Comments by "" (@rumfordc) on "Fireship" channel.

  1. ​ @TheFinalsTV  😆i use it every day, it can't even make asteroids from 1979 without messing up. keep dreaming mr tv
    3
  2.  @TheFinalsTV  I don't need luck I have a brain. It makes sense why you're expecting to be replaced by AI now though.
    3
  3. views are a thousand times more frequent than comments, so youtube counts them in batches slowly over time as opposed to comments which are just counted normally as they come in. So there is often a noticeable delay in the view count when the video is first uploaded. i believe that's what the comment above mine is referring to as well.
    3
  4. ​ @micca971  Claiming you don't know something is a claim. You don't know, others do. The neurons are never conscious, numbers of neurons have nothing to do with consciousness.
    3
  5.  @TokyoMystify  you must have not understood the 10,000 submissions part
    3
  6. they overhire when things are in their favor, become bloated, and then they lay off unproductive staff so they can cut costs. classic boom and bust cycle.
    3
  7. translation: I am a big tech shill who doesn't want privacy to exist, so I'm just going to act like it doesn't exist and never existed.
    2
  8. your location narrows down about 99% of that. your face, clothes, voice, heartbeat, and your phone's public ID will tell the rest.
    2
  9. By "deal with it" do you actually mean to say "don't deal with it, just give up" ? Because you're hearing people who want to deal with it and you are dismissing them so it sounds like you actually mean the opposite of what you're saying.
    2
  10. they already approved a decade ago. who do you think is primarily using social media? just keep telling them its for their safety, that its the modern thing to do and will help them buy some useless junk, and that being filmed is empowering them. if that still doesn't work then simply accuse them of having something to hide.
    2
  11.  @toasterbotnet  you're begging me not to care kinda sounds like you care just sayin
    2
  12. you're better off trying to salt your existing data
    2
  13. every time AI fails the quacks roll out in droves begging everyone to "just wait!"
    2
  14.  @ablationer  by typing new things that weren't in your first comment, you tried to switch the claim you made from "you won't notice the difference in 1 year" to "they didn't have AI video 30 years ago" because you know your first claim wasn't true
    2
  15.  @ablationer  yea only been hearing that one for 30 years 🙄
    2
  16.  @PySnek  yes, its a scam, just like crypto
    2
  17. You can click in the middle of a word and have the cursor jump to that part of the word, you can drag to select chunks of text, you can double click on words to quickly select them, etc. We take it for granted nowadays but at one point none of that was possible and you had to use the keyboard to do all of that.
    2
  18. right? the most basic AI application, that used to be available, is somehow not available anywhere except with the most painful voices imaginable.
    2
  19. yea as if typing speed was what was limiting programmers...
    2
  20. finally, we'll be able to accidentally inject massive amounts of incorrect code by simply answering a phone call.
    2
  21. codeium is AI doing the one job it was actually designed for: auto-complete
    2
  22.  @gustavstreicher4867  forgive me if I'm misunderstanding but does this mean that SSL/HTTPS are only as secure as the DNS's they employ? If a DNS is compromised so is the rest?
    2
  23. there's not really such a thing as "algorithms for a living" but its never too late to learn an algorithm. most of them are free to learn about or even take a class on. the ones shown in this video are only going to be used in specialized fields though.
    2
  24. honestly, i wouldn't care about advertisements if there was just some rule that ensured i never see the same ad more than once a day.
    2
  25. Basically, its not possible to recreate the Bitcoin protocol using regular databases. Many other applications could easily be replaced with a regular database though, you're right about that.
    2
  26.  @TheStrategistYT  right its not exact. however, Youtube's original dislike count was also not exact.
    2
  27.  @TheStrategistYT  oh ok nice. that one uses its own method. it has its own database and factors in view counts, comment counts, and previous like/dislike ratios to estimate the total number of dislikes
    2
  28.  @TheStrategistYT  you mean removed dislikes from the API? as far as i know they already have. if you're seeing people report the dislike counts, its because there are extensions that count dislikes on their own, so they are not using Youtube's API but their own. I'm currently using an extension that does this called "Return Youtube Dislikes"
    2
  29. when Youtube removes dislikes from the API, which they originally said they'll do in December, the extensions will stop working too
    2
  30. that's what technology is
    2
  31.  @vaolin1703  and yet there is no sane company
    2
  32. by reading the code and comparing it to what you see on twitter.
    2
  33.  @inanis6707  i wonder why no other tech companies have picked up on this "free" work strategy 🤔
    2
  34. he said he would open source it before he bought it
    2
  35. by comparing its behavior to what you see on your twitter timeline
    2
  36. by reading it and comparing it to what you actually see on a twitter timeline
    2
  37.  @2Damnsmartt  AI/machine learning will stick around, its not temporary, but the recent large influx of machine learning jobs will not last long. Right now thousands of companies are trying to figure out how they can get on the hype train without realizing that their product doesn't actually have any use for machine learning. After a few years of wasting their time, they're going to correct their mistake and the ML jobs they were offering will revert back to CS jobs. Only a small portion of the ML jobs will remain and the competition for them will be very steep. It's very similar to the crypto space ~5 years ago. Of course whatever you're interested in is what you should pursue, but I think CS will give you far more options. You can learn ML quickly when you already have a CS background, but the reverse is not true.
    2
  38. CS is by far the better option. AI hype trend will be dead by the time you graduate, and if you are still interested in it then CS will equip you well enough to learn AI on your own.
    2
  39. nah, just read the study. the tests were varied and fair. it's just objectively worse at reasoning than it used to be.
    2
  40.  @getignored  because good things make us look bad
    2
  41.  @cashmoneybanks8442  that doesn't address the 94% drop in the math section
    2
  42.  @cashmoneybanks8442  in all cases. you could argue whatever you want. what's important is that the same test was fed to 2 different versions and the newer one performed worse.
    2
  43. if i have to do manual work to make it smart, that means its dumb.
    2
  44. whoaa i imagined that would save me at least 30 seconds! wowow let's make the future happen just imagine how much more productive i will be and all it will cost is handing over my executive access to a 3rd party megacorp. talk about a sweet deal!
    2
  45. we had macros that could do this for us 20 years ago and they worked much faster than this does
    2
  46. why does AI need to be regulated? it's just text completion.
    2
  47.  @TheGargalon  do you actually believe the FDA has made food in the USA better?? that's an absolute fantasy.
    2
  48. javascript has been running at room temperature for decades without resistance, i don't see what the big deal is.
    2
  49.  @bert7560  I'm saying brain implants like this have been around for decades. I'm not saying Youtube is "the same as AI", I'm saying watching Youtube is akin to dreaming
    2
  50. doesn't seem like anything new
    2