Comments by "Игоррь Романов" (@igorrromanov) on "Putin's nuclear threat: Russia is ready to use nuclear weapons if statehood is threatened" video.

  1. It's not a THREAT, it is a WARNING.
    29
  2. I am amused. Which nuclear power (THE ONLY ONE!) has a preemptive strike postulate in its military doctrine?
    4
  3. This is just a WARNING, although a stern one. 1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL. Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON.
    2
  4.  @andrew2371  so - I am right. There is no any threat.
    2
  5. It is diametrically opposite💩🇺🇲💩
    1
  6. You just over-eat of US propaganda. Take fleet-soda or magnesium citrate
    1
  7.  @speedking1353  NO - US IS DIRECTLY THREATENING, NOT WARNING. 1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL. Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON.
    1
  8.  @hoseovalle-hm5re  simple to define. 1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON. CAPISCI, BOZOBRAIN?🤪
    1
  9. NO - IT IS NOT. 1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL. Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON.
    1
  10.  @hoseovalle-hm5re  1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL. Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON.
    1
  11.  @mikewallace8087  NO - IT IS NOT. 1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL. Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON.
    1
  12.  @hoseovalle-hm5re  1) THREAT: UNCONDITIONAL. Example: USA has a doctrine of preemptive strike. THERE ARE NO CONDITIONS. JUST THEIR CONSIDERATIONS. 2) WARNING: CONDITIONAL. Russia WARNS, that IF it will be a threat to its very existence, THEN IT WILL USE NUCLEAR WEAPON.
    1