Youtube comments of Kenneth Hammond (@kennethhammond6683).
-
266
-
198
-
133
-
75
-
73
-
70
-
55
-
36
-
33
-
32
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
26
-
25
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I have no knowledge of this woman's National or legal status, I think she is an Australian National, like it or not that gives her rights as under Australian Law, her religious affiliation is irrelevant to that fact, if she has broken any Australian laws then the right conduct is she should be tried in an Australian court of law, not on social media. Unless a Court establishes her guilt to an actual criminal act she remains from a legal standpoint, innocent. It was the US and its allies that created, armed and trained the alphabet soup of Jihadi insurgency groups in Syria, and still does, when the courts hold the Wests politicians to account for giving material support to terrorism in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan,Palestine not until then will justice have been served. This woman's crime if in fact she is guilty of a crime pales in significance to the crimes of Western leaders in the Middle East.
2
-
@alanp9624 Correction: No it is The Universal Declaration of Human Rights that says ......
Jews not being allowed to worship on the Mount in occupied Palestine is a condition of two things 1. the Israel/Jordan Peace treaty and 2. Rabbinical rules that Jews cannot enter and pray on the Mount prior to Moshiah coming, Two of Israel's most senior adjudicators of Jewish law, Rabbi Zalman Nehemiah Goldberg and Rabbi Asher Weiss, published letters ruling that it is forbidden for Jews to go up to the Temple Mount out of fear that Jews could contaminate the Holy of Holy's. Besides in Jewish law the only person permitted on the Mount is the High Priest and that is once a year, so having crowds of Jews praying on the Mount is purely Nationalistic zionist bullshit.Remember The Haram is on occupied territory over which Jordan still exercises territorial jurisdiction over 144 dunums of mosques, buildings, walls, courtyards, attached areas over and beneath the ground and the Waqf properties tied-up to “Al Haram Al Sharif”.Israeli’s actions on the so-called “Temple Mount” violates the Israel/Jordan peace treaty, tIt is the Israeli jewish Rabbinate has imposes a ban on Jews entering the so-called Temple Mount, in fear that jews may contaminate the holiness of the site in occupied Palestine.
Fireworks have been a feature of religious celebration of Ramadan for decades: idiotic fool it would appear your ignorance knows no bounds.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@american2126 Israel’s colonial violence, greatly funded by America and Americans of course, extends to the arts. The state of Israel prevents Palestinians from pursuing their right to artistic and cultural expression on both an individual and organisational level. The occupation state continues to dispossess, persecute and punish artists and performers like Dareen Tatour and Hafez Omar for daring to speak out against its violence. Israeli forces often attack cultural and artistic institutions, disrupt events, destroy archives or deny Palestinian artists access to their own archives. For example, the entire Palestinian national film and archive was stolen from Beirut by Israeli forces in 1982. Palestinians are prevented from accessing their own visual history—documents created by their own people.
Palestinians have no freedom to practice art, much less to travel to expand their practice, perform, exhibit and collaborate or participate in arts festivals abroad. The establishment of a dance group in Gaza would be near impossible, precisely because Gaza is besieged, and because arts initiatives are relentlessly targeted by Israel. Apartheid is not a theoretical concept, nor do we use the word lightly. It is a horrifying lived experience.
Self-expression through the arts is a right that Palestinians are not afforded. While suppressing and abusing all Palestinians, the Apartheid "Jewish state" regularly inserts itself into creative spaces, such as the Sydney Festival, in an attempt to launder its atrocities and fabricate legitimacy on the world stage.
https://overland.org.au/2022/01/from-safsaf-to-sydney-palestinian-resistance-and-the-festival-boycott/
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
lol"Turks conquered Constantinople" in 1493 I believe, perhaps you can educate us on what laws, conventions &charters were violated at the time?
Israel had a 4000 year history" my how time has flown since 1948.Israel declared its territory as being in accord with the Partition plan of Dec 1947, approximately 52% for Israel 48% for the Palestinians, Jordan was already an independent state by the time Israel declared its territorial extent, both Israel and Jordan were recognised dejure by the US on the same day, your “Jordan is Palestine” remark is nothing more than ahistorical Nonsense, obviously so, since your Jordan is Palestine nonsense was overlooked by the Israeli and Jordanian officials who negotiated and ratified the treaty of peace between the two countries. It merely contained a safeguarding clause regarding the status of the Arab territories that came under Israeli military control in 1967
In short, there's little substance to the notion that "Jordan is Palestine", unless you are referring to the Jordanian territories in the West Bank.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@usunited5756 Biblical mythology is Somewhat irrelevant to the question of the establishment of the state of Palestine, You may choose to live in a mythological past that gives you comfort, thats your prerogative but the rest of the planet moved on. Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne on August 26, 1924 allowed the governments of the new States of Palestine, Syria, and Iraq to issue Nationality Acts.
According to Norman Bentwich, the the British-appointed attorney-general of Mandatory Palestine the principle adopted was that Ottoman subjects habitually resident in the detached territories became ipso facto nationals of the State to which the territory had been transferred.
The fact is that Palestine was a new state that came into existence in 1920 and that it had international rights and obligations, as such.
Furthermore, the Allied and Central powers had explicit obligations under conventional international law to recognise the state of Palestine and deal with it as another state.
Every time someone challenged Palestine’s statehood in any connection with a case before an international or national Court, dealing with the period prior to November of 1947, the decisions uniformly held that Palestine was a State – no “ifs, ands, buts, or maybes”.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SeaJay_Oceans Its called a paradox, vaccines are never 100% effective, they provide a degree of protection so a percentage of those vaccinated will still get sick and possibly die, the polio vaccine is considered the most effective but even that does not give 100% protection, so despite more people getting vaccinated, the percentage getting sick, while remaining the same translates into a greater number of people getting sick and possible death in the vaccinated population, while the percentage remains the same but the actual numbers increase 1% of 100 is 1, 1% of 400 is 4, 1% of 800 is 8 and so on, so the more people who get vaccinated the greater the number in that vaccinated segment of the population will possibly get sick and die, while the percentage remains constant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@barak9966 LIE1. Independence from the British Mandate, there was no British Mandate when Israel declared, it did not exist, because Israel could not declare while the Mandate existed the Mandate ended in order for Israel to declare, so your opening sentence is just more Zionist settler colonialist b/s. LIE 2.ZionistIsrael has never made a favourable offer that would result in an independent sovereign State of Palestine, all Israel's offers have come up way short of that basic requirement, anything other than that would run counter to Zionism's basic principle, of NO Palestinian state East of the Jordan River, LIE 3.The PA is corrupt they are the Israeli zionist's poodle in charge, that carries out Israel's commands, what do you expect from a puppet regime put into office by a corrupt zionist regime. LIE4. Gaza is the worlds largest outdoor prison, Israel has never allowed any form of democratic rule to flourish in Gaza, Hamas was elected Democratically, There have been a people known as the Palestinian Nation residing in Palestine quite separate from any other Arab state long before European Jewish nationalism was invented in the1800's, The Palestinian population was largely stable up to and prior to Zionist immigration to a country well outside Jewish Europe, from where the majority of EuropeanJews who had never been in Palestine nor their European ancestors ever been in Palestine, emigrated from in the early 20th century. Love the way zionists expose themselves as the LIARS they are and always have been. Israel never agreed to divide Palestine equally, Israel only agreed to violently expel as many Palestinians from their ancestral homeland as was possible. Seems that Zionists LIE as easily as they breath.Your diatribe is nothing short of a Perversion of History.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eyestosee6750 I don't mean to offend you, thats not my intent, all of what I have offered you to date is my own words, to answer your question, about my sense that you sound angry, I just pick up that vibe from you, having said that I am quite prepared to say I may be mistaken, so if you feel offended then I apologise for that, anyway back to our discussion, I see that your link is information provided by Colleen Huber, a women who some consider to be a naturopathic nutter that cares not one iota about the vulnerable cancer patients she claims to treat but in reality just exploits for her own selfcentered profits, she reminds me of a women who like Colleen Huber used to entice cancer patients to stop taking all the cancer medications prescribed by their Doctors, medications she deemed unnecessary and commence on pills lotions and diet plans she would profit from, it goes without saying that most of those patients having trusted her ended up dying prematurely with runaway disease, unfortunately the world is full of uncaring jackals like Colleen Huber that prey on the sick and desperate who are only looking for hope, she also had this angry air about her, despising all conventional medical Doctors along with all forms of conventional medicine, maybe the anger I sense in you is really you projecting the anger many of these unhinged naturopathic quacks exhibit towards orthodox medicine. Again sorry for having to be so blunt but one has to say what one see's as evident. Colleen Huber gimme a break!! I guess our discussion is over.
1
-
@eyestosee6750 Well not trusting media or authorities is the very definition of skeptic someone who tends to doubt accepted beliefs, thats fine I think its quite healthy to have that trait, it protects people from falling into the trap of being gullible. I for one are very much the same, so I would encourage you not to change, keep searching for your own answers, having said that Covid uncontrolled is a real virus that has the potential to kill 100's of thousands if not millions, in fact its killed some 3 million people sofar, its real and we have limited understanding of it as an organism capable of many mutations, we haven't seen the last of it and I doubt we ever will, the scientific/medical field is still learning about it while the virus is still on a killing rampage while mutating all the time, to date its been mainly older folk in the 70-80 yr old group who have died from it, but we are seeing strains emerge that are now killing increasingly younger people in the 20/30/40 yr groups. Oh dear , gene therapy with operating systems, you have verifiable evidence for your claims I take it, you need to share such evidence, you are veering off into conspiracy theory with some of your claims there, friend, you sound angry, you can believe whatever you like, but society has a greater responsibility towards it citizens to find answers and possible treatments like vaccines and behaviour modification to at least try to ward off infection rates from spiralling out of control, sure the vaccines we have are not fully tested but there is an emergency going on, people are dying by the thousands, emergency situations sometimes require emergency actions to overcome the reality of rampant infectious disease.
1
-
@eyestosee6750 Clearly you are a skeptic, that is not unusual to find during major health scares like epidemics and pandemics, it a form of denial that eases the anxiety that people feel, as I said anecdotal evidence has its place, but by its very nature anecdotal evidence is not particularly reliable when it comes to gaining scientific data that one can build a credible and effective health care plan on, that is why when you go to your GP you will be asked not just questions but also sent for tests, xrays and blood work etc to gain actual reliable data that your Doctor can use to make an accurate diagnosis and implement an effective targeted treatment plan, maybe the reason why some countries are having so much trouble getting the disease under control is because people are using what is essentially conversations over coffee and gossip to gain an understanding of the disease while dismissing the actual scientific evidence, it is the reason why a country like NZ can boast total cases of 2555 with only 26 deaths in a pandemic that has infected 133 million worldwide with a death toll approaching 3 million and NZ is preparing to open its borders to other countries like Australia that take the epidemic and it management seriously, while the world plagued by skeptics is no closer to getting it under control, and probably wont for a few year to come, in the meantime the virus mutates into an even more formidable, infectious and treatment resistant strain. Do I know anyone that has been infected with covid and died, no I don,t, but what I don't know is not actually relevant when fighting an infectious disease that has claimed almost 3 million lives in the past year or so. and is mutating into an even more virulent form that is rapidly killing people as young as 20 year olds.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
MEDIA STATEMENT
Friday, 27 March 2020
Greenland Australia would like to address the recent media coverage regarding the company’s shipment of medical supplies to China.
Greenland Australia can confirm that in late January and early February 2020, the company organised shipments of medical supplies – in the form of 10,000 surgical masks, 68,000 disposable gloves, 400 protective goggles, 30,000 medical protective gowns, 1,800 forehead thermometers and 300 shoe covers – to the Greenland Group global head office in Shanghai as a donation to provide support at the frontline of the virus.
These supplies were dispatched to help contain the rapidly-developing coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis in China, which at the time, was the epicentre of the outbreak. In this sense, Greenland Australia’s efforts corresponded with those of many other companies and individuals around the world organising similar donations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
TheNaturalust Sure, its a little hard to find in the script, the findings I refer to are in the section dealing with **Legality of the construction by Israel of a wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Highlighted by **----*
Before addressing the legal consequences of the construction of the wall (the term which the General Assembly has chosen to use and which is also used in the Opinion, since the other expressions sometimes employed are no more accurate if understood in the physical sense), the Court considers whether or not the construction of the wall is contrary to international law.
The Court determines the rules and principles of international law which are relevant to the question posed by the General Assembly. The Court begins by citing, with reference to Article 2, paragraph 4, of the United Nations Charter and to General Assembly resolution 2625 (XXV), the principles of the prohibition of the threat or use of force and the illegality of any territorial acquisition by such means, as reflected in customary international law. It further cites the principle of self‑determination of peoples, as enshrined in the Charter and reaffirmed by resolution 2625 (XXV).
* As regards international humanitarian law, the Court refers to the provisions of the Hague Regulation of 1907, which have become part of customary law, as well as the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949, applicable in those Palestinian territories which before the armed conflict of 1967 lay to the east of the 1949 Armistice demarcation line (or “Green Line”) and were occupied by Israel during that conflict***.
The Court further notes that certain human rights instruments (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child) are applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Also: On May 22, 1948https://unispal.un.org/DPA/DPR/unispal.nsf/eed216406b50bf6485256ce10072f637/b4085a930e0529c98025649d00410973?OpenDocumentthe Provisional Government of Israel answered questions addressed to the “Jewish authorities in Palestine” was transmitted by the acting representative of Israel at the United Nations.
Question (a): Over which areas of Palestine do you actually exercise control? At present over the entire area of the Jewish State as defined in the Resolution of the General Assembly of the 29th November, 1947?
"In addition, the Provisional Government exercises control over the city of Jaffa; Northwestern Galilee, including Acre, Zib, Base, and the Jewish settlements up to the Lebanese frontier; a strip of territory alongside the road from Hilda to Jerusalem; almost all of new Jerusalem; and of the Jewish quarter within the walls of the Old City of Jerusalem. The above areas, "outside the territory of the State of Israel" are under the control of the military authorities of the State of Israel, who are strictly adhering to international regulations in this regard. The Southern Negev is uninhabited desert over which no effective authority has ever existed." ... " the Government of the State of Israel operates in parts of Palestine outside the territory of the State of Israel"
1
-
1
-
1
-
TheNaturalust Unless you can cite the resolutions granting Israel territory it acquired during the '48 war I will have to defer to my understanding that the UN cannot violate its own Charter,let alone customary international law I very much doubt that the UN has officially recognised territory acquired by Israel in 1948, as Israeli territory, in fact after the '48 war ended Israel filed a request that territory it acquired in that war be deemed as Israeli territory, the UN Reconcilliation Commission denied the request, pointing Israel to the General Armistice Agreement, February 24, 1949
“Article V. 1. The line described in Article VI of this Agreement shall be designated as the Armistice Demarcation Line and is delineated in pursuance of the purpose and intent of the resolutions of the Security Council of 4 and 16 November 1948.
2. The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.”
Article XI No provision of this Agreement shall in any way prejudice the rights, claims and positions of either Party hereto in the ultimate peaceful settlement of the Palestine question.
It is illegal to acquire territory by force/war and Israel has never legally annexed ANY territory outside the extent of it’s declared Sovereignty.
The laws regarding territory acquired during war are not tempered by aggressive/defensive criteria, the laws apply to all and any war. A lot of people seem to confuse the Palestinians offer of peace based on the '48 green line in exchange for recognising Israel on the same lines as a done deal,this proposal is simply an offer that has not been taken up by Israel to date, as such the border between Israel and Palestine remains at the '48 partition lines.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sorry buddy you are confusing zionist wishful thinking for facts in law,you are clearly speaking out of your ignorant zionist ass, It is an indisputable fact in law that Israel controls Jerusalem as an occupier The International Court of Justice, numerous UNSC Resolution have all stated that Zionists have no case to claim territory they occupy outside the state of Israel's declared borders,the British Foreign Office Committee functioning under the LoN’s mandate and the British government that was tasked with drafting the Mandate said:
“It was agreed that they(Zionists) had no claim, whatever might be done for them on sentimental grounds; further that all that was necessary was to make room for Zionists in Palestine, not that they should turn “it”, that is the whole country, into their home. In fact, if the claim that Jerusalem was Israeli was a fact in law, then we would not even be having the discussion nor would Israel and its minions be demanding that Palestinians recognize these erroneous nonsensical occupiers claim.
As far as the UN imposing an outcome, the UN has the authority to present the case for Arbitration and impose the outcome of that Arbitration process on both parties if they refuse to abide by the outcomes of said Arbitration. How little the hasbara troll knows about the real world divorced from zionist b/s.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1