe multiculturalism had to happen, has to continue and isn’t going to destroy the country you are delusional.
5
@Johnshaw111 I'm not sure how much attention you have been paying in terms of what is told to native Britons about what they should believe about themselves, their country and their heritage, or the changes in the types and amounts of crime that has occurred since the growth of foreign ethnic communities and multiculturalism. Despite the Act of Union putting a Scottish King on the English & UK throne and the Scots being among the most enthusiastic British Imperial actors, receive a higher proportion of UK Gov spending than any other home nation they now band-waggon on the foreign anti-Imperial Narrative to claim to be oppressed by the UK and wish to break from the Union. To take one self organising group of ethnic foreigners, there were at the last census more Muslims in the UK than the Manx, the Cornish and the Welsh put together and this census may show they have demographic parity with or overtaken that of Scots. The English are already a minority in their Capital city and of births in England and will become an absolute minority in England around mid century. Native Britons will become an absolute minority around 2066, sooner if NI merges with the Republic and Scotland leaves the latter will open their borders as a means of boosting their economy as they have already stated is their intention. So the future for the UK is looming break up and ethnic Britons are taught by the majority of educational and media institutions to hate their heritage and be ashamed of their ancestors and country and feel guilty for being themselves as minorities in their own homelands.
4
@Johnshaw111 So, for context, definitionally from the UN Convention: "genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole *or in part*, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;" is something you seem to actually support or are indifferent to because you don't care about the continuing existence of any particular groups. If the Jews were convinced to all abandon their identity, culture and heritage it wouldn't matter to you and the same for Britons, and any native people or culture. Your indifference is your own business but don't claim it to be a moral high ground.
3
@Johnshaw111 The founding father and leader of one of the World's most successful countries for over 30years is "very obscure", LOL, OK then. The point was to present a credible outside perspective, but I forget, you believe there are no meaningful differences between people, I should have just picked something by David Lammy or Kehinde Andrews or Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. People are meaningfully no different, no problem if some peoples disappear or are replaced by the demographic projects of power elites, nothing to see here. British is now a word with quite some history to it and about which there is some contention regarding it's application and use, which has been greatly broadened from being the civilisation and peoples of the British Isles united under one crown and parliament to the vague and wishy washy 'values' of today, which have apparently been recently updated to include unquestioning support for those claiming to be transgender. I can hardly be blamed for not swiftly presenting you all that mess into a complete tidy watertight package.
2
@Johnshaw111 & there it is: the accusation & pulling in from nowhere into the conversation of claims of purity & superiority; claims that are never brought in when the Jews claim they exist as a people, (even as God's Chosen), or Afghans or the Japanese or when the Maōri or the Malagasy claim to be natives of their current and long lived in lands. That is your paradigm. Not mine. I wish the preservation of the heritage and constitution of my people in our homelands. What about this is so incomprehensible, objectionable and deserving of essential deconstruction? We are an archipelago of islands, how could it's native peoples be demographically outnumbered and extirpated in area of it without the ruling power elite of the country dismantling defences and incentivising inflows, downbeating objections and normalising the process in law and culture? We are supposed to be a Democracy whose ministers and monarch are bound by oaths to preserve our constitution and customs as a people with a common law and rich varied culture, and yet the greatest and most rapid Demographic changes in over three millennia are being imposed by policies that were never proposed to the people let alone received a mandate to occur: We Were Never Asked.
2
@Johnshaw111 Well thank you for your efforts sir and on a whole raft of issues we may agree there's been much improvement. However I'm afraid you are naive and ignorant of many of the real changes that have occurred that would have been unthinkable moral evils in your youth. That the police can casually report that they realistically estimate 10s of thousand of vulnerable children and young people each year will be sexually enslaved and gang raped multiple times with almost all perpetrators never being arrested and charged let alone tried and recieving just punishment is just one such case. Perhaps it is because I have x4 young daughters that this moves me where it does not move you. As for an avatar & nom de plume it is precisely because of that offence taking and that an Englishman is not free to speak plain honest English in England without jeopardising his employment and relationships.
2
@Johnshaw111 I had previously meant to include a recommendation of a 15min speech given by Lee Kuan Yew, the founder of Singapore, in London in 2002, (easy to find with that info), for an outsiders testimony on what things Were like. So, whether you know or declare this honestly or not, by your own admission, you're an ethnic and racial communist of a sort. Whatever spell of indoctrination in such a belief system I myself was under earlier in life was broken soon after my 2nd child was born and they were evidently very different from my 1st. The idea that in the 21st century, given our level of knowledge about the biological composition of and influences on people's lives, you would assert there to be no meaningful differences among us goes against everything except social engineering propaganda. 'The British' in the context of my point No.2 was in reference to the peoples of the British Isles united under Imperial rule, who did indeed claim and view themselves to be a God ordained people. Given that you've admitted you believe there are no meaningful differences between peoples there is little point giving you a definition of British beyond that.
1
@Johnshaw111 Yes, I don't like many of them; given that they include a sharp decline in civility, and most social norms across the board including ones not questioned for over a millennium or more in most places across the world as well as ones quite special to these Isles. I don't like the imposition of taboos that give cover to the unwanted ways of criminals permitting them to grow unaddressed such as the organised gang rape and sexual enslavement of the vulnerable, the genital mutilation of children, forced marriage of children, increasingly casual murder by stabbing and shooting, the trashing of our culture and denomisation of our ancestors and ourselves today on racial and ethnic grounds and the raising to special privileges outsiders because they are outsiders such that it is illegal not just to help our own but speak aspects of our own language in our own land that those of visibly foreign extraction have free use of and to merely describe some aspects of reality is socially, economically and legally dangerous. Why you would not mind these changes or the minoritisation of your children and grand children in their historic homeland I don't understand as presumably there are things less weighty that you do care about. As for would I mind still or as much if we had been asked? I think it perfectly obvious that this has been brought about through covert means and would not have occurred otherwise, at least for a long time at the beginning. I lament that we have been disarmed and immobilised and accepted mischaracterising paradigms that prevent many people even seeing the changes let alone giving full throated objections or taking actions against them.
1