Comments by "MrEkzotic" (@MrEkzotic) on "'NOT TAKING IT': Colorado official slammed for suggesting Trump votes could be ignored" video.

  1. ​ @msabccbscnnoanfoxnews  I do, and that's why he's on the ballot. You cannot remove someone from the ballot due political disagreements and opinions.
    26
  2. ​ @msabccbscnnoanfoxnews Why do you hate due process, and why don't you want voters to decide?
    19
  3. Yep.
    18
  4.  @d.castillo9495  Habba said they will rule based on the plain language of the Constitution, and not because they are pro-Trump. All you people do is lie.
    4
  5. It's not.
    4
  6.  @d.castillo9495  And what did she say right after that?
    3
  7.  @georgehenderson7783  Probably not. These people are really cruising for a CW.
    3
  8. That's not what she said. Listen to the entire exchange.
    2
  9. You don't rule on a negative. That's not how our system works.
    2
  10.  @nandy1256  Yes, after someone is charged and all the evidence is presented and witnesses are questioned. And it will usually be a jury.
    2
  11.  @nandy1256  Their view is technically not illegal, but it violates due process. Ruling that someone engaged in, or aided and abetted, an insurrection without due process of law is a gross violation of one's civil rights. There was no trial, no witnesses were examined, and no evidence was presented. YouTube clips, hearsay, and news reports are not evidence.
    2
  12.  @nandy1256  I'm saying they came to a conclusion without due process of law.
    2
  13.  @nandy1256  Until a jury or a judge finds that, after a fair trial, someone is guilty of insurrection or rebellion, then it didn't happen in the eyes of the law.
    2
  14. Certification happened yesterday, so he's on the ballot.
    2
  15. No.
    1
  16.  @d.castillo9495  Cool. Good thing there was no insurrection.
    1
  17.  @d.castillo9495  Another lie, she didn't say they had to pay him back. You watched the MSNBC clip where they cut off the rest of her comment.
    1
  18.  @nandy1256   The FBI has found no evidence that Trump was directly involved in organizing Capitol-riot violence. It also found little evidence of an organized plot to overturn the election results. "Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases," said one former official. The FBI hasn't found any evidence that the January 6 assault on the US Capitol was part of an organized plot to overturn the election results, Reuters reported, citing law-enforcement officials. The officials also said that the FBI has "so far found no evidence" that former President Donald Trump or "people directly around him were involved in organizing the violence," Reuters reported. "Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases," a former law-enforcement official familiar with the investigation told Reuters. "There was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages."
    1
  19.  @nandy1256  No, it's not a crime, but it is unlawful.
    1
  20.  @nandy1256  Like I said, you don't prove a negative. If there was an insurrection, then show me a person convicted of engaging in, or aiding and abetting, an insurrection. Nobody has even been charged. If it was an insurrection, it was one of the weakest insurrections in history. Unarmed people don't commit insurrections against an armed government. It was a riot, not an insurrection. And the events which led to the riot are still unclear.
    1
  21.  @nandy1256  I'm not really worried about the SCOTUS. I think they will pretty much rule the way the Constitution intended.
    1
  22.  @nadia0701  Thank you, but I already know what the Constitution says.
    1