Comments by "Nobodyherepal" (@nobodyherepal3292) on "British Army versus Nato war games on Russia's doorstep" video.

  1. In the skies?
    6
  2. Still Russia, because NATO isn’t planning on invading Russia anytime soon. Unlike Russia, who’s started the largest land war in Europe since WW2…..
    2
  3.  @ahmedalsharman  again, Russia. If NATO had “trained Ukraine for 8 years”, why did Ukraine not even have a fraction of the western hardware it has now back then, or not launched any offensives into Donbass in those 8 years? And in what universe does Ukraine, who has no nuclear weapons, threatens Russia, the worlds largest nuclear armed power, with invasion?
    2
  4.  @ahmedalsharman  ok, so why was the Ukrainians military only 200,000 strong including reservists and why was it only using Soviet-originated equipment until 2022? The only western supplies gear in the Ukrainian military prior to 2022 were some decommissioned Humvee’s and a tiny amount of small arms. You didn’t see any Western artillery, AFVs, drones, communications gear, or any thing remotely close to what the UAF has after the Russian invasion. Never mind the UAF is 3x the size it was now, then it was during those 8 years. And even then, the UAF isn’t even close to NATO standardization or integration. For the simple fact, Ukraine is not a NATO member , and didn’t even have the ability to join until Russia invaded it last year.
    1
  5.  @ahmedalsharman  maybe google yourself and see that not only Donetsk and Luhansk look great despite “8 years of shelling” and the fact only about 306 civilians died in Donbas between 2014and 2022. Most of those (298) are the people who died in the Malaysian airlines flight 17 shot down by Russian backed -separatists and with a Russian-supplied missile.
    1
  6.  @ahmedalsharman  ok, so why was Russia supply said “rouge militia” then?
    1