Comments by "" (@BharatThatIsIndia) on "Modi’s new universe: the normal irritants of democracy u0026 awkward chai with Rahul Gandhi" video.

  1. If Modi would have won this election by getting even 273 seats, he would have declared himself GOD(from his pre election Avatar claims). Now, Modi can do anything with help of Naidu and Nitish but he will be a mere PM, jyst like any other PM. His Devata, Avtar, Bhagwan, GOD and most importantly Invensible persona has gone. It is not going to come back even after huge help from his GODI and Bhakt TV media. This will be lesson for everyone going forward and noone will try to be the GOD again, atleast for next 50 years.
    43
  2.  @VictimHood-qv1hx  yes, he was a winner. BJP tried to destroy congress, they claimed to get 370 seats, they lost 60+ seats from the previous government, they lost UP, they lost Ayodhya and der margin is reduced significantly in Banaras. NDA came down to some 295 seats. Modi didn't' achieve its target and opposition with all its limitations for money and resources were able to achieve+ve results. Congress increases its seat by 50 and the INDIA alliance gets some 235 seats. Just 20-30 less seats for Modi and the entire story would have changed. So, yes it is a win for Rahul, the person who was made into a Pappu (by false videos and other propaganda) has struck back. These 99 seats bring down a wannabe AVATAR to a mere mortal, is the victory of Rahul.
    13
  3.  @nitinpatel1039  so what will happen if Rahul will not become PM? Sonia has a chance and she didn't become. They could have made Rahul PM in 2010-12. They didn't. I think the Congress coalition government or BJP coalition government without Modi and Shah will do way better than the Modi government. Literally anyone, except Modi Shah, will do better for this country and its people.
    11
  4.  @rajx7120  "Rahul was minister without portfolio" - When did this happen? KUCHH jyada le rahe ho, jo bhi le rahe ho tum .
    4
  5.  @chandankumarchand6686  If Modi had got 330 seats, what would you have called it? And even if Congress would have got the same 99 seats, Modi would still be the winner It is not a win for Modi ji. It's plain and simple. One example. Modi wanted to destroy Nitish, merge its leaders to BJP so that he could win Bihar on its own. Nitish has become stronger. Modi lost 1 seat In Gujrat. In the top 5 states, he was 2nd in the first 4 and had no seat in the last one. It is like "Kisi bhi Tarah se sarkar ban gayi." Just a face saving for Modi. For you a simple example. If a boy gives an exam and claims to get 95 marks out of 100 but he finally gets 45 marks, just above passing marks. Is it a victory for him? This election was all about Modi, Modi ki Guarantee, 400 seats, etc. so it is his loss.
    4
  6. Shekhar ji, you are right on point, like most of the times. I always thought that Targetting Modi extensively on Gujrat riots, created sympathy for him. This along with Sonia Gandhi calling him "Maut ka Saudagar" when she was most powerful person in India, made him "Hindu Hriday Samrat".
    3
  7.  @reach2prasanna  Your question is wrong. The question should be, which politician is fighting for Indians. If a problem exists in India, 80% of that problem was suffered by Hindus. So solving that problem will automatically become working for Hindus as well. By the way, what happened to Hindus 800 years ago? Who was suffering and by whom? Which types of Hindu were suffering before the year 1200? By the way, all the politicians in today's India fight for Hindus, even Owaisi. He also talks about Dalits and Adivasi. He talks about Hindu women left by their husbands. He might be a hypocrite like Modi is, but still he talks about Hindu welfare.
    3
  8. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the "integ rity" of India🤦 Modi cared about the "Inte grity" of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a "ci vil w_ar" like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China "capt ured" our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "com munal hatr ed" and giving speeches which are creating "divi de" within the country. A PM creating " divi de" for his political gains, is working for the "integ rity" of India. Wow... Your "log ic" is literally out of this world.
    2
  9. @reach2prasanna Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the "integ rity" of India🤦 Modi cared about the "Inte grity" of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a "ci vil w_ar" like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China "capt ured" our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "com munal hatr ed" and giving speeches which are creating "divi de" within the country. A PM creating " divi de" for his political gains, is working for the "integ rity" of India. Wow... Your "log ic" is literally out of this world.
    2
  10.  @reach2prasanna  The same way, Modi and BJP didn't show any worries, any empathy with Hindu women conditions,who are left by der husbands. Hypocrisy, you know. It is not only a Modi patent. By the way, Read my complete comment and then comment.
    2
  11.  @rajx7120  😂😂😂So you think BJP did #Notebandi? Right wing think tank brought this idea? By the way, what is the growth rate during Modi for 10 years and UPA 10 years? How many jobs were created during Modi 100 years? What is the average growth in per capita income of Indians? Bangladesh crossed us.
    2
  12.  @chandankumarchand6686  By the way, Faizabad/Ayodhya was with BJP in 2014 and 2019. It was even with them before too. Actually since 1991 till 2019, out of 8 elections, BJP has won Faizabad seats for 5 times and SP won it only once. I don't know which metrics u used to find that it was a difficult seat for BJP. I think it was a difficult seat for the SP and not the BJP.
    2
  13. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the "inte grity of India" 🤦 Modi cared about the " Integ rity of India" and hence he pushed Manipur in a civil war-like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China captured our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "comm unal hat red" and giving speeches which are creating divide within the country. A PM creating divide for his political gains, is working for the integrity of India. Wow... Your logic is literally out of this world.
    1
  14. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the "integ rity" of India🤦 Modi cared about the " Inte grity" of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a "ci vil war" -like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China captured our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "com munal hatr ed" and giving speeches which are creating "divi de" within the country. A PM creating " divi de" for his political gains, is working for the "integ rity" of India. Wow... Your logic is literally out of this world.
    1
  15. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the "integ rity" of India🤦 Modi cared about the "Inte grity" of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a "ci vil w_ar" like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China "capt ured" our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "com munal hatr ed" and giving speeches which are creating "divi de" within the country. A PM creating " divi de" for his political gains, is working for the "integ rity" of India. Wow... Your "log ic" is literally out of this world.
    1
  16. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the "integ rity" of India🤦 Modi cared about the "Inte grity" of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a "ci vil w_ar" like situation. Wow . India "lost" war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China "capt ured" our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "com munal hatr ed" and giving speeches which are creating "divi de" within the country. A PM creating " divi de" for his political gains, is working for the "integ rity" of India. Wow... Your "log ic" is " ou t" of this world.
    1
  17. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress was in power in India for 60+ years and they didn't "car e" about the "integ rity" of India🤦 Modi "car ed" about the "Inte grity" of India and hence he "pu shed" Manipur in a "ci vil w_ar" like situation. Wow . India "lost" war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China "capt ured" our land. But Modi didn't have the "gu ts" to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading "com munal hatr ed" and giving speeches which are creating "divi de" within the country. A PM creating "divi de" for his political gains, is working for the "integ rity" of India. Wow... Your "log ic" is " ou t" of this world.
    1
  18. @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the integrity of India🤦 Modi cared about the Integrity of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a civil war-like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China captured our land. But Modi didn't have the guts to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading communal "hat red" and giving speeches which are creating divide within the country. A PM creating divide for his political gains, is working for the integrity of India. Wow... Your logic is literally out of this world.
    1
  19.  @reach2prasanna  😂😂😂 Read History. So congress ruled India for 60+ years and they didn't care about the integrity of India🤦 Modi cared about the Integrity of India and hence he pushed Manipur in a civil war-like situation. Wow . India lost war with China in 1961 but still we can say that China captured our land. But Modi didn't have the guts to do it. He actually gave a clean chit to China. Modi is spreading communal hatred and giving speeches which are creating divide within the country. A PM creating divide for his political gains, is working for the integrity of India. Wow... Your logics are literally out of this world.
    1
  20.  @reach2prasanna  I cannot explain you the meaning of my comment. If you cannot understand even simple things, it is not worth wasting my time. Just one suggestion. Read again.
    1
  21.  @nitinpatel1039  Again read the facts. None of these are proven during Modi era. So either Modi is so incompetent or these charges were false. 2G scam was of 1.7 lakhs crore in 2008. India sold 4g for 1.5 lakhs crore in 2015-16. Do you think India was so rich During 2008 but became poor in 2015 and hence the price dropped? Coal scam - 10 lakhs crore scam. Do you see anything like this? Coal is getting that much money? Which coal mine lost that money? It was all big b**l sh*t.
    1
  22.  @reach2prasanna  Why Modi is bad for India? Do you need an answer for that? Just see his rule. #Notebandi, #Lockdown are the worst kind of decisions taken without consulting anyone. He destroyed the Indian economy after #Notebandi. He has created environment of hate in India. The same was done by Zia Ul Haque in Pakistan and see what that country has become. Pakistan was not a failed nation in 1980. Its growth rate was better than Indian growth rate, 1.5 times Indian per capita income. Only Hate has destroyed Pakistan. Modi is making India the same. He is the worst thing that happened to India.
    1
  23.  @krisgopi_8  I agree to most of ur points, except the ball one. India PM does not need balls. They need understanding of issues, humility when they get it wrong and strong will when it matters to India. Example - In last 30 years, PV Narshimha Rao taking economic reform decision, Atal ji taking decision to blast atomic bombs, Manmohan Singh (surprise 🙂) taking decision to go for Nuclear deal with USA. These were bold but rational decisions best suited for India and Indian people. On the other hand, Modi bold decision was #Notebandi, which was bold but irrational, which destroyed Indian economy. Everyone thinks that 370 was bold decision. I don't think so. Der was almost no impact of 370 decision on Modi electoral prospect and India getting sanction for this. 370 was already so week and Indian people didn't get anything out of this decision.
    1
  24.  @VictimHood-qv1hx  yes, he did that and hence lost 2014. He learnt from that.
    1
  25.  @VictimHood-qv1hx  Let him manage na? Modi ji giving 500 rs, 20 kg is not bankrupting the country? Obviously,when he will give 8500,he will stop these schemes. So Money will be just double. Less expenditure on advertisement and image building will help too.
    1
  26.  @kumarm5961  😂😂 I can understand your confusion, but everyone is not like you. I can't be a "Cham_cha" of any leader. That is reserved for people like you.
    1
  27.  @LD-gi3kq  First of all, Rahul Gandhi has way better English than me. Secondly, Everyone is not paid. Some are Janata too. But right now I can't criticize someone who is not in power and as the opposition tried to fight. Khair.
    1