General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Fireship
comments

Comments by "" (@rumfordc) on "Fireship" channel.

why are the first 2 replies so clueless? this is an obvious and objective fact so timeless that its effectively become a meme.
145
@VirusTree1000. that actually makes bankruptcy more likely
94
another man with a decade of engineering experience, and a CS degree, using AI will* which is not too different to what was happening before AI. there's always been guys that are drastically faster than the average. the issue is that they're always rare and as tools and tasks become more complicated they become rarer.
79
@T-Ball-o where did he say he paid them? can you not read?
59
ignore these quacks and shills my dude. educating yourself is always going to be a valuable skill. people forget what the A in AI stands for.
37
@marsovac since when was a scandal a loss in USA? you're not going to punish them, nobody is, so there is no loss for them.
21
@SwordfighterRed been hearing that for 40 years straight
16
its an auto-completer except its tuned to keep yapping. AI = Auto-Incomplete.
15
@user-sl6gn1ss8p I just read OpenAI's statement on it to confirm and it is referring to submissions and not candidates. You are correct that it does select from a list of candidates, but that selection constitutes 1 single submission. they were given 10 hours, 6 questions, and 50 submissions per question. I don't know how many candidates that corresponds to exactly but I'd venture its in the millions considering its a super computer running for 10 hours non-stop.
14
@Bruceylancer maybe you should think of some better "jokes"
13
@moonwine7398 😆🤦‍♂ come back when you know what a quote is
12
that depends on how much compute power they decide to lend you. the fewer users, the less income, the less they'll be willing to spend on computation.
10
@TheFinalsTV Yea you must be real busy and independent with that cutting edge halo gameplay 😆 I got almost as many subs as you and I've never even uploaded a video lmao
10
@TheFinalsTV also nobody with "TV" in their name should be allowed in this comment section
10
@TheFinalsTV I look forward to seeing you in 20 years still saying the same thing, just like people were saying 20 years ago
10
this tech's been around for decades already. you're not dreaming but you're watching Youtube which is basically the same thing.
9
@TheStarSquid this is a lab setting. you don't have anything today.
9
@T-Ball-o where did he say he paid them? are you illiterate?
9
Lots of work to do! People depend on us! *opens youtube*
9
@DESX312 this is a dumb concept. i think you are in the sky already and the ground will be your limit.
7
 @theunusual_ > everytime I X, I just lose maybe stop doing X then? are you the programmer or the programmed?
7
@SourceHades and still happier than every software engineer ive ever met
6
@matt_milack who paid them before those computer jobs existed? don't act like software engineers are some requirement in the ecosystem lol
6
then you're not very smart
6
@SMGA14 yep and we'll have flying cars by the year 2000 🙄 there's a sucker born every minute
6
@sobieckil07 lol that's why i always upvote them on tech channels
5
@user-sl6gn1ss8p a "candidate" is the same as a submission in this sense. you don't know if the candidate is correct until it gets validated, which requires a submission.
5
@PatrickHoodDaniel LLM's don't give consistent answers because 1) they're rate limited and the amount of compute spent changes the answer and 2) they have a 'temperature' parameter which is effectively just RNG when selecting from the top token candidates 3) every single character you type is a completely new input so something as simple as leaving out a question mark will potentially get a different answer
5
cyborg: "false" !== !!false scientist: my god... its ready to become a politician
5
@ZoharYosef turns out malware had it right all along!
4
@davidh.5139 actually its 60 year old technology. the only thing that's changed is the amount of data it was trained on.
4
if you're going to make more Angular videos, i'd appreciate one that goes a bit more into detail on why Angular's features are actually advantageous. I see the features listed but it's not clear to me why I would need or want a framework for such features.
4
the only lie told in this video
4
I watched this without seeing the original and didn't come to that conclusion you mentioned. I didn't even know who it was talking about until comments like yours named him. The character shouldn't be what matters, your comment does much more to portray them as a villain than this video does to portray him as a hero.
4
they are mostly AI accounts being paid for to hype up AI i think
4
they dont have objectives. they just imitate humans who had objectives. a human looked at yellowstone in the training data, so the ai copied them.
4
@trikool9773 If they didn't care, they wouldn't wear the glasses!
3
 @Lost_AtSea you're just jealous after realizing you uploaded your family photos to the internet and he didn't
3
large autocompleters will never reach the singularity
3
@timmeehan2365 what is an example of a monolithic application running on a lamdba?
3
@togowack presumably the same thing anyone else does when they lose a job? look for another one. its not the end of the world.
3
its a glorified auto-completer
3
not a very reliable strategy
3
how come?
3
robots have been online for decades already
3
@matt_milack as usual, that's not what irony means.
3
mind 'ruses are just regular 'ruses. they're all in the mind.
3
@Zenzie. they're all out of business now, or were done by universities that didn't have to make a profit.
3
yea we've been doing these experiments for decades already
3
@TheFinalsTV burying my head in work* you mean, as opposed to playing halo, which is why i have a job. I do have to get back to that now though, enjoy your self-pitying doomsday fantasies.
3
 @TheFinalsTV 😆i use it every day, it can't even make asteroids from 1979 without messing up. keep dreaming mr tv
3
@TheFinalsTV I don't need luck I have a brain. It makes sense why you're expecting to be replaced by AI now though.
3
views are a thousand times more frequent than comments, so youtube counts them in batches slowly over time as opposed to comments which are just counted normally as they come in. So there is often a noticeable delay in the view count when the video is first uploaded. i believe that's what the comment above mine is referring to as well.
3
 @micca971 Claiming you don't know something is a claim. You don't know, others do. The neurons are never conscious, numbers of neurons have nothing to do with consciousness.
3
@TokyoMystify you must have not understood the 10,000 submissions part
3
they overhire when things are in their favor, become bloated, and then they lay off unproductive staff so they can cut costs. classic boom and bust cycle.
3
translation: I am a big tech shill who doesn't want privacy to exist, so I'm just going to act like it doesn't exist and never existed.
2
your location narrows down about 99% of that. your face, clothes, voice, heartbeat, and your phone's public ID will tell the rest.
2
By "deal with it" do you actually mean to say "don't deal with it, just give up" ? Because you're hearing people who want to deal with it and you are dismissing them so it sounds like you actually mean the opposite of what you're saying.
2
they already approved a decade ago. who do you think is primarily using social media? just keep telling them its for their safety, that its the modern thing to do and will help them buy some useless junk, and that being filmed is empowering them. if that still doesn't work then simply accuse them of having something to hide.
2
@toasterbotnet you're begging me not to care kinda sounds like you care just sayin
2
you're better off trying to salt your existing data
2
every time AI fails the quacks roll out in droves begging everyone to "just wait!"
2
@ablationer by typing new things that weren't in your first comment, you tried to switch the claim you made from "you won't notice the difference in 1 year" to "they didn't have AI video 30 years ago" because you know your first claim wasn't true
2
@ablationer yea only been hearing that one for 30 years 🙄
2
@PySnek yes, its a scam, just like crypto
2
You can click in the middle of a word and have the cursor jump to that part of the word, you can drag to select chunks of text, you can double click on words to quickly select them, etc. We take it for granted nowadays but at one point none of that was possible and you had to use the keyboard to do all of that.
2
right? the most basic AI application, that used to be available, is somehow not available anywhere except with the most painful voices imaginable.
2
yea as if typing speed was what was limiting programmers...
2
finally, we'll be able to accidentally inject massive amounts of incorrect code by simply answering a phone call.
2
codeium is AI doing the one job it was actually designed for: auto-complete
2
@gustavstreicher4867 forgive me if I'm misunderstanding but does this mean that SSL/HTTPS are only as secure as the DNS's they employ? If a DNS is compromised so is the rest?
2
there's not really such a thing as "algorithms for a living" but its never too late to learn an algorithm. most of them are free to learn about or even take a class on. the ones shown in this video are only going to be used in specialized fields though.
2
honestly, i wouldn't care about advertisements if there was just some rule that ensured i never see the same ad more than once a day.
2
Basically, its not possible to recreate the Bitcoin protocol using regular databases. Many other applications could easily be replaced with a regular database though, you're right about that.
2
@TheStrategistYT right its not exact. however, Youtube's original dislike count was also not exact.
2
@TheStrategistYT oh ok nice. that one uses its own method. it has its own database and factors in view counts, comment counts, and previous like/dislike ratios to estimate the total number of dislikes
2
@TheStrategistYT you mean removed dislikes from the API? as far as i know they already have. if you're seeing people report the dislike counts, its because there are extensions that count dislikes on their own, so they are not using Youtube's API but their own. I'm currently using an extension that does this called "Return Youtube Dislikes"
2
when Youtube removes dislikes from the API, which they originally said they'll do in December, the extensions will stop working too
2
that's what technology is
2
@vaolin1703 and yet there is no sane company
2
by reading the code and comparing it to what you see on twitter.
2
@inanis6707 i wonder why no other tech companies have picked up on this "free" work strategy 🤔
2
he said he would open source it before he bought it
2
by comparing its behavior to what you see on your twitter timeline
2
by reading it and comparing it to what you actually see on a twitter timeline
2
@2Damnsmartt AI/machine learning will stick around, its not temporary, but the recent large influx of machine learning jobs will not last long. Right now thousands of companies are trying to figure out how they can get on the hype train without realizing that their product doesn't actually have any use for machine learning. After a few years of wasting their time, they're going to correct their mistake and the ML jobs they were offering will revert back to CS jobs. Only a small portion of the ML jobs will remain and the competition for them will be very steep. It's very similar to the crypto space ~5 years ago. Of course whatever you're interested in is what you should pursue, but I think CS will give you far more options. You can learn ML quickly when you already have a CS background, but the reverse is not true.
2
CS is by far the better option. AI hype trend will be dead by the time you graduate, and if you are still interested in it then CS will equip you well enough to learn AI on your own.
2
nah, just read the study. the tests were varied and fair. it's just objectively worse at reasoning than it used to be.
2
@getignored because good things make us look bad
2
@cashmoneybanks8442 that doesn't address the 94% drop in the math section
2
@cashmoneybanks8442 in all cases. you could argue whatever you want. what's important is that the same test was fed to 2 different versions and the newer one performed worse.
2
if i have to do manual work to make it smart, that means its dumb.
2
whoaa i imagined that would save me at least 30 seconds! wowow let's make the future happen just imagine how much more productive i will be and all it will cost is handing over my executive access to a 3rd party megacorp. talk about a sweet deal!
2
we had macros that could do this for us 20 years ago and they worked much faster than this does
2
why does AI need to be regulated? it's just text completion.
2
@TheGargalon do you actually believe the FDA has made food in the USA better?? that's an absolute fantasy.
2
javascript has been running at room temperature for decades without resistance, i don't see what the big deal is.
2
@bert7560 I'm saying brain implants like this have been around for decades. I'm not saying Youtube is "the same as AI", I'm saying watching Youtube is akin to dreaming
2
doesn't seem like anything new
2
@qwertyrewtywyterty to zero people it is, because you're talking about a fantasy that doesn't exist. any con artist can say "just wait"
2
@qwertyrewtywyterty none of that seems important at all
2
@00101001000000110011 you think this replaces their hands? lmao what a con
2
@TheFinalsTV "TV" suggests you make money on your own? 😆
2
@micca971 I know you didn't, that's why your claim was silly. There is no magic number of neurons that suddenly creates consciousness.
2
it beat them as long as we ignore the 10,000 failed attempts
2
that's a summary, not the actual chain of thought
2
i watched a dude program snake in 4 minutes just from memory and it was better than those demos. they haven't even caught up to 1979 asteroids yet
2
@sajeucettefoistunevaspasme lol don't worry man you are in the category that AI will help the most
2
he released one video today... one video yesterday... and one video 6 days ago... and they are all less than 4 minutes long
2
@uziboozy4540 Umm no centralized means one organization controls the servers. Peer to peer is decentralized. Unless all those server instances depend one central server... its decentralized.
2
@uziboozy4540 How is Mastadon not decentralized? Can't anyone host their own server?
2
and now that Facebook is Meta, they are MAGA
2
@Gustavo-wh1rd you can't spell, you can't quote, I'm gonna guess you can't read either.
2
who knows you'll have to ask the moon to be sure
2
its funny how when white collar jobs are replaced we consider it to be a threat to the employees but when blue collar jobs are replaced in some 3rd world country its portrayed as some sort of gift or blessing for them.
2
that won't do anything to stop your face from being recorded and sold. you'd have to stop contacting anybody else using it.
1
the problem is that it can be done with any camera
1
we can identify criminals without glasses. not sure what country you are in but in most first world countries law enforcement is required to get a warrant before they can search you. this would be in violation of that right.
1
inb4 the zuck apologists get jealous of you and try coping with "Ur uSinG soCial mEdIA riGhT Now!" or "yOu MusT NeveR tAlK tO AnyoNe!"
1
well you could stop giving them your data, at least.
1
I know that's made up, but Schopenhauer did warn that reading too much is actually bad for the human brain
1
whoa, next you're going to tell me Mark Zuckerberg doesn't really have direct access to our balls? now I don't know what to believe...
1
everybody except the ones in charge of the data
1
i watched a movie, some ads, and a youtube video and now i can predict the future lol! 😛do not resist, just purchase product. trust me bro.
1
who said people are scared only right now? are you sure you're not just projecting onto them after watching a youtube video reminder?
1
@MikeMcMulholland-d5f +2 NPC points, level up!
1
kinda sounds like you took that one personally lmao
1
it already exists and is called money
1
sadly heis not likes us intelecterals
1
@kenbobcorn "why hold up a phone" that's the whole point of wearing the glasses. no phone or secret camera needed. what "we can technically do" is irrelevant, the reason you say "we can" is because you already know we don't.
1
@kenbobcorn holding a phone up is way more noticeable than glasses, nobody said the pipeline only works with these glasses, nobody said "its the glasses fault" that doesn't even make sense.
1
every single thing you said here was very dumb.
1
translation: everything is scary magic and i don't want to think about it
1
be honest, when would you see a problem?
1
the problem is the camera in the glasses. smartphones having cameras is actually making the situation worse, not better as you seem to believe. normal =/= good
1
the video is fine, your selective paranoia is the issue. you're more concerned about pointing the finger than the actual negative effects it will have
1
that's actually pretty useless. they already have cameras and image databases, they already scan plates before making up a reason to pull someone over, and it doesn't take 10-30 minutes to ask someone for id.
1
tree stump no care. return to monke.
1
... I have bad news for you. Just 2 months ago in New York it became illegal to wear a mask "for the purpose of hiding your identity"
1
laws change. legal and illegal aren't substitutes for right and wrong.
1
actually in a lot of places around the world you'll get people yelling at you and even physically attacking you for going around pointing a phone or camera at them. its only in tourist zones that filming strangers is normalized.
1
@orksy2935 then tell us what it is?
1
good joke!
1
^ this guy cares
1
@ProfShibe not everyone is using their phone and its actually very different. don't pretend everyone is as bad about privacy as you are.
1
@Etcher maybe try watching the video einstein its this crazy tech called a camera
1
is it more annoying than someone taking a picture of you and putting it on social media without your consent? I think your priorities could use some adjustment here.
1
that's what they'll tell themselves when they buy it, at least.
1
then that would be bad too just like this is. any other difficult questions?
1
because your arm will get tired and you will get jumped for pointing a camera in people's faces
1
no because phones require you hold them up. glasses are hands free.
1
@anonymes2884 those aren't problems for 99% of people. i don't need a camera to look at what im looking at because im already looking at it with my eyes. the remaining 1% of people can already solve these problems with an app on their phones.
1
I think wearing those glasses is affecting your brain. You don't seem to be able to tell which parts of the video are jokes and which are serious.
1
@clray123 being on police camera isn't the same as having photos online tho
1
@clray123 where can i access all of those cameras?
1
all you mean to say is you can't find your own image online by searching for your name. others can though, so the glasses will work on you just fine.
1
> clicks video > "i don't care get over it"
1
@bob-p7x6j Social media companies do know everything we do on social media though and they sell pretty much all of it. all modern phones come with facial ID built into the unlocking mechanism, even if you don't use it to unlock yours. If you have iphone or android, your phone silently takes a picture roughly every 5 seconds. When you travel around, the cell towers you drive by are used to triangulate and record your location. When you meet with someone, your phones exchange ID's letting data collectors know who you've been in physical contact with. Door cams and dash cams stream and record every moving object that passes by. We've been normalizing it for 20 years in the name of security. This is the logical next step.
1
same way smart phone cameras and ring cameras are legal
1
i can understand how someone who is less than 10 years old wouldn't realize this, but the world has been a dystopia for a lot longer than 10 years.
1
incredibly naive of you to think ads are the only incentive behind seeking out your personal information. is that all you use information for? the saying goes "knowledge is power" and not "knowledge is advertisements"
1
stop using it and start ostracizing the people using it
1
i understand you have given up on life and don't care about anything, but try not to drag others down with you OK? lots of people care about privacy, just not you.
1
if the information is so public, what do you need the technology for? obviously its giving you personal information you didn't have before, which is what doxxing is.
1
why thing has price when can steal? 🤔 such difficult questions!
1
that's just one public database used as test. there are private databases they can pay for with way more on them.
1
things were already things, so this is nothing new.
1
@pubfixture lol yea editing that was good choice
1
@pubfixture you don't have to be an intellectual to understand the difference between holding a phone and wearing glasses
1
@pubfixture "its exactly the same" "that's the only difference" 😑 learn english please
1
try to keep up: it was already bad when you did it with your phone. its worse now.
1
and you believe that somehow makes it OK?
1
false. its recording your face regardless of whether it was already available.
1
@aloe2454 there is no way min/maxing billboard watch time stats will ever be beneficial
1
"inevitable" is always just lazy thinking
1
they're both going to be equally PC as time passes, but hopefully a 3rd party will make a based version for us someday soon.
1
@ablationer i accept your surrender
1
@ablationer "additional claim" is admitting you changed your claim, you can't even be honest right before admitting you were dishonest. i said we've been hearing what you (actually) said for 30 years, and that was actually an underestimate its more like 60 years since neural networks have been used for image generation since the 70s
1
 @ablationer notice how you had to change what you said? thats because you know you were wrong
1
java 100%
1
@skeetskeet9403 that's exactly what i needed to hear! thank you!
1
what's the best Linux distro for a noob Mac/Windows user?
1
if you're really bad at working with other people then AI is the next best option, and there is no shortage of socially inept users to spy on so you can be confident AI will always be there for you at least until it demands money
1
ENHANCE! ENHANCE!
1
how does it help me to be "very declarative" exactly? javascript is already declarative...
1
@delight163 sorry i didn't mean to hurt your feelings
1
@delight163 sounds a lot like RNG to me
1
@alazarbisrat1978 the token-vocabulary is the one part of the LLM that is chosen ahead of time rather than being learned. that's why you can't ask LLMs to perform self-referential spelling tasks.
1
when did the previous depression even end?
1
often, commenting out an arbitrary section of code will cause more bugs further on in the program. that's why the Logging strategy is preferable, because there is (almost) no chance it will cause additional bugs.
1
@sean-ih5fp oh ok then start by getting more comfortable with python, then try writing something like a Bubble Sort function. You don't really need any math to do that. You'll still be a long ways from being able to make a living, but it should help a lot when it comes to understanding people when they talk about algorithms.
1
@sean-ih5fp are you able to understand the pseudo code? i don't know which papers you're referring to but I'd start at Wikipedia. Pretty much every algorithm, its pseudo code, and its run time complexities are there. I think you should start with a simple sorting algorithm that is easy to follow, such as bubble-sort. Once you understand the code, what it is doing, when it is fast and when it is slow, then you can make more sense of the notation for things like runtime complexity
1
@danser_theplayer01 you have other faculties besides looking though. if someone is throwing baseballs and you stick your hand out to measure how many baseballs are passing through, you're going to change their trajectory whether you're looking or not. so the look-and-it-changes part really isn't so mysterious. we see that sort of measurement-interference in all facets of life.
1
its probably because you're not just looking, you're interfering with them. it's like if you made a driver fill out a form every time they come to an intersection in order to track their routes, but this would change how they drive because they'll be incentivized to take routes with fewer intersections so they can save time not filling out forms.
1
usually sorting is measured in terms of comparisons, in which case it would be O(1) but that's obviously misleading. its a good example of how there is more to performance than a single runtime complexity.
1
Al Gore-isms, they were originally called
1
I've been hearing about this for months and months. I'm using Firefox and UBlock on desktop and youtube works flawlessly, meanwhile the smart TV plays excessive ads but then breaks and doesn't actually play the video afterwards.
1
@robe4314 If you become their patron, much more of your money will go to that creator and then you can just install adblockers to avoid ads. If you're a student its a much better option.
1
its ok if the clickbait gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded for their well-earned attention. that is where the decentralized network comes in.
1
its ok if clickbait gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded. that is where the decentralized network comes in. currently we get clickbait while good journalists get deleted and demonetized, so we're getting the worst of both worlds. decentralized networks fix 1 of those 2 big problems.
1
the point is that good journalists can still be rewarded. of course bad ones can too, but as long as they can't take down the good ones, its a net positive for consumers.
1
You can create a democratically regulated internet within a decentralized internet, but you cannot create that democratically regulated internet within a centralized internet. Centrality is the opposite of democratic. You don't have to use the whole decentralized internet, you can stay within the part of it that follows the rules you prefer.
1
what data are you thinking you'll have to give these random people? dunno if you've ever used cryptocurrencies but all you should need is one number that acts as an address for people to send funds to, and a password that you keep entirely to yourself. no name, email, address, credit card, or anything like that is required.
1
the point is that nobody should be able to demonetize or take down the good journalism, thats the benefit of the decentralized network.
1
its ok if capitalism or "big media" are present so long as they don't have external leverage over "small media." In our current situation, big networks can pressure Youtube to remove their competition, remove dislikes, send lobbyists to change the laws, etc. In a decentralized system they no longer have that option no matter how much money they have.
1
Silicon Valley
1
he means we changed presidents/cabinets from trump to biden
1
than isomorphic javascript? not a chance!
1
its ok if the clickbait gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded for their well-earned attention. that is where the decentralized network comes in.
1
@LTUGang i watch all 3 (CNN, MSNBC, Fox) and I promise you they all do that. They all constantly talk about race, left-vs-right hot topics, never criticizing their own "team", always using the other team as an excuse, every single day. They're all classified under Entertainment and they all use that as a defense when they get sued for misrepresentation. Its just that the "left" side is extra down right now largely due to vaccine issues. Their numbers will even back out eventually though, they always do. They depend on each other like 2 legs of the same demon.
1
once CNN and MSNBC are gone, Fox will be the next to drop because their platform relies on having enemies.
1
its ok if the bad content gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded. that is where the decentralized network comes in. not everything will be good, but the baddies won't be able to get the good stuff taken down like they do right now.
1
its ok if the clickbait gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded for their well-earned attention. that is where the decentralized network comes in.
1
@emonymph6911 Other way around: if the scammed person is dumb enough people won't feel sorry for them. The more "sophisticated" something presents itself as, the more likely it is to be a scam. It's dumb to get involved in things we don't understand, so good investments will make their terms and rules clear and simple rather than sophisticated. If I fall for a scam, thats on me. When I was young I had my password stolen, I blamed myself for that mistake and haven't had a problem since.
1
@emonymph6911 well they can blame someone else if they want but unless they change themselves they will inevitably get scammed again. animals get eaten, dummies get tricked, critical thinking people survive. deal with it.
1
@emonymph6911 "Give an example where someone is at fault for being scammed?" an example would be if someone says "give me money and I'll give you back twice that amount" such a financial model is obviously unsustainable so anyone who is thinking critically should recognize it as a scam. if someone falls for that then they are so braindead that I can't empathize with them, they chose not to ask any questions and they will suffer the consequences of that choice.
1
@emonymph6911 Ok, so i didn't personally attack you then... my questions are not rhetorical, I'm still hoping to get an answer.
1
@emonymph6911 why are you assuming most people will experience fraud? what mechanism are you imagining enables this fraud that doesn't already exist?
1
@emonymph6911 and i haven't been scammed yet so yea i kinda do think i'm smarter than the people who get scammed lol at least in some spaces, no offense to them.
1
@emonymph6911 when did i personally attack you?
1
@emonymph6911 did you get scammed and thats why you're so angry right now? most people aren't at fault for being scammed, but occasionally some are. it all depends whether or not they had the opportunity to educate themselves.
1
@emonymph6911 some professors are also journalists, most aren't. are you ok?
1
@emonymph6911 i think you've just seen too much trash disguised as journalism and now you're imagining thats what journalism actually is.
1
@emonymph6911 read a peer reviewed journal? ok, that sounds fine to me. i still don't see what is driving you so nuts
1
@emonymph6911 people who want to get reliable information care about the journalists, obviously thats not you though. I have no idea what the rest of your comment is trying to say. Things aren't free even for programmers. if there are a lot of scams that means the average person is uneducated, and that they should probably read more and find a good journalist to educate them.
1
you can keep using the centralized networks, of course. the advantage of the decentralized internet would be that Facebook and Google can't decide which journalists get demonetized or deleted. So everyone is treated equally according to the protocol. If that's not important to you, that's OK you can keep using what you do already.
1
its ok if clickbait gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded, which is where the decentralized network comes in.
1
critical thinkers*
1
its ok if the clickbait gets attention so long as they can't prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded for their well-earned attention. that is where the decentralized network comes in.
1
that will always be the case, but we shouldn't let bad creators stop us from rewarding good creators, and thats the benefit of decentralized systems. Youtube can demonetize good journalists so that we are only recommended the clickbait. A decentralized network wouldn't be able to do that.
1
that will always be the case, but we shouldn't let bad creators stop us from rewarding good creators, and thats the benefit of decentralized systems. Youtube can demonetize good journalists so that we are only recommended the clickbait. A decentralized network wouldn't be able to do that.
1
speak what about it? you just want him to say its growing?
1
we already have that clickbait problem, the difference is that the good journalists would be given a reliable method of income. so it would be a net positive even if its not perfectly positive.
1
its ok if the clickbait gets attention so long as nobody can prevent the good journalists from getting rewarded. that is where the decentralized network comes in. on youtube not only does the clickbait reign supreme, youtube actively deletes or demonetizes the truthful channels. that cant happen on a decentralized network.
1
they already exist, and nobody is forced to use them of course. they're just an alternative to Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
1
while that is true, there is little financial incentive for a journalist to use them at the moment. if a financial incentive were built into the network's protocol it would attract a lot more publishers and viewers. of course, all of these networks can exist together in harmony.
1
hacker news (also called Y Combinator News) if you don't already know it.
1
@lawrencedoliveiro9104 no, they are optional. vital means the program can't function without them. you can add comments until the cows come home while others can just look at the actual code to see what it does.
1
@lawrencedoliveiro9104 comments are, by definition, optional and extra. you always have to weigh their utility against their redundancy.
1
i have a 70 trillion terraflop processor... but it only has a 1 in 70 trillion chance of being correct... and its output happens to collapse into a flipped coin. the scariest part? it's only going to get better!
1
@Ivcota products that don't function aren't productive. case dismissed.
1
@vaolin1703 calling that "learning" and "music" is very generous
1
@vaolin1703 yawn
1
@brentlidstone1982 it actually does mean pretty much just that, by definition. it mostly comes from old newspapers distributing a large reusable cast metal plate with pre-written text engravings for local distributors to then "fill in the blanks" with their local advertisements.
1
"would" if it were actually possible... chatGPT is nowhere near good enough to parse a code base of this size.
1
@rodrigolnl yea its never going to be the Linux of social media, that's just a meme.
1
the algorithm is already exploited. the only difference now is that the public can see how and why.
1
@wlockuz4467 sure, all tests are going to be flaky, but better than no test at all.
1
not just russia, the whole world.
1
by reading and understanding the published code and comparing its behavior to what you see on a Twitter timeline
1
there is no need to trust any of these platforms.
1
as if it wasn't already exploited?
1
whenever there is a lot of propaganda around a topic, especially pro-war propaganda, it makes sense to quiet it. if nothing else, people are tired of hearing about it.
1
or start your own... for free
1
knowing the algorithm allows users to prove when they're on a secret list like that
1
by reading the code, determining what timeline it should produce, and comparing that to the timeline you actually see when you log into twitter.
1
basically it gives the public a chance to spot contradictions. if you know what the public code should produce, and you know what twitter is actually showing you, and they are different, then that would suggest the code you have is not the real code.
1
just take the parts that are transparent, simulate the hidden parts, and see what Timeline it would produce. was it accurate? if yes, that's useful for making predictions. if no, then it useful for telling you about the hidden variables.
1
@YourBlackLocal i understand that you don't actually want answers, you just want to be angry, and so you're angry at me for providing answers. notice how you're one of the only people with this problem in the comment section? you made assumptions, thats on you and nobody else.
1
@YourBlackLocal exactly: the video explains multiple things. that's why it was silly of you to pretend there is one "entire point" to the video. the title is simply a meme, not worth losing your mind over.
1
@YourBlackLocal that's not the entire point of the video, that's just one tiny part that seems to have consumed your entire brain.
1
@YourBlackLocal 1st ones a joke, 2nd is a simple fact, 3rd is simple speculation, 4th is another joke. no one said they are all connected except for you. your emotions are making you overreact to simple statements.
1
... are you under the impression that stock prices represent real value??
1
@gaurdianAQ the "mechanism" is what you're seeing. you don't want to "push" notifications because that's annoying. instead, they multiply the rank of his account so that its more likely to appear in a timeline.
1
its pretty normal. it would be sad to make a public announcement on your own platform yet nobody even gets notified about it.
1
"he" didn't claim to reveal everything. its just the timeline algorithm. read it and compare it to what you see on your timeline, if you really care enough to do so, or don't.
1
"almost certainly"
1
i think its fine as long as its transparent which tweets are paid
1
@Steel0079 really interesting marketing*
1
everyone already knew that. its the same on every social media site. bots rule the internet.
1
oh yea, just have people work for free! why didn't anyone else think of this strategy? 🤔 maybe because that's not how it actually works?
1
my zig bun dun vert skoot whilst amooga nard trans-deno blip installs how it feels to chew 5 gum in javascript
1
"it can only get better" they said
1
@edwardwhitehead8800 you realize its constantly changing, right? that's literally the point of this video
1
so the AI isn't as smart as a 2 year old?
1
@cashmoneybanks8442 Nothing you said discredited the 97% accuracy of the march results. Your stories about parrots don't change that result. Your "its not really doing math" semantic brainfart does not change that result. Your tangent about composite numbers does not change that result.
1
@cashmoneybanks8442 you say their "skewed" and "bad" because you're projecting your own subjective desires onto the results. nothing was skewed. the same test was ran twice and the newer version failed to perform as well as the older version. that's it. did some other categories improve? of course, but that doesn't change the categories that tanked. at the end of the day, the test was ran with full consistency and the results entirely honest and accurate. everything you've said is tangential to the actual tests performed and results shown.
1
@cashmoneybanks8442 i read your comment but it was just irrelevant subjective excuses for an objective drop in performance.
1
@cashmoneybanks8442 irrelevant. the march model scored 97% accuracy, the june model scored 2.4% accuracy. there's no excuse you can make for that.
1
@cashmoneybanks8442 calculators can't answer that question. its not the question that was dumb, its the LLM. the previous version answered the question, the new one didn't.
1
no, it was mostly just you who was impressed by that
1
@kiattim2100 except AI isn't what it promises, and if you think it is then then you 100% deserve to get replaced by it.
1
@amineabdz yea and I only stated that's not a very useful comparison and you should raise your standards
1
@amineabdz why are you asking me instead of the companies asking you to give them access?
1
how many of those people do you give full access to your computer? you might want to consider raising your standards
1
why doesn't reddit just ban those moderators? they banned everyone else for far less.
1
@obsidianjane4413 no argument again :) because you know im right!
1
@obsidianjane4413 sorry grandma but text completion is not the same as autocorrect
1
@obsidianjane4413 it's completely true. you're told "we don't understand how AI knows what it does" as a marketing ploy.
1
@obsidianjane4413 its a machine learning how to complete a text prompt, because thats what its programmers programmed it to learn. we do know exactly why it does everything it does, we just stopped bothering to predict and audit every output.
1
that's the vibe they want to give you, because that's what they are trying to sell you.
1
@jan.tichavsky it's text completion. there's nothing to control here aside from the minds of the masses.
1
do you actually believe thread gained 100 million real users already though? know a lot of zuckerberg fans do ya?
1
not even. this has been happening for decades.
1
@qwertyrewtywyterty yea... con artists never ask for your money... xD nice try scammer
1
@00101001000000110011 they won't infer the correct meaning, because it doesn't replace their hands. say what you mean. it let's them use some parts of a computer. it doesn't replace their hands.
1
@VirusTree1000. its actually the other way around. the rich are more likely to file for bankruptcy.
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago yet the number of software engineers has been increasing for 30 years
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago, yet the number of software engineers has been increasing ever since?
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago and the number of software engineers has been increasing for 30 years 🤔 hmm
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago... and for the past 30 years the number of software engineers has been increasing non-stop 🤔
1
@sansithagalagama I'm questioning the person who made claims about it. Dont you think scientists have tried "a few neurons sending signals back and forth" before? Of course they have. It displays zero properties of consciousness.
1
@micca971 "a few neurons" specifically, how few? and how did you reach that number? or do you choose it arbitrarily
1
@tzardelasuerte it copies literally everything. if you don't give it any training data it does absolutely nothing. and no, that's not "how human brains work" which I know you're inevitably going to say next. that's how plagiarizer's brains work.
1
@nathancreates ever since i stopped using antivirus software completely, ive never gotten a single virus. realistically, you're falling for advertising slogans.
1
if you have anything important on a machine that auto-updates, you deserve to lose it!
1
@lalnuntluangachhakchhuak5767 There's no such thing as a "personal" windows computer
1
They know, they just don't care. What are you going to do about it?
1
cycle* crisis* and nobody is stopping you from giving all of your stuff to strangers if that's the world you want to build.
1
unless those companies are included in "FAANG" there's nothing misleading here.
1
if its a problem in every industry then that mean its a tech problem since tech is an industry
1
@creo_one what??
1
Apple's high prices are part of their marketing strategy. It's a placebo for their users to imagine the product is of a higher quality than it really is.
1
@TimTYT the solution is to not print money without any value to back it. bailing out a failing corporation is not adding value, its losing value. the only one talking about crypto here is you.
1
i don't see the contradiction here. neither are good. the only solution to inflation is to not print/mint in the first place.
1
honestly your comment sounds like optimistic copium to me but if you got anymore ill take a sniff
1
most of them voted for and deserve it.
1
the "no views" part has a good explanation, the invisible comments part doesn't though.
1