Comments by "" (@BharatThatIsIndia) on "Israel is angry, Netanyahu poised for Gaza invasion. But there are limitations to military power" video.

And biggest example of that is Assam and other north east issues solved by successive Indian governments
2
@col.waltervonschonkopf69 wow. So you think the Assam accord was done by the Intelligence agency? Then why they are not able to control the Manipur issue, when a incompetent CM is der? Rajiv Gandhi made disaster in Srilanka. But Give Credit where it is due. Rajiv Gandhi has done a great job in Assam. He sacrificed his state government. He has done that not some intelligence officer. Obviously they will support, implement those.
2
Right now, I don't think anyone will even dare to say it. But terrorist organisations like HAMAS like Leaders like Netanyahu. He will go to the UN and show the entire region as Israel, dismiss the 2 state solutions, undermine PLO and expect the people of Palestine to accept all that??? If PLO peaceful means will be seen ineffective, People will start supporting terrorist organisation and that's why peaceful means are necessary and must be allowed. Else it will only benefit the HAMAS.
1
@AmalTan First of all, Read the comment properly. Then read history and understand facts before commenting. 1. Kashmir is part of India legally. 2. Kashmir is morally part of India bcz its biggest leader Shekh Abdullah was with India in 1947. 3. Yes we have done some mistakes and der are some issue in Kashmir but Kashmir issue is nothing like Israel Palestine issue and India has not captured any land. 4. India never tried to change the demographic of Kashmir valley too. Not even during Modi government who is seen Anti muslims. Still India never did that. 5. Pakistan has a delusion and they wanted to capture Kashmir from India. So they illegally tried to capture it though war and when they failed multiple times, they started terrorism. Terrorism in Kashmir is sponsored by a greedy, fool, delusional nation where An Army to justify der position and privileges in Pakistani society, promotes terrorism. On the other hand, Palestine was with Arabs and Zionist, after persecution from Europe came to Palestine where they had ruled for 73 years 2000 years earlier. They first bought lands and then started capturing those lands and finally with support from colonial power then captured Palestinians lands But till 1990 everyone accepted that Israel is reality and they signed OSLO accord,which Israel has not fulfilled. They are colonial power, who captured the Palestinian lands and now making Palestinians the 2nd class citizens. This is what British does to Indians for 200 years. Only difference was that they had to leave India. They are changing the demographic reality of Palestine, even in the west bank where der is no HAMAS. At least hear Atal ji's speech on this. HAMAS is a terrorist organisation. And if they keep killing citizens in GAZA, HAMAS will become more powerful. Even if they are destroyed today, they will come back and will be more dangerous and inhuman than today. So the only way is, the 2 state solutions and OSLO accord.
1
@AmalTan First of all, Israel is occupiers but India is not. This is the difference. What other sides says doesn't matter bcz it is not based on facts. Der was a partition in India and rule was same for all states. Same was followed for Sindhiya or Kerla or Kashmir. Indians didn't come from Europe to capture Kashmir. Now, Israel can be occupiers but you cannot go and kill civilians just like that. And definitely you cannot directly attack the civilian. If you are doing so, you are a terrorist organisation. Anyone who is justifying the killings by HAMAS, is a terrorist sympathizer. HAMAS can attack Israel's defence forces and win the war. Now, my whole point is, by not accepting two states solutions and rejecting OSLO accord, humiliating the PLO and peace process, Israel has created a situation where HAMAS like organisations will become stronger day by day and even if Israel destroys HAMAS today, they will again come back. A political, peaceful solution and a country for Palestinians will solve this issue. And 2 state solutions will be better for Israel more than anything else. A legitimate Palestinian Government can be controlled using multiple ways, but not HAMAS like terrorist organisation.
1
@AmalTan Again, don't bring Kashmir and Palestine together. Both are completely different things, different issues. If you capture my land, the. You are a coloniser. If I will claim on your land which is on your name, which you own and for which you have legal documents and I am still claiming for certain reason, then I am a delusional or a goon or at best a person with some support in locality and they will back my claim. But in rule of law, or in court, you will win. And plebiscite.. for that Pakistan has to remove all der forces from the POK and then India will even think about it. This is the UN resolution. First is not going to happen, at least willingly. So there is no way 2nd will happen. And you will find it difficult, but even today if der is a Plebiscite in Kashmir Valley itself and der is only 2 options, then the majority of people will choose India. Kashmiri had rejected Pakistan in 1948 and they will reject it again.
1
@AmalTan Again, I never justified the attack. I am only saying that a terrorist organisation gets its strength if people feel that they are not going to get justice by peaceful means. Example - In Assam der was terrorism. Rajiv Gandhi did Assam Accord along with military action. Once the political solution was reached, Assam people stopped supporting those anti India terrorists and eventually the terrorist organisation was destroyed. It was in that sense Israel is enabling HAMAS. Not the justification of any of HAMAS killing and its hateful bigoted agenda.
1
@col.waltervonschonkopf69 Arrey yaar. Do you think MS Dhoni alone won the world cup? So those who take decisions, those who are blamed for failure, should get the praise also. Finally, Any officer can do anything but decisions are always taken by the leader and hence they get credit/blame, and not the officers. Rajiv Gandhi got credit for Assam Accord. It was very important accord in Indian history. The same way, he was blamed for the Srilanka disaster which is another important part of our history. Obviously both of these are felicitated by IAS, Intelligence officers. But again the credit or blame goes to the leader as they take decisions.
1