Comments by "" (@BharatThatIsIndia) on "Why did Muslims in Maharashtra vote for Uddhav’s Shiv Sena: move to secular Hindutva with INC-NCP" video.

Bal Thackeray, Moving from Maratha only to Hindutva, made the situation of Shiv Sena precarious vis a vis BJP. BJP being a bigger Hindutva party was always going to surpass Shiv Sena and that's what happened. Now, only time will tell how this "secular Hindutva" is going to work for Uddbhav Thakarey.
24
It can be like Soyabean chicken masala too.
9
Wow. BJP got 1% less vote than 2019 and they fought more seats. Consider that too.
6
 @nitinpatel1039 Ajit Pawar fought only 4 seats, he won 1. If all 3 would have been fought by BJP or Shinde, still they would have got at max 3 more seats. Math is important. You know.
3
@nitinpatel1039 I got it. But why were those same people Calling it a master stroke when Modi Shah did it? Again, 3 seats they lost bcz of Ajit Pawar losing it. What was the BJP strike rate? BJP can get Shinde sena vote na? They did too. But still lost. The problem is deeper than NCP or Ajit Pawar.
3
@itzmontupatel yes, but when shekhar ji is talking about Secular Hindutva, it means it is not against Muslims. They will not abuse Muslims. Same way, obviously Muslims voted bcz of congress and NCP. But if UBT had not changed his stance, then may be Owaisi would have given his candidate der and he could have got the vote. So UBT has to redefine his hindutva.
2
 @nitinpatel1039 Obviously, but by then Modi, Shah will not be der, by then BJP might be not a force that big, etc.
1
@manjulashanmugasundaram706 I don't think Mr Adani is doing that. It is Mr Modi who is doing it as a favour for Mr Adani.
1