Comments by "" (@rumfordc) on "" video.

another man with a decade of engineering experience, and a CS degree, using AI will* which is not too different to what was happening before AI. there's always been guys that are drastically faster than the average. the issue is that they're always rare and as tools and tasks become more complicated they become rarer.
79
@user-sl6gn1ss8p I just read OpenAI's statement on it to confirm and it is referring to submissions and not candidates. You are correct that it does select from a list of candidates, but that selection constitutes 1 single submission. they were given 10 hours, 6 questions, and 50 submissions per question. I don't know how many candidates that corresponds to exactly but I'd venture its in the millions considering its a super computer running for 10 hours non-stop.
14
@moonwine7398 😆🤦‍♂ come back when you know what a quote is
12
@TheFinalsTV Yea you must be real busy and independent with that cutting edge halo gameplay 😆 I got almost as many subs as you and I've never even uploaded a video lmao
10
@TheFinalsTV also nobody with "TV" in their name should be allowed in this comment section
10
@TheFinalsTV I look forward to seeing you in 20 years still saying the same thing, just like people were saying 20 years ago
10
@SMGA14 yep and we'll have flying cars by the year 2000 🙄 there's a sucker born every minute
6
then you're not very smart
6
@PatrickHoodDaniel LLM's don't give consistent answers because 1) they're rate limited and the amount of compute spent changes the answer and 2) they have a 'temperature' parameter which is effectively just RNG when selecting from the top token candidates 3) every single character you type is a completely new input so something as simple as leaving out a question mark will potentially get a different answer
5
@user-sl6gn1ss8p a "candidate" is the same as a submission in this sense. you don't know if the candidate is correct until it gets validated, which requires a submission.
5
@TokyoMystify you must have not understood the 10,000 submissions part
3
 @micca971 Claiming you don't know something is a claim. You don't know, others do. The neurons are never conscious, numbers of neurons have nothing to do with consciousness.
3
views are a thousand times more frequent than comments, so youtube counts them in batches slowly over time as opposed to comments which are just counted normally as they come in. So there is often a noticeable delay in the view count when the video is first uploaded. i believe that's what the comment above mine is referring to as well.
3
@TheFinalsTV I don't need luck I have a brain. It makes sense why you're expecting to be replaced by AI now though.
3
 @TheFinalsTV 😆i use it every day, it can't even make asteroids from 1979 without messing up. keep dreaming mr tv
3
@TheFinalsTV burying my head in work* you mean, as opposed to playing halo, which is why i have a job. I do have to get back to that now though, enjoy your self-pitying doomsday fantasies.
3
that's a summary, not the actual chain of thought
2
it beat them as long as we ignore the 10,000 failed attempts
2
@micca971 I know you didn't, that's why your claim was silly. There is no magic number of neurons that suddenly creates consciousness.
2
i watched a dude program snake in 4 minutes just from memory and it was better than those demos. they haven't even caught up to 1979 asteroids yet
2
@sajeucettefoistunevaspasme lol don't worry man you are in the category that AI will help the most
2
@TheFinalsTV "TV" suggests you make money on your own? 😆
2
@micca971 "a few neurons" specifically, how few? and how did you reach that number? or do you choose it arbitrarily
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago... and for the past 30 years the number of software engineers has been increasing non-stop 🤔
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago and the number of software engineers has been increasing for 30 years 🤔 hmm
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago, yet the number of software engineers has been increasing ever since?
1
@seanmurphy2365 it happened 30 years ago yet the number of software engineers has been increasing for 30 years
1
@tzardelasuerte it copies literally everything. if you don't give it any training data it does absolutely nothing. and no, that's not "how human brains work" which I know you're inevitably going to say next. that's how plagiarizer's brains work.
1
@sansithagalagama I'm questioning the person who made claims about it. Dont you think scientists have tried "a few neurons sending signals back and forth" before? Of course they have. It displays zero properties of consciousness.
1