Comments by "" (@BharatThatIsIndia) on "Rural Punjab is a time capsule: falling economy, rising religiosity, bad politics" video.

  1. Wow. And it doesn't have anything to do with BJP and der "fool Chamchas" calling all farmers "Khalistani". It is nothing to do BJP majoritarian politics and guys like you calling protestors or even simple dissenting Punjabi "Khalistani". By the way, Pakistan and China were trying this even during 2000, 2005, 2010 and still there was no problem. Kabhi apne "Maalik" ko bhi dosh de do If China and Pakistan are able to do this within India then "Amit Shah" is an incompetent HM.
    10
  2.  @greenrico10  These people will do anything, accuse anyone but der "Maalik". He said Pakistan and China are enabling the Khalistani along with Akali Dal. So basically he is saying - "Amit Shah is incompetent along with S Jayasankar, who are not able to Stop Pakistan and China to amend within our country and not able to counter them on the world stage. And eventually he is accusing Modi to not able to stop this."
    4
  3.  @HeavenRacer422  First of all read history. Whatever u get on ur WhatsApp and from Sudheer Chaudhari or Modi ji, that is "Rubbish". Congress has not divided India. Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha, Savarkar, Shayma Prasad has done that/supported that directly/indirectly. Who formed governments with Muslim League? Who was in government with Muslim League in Sindh when the resolution for Pakistan was passed? What was happening in Bengal? Read history. Now for Punjab. Yes, Congress has made a grave mistake and they accepted it and corrected it. Unlike Modi who is keeping the same CM in Manipur and creating a civil war-like situation in Manipur. First of all, I was talking about India and congress both paying price. But lets talk about Congress. Congress paid price- I know the limit of WhatsApp University but Indira Gandhi was killed bcz of that and that communalism started another communalism after 1984 and finally congress never able to get full majority after that. Modi ji got an India which didn't have any major insurgency, except in Kashmir, Baster (which is not yet solved). Now He created a civil war in Manipur. Khalistan is back in Punjab and a man comes from outside and demands Khalistan which Bhinderawala has not done openly. Apart from Road(toll highways) and External terrorism (which has some global reasons as well), der is almost nothing which Modi can claim in the last 10 years. Hence his campaign is only on "Hindu Muslim", "Mujara", "Mutton", "Pakistan", etc. Finally he has to do "Chasma Pahan kar DHYAN".
    2
  4. The main problem with religious politics on the name of majority religion, is that it will drive all the minorities to do der own divisive politics. The hate will increase day by among communities, the nation will be broken into fragments internally and peace will never be ensured. On the other hand, If a minority does religious politics, it will be isolated, no other minority will join them and eventually that religious politics will be rejected by that minority itself.
    2
  5.  @priyanshumishra5778  जितनी "औकात" हो उतनी ही बात करनी चाहिए बबुआ। तुम्हारी है नहीं कोई "हैसियत"। "चम चा" होना मोदी का, कोई qualification नहीं है और ना ही "जाति वादी", "जह रीला", "जाहि ल" होना ही। वैसे, हज़ारों सालों की लूट के बाद भी "आरक्षण" के लिए तुमलोग ही रो रहा था। खैर। तेरे पास इतनी "बुद्धि" होती तो क्या ही कहने थें।
    1
  6. Yes, Congress has done that mistake and then corrected it. Obviously not without paying a price for that. But Why this problem stared again during Modi era? It didn't happen even during Atal ji or Manmohan Singh ji goverment. What is Amit Shah doing except accusing all of protesting farmers to be a "Khalistani"? Obviously he asked his social media " goons" to accuse them. Kabhi apne "Maalik" ko bhi dosh diya Karo babua. Kabhi to DESH ke baare me soch lo. Har baar "Maalik" ka nahin '"Chatana" hota hai.
    1
  7.  @StayAlertfrom786  Again Read history. Only 3% of muslims were eligible for voting in India during that time. Those were Jinnah supporters and they voted for Jinnah. In the same way , Hindu Mahasabha votes in some places. British design this election in that way. Those who voted for Pakistan went to Pakistan in 1947. Yeah but you guys are so "hateful" that u will accuse congress, Gandhi, Nehru ( U guys ignore patel, but Nehru and Patel were together) for partition which is also Pakistan narrative.
    1
  8.  @StayAlertfrom786  Yes, bcz those 3 percent were the Muslim League supporters. Even after Pakistan was created, Those upper class muslims didn't give anything to poor Bengali Muslims. They treated them as 2nd class citizens. So that is the base of Pakistan and that's why it was broken. The poor, be it a Hindu, Muslims, Sikh, they don't want to leave der village for anything but work. In 1947, they didn't want to change der place. So they could not have supported the creation of Pakistan. You can see by one fact. After Independence, Indian Muslims didn't create any Muslim leadership. They voted for parties led by Hindus. Owaisi is leader of one City and in kerla Indian Muslim league is der to play small role. But no dominant leader. I think that was der learning from what the got from Jinnah and der educated class during independence.
    1
  9.  @StayAlertfrom786  😂😂😂 You are wrong about BJP being elitist.BJP is supported and created by elitist mindset. U check the things BJP/Jansangh used to do. They were parties of Landlords. Till 1989 they were party of upper caste and Bania. These groups are social elitist. So they support Right wing elitist. Creation of Pakistan - Obviously, Muslim elite created it. Der is no doubt about that. Today also, these ultra nationalist Right wing "BJP goons" are "killing poor muslims" who do menial jobs. Elite muslims are sitting in der banglows and enjoying all benifits which they used to do during congress rule. Do you know any Muslim elite who is having less benifits in Modi era than Congress era? Yes, they are against different kinds(Left wing) of Elite, which all right wing political party will be. U check USA or Italy. It doesn't matter. Regarding my point about Elite - I voted for the BJP till 2017. Till date, I voted more for BJP than any other party. I was so sad after 2017 that I didn't vote in 2019 general elections which is the only time, I have not voted in my life. I actually believed Modi can change India for the better. But after 3 months of #Notebandi, I checked a few pieces of data and saw the disaster what #Notebandi was. I will request you to check a few simple things. See the Indian economic situation, All the good ideas Of Modi like Jandhan, Swatch Bharat, Make In India, Skill, Digital India, smart cities etc came before #Notebandi. After that he was only doing Hindu Muslim, Kapdo se pahchano, Mutton, Mujra, etc. just check these. I used to listen to his speeches and hence saying all these.
    1
  10.  @Victor-y9g1w  कहां से आते हो तुमलोग? किस द्रव्य का सेवन करते हो? Illegal है "ड्रग्स" लेना भारत में, पता है ना? मतलब "जहा लत" की लिमिट होती है।
    1
  11.  @StayAlertfrom786  Again Read History. Educated ( those with Graduation degrees) are more "bigot" and "fool" than non educated. Just see today's India. U can just replicate the same in 1947. Religious Politics is almost always supported by powerful, educated, rich people of that religion. Hindu voted for congress and seperate electorate was for Muslims and not for general Hindus. So Hindus were not going to vote Muslim League. Congress was seen as a party of Hindus. That was the whole politics of Jinnah. When Gandhi was killed, he said "Great Hindu Leader" was killed. Congress had leaders with a strong Right wing mind set and also those who are to left leaning. Congress was more of an umbrella organisation. Hindu Mahasabha and Muslim League both were against Congress and were helping each other.
    1
  12.  @StayAlertfrom786  and one more thing. The irony and biggest problem of Muslims is that the educated Muslims are more bigoted than the uneducated one. Here education means those with Graduation/Undergraduate degrees. I have not done any survey but that's what my understanding and experience is.
    1
  13.  @StayAlertfrom786  I am saying again and again, that you have to read. You are comparing superfluously. I will answer all ur questions, just a few questions first - 1. Do you think der is something called God/Bhagwan/Allah/Son of God, etc? 2. Do you think, Modi ji is not biological? 3. Do you think Hindu dharm is in danger? 4. Do you think Modi ji or BJP is the one who can or is saving Hindu Dharma? 5. Do you think Congress is a Muslim party or not party for Hindu? 6. Do you think that Congress has done nothing in 60 years and everything was done by Modi in 10 years? 7. Do you think, all those who are voting for the BJP are "bigot", "Muslim Hater" or they think that Congress will give der Mangalsutra to "Muslims"? 8. Do you think Modi will change the constitution (major change) if he wins 370+ seats? All are important questions, and the 7th one is most important.
    1
  14.  @StayAlertfrom786  I asked bunch of questions. If u answer those, I will answer ur questions. Why are Muslims today not voting for Owasi everywhere? And why 40-50%+ Hindus voted for the BJP in 2014 but they were not voting for the BJP in 2009? The simple answer is, Charismatic leadership, political management, good speech, love, hope and most importantly fear. Modi in 2014 created hope and in 2024 he is relying on fear. Jinnah in 1945 was relying on fear. People react based on the current environment. See what happened to the Muslim league in just previous election. Same voters, different choices. So read. Why Hindu voted for congress. Bcz congress has leaders like Patel and Rajendra Prasad, who were Right wing thinking leaders(obviously they were well read and not bigot like today's BJP leaders). They were Charismatic. People loved and trusted them. Gandhi was der and he brought religion (Hindu Religion and Ram) into politics. Obviously he added Ishwar Allah in his prayers to accommodate everyone. His Ram was inclusive and secular. But just watch any of Modi ji's speech and u can understand how Jinnah could have used "The Gandhi Ram" to brainwash Muslims (educated first). None of Hindu Mahasabha leaders were charismatic and the one who has the charisma "Shyama Prasad Mukherjee", he won. Hitler,Mao, Jinnah, Putin, Modi,etc all are charismatic leaders of der respective time and we all know, if time is suitable "hate" politics is very easy to replicate and can be used to become a dominant force. Just on today India, Owaisi can debate but he doesn't have charisma. So Indian Muslims are not going to vote for him. He can win 1-2 odd seats here and der but cannot be leaders of muslims in India.
    1
  15.  @drg598  पंजाब में समस्या 1975 के बाद से ही थी। दंगे आदि सब हो रहे थें। और हां, 1980 में भी Majority Politics हो रही थी। 1984 में तो कांग्रेस खुलेआम कर रही थी। RSS कांग्रेस का साथ दे रही थी तब। ये भी सच है।
    1
  16. @hj2711 😂😂😂 why I should reject both? If a political party is doing good politics which is better for the country at that point of time, why should I reject it? And This type of politics did not start after 1947, it was present before that.
    1
  17. @hj2711 Seriously? Before 1947 der was no country... Read..
    1