Comments by "" (@BharatThatIsIndia) on "60th year of the 1965 war, a dive into where Pakistan lost out, in a war where it held the aces" video.

Whenever you talk about Wars, the smile on your face reveals, how much you love militry tactics, strategy and its history.
91
@Cardscricket U cannot realise it but hate makes people what you have become. You cannot even see and understand basic things properly.
4
@mtrajpoot2659 First of all 1000 years was not slavery. 800 years, if u include muslim rules. But that Muslim rule was not slavery. They were king from different countries who came and won some kings in India. That was the norm those days. India was under colonial rule and that was slavery.
2
@mtrajpoot2659 If u r going to take some land/recapture ur land, then u always need more men than who are already sitting and defending. And which battle, which post r you talking about? In Dhaka, Pakistan surrendered with 90+k soilders and ammunition. Also, if u cannot supply men, weapons and other reinforcement then it is ur problem. How can it be a problem to have more men, ammunition and reinforcement capability?
2
U cannot see it but hate makes people, not only blind but buddhu too. U r an example of that.
1
@Cardscricket Matlab kuchh v. U cannot see it but hate makes people, not only blind but I**diot too. U r an example of that.
1
Kya? Kuchh v? Matlab Kuchh bhi...😂😂😂
1
@mtrajpoot2659 A simple question. If Niazi has 35k Soldiers then how did he surrender with 93k soldiers? 93k Pakistani surrendered. This is a fact. Also even after his surrender, few Pakistani troops were fighting in distant areas. So use ur CS.
1
@mtrajpoot2659 Just Google, how many Pakistani soilders surrendered in 1971 in East Pakistan. Check Pakistani sources and then come back. By the way, how many Pakistani Soilders surrendered in East Pakistan?
1
@mtrajpoot2659 And Pakistani kept der family and civilians in war zone? So they were not only cowards (who surrendered without fighting) but also not wise enough to send der family back before war broke. War was not out of the blue. Also, Even if I accept ur number ( for argument sake), 35k is not a small number of Soldiers. And those who were fighting outside, didn't fight till the last bullet. Most of them also surrounded. So stop making false claims. Pakistan lost more than half of its country in 1971. This is rare in the post WW2 era. So stop making excuses.
1
@mtrajpoot2659 Hey Bhagwan. I already responded to that. 1-15 or 1-50 or even 1-300. It doesn't matter. What matters is, if we won the war or not. If I have a capacity to send 1 Million soilders for ur 10k Soilders, I will send. That is not ur problem. U also can send, if u have that much capacity. Defending army always needs smaller numbers. So we sent 15 times more soldiers. We could have sent 25 times the soldiers that Pakistan has. Why r u bothered about that? Now my question. Google it. How many surrendered? Is even 35k is not good enough to fight? They could have fought till the last bullet and could have killed at least 1-2k Indians. But they surrendered. Again, if 35k were Soilders and others were family members. then this is a huge question on Pakistani mind. How can u do that in a war zone?
1
@mtrajpoot2659 😂😂😂 Yes, those who surrendered to Russia were German Soilders or SS or Nazi party members. Are you serious when u t giving reference to Jews? Again, the question is - Even if I accept ur argument that only 35k were Soilders in East Pakistan, it is not a small number. Why can't they fight with Indian Soldiers? What cannot they fight till the last bullet? Why India is hated in Bangladesh? Obviously der were 30% Jamati who were Pakistani supporters. So they hate India. Also Bcz of Shekh Hasina and Modi, der is some resentment. That will be gone in sometime automatically. So don't worry about this. Answer the question. Why did 35k Pakistani Soilders surrendered without fighting? Why were they so brave😂
1
@mtrajpoot2659 😂😂😂 I think u r living in ur own world. I can understand why the situation in Pakistan is what it is today. By the way, Indian army total count is 1.5 million now. So it was never millions and millions. Second, Pakistan cowardly lost more than half of its country. Thirdly, Bangladeshi muslims helped Indian army Bcz Pakistan army does what it did- killed der own countrymen. And I think u r forgetting the most important part. Why did this all star? If you remember (if u r not brainwashed), Shekh Mujibur has won that election and u west Pakistani didn't want so called lesser Bengalis, to be ruling Pakistan. So read your country's history,which is filled with unthinkable bad things. And again the question remains - why even 35k Soilders surrendered without fighting? Were not they cowards? Atleast accept the reality.
1