Comments by "João Soares" (@JoaoSoares-rs6ec) on "Ukraine's HUGE Gamble to Stop Russian Breach!" video.

  1. Not just that, but putin, xi and many others will feel motivated to go further and more conflicts will not just spark, but they will grow to out of control proportions.
    11
  2. ​ @mendos9348 no it wasn't, zaluznhny was in charge of the hole Ukrainian military, syrsky was in charge of the bakhmut defense.
    9
  3.  @compositestechbb9087  it wasn't the lessons learned, but the politics that led to it,
    3
  4. But Paul, it wasn't the government, that didn't want to send supplies, but some radicals in Congress, under party leadership to not aprove supplies.
    2
  5.  @Litt-g3p  yes it did we are seeing that on the streets and campus, but what would come would be far worse
    2
  6.  @MarkNOTW  NATO is a defensive agreement, that's it, also there was no such promise, agreement our anything. As Russia ever threatened EU or US, are you kidding, what do you think the invasion of Ukraine is, a friendly visit.
    2
  7.  @MarkNOTW  countries requested to join NATO, NATO is open to all European countries that want to join, that's it, don't give the BS.
    1
  8.  @MarkNOTW  and I answered clearly. It's not what I think but what it is, Russia/putin wants to rebuild the old Russian empire, Ukraine is key to secure crimea, securing crimea means control of the black sea, that is also key for Russia economy and force projection, they have a short road to the Mediterranean Indian and Atlantic. Why because putin controlled Ukraine of three ways, by controlling the political leadership, by corruption, by economy, Russia had been Ukraine main commercial partner with a push for EU not Russia putin lost control of Ukraine, that's why the 2014 invasion, the current one to secure his hold on crimea and to control Ukraine permanently,
    1
  9.  @MarkNOTW  j already answered that, Has to why the war, simple putin wants to rebuild the Russian empire.
    1