Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "Turley: Barr is vindicated in Jan. 6 hearings" video.

@rickkahl5444 Nope.
17
@jaqenhghar1631 Ok, sure.
3
That's projection.
3
@mikew764 Fight and taking back? That doesn't mean physical violence. He said let your voices be heard. People say "fight" all the time. For example, fighting for your rights. When you go to court and fight a traffic ticket, you don't assault the judge, you use words and facts to influence the judge or jury.
2
@masonhunter2921 I don't agree, but hey, we're all entitled to our opinions.
2
@rickkahl5444 A handful happened to drive past multiple ballot boxes? Nope, that's not at all what it shows.
2
@jonhenry8268 He was correct then. He changed his tune after they told him he'd be ostracized from "polite society" if he didn't toe the line. No more invitations to cocktail parties and no more lucrative contracts caused him to snap back in line.
2
@jasonscott6174 No, Barr actually defended states which illegally changed election rules which created opportunities for manipulation of the results. The recent documentary is compelling evidence that a coordinated effort among activist NGOs exploited these security holes to stuff ballot boxes with illegitimate ballots.
1
False.
1
“It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, we saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character." -The Modern Democrat Party
1
@yourlord4096 How many had horns?
1
@yourlord4096 I though calling people, animals, was dehumanizing?
1
@pefo1674 I read it, it was a dud. And we now know that Hillary and the FBI manufactured evidence in an attempt to frame Trump.
1
@rickkahl5444 What evidence? I think it's pretty clear to most reasonable and objective people that election rules were changed in several states to create opportunities to manipulate the outcome. The "2000 Mules" documentary is compelling all by itself, not to mention the mountains of other evidence which clearly demonstrate a multi-pronged effort to influence the results.
1
@pefo1674 It wasn't. That is a popular talking point which lacks specific details in order to promote a distorted reality.
1
@Costafishin “It was miraculous. It was almost no trick at all, we saw, to turn vice into virtue and slander into truth, impotence into abstinence, arrogance into humility, plunder into philanthropy, thievery into honor, blasphemy into wisdom, brutality into patriotism, and sadism into justice. Anybody could do it; it required no brains at all. It merely required no character." -The Modern Democrat Party
1
@masonhunter2921 Do you want to live under tyrannical rule? Why do you defend and support the very people who loath America and its citizens? Do you think the people now in charge of running the country care in the slightest about your interests?
1
Barr is a two faced treasonous swamp creature who wanted to ensure he'd still be invited to cocktail parties.
1
@mikew764 Your version of the truth I predict is a highly distorted version of the objective truth.
1
@lovemyalaskaful He tries to, but they end up being deep state plants.
1
@mikew764 Provide an example and I'll cite the evidence which refutes it.
1
@mikew764 Well, if it was an organized effort, then Trump's speech has nothing to do with the riot, did it? And if the FBI had this intelligence and informed Nancy Pelosi and the Capitol Police, why did they refuse deployment of the National Guard? The whole Jan 6 narrative is a partisan show trial with cherry picked facts...any exculpatory evidence is being suppressed. Every member of the committee is a never Trump political activist, only a one sided narrative is being presented.
1
@mikew764 Wrong. Asking people to peacefully march is not inciting violence. No, I'm not watching it. The vast majority of the country isn't watching it because we all know it's a one sided show trial. The whole Jan 6 BS is blown way out of proportion. There are innocent people still in jail and being mistreated by prison guards simply because they were peacefully protesting on Capitol grounds. The Constitutional rights of these political prisoners are being grossly violated. This is abhorrent and unamerican, and there will be consequences. When are those hearings on BLM/Antifa riots going to be held? Do you think Brian Sicnick was struck in the head with a fire extinguisher?
1
@mikew764 The FBI had intelligence that people were planning violence. It's documented in official FBI communications. Instead of watching the show trial, why don't you do some actual research to find out the true facts. An internal after-action report by the Capitol Police Department identified 53 major failures, while the department's official timeline of the tragedy revealed the Trump Pentagon began offering Congress a deployment of National Guard troops on Jan. 2, 2021, four days before the tragedy, but it was turned down, first by police and later by aides to Pelosi and Schumer. File Internal memos show Capitol Police on the eve of the riot received two separate warnings from the FBI, the one about the targeting of tunnels and another in the form of an intelligence bulletin from the bureau's Norfolk, Va., office warning that protesters were planning bloodshed, invading the Capitol and targeting members of Congress. Neither were distilled to the frontline commanders responsible for security, multiple investigations have found.
1
@mikew764 So, no pro-Trump "activists," but an entire panel of anti-Trump activists is acceptable? Do you even hear yourself? There is no help for you. You're too indoctrinated to step outside of your bubble. If you honestly believe this "hearing" is to get to the facts, I don't know what to say. Your unbridled hatred for people with whom you disagree is palpable, you will never accept any facts which serve to rebut your beliefs. This is not a battle between democrats and republicans, because they are basically the same swamp creatures just putting on a show to fool voters. This is a battle between good and evil. Since you are unable to be reasonable and objective, this discussion is a waste of my time and of your time. So have a good night.
1
@rickkahl5444 It had nothing to do with Trump's assessment of the election. Even if Trump believed the election to be untainted, I knew that it wasn't. Some simple common sense and an objective view of all available information would lead any reasonable person to have serious doubts about the integrity of the 2020 election For example, we know absolutely for a fact that several states changed election security rules without the approval of the elected representatives, thereby violating the Elector's Clause of the Constitution. How many ballots were counted which would have otherwise violated the original, lawfully approved security rules? We know that the 2020 elections in Virginia and Wisconsin were ruled illegal because of these unlawfully implemented security rules.
1
@mikew764 I already know the truth, I've done my research into actual facts. Documented, corroborated, and verified facts. No anonymous sources, no innuendo, no fake crying RINOs, just pure facts without all the phony emotion.
1
@garyr7646 Well, what have I said that's incorrect?
1
@carlbutler8 To which comment are you referring?
1
@carlbutler8 Yes, I was crying. 🙄
1