Comments by "" (@BharatThatIsIndia) on "Why ex-IAS officer VK Pandian is in crosshairs of PM Modi, Amit Shah and Himanta Biswa Sarma" video.

BJP needs polarisation, be it Hindu Muslim, Jaat Non Jaat, Tamil Odia, etc. They have learnt from der master's i.e. "British" divide and rule politics.
12
@AmalTan Who said he will be CM? Is he the CM candidate now? Is der any announcement by BJD? By the way, Modi is MP from Vanaras and I don't think he is from UP. If you are talking about working from behind or doing work for a political party as number 2 or 3, then what about the Gujrat BJP president? He is not Gujrati. What about Amit Shah doing work, election rally in 2013-14 in UP? So when he becomes a CM candidate then you can talk about this. And I understand BJD politics and especially Navin Patnaik politics. Pandeyan is most likely to be removed in 2nd or 3rd year of the next BJD government. Just check what happened to piyari mohan.
4
@AmalTan Do you know, less knowledge is worst than no knowledge. This is the case with most of the people nowadays and almost always they are Modi ji Bhakt. For your info, Kejriwal is not from Delhi and he is CM of Delhi, Jayalalithaa was from Karnataka and CM of Tamilnadu, Kamalnath is originally from UP, but was CM of MP. Aadityanath is CM of UP but he is from Uttarakhand and don't tell that it was earlier part of the same state. Then it will apply to almost all states in India. Does "Son in law" become part of family and hence the state? By the way, what about Gujrat BJP president " Patil"? He is not Gujrati. Why is he the state BJP chief? Just check who is actually controlling the Gujrat government, CM or Patil? Pandeyan speaks Odia, he has worked his entire life in Odisa and for the people of Odisa. So his "Karmbhoomi" is Odisa. It is the same way for Gujrat BJP chief " CR Patil". "Pandiyan is power behind the throne" do u even understand the meaning of this? Naveen is the source of power and not the other way around.
3
@AmalTan and about projecting CM.. Did it happen? If it will happen then raise this. Not now. Also, Aadityantha was from Uttrakhand and he was not declared CM before elections. He was selected as a CM of UP , where as he was from Uttrakhand.
2
@AmalTan Again, He is not the CM yet. He was neither declared as a CM. He is at most the 2nd in command. I have given u examples of many people in many states becoming CM like this. Anything against the BJP example, like Yogi, who is actually a CM?? Der are 30+% Odia people who voted for BJP. Der are BJP workers. Obviously they will have a view against that. But u r not an Odia and u r generalizing this as hurt sentiments of other states, which is not true. Other states have cm from different states. So, Hypocrisy ki seema hoti hai. And read properly. I said "Most of the time they are Bhakts". I didn't say u r a Bhakt or not. It is up to u, whether u r part of " most of them" or "very few" of them. But one thing is certain. You don't make factual arguments. And obviously u know better about urself.
1
@AmalTan Again, Gujrat government is run by a Maharastriyan. He is not elected as a cm. Who is running a government from behind is speculation. Like, we can say Amit Shah is running MP and not the CM. But it is speculation. IAS are always running governments. He is number 2. Obviously he will be running the government. But CM will be Naveen Patnaik and let me tell you this. If one day he decides to remove Pandeyan, he will remove him like anything. Naveen gets the vote, he is the face and he is the power. In democracy, whoever gets the vote, is the power centre, whether ill or not doesn't matter. And mark my word, in 2nd or 3rd year, Naveen will remove Pandeyan, if he thinks that Pandeyan is trying to take over him.
1