Comments by "" (@rumfordc) on "Fireship" channel.

  1. they overhire when things are in their favor, become bloated, and then they lay off unproductive staff so they can cut costs. classic boom and bust cycle.
    3
  2. state of the art tools that can't count or spell what a time to be alive
    3
  3.  @trikool9773  If they didn't care, they wouldn't wear the glasses!
    3
  4. not a very reliable strategy
    3
  5.  @matt_milack  as usual, that's not what irony means.
    3
  6. mind 'ruses are just regular 'ruses. they're all in the mind.
    3
  7. ​ @micca971  Claiming you don't know something is a claim. You don't know, others do. The neurons are never conscious, numbers of neurons have nothing to do with consciousness.
    3
  8. views are a thousand times more frequent than comments, so youtube counts them in batches slowly over time as opposed to comments which are just counted normally as they come in. So there is often a noticeable delay in the view count when the video is first uploaded. i believe that's what the comment above mine is referring to as well.
    3
  9.  @TheFinalsTV  I don't need luck I have a brain. It makes sense why you're expecting to be replaced by AI now though.
    3
  10. ​ @TheFinalsTV  😆i use it every day, it can't even make asteroids from 1979 without messing up. keep dreaming mr tv
    3
  11.  @TheFinalsTV  burying my head in work* you mean, as opposed to playing halo, which is why i have a job. I do have to get back to that now though, enjoy your self-pitying doomsday fantasies.
    3
  12. robots have been online for decades already
    3
  13.  @vaolin1703  and yet there is no sane company
    2
  14. who knows you'll have to ask the moon to be sure
    2
  15.  @00101001000000110011  you think this replaces their hands? lmao what a con
    2
  16.  @qwertyrewtywyterty  none of that seems important at all
    2
  17.  @qwertyrewtywyterty  to zero people it is, because you're talking about a fantasy that doesn't exist. any con artist can say "just wait"
    2
  18. if i have to do manual work to make it smart, that means its dumb.
    2
  19.  @cashmoneybanks8442  in all cases. you could argue whatever you want. what's important is that the same test was fed to 2 different versions and the newer one performed worse.
    2
  20.  @cashmoneybanks8442  that doesn't address the 94% drop in the math section
    2
  21. we had macros that could do this for us 20 years ago and they worked much faster than this does
    2
  22. by reading it and comparing it to what you actually see on a twitter timeline
    2
  23. its funny how when white collar jobs are replaced we consider it to be a threat to the employees but when blue collar jobs are replaced in some 3rd world country its portrayed as some sort of gift or blessing for them.
    2
  24. by comparing its behavior to what you see on your twitter timeline
    2
  25. that's what technology is
    2
  26. you're better off trying to salt your existing data
    2
  27.  @sajeucettefoistunevaspasme  lol don't worry man you are in the category that AI will help the most
    2
  28.  @vectoralphaSec  if they're not willing to tell people about their actually good stuff, they shouldn't expect to sell much of it.
    2
  29.  @getignored  because good things make us look bad
    2
  30. i watched a dude program snake in 4 minutes just from memory and it was better than those demos. they haven't even caught up to 1979 asteroids yet
    2
  31.  @toasterbotnet  you're begging me not to care kinda sounds like you care just sayin
    2
  32. whoaa i imagined that would save me at least 30 seconds! wowow let's make the future happen just imagine how much more productive i will be and all it will cost is handing over my executive access to a 3rd party megacorp. talk about a sweet deal!
    2
  33.  @PySnek  yes, its a scam, just like crypto
    2
  34. nah, just read the study. the tests were varied and fair. it's just objectively worse at reasoning than it used to be.
    2
  35. that's a summary, not the actual chain of thought
    2
  36. doesn't seem like anything new
    2
  37. he said he would open source it before he bought it
    2
  38. finally, we'll be able to accidentally inject massive amounts of incorrect code by simply answering a phone call.
    2
  39. they already approved a decade ago. who do you think is primarily using social media? just keep telling them its for their safety, that its the modern thing to do and will help them buy some useless junk, and that being filmed is empowering them. if that still doesn't work then simply accuse them of having something to hide.
    2
  40. when Youtube removes dislikes from the API, which they originally said they'll do in December, the extensions will stop working too
    2
  41.  @TheStrategistYT  you mean removed dislikes from the API? as far as i know they already have. if you're seeing people report the dislike counts, its because there are extensions that count dislikes on their own, so they are not using Youtube's API but their own. I'm currently using an extension that does this called "Return Youtube Dislikes"
    2
  42.  @TheStrategistYT  oh ok nice. that one uses its own method. it has its own database and factors in view counts, comment counts, and previous like/dislike ratios to estimate the total number of dislikes
    2
  43.  @TheStrategistYT  right its not exact. however, Youtube's original dislike count was also not exact.
    2
  44. By "deal with it" do you actually mean to say "don't deal with it, just give up" ? Because you're hearing people who want to deal with it and you are dismissing them so it sounds like you actually mean the opposite of what you're saying.
    2
  45.  @ablationer  yea only been hearing that one for 30 years 🙄
    2
  46.  @ablationer  by typing new things that weren't in your first comment, you tried to switch the claim you made from "you won't notice the difference in 1 year" to "they didn't have AI video 30 years ago" because you know your first claim wasn't true
    2
  47. there's not really such a thing as "algorithms for a living" but its never too late to learn an algorithm. most of them are free to learn about or even take a class on. the ones shown in this video are only going to be used in specialized fields though.
    2
  48. codeium is AI doing the one job it was actually designed for: auto-complete
    2
  49.  @inanis6707  i wonder why no other tech companies have picked up on this "free" work strategy 🤔
    2
  50. CS is by far the better option. AI hype trend will be dead by the time you graduate, and if you are still interested in it then CS will equip you well enough to learn AI on your own.
    2