Youtube comments of Nobodyherepal (@nobodyherepal3292).

  1.  @user-vy2hv5pp7k after losing half of all there agains last year. Cope.
    266
  2. It seems Russias words really do mean nothing, if they won’t even come help an “ally” of theirs in need.
    174
  3. Because it was barley better then the AK-74….
    163
  4. The got AOC to go on Fox News? That’s impressive.
    151
  5.  @Sea_Enjoyer  the US didn’t nuke Japan because it couldn’t win. It nukes Japan because it didn’t want the hassle of invading the home islands, after taking back all the pacific already.
    143
  6. Some of these guns look like there straight out of Death Stranding.
    142
  7. Angry cops did a great break down of this stunt. If you watch that, you’ll get an idea just how poorly thought out and executed this “operation” was.
    126
  8. Ah Louisiana….my home state is an American green hell. Glad the brits think it is too..
    104
  9.  @WackSil  sorry my guy. It probably doesn’t mean much though. I’m just sitting here amazed of Putin stupidity. And scratching my head on what magical material reserves he thinks he still has left to send.
    86
  10. Ya, I’m thinking whatifist is going down a rabbit hole in his life right now.
    84
  11.  @starline7228 empty bases means no tanks. No tanks mean no Russian offfenives No Russian offensive, means Ukraine can retake its land easier
    76
  12. Wait are you serious?
    64
  13. Now compare those conflicts to WW2, and they don’t even hold a candle to the scale or causalities of that war.
    58
  14.  @Alex-pj8nz  bro, the Russians have lost over 600 tanks alone in this war. There an entire website that’s been keeping track of every recorded tank loss this war. The Russians have also lost AT LEAST 3 ships, 5 small craft, and atleast 30 planes and helicopters. How the hell is Russia stuff more effective ??
    43
  15. That guy on the far-left at 4:20 is firing a rifle with one arm amputated.
    42
  16.  @AntonVelibor  bro. That sucks. What do they think there going to send all these conscripts into battle with at this point?? Do any of them have any real training outside a year of being cheap labor?
    40
  17.  @zeriel9148 tell that to the pile of bloody bits that used to be a Russian squad in a trench line, or the burnt husks of wrecked planes on a runway strip.
    36
  18.  @bodryy_vecher  do it. No balls.
    30
  19. @ if the Russians don’t have any more tanks, then the Ukrainians don’t need as much to push through.
    25
  20.  @meteorknight999 maybe Russia should stop invading their neighbors all the time, and people wouldn’t join NATO the first chance they got.
    24
  21.  @_DeadEnd_  the south Vietnamese, the iraqs and the ANA turned tail and ran the first chance they got. Compare them to the south Koreans, west Germans, and now the Ukrainians and tell me who actually wants to fight for their country?
    24
  22.  @OGPatriot03  I wish a fellow “Patriot” wouldn’t simp for Putin’s communist regime. How support the victim here and not the oppressor?
    24
  23. Short answer: no Long answer: MAYBE
    23
  24. Well the US hasn’t had any rebels to put down within its borders…..yet……
    22
  25.  @damirbajic4579  indeed. And I have no idea where you get the idea where running out of tanks to send them either. We have 4,000 M1 sitting in storage doing nothing right now.
    22
  26.  @Unknown_Web_User  30+ air to air kills, 4 small boat kills and zero US losses says other wise 😉
    21
  27.  @sisyphusvasilias3943  provoke them? They’ve already invaded! We’re way passed “don’t poke the bear”.
    21
  28. Eh, I got no problem with women getting drafted.
    20
  29. Will HTS accept toilet paper (aka, the ruble) as payment?
    19
  30.  @JesterEric  cool fanfic bro.
    19
  31. We already got problems doing that in Alaska. What you want us to do?
    19
  32.  @gamer-px5cu  ah yes, totally. Ukraine was totally going to attack the massive, nuclear armed state of Russia and March all the way to Moscow…. WTF are you smoking?
    19
  33. Remember, no cameras....
    18
  34. Man, I’ve felt this way for a long time. It’s called working for a living 7 days a week.
    17
  35. And the Russians abandoned a place they called “Russia forever” without a fight 🤡 Still a defeat bud.
    17
  36. By attacking random foreign ships?😂
    15
  37.  @vlajkodzudovic9957  “NOOOO, you can’t bomb us! We’re just “peacefully” committing genocide against our former neighbors! You jerks!”
    15
  38.  @WilliamMcAdams  no. It would better honor to fight the would-be “Caesar” to protect our democratic republic, which many more have died before to keep.
    15
  39. Ya, let’s tax the hell out of them. Pun intended.
    14
  40. Is it the fact that things like Flares, night vision optics’s, thermal/FLIR, and good ol’spot lights exist?
    14
  41. @PatagoniaAries ya, there no where near that high bud. They’re wouldn’t be any veterans around today if it was 🤣
    14
  42. Ya, defending himself in a place he had no reason to be in the first place.
    14
  43.  @damirbajic4579  yes, Ukraine has plenty of tanks
    14
  44.  @MatthewChenault  you say “throw lives away”, but what’s the alternative? Surrender to an invader? Why wouldn’t you fight for the survival of your country?
    13
  45.  @jonnomarko7072 and the UK has hundreds of Tridents for Russia.
    13
  46. We don’t abandon people who actually want to fight for their countries.
    13
  47. Eh, maybe not a completely bad idea.
    13
  48. Ok, you know what, can we get a hypothetical Canadian civil war video? I’m actually curious to see what that would look like.
    13
  49. No
    12
  50. Ok, see you in Savastopol 👍
    12
  51. The Soviets thought the same thing going into Afghanistan.
    12
  52. Ah yes, America’s Hat. We’re all the weird people live.
    12
  53. So….can we also make Cascadia out of this while we’re at it?
    11
  54. He wasn’t wrong, they’ve been starting to withdraw from Kharkiv now.
    11
  55.  @sinoroman  more like going broke.
    11
  56.  @Dung_Bernard  your right. This is a real war, and people are dying at the hands of Putin. We need to ramp up the lends lease then, and give them a fighting chance.
    11
  57. It’s not like there hard to find.
    11
  58.  @ChR1St0p4eR so why did it give up Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Lymen, Chernihiv, Sumy, Snake island and is struggling to hold Kremenia if it’s losses or so little then comrade vatnik?
    11
  59. Watching Russia still try to cope with losing Kherson, Lymen, Izyum, snake island, all of Kharkiv oblast, retreating from Kyiv, losing its flagship and being stuck for 6 months in the donbass is still funny. Hell, I’m still laughing my ass off at the mountain of Russian dead it took to take Soledar
    11
  60.  @randomdude8202  that maybe true, but after losing 600 M1 tanks, with there crews and there 3million + price tag, america would a have either A) quite fighting, B) fire most of the general staff that allows that to happen, or c) stop using so many god-damn tanks. Imagine, 600 m1s and Bradley’s lost in just 3 months of fighting, against a “weaker” enemy I may add. You how much controversy that would cause here at home? Our leaders would have called it quites by now!
    11
  61.  @saqeralthawara2342  no, just our stupid politicians call them that.
    11
  62. Then we grit our teeth, Put on our helmets, and answer the call of history.
    10
  63.  @MatthewChenault  apparently Russia does. And has in the past. Many times, it’s own allies. Just ask the Czechs, Hungarians, and Georgians. America, believe it or not, is not the only imperialistic power.
    10
  64. 1972 for the t-72 > 1995 for challenger 2. Ya, I’d say the T-72 is a bit long in the tooth now.
    10
  65.  @wereback3771 no more appeasement. Never again.
    10
  66. Cope harder Ivan.
    10
  67. “Just two more weeks till Bakmut falls guys” - the Russian fan-boy battle cry for the last 11 months 😂🤡
    10
  68.  @TheDudeMaaaan  except it won’t, because too many countries still use it. Unless BRICS’s currency is somehow more stable then the US dollar is, which, fat chance, given chinas constant devaluing of its own currency, Russias collapsing ruble, and India’s debt problems. And that’s not even mentioning Brazil’s and South Africa just sucking any real value the BRICS currency could even have, with there horrific economic issues
    9
  69. Putin has never visted the frontlines…
    9
  70.  @johnfreeman9358  common sense says it’s better to be in a alliance that will help you against an invader, then being a independent target.
    9
  71.  @ИльяПетров-ц5п  don’t care. We keep up the lend lease regardless.
    9
  72. Why not? They didn’t do well in the snow of 1905,1915-18, or the winter of 1939, or the snow topped afghan mountains. I wouldn’t be surprised.
    9
  73. They don’t. Ukraine has an air transport fleet of its own.
    9
  74. Well this “prop” just took out a helicopter base in one strike….
    9
  75. Not a single NATO solider is even involved in this war
    9
  76. Source?
    9
  77. Ya go figure. He acts like he’s always been telling the truth this whole time, rather then regurgitating pro-Russian points.
    9
  78. Ah….it so satisfying to see Finland and Sweden on a NATO map now……
    9
  79. Don’t overlook how a war in one’s own homeland can motivate people to fight for it. The US military would see the biggest boom In recruits its seen decades, if peoples personal lives, homes and families are under threat from domestic terrorists.
    9
  80. They didn’t join Russia bud 😂
    9
  81.  @TheGrindcorps  3 weeks? They getting 120 days worth of training. And it’s not just the UK, but Denmark and Poland too. That’s about 30,000 newly trained troops every 120 days for Ukraine.
    9
  82.  @Western_Decline  the Taliban can’t even defeat ISIS in their own country, and Russia can’t even fight Ukraine with NATOs Cold War left overs….
    9
  83.  @Mastakilla91 oh it’s been used in combat. Over Syria.
    9
  84. So why was Putin so worried about Ukraine then? 🤡
    9
  85. Least they’re rocking optics Ivan. 😂
    9
  86.  @MandNsvideos665  my brother in hell, they’ve literally hit Indian, Norwegian, Russian, Philippino, and Greek ships in the last month, and there’s no sign they were even remotely involved with Israel in anyway. Israel doesn’t have that many ships under its ownership bud, their not really a naval power to begin with.
    8
  87. Was it worth losing 500,000 men at Stalingrad for success in the long run? History says yes. 5,000 is pretty cheap to beat back a super power. The Taliban and the Vietnamese lost 10x that fighting the US.
    8
  88. Sure as hell not Russia winning.
    8
  89. Ya, remember how the Russians lost there too.
    8
  90. lol. You guys can’t even beat Ukraine, but now you want to pick a fight with an additional 31 countries? 😂🤡
    8
  91. Who’s says they don’t have the resources for a small team to cause havoc somewhere?
    8
  92.  @Attaxalotl  the ANA and south Vietnamese didn’t even try to fight their enemies. The majority of their forces either deserted or surrendered at the first opportunity. As for the Kurds, ya we’re not supporting them as much as we were, but to be fair, we’re also not supporting Iraq or the FSA much anymore either. Probably because after 20+ years, it’s becoming apparent to us thar none of them will actually make that area stable again.
    8
  93. Hey, TP, maybe give us your take on the Kabul situation? These tech update videos are ok, but I think we have more concerning things to worry about right now.
    8
  94.  @daveo8480  oh yes, because TASS and RT is sooo much better right?😂 Still waiting For the “Bio-labs” to be shown off bud🤡
    8
  95. Nah, he would probably say “then the transmission broke” or “we ran out of gas” first 😂
    8
  96. Indeed
    8
  97. No, it’s only the logical thing to do, unless you want to see your shelves empty in your countries stores.
    8
  98. Ya, we’ll, Russia seems to not have any plans to recapture anything it seems. If they did, they would be back outside Kyiv again or still holding on to most of Kharkiv.
    8
  99. “Any day now bro, just another week bro, Bakmut is going to fall bro, just trust me bro, just another month bro, Ukraine is going to lose bro” 🤡🤡🤡🤡
    8
  100.  @davidnoelfranks1124  if you want some sources I can try and send you a link of Russian equipment losses recorded on the field
    8
  101. I have to disagree, in the age of modern weapons (especially man-portable missiles), flat open terrain no longer favors the attacker. This war is proving to me that the traditional mobile warfare/maneuver warfare strategy’s of last century, are obsolete in the face of modern guided munitions and light infantry.
    8
  102. “All warfare, is based”- Sun Zu….probably…..
    8
  103.  @thiefsleef6752 and since 2022, the Russians equipment quality has been decreasing. They went from T-90Ms and BTR-82s to Attack sheds and golf carts in 2 years…
    8
  104. Ya, looks like Russian logistics didn’t get the memo, so now Ivan’s conscripts have to use motorcycles to attack enemy positions now…
    8
  105.  @Matt-yg8ub  well theres a lot more to that. Tanks are kinda....useless in the Asia-pacific theatre. Really the days of mass tank battles and large scale mechanized warfare ended with the fall of the Soviet Union. Without a pier adversary that Feilds large formations of mechanized equipment and terrain there friendly to tanks (like northern/Western Europe), there just no reason to develop tanks further. Since the focus will be in Asia in the near future, ship, light infantry, aircraft, and amphibious units will be the focus going forward. And that form of warfare is expensive to all involved
    8
  106.  @jonasbaine3538  if they attack Finland, which is in NATO now, they will be at war with 30 other counties. How is that not ww3?
    8
  107.  @jonasbaine3538 what? Start a world war when they can’t even beat Ukraine?? 😂
    8
  108. Good. Let liberalism do its thing!
    7
  109. “If crimefighters fight crime, and firefighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight?”
    7
  110.  @swampfox3906  al qaeda would be proud of your devotion to killing democracy with terror.
    7
  111. Been hearing the same thing since serverdonesk comrade. Still isn’t true today either.
    7
  112.  @Bagginsess  don’t have to. We already have 1905, 1914-1918 and 1939 to use as examples. Possibly 1988 too….
    7
  113. Or till the last Russian Orc is driven out.
    7
  114. How is it in anyway bias?
    7
  115. Your not fighting for them either pal.
    7
  116. Bye bye 👋
    7
  117. Says who?
    7
  118.  @alex4863  pacifism only enables fascism. I thought we learned that lesson by now, but apparently not.
    7
  119. You’d think. But NATO would have to be very aggressive to see that happen.
    7
  120. Have you been under a rock the last 20 years? We still haven’t rebuilt our reputation after the Iraq war.
    7
  121. Just pointing out, neither does Russia. There last Pier adversary was also Nazi Germany and imperial japan. And they too also got there asses kicked by Third Worlders with AKs and flip flops. The SAME ONES, in fact,
    7
  122.  @NK-ne9uf still waiting for the “traps” at Kherson and Kharkiv buddy. Right after the Russian destroy the “last of the Ukrainian forces” for the 10th time too…
    7
  123. There going to have to cook that bug Turkey with Greece, because the balkans got Hungary...
    7
  124. Turkmenistan
    7
  125. I like that book, but i wanted more Land combat chapters set in Germany. The few times we see a M1 tank crew are great to me.
    7
  126.  @georgialeksandrov2080 if that’s the case, why’s Russia in control of less of Ukraine then it had in 2022?
    7
  127.  @olegBas and then Russia had several bad days…..or rather months in 2022 ^^
    7
  128. Why would Ukraine need food from Israel? It’s the bread basket of europe.
    7
  129. Well seeing how there doing that anyway, I say the Ukrainians should keep up these attacks at regular intervals. They seem to being doing some good damage on the Russians.
    7
  130. if Elon would stop trying to reach Mars and focus on that, perhaps
    6
  131. Im sure all terrorists think there fighting for a better country as they do there terrible acts.
    6
  132. Ok, what would cause the collapse?
    6
  133. That’s still a loss bud.
    6
  134. And giving even more high end weapons to Ukraine…..
    6
  135. Putin’s delusions of grandeur
    6
  136. Cope
    6
  137. Ya, I’d say having the ability to blockade at Petersburg and surround Kaliningrad from all sides is definitely a sign you’ve lost control of a situation.
    6
  138.  @shakiMiki oh ya, so what’s your alternative buddy?
    6
  139. Yet, your ok with a war of imperialism carried out by Russia?
    6
  140.  @Sergeant_Camacho and then proceeded to lose 2 lines of that over hyped static defense to the Ukrainians, had a attempted coup against their government, and now can’t even take a suburb of Donetsk city after 5 months of fighting.
    6
  141.  @mammajamma4397 man, I never heard a more racist statement in my life.
    6
  142.  @109destiny what a shame, for Moscow to be radioactive glass not long after.
    6
  143.  @VojvodaBla I mean ya. Basically. They have the US giving them what ever they need, and we have no shortages of MREs and winter gear to send over.
    6
  144. And Putin has been blue-balled out of another conquest 😂
    6
  145. The Sudanese let them come in, and Russian forces in Syria are fair game.
    6
  146. We’re not directly involved in this war, and compared to Afghanistan and Vietnam, this is costing us basically pennys.
    6
  147. In the skies?
    6
  148. Australia fought in WW1, (a very artillery heavy war) and was on the victorious side of that conflict. And artillery doesn’t win wars. It always comes down to the infantry and his rifle.
    6
  149. Not without help. And they lost to them in WW1
    6
  150.  @franticsledder  “the most fortified position in the world” to you is a bunch of empty fields, ruined towns and some WW1 trenches? Christ the Russian army is pathetic if this is what’s holding it up.
    6
  151. Basically unlimited thanks to the US MIC
    6
  152. Ukraine also took more land than Russia in the same time span
    6
  153. @Shaquille Oatmeal oh don’t worry, it will come here if we don’t keep helping Ukraine. . Putin is already sizing up Alaska.
    6
  154. Oh yes, because the Russians are totally about to March in Kyiv any day now, and Kherson is still a Russian city forever too, right? 😂🤡
    6
  155.  @adamelghalmi9771  so, your Portuguese? My brother in hell, where do you think your county’s fuel comes from?
    6
  156. lol, most of the 61 billion stays in the US and goes towards expanding our military industry, which in turn creates hundreds of thousands of jobs for our citizens
    6
  157. For what, kicking your asses?
    6
  158. Looks like someone is a bit salty about their loss. What’s the matter ruskies? Don’t like it when the other guy fights back?
    6
  159. Welp. This aged like milk.
    6
  160. My friends up there said the same thing. It really was pathetic as a “rebellion” wasn’t it?
    6
  161.  @chico9805  Only if we let it. And there plenty of people like me out their who will resist any attempt to make such an empire.
    6
  162. Russia is winning after 6 months of retreating from 8,000+km of terrain and 2 major oblasts?
    6
  163. 1:13 welp, on my way to harass those people 😊
    6
  164. Regardless, that’s still an insane amount of casualties for 3 months of fighting.
    6
  165. GET BACK HERE, YOU GENIUS!
    6
  166. Russia won’t do crap.
    6
  167. Hey, Arma 3 modders out there. Please make this. Thank you.
    6
  168. From what? Unarmed civilians with slightly darker skin tones?
    6
  169. So, why’s the Russian pulling guns out from the 1940s and 50s if there production is so much better?
    6
  170. Try something bud. Turkey is a NATO nation too🤡
    6
  171. How’s it propaganda when it’s true? 😂
    6
  172.  @jonasbaine3538  ok again, a nuclear attack on a NATO member will only result in the destruction of Russia when NATO retaliates in kind. Again, how is that NOT WW3?
    6
  173. Judith Jackson all ways has been.....
    6
  174. Jairion: I think it would be a interesting world. It means large conflicts would be difficult to fight and they couldn’t go on very long with attrition eating away at there small warrior Castes
    6
  175. Not going to lie, I thought a civil war was about to start. I was scared shitless. It made me abandon the right wing as well.
    6
  176.  @doliniplanini2260  your still forcing people that have been contributing to your society for generations to leave there homes and go else where. How is that a good thing, compensation or not?
    6
  177. Answer: it is
    6
  178.  @philipmcgee8425  thank you. Too many people think us here in the south are Stars and Bars flag waving imbreds that want the confederacy back. It pisses me off.
    5
  179.  @rockycomet4587  like hell it is.
    5
  180. Well what did you expect? , it’s YouTube.
    5
  181. Funny. Maripol and Bakmut are wastelands compared to donbass, and Russians have been there only a year.
    5
  182.  @renevargas8616  what, were you sleeping during Kherson and Kharkiv or something?
    5
  183. It’s an embarrassing failure, because it was the only city Russia captured intact . And then the morons “annexed” it and called it “Russian forever”. So by losing Kherson, they technically abandoned “Russian” territory without a fight😂.
    5
  184. The Ukrainians arnt invading Russia this time, and Russian logistics have been terrible even in the “good” summer months. Winter isn’t going to be helping them much this time.
    5
  185.  @izantzafer5842  the Russians abandoned the largest city they’ve captured this war, plus all that terrain up north, AND tons of ammunition and equipment to the Ukrainians,… But that’s not a frontline collapse to you?
    5
  186. If NATO was directly involved in this fight, this war would last a month. TOPS.
    5
  187.  @MandNsvideos665  it really isn’t bud. And if the Houthis keep it up, their going to have US troops occupying the coast of Yemen.
    5
  188.  @neweraamerica7363 well it’s not just rail depots that have been hit. They’ve hit ammo dumps behind the lines, the port facilities Bryansk several times, at least 2 helicopter bases behind the lines, and are starting to kill Russian artillery batteries with HIMARS now.
    5
  189.  @MatthewChenault  they really didnt. In order to be a neutral buffer state they Would 1) have to have the ability to fight both NATO and Russia if there neutrality was threatened And 2) have ZERO foreign troops or bases on there territory. Ukraine is not capable of the 1st requirement because unlike Switzerland or Sweden, it doesn’t have the money, military industry or advantageous terrain to fight off invaders by its self. And Russia’s Naval bases in Crimea would prevent them from achieving requirement 2. Not that Russia was ever going to give up its naval base, thus this war was inevitable the minuet Russia annexed Crimea.
    5
  190. Far less then the Russians, that’s for sure
    5
  191. None.
    5
  192. Then your in luck, because all the aid sent over is obsolete military gear and equipment we were getting rid of any ways.
    5
  193. No
    5
  194. They’ve kinda been doing that in the Czech Republic, with the plant that refurbished T-72s and BMPs
    5
  195. Nope, just the truth.
    5
  196. It forces the Russian to send reinforcements to Syria to prevent more attacks and further makes the war more costly to Russia. And Ukraine doesn’t have a manpower shortage.
    5
  197.  @modarkthemauler are you kidding? There was tons of things going on in the ME while trump was in office.
    5
  198. And get shredded by AA guns straight out of WW2….
    5
  199. You say that, but we have fresh footage of them around Kherson and the Kharkiv area during the recent offensives. I thought they were all destroyed too.
    5
  200.  @matthewrussell8590  there getting at least 60,000 new replacements from NATO training centers every month, and American Lend lease definitely isn’t ending. Just today, the white house is finalizing the transfer of Patriot missiles to Ukraine, and Slovakia may finally be sending its mig-29s over too. And hey, personally, I love being the Arsenal of Democracy again.
    5
  201. Lousiana man here. I agree.
    5
  202. I always wondered how went from the cool 90s gear to the Tacticool crap of today.
    5
  203. 8:43 oh no, we dug up Land Warrior from the military projects grave yard didn’t we?
    5
  204.  @alexanderpepkin4110 I guess they don’t care there second largest city is an hours drive from NATO territory now, their nuclear submarine headquarters is just 300 miles away from NATO, and Kaliningrad can now be blockaded and cut off by sea now……
    5
  205. No more appeasement
    5
  206. Ya, like Russia losing this war
    5
  207.  @dalbhuie_youtubeaddedanumber oh man, one disgruntled sailor burns a ship, the whole navy must be “protesting” now right? 🤣
    5
  208. Says who?
    5
  209. You really haven’t read European or American history then, have you?…..
    5
  210.  @kris7968 if you just Ignore all th land Ukraine retook not even 4 months ago, the sure….
    5
  211. The Germans lost in the end. And they didn’t have to worry about precision munitions attack thier supply lines or constant drone attacks picking off their soldiers while they slept.
    5
  212. Same.
    5
  213. @Slava Ukraine ya, didn’t you see the Russian tanks finally reach Kyiv? To bad there orcish crews didn’t….. Or there VDV comrades…..
    5
  214. The Ukrainian did it twice last year, to great success.
    5
  215.  @michaelpelzek8882  and you should change yours to a Russian Tri color with a giant Z on it.
    5
  216.  @michaelpelzek8882  I’m not
    5
  217. They sowed the Wind, and now their going to reap the whirlwind
    5
  218. On the contrary, weapons like these will bring it to an end quicker.
    5
  219. Oh so the Russians didn’t run away from Chernihiv, Sumy, Kupyansk, Izyum, Lymen, snake Island, Kharkiv or Kherson bud ? 🤡
    5
  220.  @livingroom1381  hey, I’ll take the “they/them” army vs Putin’s “Was/Were” army.
    5
  221. Oh ya, look now they’ve busted out the t-55s now. 😂
    5
  222.  @samschreiber1640 because my tax money kills them faster and more efficiently 👍🇺🇸
    5
  223. 22:00 I’m sorry Whatif, but I can not agree. If all the century’s of Warfare history has shown us anything, humans have been willing to wage horrible nightmarish wars at ever greater scale over the pettiest of reasons. No matter how much it costs in lives or Treasure, no matter how bad the weapons, war seems to always occur. War never changes, because people never change.
    5
  224. 5:39- I guess you didn’t hear there song “ smoking snakes” then?? It’s about Brazilian Troops in WW2 Italy.
    5
  225. As long as they don’t go back to religion, fine by me.
    5
  226. 16:35 ok look, I’ve heard this argument many, many times. And it’s very flawed. 1) yes, on the map shown, it looks like much of the heartland is blood red conservative. In actuality it’s more purple, as many of those areas also have the greater suburban and metropolitan areas of the major cities in them. Never mind much if the land is made up of a highly diverse population of people. This ranges from whites, blacks (especially in the rural south), Hispanics, native Americans ect. I highly doubt this group of people would really around solely the right wing of the political spectrum. 2) have you ever done the logistics of how one would “cut off and surround” a major city??? Like, you’d need easily 10s of thousands of militants just to blockade all the ways into one city . And even then, that’s just the land connections. How the hell do you think your going blockade a major port or a city with a big international airport? You would need several counties worth of people to even attempt this wanna-be Maoist tactic. And as I stated in point 1, very few rural people are going to be on the same page, let along 10s of thousands of them.
    5
  227. 2019: they year of shipwreck discovery’s. Was it new tech or something?
    5
  228. Oh those poor Russian McDonald’s employees who had to make this…..
    5
  229. It’s going to be fun watching you cope with Russias defeat….
    5
  230. Oh ya, they’re just invading one of their neighbors right now but totally not a threat right? 🤡
    5
  231.  @randomdude8202  this is not WW2 though, men and equipment (especially equipment) are far more expensive to replace and the public optics on such losses can cause serious consequences to each sides political and social environment. I’d like to point out the US helped win world war 2 by, firstly, working ALONGSIDE its allies, making the greatest logisticaland industrial m system in military history, and using its massive air and sea power to grid down the german, Italians and Japanese war machines at home. Nevermind the fact much of our equipment was more then a match to what the axis were fielding, especially our small arms, aircraft, ships, radar, sonar, radios, artillery, medicine and trucks. Which is what we’re doing right now, giving Ukraine lend-lease, intelligence, and training and hurting the Russians politically and economically. And you bet your ass we got rid of under-performing generals in the world war 2. A great example is Lloyd Fredendall, who completely botched the early North Africa campaign for us. And this really didn’t have to be a life or death situation for Putin either. He can quite right now, and MAYBE we can go back to the status quo of pre-February 2022, though atm, thats a BIG “maybe”.
    5
  232. Who is he referring to?
    5
  233. Laughs in Saudis and Venezuelans
    5
  234. I STAND WITH CROWDER!
    5
  235. I second this! It would be interesting for Cabal to cover!
    5
  236. Yes! I’ll go ask him!
    5
  237. No we definitely still ridicule them. They basically trap the crew and compliments in a burning death trap if they’re hit.
    5
  238.  @UmbraHand  how about you stop grasping at straws and tell me what the SU-57 has ever done?
    5
  239.  @desertodavid what’s a joke, is that we all though Russia was a peir adversary.
    5
  240. Not really. The leopard actually can save its crew when it’s hit, and most do the leopard causalities have been recovered for repairs. I can’t say the same about the T-90M
    5
  241. No, this is what happens when you use an outdated clunker in frontal attacks and meatwaves…
    5
  242.  @edwinsiala3373 ya, ok bud. Just like how Kherson is Russian forever too right? 😂
    5
  243. @ no, empty bases means no tanks coming, and less at the frontlines. And ya, just like 2023, but now with F-16 support and more long range missiles to support it.
    5
  244. Ya, one supposed to be the “second strongest army in the world”, but for some reason can’t seem to defeat the “most corrupt country in Europe”. The other is protecting his home.
    5
  245. And it’s not even a fraction of the casualties just one year of Russian shelling, bombing and general combat has caused.
    5
  246. Ya, they learned to join NATO before Russia gets the idea to invade them
    5
  247. Iand leave all their vehicles and weapons behind and sacrifice several Planes to cover their withdrawal? That sounds like a route to me more then a trap.
    5
  248.  @doliniplanini2260  they pulled a coup because they couldn’t win democratically. Cope
    5
  249.  @doliniplanini2260  expect the Hasvara agreement was not instated by a democracy. It was passed and enforced by a horrible fascist state against a population that could not resist it or vote against it.
    5
  250.  @vig6254  he is
    5
  251. Well there mostly serous. Most large heavy machinery requires at the very least, diesel fuel. Trains, river ships, large tractors and combines ect. If they could be electrified it would be nice, but i doubt they will be as efficient. Also: getting rid of oil has some serious complications. Most of the US gulf coast is built on the oil industry. If it went a way, it would devastate them; On that note, do you really want to destabilize Russia? The largest petrol state in the world?
    4
  252.  @jdbc94  I’d advise to getting OFF said forums and sources. They seem to have convinced you that a bloody war between fellow citizens is coming, and that you should Welcome and Accept it. Not a bunch of people I would like to associate with.
    4
  253. Aw yes, because America is the only country that benefits from the Suez Canal right? 🤷‍♂️
    4
  254. Never had lamb before. How is it?
    4
  255. CS:GO was right! _ terrorists win…..
    4
  256. Only in your head vatnik.
    4
  257. (Psst, no one tell him about the ruskies giving eachother head while a drone watches)
    4
  258. The same “idiots” who see Russia hasn’t even defeated Ukraines Soviet era airfleet, 3 years into a conventional war….
    4
  259. Ya right. Like Europe wants a repeat of appeasement that lead to the largest war in human history.
    4
  260. Ya, because Ukraine took back almost 10,000km of terrain back, and many towns, with our losing nearly a fraction of what Russia has. It’s taken Russia 6 months to take a bombed out town in the middle of nowhere, while losing its own intact major city, only bridgehead over the Dnipro, and only land threat to Odessa it had left by losing Kherson.
    4
  261.  @realdaybreaker8013  oh I see the long term plan alright. It involves Russia leaving like both of us did in Afghanistan in defeat.
    4
  262.  @FOLIPE the hell does national parks have to do with literally anything here?
    4
  263. 12:50- so....what’s the Belorussian army doing during all this?
    4
  264.  @hello-rq8kf technology products, services, luxury goods, food, consumer electronics, aircraft, maritime machinery, tourism ect.
    4
  265. Why would Ukraine hire a terror group to attack random civilians, when it’s already had success attacking refineries and military targets like airbases, ships, and munition dumps inside Russia with drones already?
    4
  266.  @shakiMiki indeed. Your either under the nuclear umbrella of a super power, or the your target of another. That’s the lesson here.
    4
  267. It needs to be ONE of our priorities. Not THE priority.
    4
  268. No, Ukraine should get into NATO as soon as possible.
    4
  269.  @carlscamino5844 1. Yes the Russian jets would have enough range to reach Guyana if they had external fuel tanks 2. Well, there’s speculation the Venezuelans might go through a small part of Brazil to use the Highway there to invade Guyana with.
    4
  270.  @calistusfrancis1340 says who? Because the Russians can’t even beat Ukraine who’s using just our ColdWar left overs.
    4
  271.  @Raul_Menendez stop looking in the mirror then.
    4
  272.  @georgekaradov1274  neither have the Russian tank apparently. It doesn’t help either when the Ukraine destroy their fuel stocks constantly too.
    4
  273. The Canadians, Finn’s, Swedes, Norwegians, and Danes and Estonians would disagree with you there pal
    4
  274.  @andreapehjerne8490  like?
    4
  275.  @shyamsulannuar3861  apparently not, because not only are they a year into this war with no end in sight, but the Ukrainians are only continuing to get better armed as time goes on. You what is the best way to save BTGs from destruction? not invading another country . Instead, not only did they lose a 1/3 of the BTGs originally deployed, they lost most of the land they fight so hard to capture to start with. At this point, when Mariupol is inevitably back in Ukrainian hands, im sure the Russian will say “it was a jester of good will” ,” we didn’t want to be I circled”, or better “we didn’t need THAT city anyway, even if we fought for 2 months to take it”. Oh, and when my feed online is filled with “a tornado” aftermath, I’ll let you know. Because compared to HIMARS, the tornado hasn’t turned things around for the Russians yet.
    4
  276. Ok, I’ve been needing to ask this: can modern body armor stop AP bullets? Because if everybody’s armies wear armor, wouldn’t they just equip there guys with AP bullets?
    4
  277.  @MrTreacletime  true, which is why Taiwan has so many.
    4
  278. Unless the enemy busts out the Bofors 40mm from WW2……or you know, some of the ungodly amount of ZU-23s out there these days….
    4
  279. ANNNDDD a cheap 250 dollar drone just got jammed or shot down by a radar guided gun on it.,,
    4
  280. we’ll just train the Ukrainians on the them.
    4
  281. @ yes. Your a traitor for wanting to help our nations oldest enemy, and support them in their war of expansion that has became the largest land war since 1945. You’re a disgusting traitor to that uniform you wore.
    4
  282. Traitor.
    4
  283. He doesn’t, so they don’t feel anything
    4
  284.  @AzureRoseMarshal  yes, you are right bud.
    4
  285.  @donodono2287  they can either go home, and quite this stupid war, or they can escalate further, and risk not existing much longer afterwards.
    4
  286. It can’t even defend itself against Ukraine, but it’s suddenly going to be able to fight 32 other nation?
    4
  287.  @fordwrc2006  We have treaty obligations to defend Ukraine that were signed back in the 90s in exchange for it surrendering its nuclear weapons. Some day, it will be a member of NATO anyways, so why not help it out?
    4
  288. No more appeasement
    4
  289.  @diegoflores9237  “it can up the intensity of attacks” lol, no it can’t. It barley manages a single missile barrage every other month against Ukraine these days, and it’s not like the dozens of other attacks it’s already launched have destroyed Ukraine as is. So what changes here bud?
    4
  290.  @diegoflores9237  like what? What more “escalation” can Russia possible do at this point?
    4
  291.  @diegoflores9237  what consequences for Ukraine are there, other then a helping hand shooting down Russian munitions killing its people?
    4
  292.  @Jamie-qt5yo with what navy?
    4
  293.  @jfkj1695 yes, those are countries. Still doesn’t make Britain at war with anyone currently.
    4
  294.  @niblet112  no it’s definitely coping. Or do you just ignore Russias army slaves, because you don’t care about Siberians, Chechens, dagistanis, khazaks, and Uzbeks? Nevermind the Syrian, Nepalese, Indian, and Tagik migrants that have been forced into the Russian military service now.
    4
  295. Cope harder tankie
    4
  296. He should be, because 0 NATO troops in Ukraine was apparently a massive threat to Russia it just “had” to invade it…
    4
  297. 1) Strellas arnt anti tank, those are anti air 2) we’d seem more downed Russian helicopters and jets long before the tanks ran into them 3) the Russian tanks have had a hell of a time fighting western ATGMs and Ukraine’s Soviet era armor already. The only thing i see coming up, is more Russian tanks participating in more turret-tossing competitions 😊
    4
  298. About 4-6 weeks. That’s about how long it took for them to learn the HIMARS system
    4
  299. It’s “slowly crumbling” after 2 successful counter attacks and holding the line in the east for 10 months straight?
    4
  300. And it’s 5x more likely to fail when used 😂
    4
  301.  @trevorcrook5753  last I checked, roughly 81,000 KM retaken as of right now. Russia only has about 1/2 of what they started this war with. Roughly 69,000 km as of today.
    4
  302. I agree. And we should provide the weapons to do so. I want Ukraine to get ATACMS and PrSim missiles. Maybe some more kamikaze drones if there own and longer range guided artillery too.
    4
  303. Ya? And Russia never demographically recovered from it.
    4
  304. Which haven’t stopped Ukraines T-72s yet 😂
    4
  305. Pretty well apparently. The lancet can’t penetrate MBT armor, and the Sharid drone can’t hit a moving target.
    4
  306.  @michaelpelzek8882  oh ya, if you just ignore the war against ISIS, the 2018 Gaza conflict, the war in Afghanistan, and the early phases of the Russo-Ukrainian war…
    4
  307.  @michaelpelzek8882  he literally drone striked a Iranian general. That’s the closest the US and IRAN have gotten to a war in decades
    4
  308. @ 1. Irrelevant 2. BS with no source 3. So can Ukraine 4. Also irrelevant
    4
  309. I’m sure you didn’t at Kharkiv and Kherson too huh?
    4
  310. No, the Ukrainians have other troops available. And remember, summer was almost over when the “summer” offensive was launched last year.
    4
  311. We’ve had 4 different leaders in the same timespan of Putin entire regime has been in charge of russia
    4
  312. lol. You act like Russia will actually do anything 😂
    4
  313. Hey, Russia can pack up and leave anytime. And if your nation was being invaded, would you give up?
    4
  314. Because static defenses arnt that useful in modern warfare.
    4
  315. They said the same thing about the 16 HIMARS. and then Russia retreated 10,000+km and lost 2 major cities and oblasts 😂
    4
  316. Dead.
    4
  317.  @mark9099  they said that about Kherson too. And look how that turned out.
    4
  318. My god man, this is nothing more then the crazed ramblings of a guy who needs to seriously touch grass
    4
  319.  @historyrepeat402  what are you even going on about, I hate dictators. You were the one promoting we put the dictators son in office for life or some crap like that.
    4
  320. There best bet would be like some armed Cessna light planes and maybe scrounging up some spare parts for there Mi-17/Mi-8 helicopters. The black Hawks and super Tanacos they have are too maintenance intensive for there terror state to use. Not to mention the manufacturing of spares and munitions is held by a enemy of there’s.
    4
  321. Here’s you 5 sheets of toilet- oh, I mean, rubles comrade.
    4
  322. Bye bye 👋
    4
  323. Cope
    4
  324. Oh wait your serous, let me Laugh harder ahahhahahajahahahahhahaha 😂😂🤡
    4
  325.  @QWERTY-gp8fd you think Russia can keep this up for a decade ? My brother in hell, they’ve broken out the museum pieces already! 🤡
    4
  326.  @RRRR0707  maybe if Russia treated its former states better, they would all be trying to get into NATO now. And knowing Ukraines history of being abused and oppressed under the Russians, it’s no surprise they would want to be part of NATO. Ukraine will be a NATO member no matter what now.
    4
  327. lol, we don’t build walls to keep our people in😂
    4
  328. The US actually has planes in Finland now.
    4
  329. It goes right to an Russian oligarchs pockets.
    4
  330.  @Cowboy-bo1km Russia also was supposed to help Armenia too…..and look how that turned out ….
    4
  331. Ukraine isn’t invading Russia in the winter this time. And Ukraine is just as adept to winter fighting as the Russians are. They also gave the Nazi a hard time in the winter, if anyone bothered to actually study history would remember.
    4
  332. With all this western aid, yes
    4
  333. Low. Because then NATO would have a reason to get involved directly.
    4
  334.  @bireswarhalder9765  why so Russia can invade them too with no real deterrent? 🤡
    4
  335.  @bireswarhalder9765  ruskies go home.
    4
  336.  @bireswarhalder9765  perhaps Russia should stay home then.
    4
  337.  @bireswarhalder9765  wow, how did I know you would parrot the Kremlins bullshit in response 🤡 You Vatniks are like NPCs
    4
  338. Russia not invading Ukraine wouldn’t have led to war either.
    4
  339. Then NATO has a reason to intervene directly.
    4
  340.  @UmbraHand  at least it’s actually done something then sit around and be a parade piece, like the Felon.
    4
  341.  @kuunoooo7293 ot really, the only T-90 I’ve seen intact, is the one that ended up in Louisiana on the back of a truck I saw along I-10 east 😂
    4
  342. Welp, we now know why stealth aircraft arnt that special in the Ace combat universe now.
    4
  343. If they did, they wouldn’t be sending men in on motorcycles and gold carts to attack trenches….
    4
  344. lol. If you call attack sheds “tanks”, sure…
    4
  345.  @TheLoyalOfficer  no, it’s a very bad vehicle. It’s an outdated “artillery tractor” that’s constantly pressed into a APC role because somehow the Russian are running out if BMPs….
    4
  346.  @Ph3NiX80  not at all. Older guns like what the Russians are using are out ranged by Ukraines modern 155mm guns and HIMARS munitions, and the Russian guns tend to be Towed guns rather then self propelled. This means the Ukrainians not only can hit them from further out more accurately then the Russian guns can shoot back, but they can also relocate much faster then the Russian guns can. And adding more artillery isn’t really going to be helping the Russians logical issues either. If anything, it’s made the situation worse for Russian supply lines and made them even more reliant on rail-hubs for supply. Which, with the introduction of StormShadow, is making Russias ability to keep all these guns firing extremely limited.
    4
  347.  @tomk3732 ok, so what’s the point of that if the crews constantly get killed, the new guys don’t know how to operate it, and Russian artillery support still gets diminished ?
    4
  348. Does that mean we get flying warships too? That would be epic!
    4
  349. So who’s re Russians fighting then bud?
    4
  350.  @guilhermeoliveiraneves2422 fuck the LPR and DPR 😂
    4
  351. Here’s my question: why? Is there a reason Russia would want these countries?
    4
  352. Lol. Good joke😂
    4
  353.  @oxidemeta7793  you say that, but the Russians literally left several brigades of gear behind, because they couldn’t run away fast enough…
    4
  354.  @DanielNotWise you mean when it took over eastern Poland after Germany destroyed most of the polish military before hand, or the time it invaded Finland and lost half a million troops for ~50km of land? 😂
    4
  355.  @George_5050  the Russians reap what they sow.
    4
  356. It’s not propaganda if it’s true.
    4
  357. Ya, I thought a civil war was about to start that day. Scared me shitless, and convinced me to leave the right wing.
    4
  358. Not particularly doing well either
    4
  359.  @nzuncovered1845  And yet: -Russia did have 40% of Ukraine, and proceed to lose half of that over the last 6 months -despite “60% of Ukrainians power grid being destroyed”, it hasn’t hampered there ability to launch 2 major offensives and hold on to the Far East of the country against Russian attacks fir 6 month either. Apparently they have so much of their electricity working again, the electric trams in Kyiv and Lyiv are working as normal again, and Ukraines train network hasn’t stopped working a single day in this entire war. -and apparently, Ukraine has taken “Russian territory”…because they took Kherson. A city Putin himself called “Russia forever” 🤡
    4
  360.  @nzuncovered1845  nope. Just spitting the facts.
    4
  361. After 11 months, I’d say this war will end, with every last Russian thrown out of Ukraine.
    4
  362.  @sullathehutt7720  no, I’ll just watch with glee as my tax money stacks more Russians like cardwood 👍🇺🇸
    4
  363. It’s trash.
    4
  364.  @doliniplanini2260  pure copium
    4
  365. Double bruh.
    4
  366.  @joemann2178  no, id probably just pullout a laser guided ATGM out of my storage at that point. Is also say if your having to pull a 60 year old tank out of storage, your probably not winning the war either..,,
    3
  367. Lol, it will be Venezuelas Vietnam war 😂
    3
  368.  @jonahembrom4043  he’s American. He can say what ever he damn well please.
    3
  369. Dislike.
    3
  370. I thought trump was suppose to fix every thing too.
    3
  371.  @rockycomet4587  why? He’s a former president and a private citizen. I got better things to do.
    3
  372.  @rockycomet4587  are you ok in the head buddy?
    3
  373.  @n225bw  god is dead, and we have killed him.
    3
  374. Plato was a Cuck, and modern society proves it.
    3
  375.  @LordRykard9376  your very confident about that.
    3
  376. Ya they do. And I bet we’re going to get some really gnarly stuff from this technology.
    3
  377. Vive la resistance!
    3
  378. Perhaps, countless years from now, a new generation of historians will pick over our ruins and ask what have asked about the Roman republic: “what went wrong?” And perhaps, they will learn from our mistakes.
    3
  379. Ok, 1) our border isn’t being assaulted by a nuclear armed super power hell bent on dominating our nation And 2) if Russia isn’t weakened enough with this war, they won’t stop at Ukraine , and we’ll have a even bigger war on our hands.
    3
  380. No more appeasement for Russia!
    3
  381. Is an accident that causes TWO massive explosions and severely damaged a military installation really better cause then a Ukrainian missile attack?
    3
  382. Except Russia isn’t in the defense this time, and the Ukrainians don’t have the logistical issues Napoleon had, thanks to constant NATO resupply. Winter usually favors the defender too.
    3
  383.  @noone7692  where? They’ve pulled out 2 brigades from Kharkiv and they haven’t done much anywhere else
    3
  384.  @ZlolupKO  they use them constantly. The Ukrainians Air Force is responsible for the majority of the Black Sea fleets losses thanks to its SU-24 fleet. And it’s been used extensively against russian radar sites and formations.
    3
  385. And it was just green-lite today. The US officially says anyone with F-16s can donate them to Ukraine, and it will provide training.
    3
  386. So their traitors then?
    3
  387.  @Itsoperated  ya. I do. Bakmut was suppose to be the southern pincer for the encirclement of sloyvensk that was suppose to link up with the northern pincer from Izyum. Since Russia lost both Izyum and Lymen, sloyvensk isn’t in danger of being encircled if Bakmut is lost. And now since Kherson and all of Kharkiv are back in Ukrainian hands, the Ukrainians can free up more troops for the east to help defense the next defensive line after Bakmut. So ya, I say Bakmut lost its strategic value months ago for Russia, and it tied them down for 6 months so Ukraine could retake Kherson and push the Russians out of the north.
    3
  388.  @realdaybreaker8013  and who made up the majority of Soviets buddy? I’ll wait.
    3
  389.  @A_Takacs it really is
    3
  390. Yes. We can.
    3
  391. So, how are they selling that Petro?
    3
  392. It wouldn’t divert much. The US really only needs to send a single carrier group to assist Guyana.
    3
  393.  @Pythoner  they said the same thing about Kherson, and it’s the Ukrainians flag that’s flying there now.
    3
  394. Then Pepperidge farm has a terrible memory
    3
  395.  @MandNsvideos665  ok, so basically the Houthis are declaring war on the entire world then? Gotcha
    3
  396. No, but I do believe the pictures of dead VDV, burnt Russian tanks, destroyed Russian bridges, and sinking Russian ships.
    3
  397. Because they deserve it. There 215 days into there 15 day “super duper special needs military operation” and our calling up a force 2x the size they started with. All the while Ukraine still has the means to fight, 7 months later.
    3
  398.  @damagedmak  how about 10 more himars, 20 more m777s, NASAM’s, ATACMS, more javelins, drones, M2 Bradley’s, Stykers, Bushmasters,…… Man, we still have at least a year worth of supplies left in the storage dumps. And that’s assuming we don’t just start making more soon.
    3
  399.  @buni1934  they were at Kyiv too. But in time, they wore the Russians down and counter attacked. I’m confident they’ll do it here too.
    3
  400. Eh, that depends if Ukraine’s mobile reserves and partisan can put up the same fight they did around kyiv. I’m confident they’ll stop the Russians with all that fire power NATO is sending now.
    3
  401. No. So far our predictions have been correct. It’s going to be amazing tk see the Ukrainians back in Melitipol
    3
  402. I get the reference 😉
    3
  403.  @marvin902x so, why are the Russians not back in Kherson, or marching into Kyiv again?
    3
  404.  @anasqader3851 meanwhile, Russia has lost almost everything its fought so hard to take last year, including about to lose Bakmut , and literally just had a Coup against putin last month…..
    3
  405. Nope. There in reserve up north somewhere apparently.
    3
  406. And Russia won’t be around much longer after
    3
  407. Russia doesn’t have a say in what Ukraine does for its self. Cope harder vatnik.
    3
  408. So why hasn’t Russia invaded Estonia or Finland yet pal?
    3
  409. So, why has the west spent the last decade fighting ISIS then?
    3
  410. You think we have any control over a group that we’ve actively been fighting for over a decade now? 😂
    3
  411.  @academision  no I was referring to Mcgregor
    3
  412. Oh no, some Pedo thinks Russia is totally going to win this time guys, we really really swear this time! Just like how Russia was on the verge of winning at Mariupol, Serverdonensk, and the gates of kyiv ……A YEAR AGO??? 😂
    3
  413.  @georgewilliams7301  are you kidding? Finland alone has a larger active and reserve force then most of our western Allie’s combined have, as well as the largest artillery force west of Russia. Sweden has a modern capable navy, and sizeable, fully mechanized professional army, and a decent defence industry of its own. Those two would be just fine as Allies.
    3
  414.  @awesmohamed5341  you don’t get my point vatnik. You can have all the nukes your want, but if it’s too costly to use them, what’s the point of having them? The west now can cutoff Kaliningrad and blockade st.Petersburg and prevent any Russian shipping in the Baltics at anytime if it’s choosing, and there’s not a damn thing Russia can do about it without causing the apocalypse in return.
    3
  415. And then the Russian navy has to deal with the combined force of Poland, Germany, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark’s navies too. Assuming the US, UK, Dutch, French, and Norwegians also don’t send ships to keep the seas open for trade.
    3
  416.  @rafalzych8031 hence the Mig-29s to tie them over for a bit longer.
    3
  417. It sure is awesome to see my tax money put ruskies in the dirt 👍🇺🇸
    3
  418. Hey, I love seeing my tax money stack ruskies like cardwood 👍🇺🇸
    3
  419. Safe from what? Unarmed civilians?
    3
  420. That wouldn’t deter the US.
    3
  421. Nope.
    3
  422. And no more nation left either…..
    3
  423.  @TronHero  could you support them at least?
    3
  424. Then you definitely going to hate when we have to finance WW3. Because if Russia isn’t stopped in Ukraine, the Baltic states, Finland, Moldova and maybe even Alaska may be next.
    3
  425.  @Rob_F8F how the hell is Russia fighting Ukraine a “near peer” conflict?
    3
  426. You say that, but you dont see too many native American tribes around do you?
    3
  427. Meanwhile: the Russians still don’t have Kyiv, there’s no “labs”, Kherson still isn’t Russian, and Odessa is no where near in danger of being captured by the end of this month…..
    3
  428.  @mrpilkington9710 it hasn’t lost, but Russia sure is.
    3
  429.  @flyingpharoah4867  that’s not much. They held way more at the start of the war. The “super power” like Russia shouldn’t be holding anything against a non-nuclear power, let alone something that small.
    3
  430. Oh their here bud. Let’s get to bot killing!
    3
  431. It’s almost like if the German government weren’t a bunch of idiots and had stuck with nuclear energy, none of this mess should be happening right now.
    3
  432. Yes. Yes we are. No more appeasement.
    3
  433.  @georgekaradov1274  america also has plenty of fuel to spare. We’ve been giving them fuel this whole war. The Ukrainians apparently can keep their trains running just fine. Other wise, Kherson wouldn’t have been liberated.
    3
  434. Eh, if we can’t do that, why not put our bloated defense spending to some good use for once and keep stacking Russians like cardwood ?
    3
  435. Fat chance. Not only is the Taliban too busy dealing with its own rebel issue, but it’s got a brewing border war with Pakistan in the works. Not to mention, putting them in Ukraine would actually be a huge disadvantage for them. They don’t have the home field advantage they would have in Afghanistan, against an enemy who does.
    3
  436. Poland defeated Russia in the 1920s, as helped win WW2. Poland also had plenty of victories in its wars up until the 1700s as well, like the 30 years war.
    3
  437.  @ali-haider5788  the Syrian army is probably abit distracted with, you know, it’s on going civil war to really be bothered by some Ukrainian spec ops not shooting at them. As for the Russians: none of those forces are in Syria. They, at best, have like a single squadron of aircraft and maybe a short brigade of troops in Syria. I highly doubt the Russians would deploy so much hardware to a secondary front while their war in Ukraine is going so bad for them.
    3
  438. And Russia is so dead
    3
  439. So tell me. Who has Russia fought in 80 years and won against? I’ll wait.
    3
  440. It dumps the spent shell out to be reloaded
    3
  441. thats why thats just the first batch . remember, we only sent 4 HIMARS at first. now they have 28.
    3
  442. They said the same thing about HIMARS. And who didn’t stop retreating for 6 months ?
    3
  443. So, how did Russia lose to the afghans?
    3
  444.  @Taskandpurpose  oh believe me I want that! I’m tired of these lying political snakes we got. Tell to us from a grunt perspective!
    3
  445. Accept it doesn’t work, and it’s very stupid. This isn’t adaptation. This is desperation.
    3
  446. So we’re one step closer to the MX rifles from arma 3? (It uses that caliber)
    3
  447. Exactly.
    3
  448. It’s not bullshit if it’s true comrade.
    3
  449. Fat chance.
    3
  450. So why did Kupiansk not resist them when they arrived?
    3
  451. And their going to find out how pointless they are the hard way too.
    3
  452.  @SpaghettiFPV-tg3qh  tanks will evolve to counter drones in the not too distant future
    3
  453.  @SpaghettiFPV-tg3qh  ya, because most of it is Soviet made crap, not modern MBTs with anti-drone systems built in, like a lot of the new planned ones have,
    3
  454.  @steveb8883  it’s what we’re good at. I love being the Arsenal of Democracy again.
    3
  455.  @steveb8883  or they just send back to Poland for maintenance. That’s what they do for the panzer 2000 SPGs and Crabs
    3
  456. Absolutely clobbered him!
    3
  457. What exactly is he going to see there? A liberated Ukrainian city and a site of now 2 failed Russian offensives?😂
    3
  458. Then Russia should pack up and go home
    3
  459.  @freddie11b  yes, you are a traitor. Your supporting the barbaric actions of our nations oldest enemy who has spent the better part of a century doing all it can to destroy our nation. You’re supporting a nation who’s supported everyone of our enemies, including the ones you supposedly fought, with arms and training to kill our soldiers with for the last 80 years. You are a traitor to your uniform and our country.
    3
  460. No, Ukraine has SU-27s. Not a lot, but they do have them. You are right in the storm shadows though. Maybe he mistook both planes. 🤷‍♂️
    3
  461. None. Unlike the Russians, the Ukrainians don’t attack civilians
    3
  462. He didn’t. Because that doesn’t happen in Ukraine. It happens a lot in Russia though, especially east of the Urals
    3
  463. No, there not. The Ukrainians have no intention of lowering the draft age to 18
    3
  464. Theres no kill like *Overkill* 😉
    3
  465. Truth is, they were a paper tiger from the start.
    3
  466.  @kurtschmidt5005  we should not.
    3
  467.  @Taskandpurpose  it’s odd. When I was in high school, I thought land warrior was going to be the future of infantry gear. Used to draw futuristic soldiers based on the gear and the OICW weapon. Then it got canceled. It’s weird to think this old idea might still have relevance thanks to modern IT technology and electronics getting so light and small for it to work. . But my question is, how the hell are they going to run all this stuff? Batteries are heavy!
    3
  468.  @stinkypete891  ya that that, but Ukraines BTR-4s have done a number on them already,
    3
  469. Not before wrecking Ruskie BMPS and infantry. Like it was designed to do
    3
  470.  @fordwrc2006  you just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. Like good little bot you are 🤣
    3
  471.  @fordwrc2006  you are NOT. A real person.
    3
  472.  @Robert-xy4xi  I will. And I will be grateful we didn’t repeat the same mistakes of appeasement that our ancestors did!
    3
  473.  @fordwrc2006  Iol really trying to get that paycheck from your handler, eh comrade? 🤡
    3
  474.  @fordwrc2006  and under treaty, we are obligated to defend Ukraine from outside foreign aggression. Which is what where doing now. No more appeasement.
    3
  475.  @diegoflores9237  indeed. Russia CANT escalate any further, seeing how it’s lost half a million troops just trying to hold what’s its taken so far. And even then, it has far less then what it took originally back in 2022, and is now in the process of losing land in Kursk of all places. So, please, by all means, what further “escalation” can Russia possible do at this point that is hadn’t done already?
    3
  476. You mean the like the Russians rhe Ukrainians already turned into fertilizer?
    3
  477.  @supershayloman961 so, what’s launching all the storm Shadows then Ivan?
    3
  478. Lol, ok bud sure. Is that why 1/3 of the Black Sea fleet have been converted to submarines by now? 😂
    3
  479. They don’t have air superiority, that’s why you only hear of a few dozen strikes on the immediate frontline every other day, at the cost of 4-6 Russian planes every couple of weeks to Ukrainian air defenses. If Russia had air superiority, they’re wouldn’t be a rail/road system, electrical grid, or communication system left to even allow the Ukrainians to have a frontline, let alone one literally 90 miles from the Russian border
    3
  480.  @gumelini1  and every time, they do. Russian artillery fire has not only seen a huge decrease on the front, but less cruise missiles and drones get thrown against Ukrainian cities as time goes on. Russia used to launch 100+ missiles every week or so at Ukrainian cities. Now it’s about 40 every couple of weeks. Pro-Russians love to comment about how the Ruskies can throw 90,000 rounds a week, while forgetting the Russians were firing off twice that in the same time frame, during the first 4 months of the war.
    3
  481. No there still running out of ammo. You don’t hardly see massive missile strikes anymore, and the last Russian offensive suffered from lack of artillery support to back it up.
    3
  482. What do we need it for? It was made to fight Russians anyway.
    3
  483. Ruskies go home.
    3
  484.  @niblet112  again, whos Coping? It’s not NATO, because for the first time in almost 20 years it just gained new members.
    3
  485. Who’s coping?
    3
  486. Not a single Abrams has even shown up the front yet, and Russians have lost tanks then all of NATO ever had combined already 😂🤣🤡
    3
  487.  @purgenews599  ya, I’ll take out They/Them army over Russias Was/Were army of corpses any day pal 🤡👍
    3
  488.  @purgenews599  so what is then bud? The Russians being too chickenshit to actually fight for the land they “annexed”? 🤡
    3
  489. Electric warfare, anti-satellite weapons, misinformation warfare, good old “Ghost army” tactics, ect.
    3
  490.  @Andy-kd5or  you think the Brit’s should use tanks on unarmed civilians?
    3
  491. Not that you need it….
    3
  492. No, we’re still interested in Ukraine. Gaza is a tragedy, but the results of the Ukraine war have massive consequences.
    3
  493. And yet, Russia doesn’t even have all of donbass 2 years later, while losing most of their conquests up to this point in the process…
    3
  494. You said the same thing about the 16 HIMARS I bet, but look who has Kherson again….
    3
  495. Which is probably why it’s lost the majority of its wars
    3
  496.  @reinbooo1885  back in 2022, the Russians had about 50% of Ukrainian territory under their control. They’ve since lost most of it, and now are losing their own territory.
    3
  497. Yet, Russia had 50% of Ukraine controlled not even 18 months ago, and now are losing Russian territory proper….
    3
  498. No, more like they get 460kms of land in 6 days, while Russia hasn’t even gotten half of that in 6 months
    3
  499. lol, sure bud. The Ukrainians already lost a brigade of troops yet are still gaining ground😂
    3
  500. Pushed back with what? Hope and vatnik tears? 😂
    3
  501.  @sysghost  we all die some day. I’m not afraid.
    3
  502. With crap active like this, Putin’s going to be at war until august next year. And that’s before the US backed insurgency inevitably starts
    3
  503. A lot. Ukraine has a petro chemical and agricultural industry that would allow for the production of mustard gas if needed. And that assumes the west doesn’t immediately supply CBRN gear in response….or hell, gets directly involved.
    3
  504.  @Arhatu those were the A4 export model to Turkey, and those were killed by TOW missiles, not Russian tanks.
    3
  505.  @typedef_ I hope they don’t miss Crimea then, when the Ukrainians take it back too.
    3
  506. So why’s the 82nd VDV falling back and the Russians begging North Korea for back up?
    3
  507. So…modern technicals then bud?
    3
  508.  @NK-ne9uf still doesn’t come close to the ocean of salty tears Russians fan boys have made after all there losses last year.
    3
  509. Because 1) those missiles don’t have the explosive power as we saw at the hospital impact area And 2) no, it’s not a warcrime to build industry by hospitals. Not that it would matter, because Ukraine finest have many factories not by its western borders at this point,
    3
  510. Ya, how much land did they take this month? 100 meters 😂
    3
  511. Cool fanfic bro.
    3
  512.  @Peacewar2020 apparently a lot, because the Russian airforce still doesn’t have air superiority 3 years later 😂
    3
  513. Most Russian units do not have any sort of optics for their weapons, let alone NVGs in 2024
    3
  514.  @Söderlund11  lol, was it obvious at Kyiv too? How about Kherson? Or Kharkiv? Or Izyum? Or Kupyansk? Or how about Kursk? Is it obvious there too seeing how the Russians arnt even putting up a fight? 🤡
    3
  515. You’ve probably been saying that since 2022 😂
    3
  516. It’s been a dream come true so far.
    3
  517. Because Russia doesn’t have any of the advantages it does in donbass in Kursk. And as the old proverb says “strike where’s your enemy is weak”.
    3
  518.  @thephoenix756  so why did Russia run away from a force that has no tanks for 6 months straight?
    3
  519.  @thephoenix756  so why haven’t they destroyed all of Ukraines armor force yet and didn’t stop running away for almost 6 months?
    3
  520.  @LUDIKCRYPTO  not Russia, because their about to lose more territory back to the Ukrainians. Never mind the amount of equipment they’ve lost that they’ll never get back.
    3
  521.  @Ofasia777  hey, we got F-16s coming to Ukraine within 2 months.
    3
  522. If that was the case, Spain and Greece wouldn’t be an EU members
    3
  523.  @michaelpelzek8882  and it would be on fire now regardless, but we should not have stuck the Iranians back in 2020. Declaration or not.
    3
  524.  @michaelpelzek8882 he nearly did too
    3
  525.  @rmcguirephoto no, it does not. The moral high ground is hard to lose, when your fighting an enemy who’s hell bent on the extermination of your country, people, language and history. The Russians sowed the wind with their use of cluster munitions, and now their going to reap the whirlwind.
    3
  526. No more appeasement for the Russians. Only victory will bring a lasting peace for Ukraine.
    3
  527. Except they not.
    3
  528. You say that, but it’s the Russian being forced to fight at gun point.
    3
  529. Tell that to the mountain of Ruskie corpses that have nothing to show for it a year later…
    3
  530. Still waiting for the Russians to show off the “bio labs” they found comrade 🤡
    3
  531. It’s literally not collapsing. That’s why.
    3
  532.  @sunwukong5518  right, so those troops are basically stuck there
    3
  533.  @ОбамаОбамович-ъ7о  if it was “just math”, the Russia should have won in Afghanistan and Chechnya too. But they didn’t. But I guess you also think Bakmut and Avdiivka were amazing “success” stories too huh?
    3
  534. And Russia has lost half its land gains, Most of its paratroopers, tank formations, it’s Black Sea flag ship, and it’s international respect….. And it still hasn’t defeat Ukraine, and nation 1/10ths its size, over 500 days later….
    3
  535. He’s going to at this rate.
    3
  536.  @adamelghalmi9771  and how does it reach Egypt? That right, via the Red Sea
    3
  537.  @Archangel55 oh yes, just look at the US military invading Ukraine right now….
    3
  538. Russians
    3
  539. Ukraine will not lose in the end, thanks to this aid package.
    3
  540. Speak for yourself, I love seeing my tax money stack Ivan like wood. 🇺🇸👍
    3
  541.  @jamesng7320  and your independence, fame in the history books, and possibly a member of massive defensive alliance not long after….
    3
  542.  @jamesng7320  have you ever heard of a defensive war my guy?
    3
  543.  @AlphaSections  no. It’s not. It just a temporary ceasefire for the Russians to rebuild and try again later.
    3
  544. F@ck that. No more appeasement.
    3
  545. What? The Russians gain a bombed out town that lost its strategic purpose back in October while losing their only major city they’ve captured this war to the Ukrainians and the northern pincer they were suppose to link up with at Izyum also to the Ukrainians? That’s a “victory” to you commies??
    3
  546. Exactly. Aged as well as “Kherson is a trap”
    3
  547. He’s a French Canadian. He’s the worse of both worlds.
    3
  548. If Russia was kicking ass, it wouldn’t run away and leave a ton of ammo and gear behind. again .
    3
  549.  @michaelhaner4866  I meant the Russians. But ya just keep saying “Ukraine doesn’t have the manpower” despite fielding a 700,000 personnel army that has fought Russia to a stand still for over a year and a half now.
    3
  550. I will. I’ll also say bye to him in 2-6 years when he’s voted out or used up his term. Cant say we’ll say bye to Putin till he’s lying in his grave.
    3
  551. Look we all know why they keep making bigger missiles “Dear leader” is trying to make up for his underperformance in bed so he has to impress the wife somehow…..
    3
  552.  @mark9099  it got defiantly cheered me up when Kherson was retaken and Russia copium flowed like it never had before 👍
    3
  553.  @mark9099  I don’t understand where people get this idea Russia is great at wars of attrition. They lost the First World War, the Crimean war and the Polish-Soviet war, despite them being attritional conflicts. I don’t see how there going to outlast Ukraine, who has shown the ability to go on the offensive, even when out numbered by the Russians.
    3
  554. Ya, I’ve noticed that too.
    3
  555. True, but a lot of people also thought the Ukrainians would offer next to no resistance to the Russians, like they had at Savastopol 8 years prior. And Remember, until about April last year, Ukraine WAS fighting with what it had on its own, until western aid began to arrive in bulk.
    3
  556.  @henrylansing9734  bruh, I was making a pun. Think about it....
    3
  557. Ya, even while I am all for de-militarization the police, I sure hell wouldnt get rid of them entirely. That’s way too far.
    3
  558.  @innosam123  it’s never like that. The Syrians and Libyans probably thought the same way, and now look where they are over 10 years later.
    3
  559. No, that was world war 3 that lead to that. Remember, for that to happen, it would have to be a global conflict, so that mankind as a whole can be United under the Federation.
    3
  560.  @pierren___  so? What good is respect if you still lose?
    3
  561.  @jgw9990  yes it does. If you really don’t want trouble, then stay the hell home. He went to that riot with a gun on his own accord. No one made him go their. He went looking for trouble.
    3
  562. Oh NOW you noticed??
    3
  563.  @Antrplg  the US has still had more leaders in the same amount of time putin has ran Russia.
    3
  564. Not at all. We don’t have the same guy running out country for 30 years straight…
    3
  565. 3:55 ticks? There had to be enough cigarettes around to burn them off right?
    3
  566. Oh ya so how you doing buddy?
    3
  567. How many rubles does it take to make a dollar at this point? Almost 80?😂
    3
  568. So, when do you get mobilized yo front comrade? Or did you make it to Armenia in time?
    3
  569. He’s a Russian citizen who has the brains to get out of that failing country. Seems logical to me.
    3
  570. Only on the internet
    3
  571. We already have Estonia, Japan, and Alaska, and soon Finland bud. We can always park more nuclear subs in the Arctic too. We don’t need Ukraine to park missiles in. This isn’t the 1960s.
    3
  572.  @RRRR0707  and hey, if the war ends, then there isn’t any territorial disputes preventing Ukraine from joing NATO. So unless Russia wants to be at war forever, which it can’t, then Ukraine going to be a NATO member once the war is over.
    3
  573.  @RRRR0707  lol, take the Black Sea coast? With what navy comrade? 🤣
    3
  574. Nope. Ukraine can’t join the alliance while it’s at war. Once the war ends, their be able to join.
    3
  575. Oh I don’t know, could it be it’s literally right next door to 3 NATO countries and is currently being invaded by Russia or somthing ?
    3
  576.  @Alex-pj8nz  oh ya, there only successfully held there capital, have killed 7 Russian generals, liberated Kharkiv, sunk the Black Sea flag ship, prevented a bridging operation at Iziom, held out In Mariupol for 3 months completely surrounded, and are still keeping Russians form Gaining air Superiority 80+ days later…. I’m sorry who’s losing again?
    3
  577.  @chadimirputin2282  as appose to virtue signaling the invader?
    3
  578. Not a bad idea there.
    3
  579.  @muckle8  lol. Europe isn’t struggling, let alone the Baltic States.
    3
  580. Oh, so Putin can come in and restore the USSR? Screw that.
    3
  581. None.
    3
  582. For however long it takes for the Russians to pack up and leave.
    3
  583. Cool fan fic bro. I hope the Ukraine love the latest shipment of gear we sent them 🇺🇸
    3
  584. James, no! Your the only YouTuber I know from Spokane.
    3
  585. So who’s Russia fighting then?
    3
  586. They said 14 HIMARS wouldn’t make a difference too. And now Ukraine has 10,000+km of terrain back and 2 major cities and oblasts liberated 😊
    3
  587.  @mikemunro811  hey, I’d love to see America drill like no tomorrow. Better the euros use our fuel then Russias
    3
  588.  @HealzHS  hey, at least mine arnt “was/were” like Russia army’s are now 😉
    3
  589. Cool. Good luck finding modern computer and mechanical parts to keep the oil flowing ruskies 👍
    3
  590. Cool. So Ukraine gets even more better weapons as a result of Russian hissy fits?
    3
  591. Once it ditches Putin and leaves Ukraine, sure.
    3
  592. From whom?
    3
  593. That’s not all that accurate to the current situation. The winter certainly helped Russia out against invaders on their soil, but was a detriment to them when they went in the attack. It’s also not like the EU can’t get more gas from the US in a pinch if it needed it.
    3
  594.  @misastevanovic9395  bud, after everything we’ve seen in Ukraine, I can confidently say the Russians wouldn’t even make it past the Estonian border, let alone anywhere else in the Baltics. It would be a blood bath for the Russians that would make Hostemel, Vuladar, Grozny and Kharkiv look like skirmishes in comparison.
    3
  595.  @samirzemmache don’t worry, Ukraine will get that land back.
    3
  596. Hey, I’d take the they/them army of the west, over the Was/were army of Russia.
    3
  597. Oofff
    3
  598.  @thedave8097  bullshit. Russia would have been at the Polish border by now if none of our lend lease was being used as it has been.
    3
  599.  @GenocideWesterners  maybe the Russias should have treated their former vassals better. All NATO members joined voluntarily, out of fear of future Russian aggression. Nobody joined the Warsaw Pact on there own occurred. And the Russians made sure no one left. NATO isn’t great, but we don’t send tanks into fellow NATO countries when there people don’t want their government anymore. Ask the Hungarians, Germans, pols, and Czechs how their Russians “Allie’s” treated them, and you’ll see why they joined NATO in heart beat.
    3
  600. Cope harder tankie 😂
    3
  601. Question: why can’t China build its own Chip industry like Taiwan’s?
    3
  602. That is literally the worst invasion plan ever. Imagine putting the equivalent of 2 army corps on the other side of the world, with not logistical support, air support, or anything heavier then what can be carried on their backs. That “invasion” would be over so fast, it’s not even funny.
    3
  603. They can’t be “obliterating NATO”, seeing how there’s not a single NATO soldier in Ukraine and the alliance is about to gain its 32nd member nation soon.
    3
  604. They literally threw over 100 missiles at 7 different cities for less then a dozen hits on civilian targets…. That is some impressive air defense on the Ukrainians side.
    3
  605. There not winning by any measure either.
    3
  606. ya no. there has been no HIMARS losses this whole war.
    3
  607. It hasn’t even fought American or British tanks yet bud…..
    3
  608.  @_imtellingmum_  I have, and I’ve seen them rolling out to the front without thermals, lacking a RCWS turret, last generation night vision off the T-72s, and not even the active protection they’re suppose to have…..
    3
  609. That’s a lot, considering the Russians only had like 100 or so when the war started.
    3
  610. It’s up to about 25 now.
    3
  611. They do. All the time.
    3
  612.  @JeffGordon-ph4vz  ya, sure bud. Whatever.
    3
  613.  @blue_ish4499  like where ? Russian AirPower wasn’t present when they ran away at Kharkiv It wasn’t there at Kherson It wasn’t there at Izyum It wasn’t there at Kupyansk And it barley was present at Bakmut or Vuladar, and even then it took serious losses.
    3
  614. How’s it failed when the Russian lines are still falling back?
    3
  615. Says who?
    3
  616.  @KrunoslavStifter yes.
    3
  617.  @jonasbaine3538  don’t let the door hit you on the way out bud 👋😂
    3
  618.  @jonasbaine3538  radiation doesn’t respect borders bud. You think the Russians would know that after Chernobyl.
    3
  619. I’m scared for the future now.
    3
  620. So Ian, quick thing I wanted to ask....we’re did you get that globe in the back round? I ask, because I think that was MY old globe from my old house.
    3
  621.  @dedster3164  if they want to be Russian so Badly, they ought to go back to Russia then. When the Russians get kicked out eventually, they can leave too.
    3
  622.  @dedster3164  ya I did. And I don’t care. I’ll still support the other millions of Ukrainians who are trying to fight off the Russians.
    3
  623.  @dedster3164  well bud since you asked, the significance of retaking Kherson is: 1) it gets rid of Russia’s only bridgehead over the Dnipro Into western Ukraine 2) it gets rid of the only land threat Russia has left to the port Odessa 3) it frees up Ukrainian forces to be moved elsewhere 4) it makes Putin look really stupid for not only annexing the city, but declaring it to be “Russian forever” and then not fighting for it . It’s honestly not only been a huge moral boost for the Ukrainians, but it also shows the west the Ukrainians can effectively use there equipment agains turn Russians. Probably why now we have tons of new tanks, artillery and munitions coming in now to help them out further.
    3
  624. That’s what happened when you got unmotivated crews and soldiers
    3
  625. Ya, the warning is don’t be this f@cking moron an enjoy your life
    3
  626. The “foreign element” gave america a huge surplus of manpower to use in both the military and in war production.
    3
  627. So why didn’t Russia invade Finland before they invited US troops?
    3
  628. With the DPR’s leader in the run, Russias vaunted “3rd army corpse” bogged down in the south, and most of the northern Russian forces running away with out there gear…. I think the Ukrainians have plenty of time to dig in and secure their gains
    3
  629. Tell Putin the leave Ukraine then.
    3
  630. Hey, I’ll take our they/them army over the was/were army of Russia.
    3
  631. Zelensky is the worlds greatest comedian. He made all of mother Russia and her dollar store army a joke!
    3
  632. So why did every former Warsaw pact country join it the minuet they had the chance to?
    3
  633. When Paul says capitalism is bad ( toward the end) you know times are bad.
    3
  634.  @Carl_ATHF  it’s sites zero sources, it’s 8 hours long and is blatant propaganda trying to argue a long dead ideology.
    3
  635.  @doliniplanini2260  who voted the Fuhrer in?
    3
  636.  @vig6254  no I’m pointing out TIKs contradictions too, and pointing out how neo-Nazis today have replaced Jews with “globalists” to hide there true meanings.
    3
  637. 5:03- so what you saying is....they made a AWACS of sorts?
    3
  638. @Работаем, брат! well I didn’t mean specifically with helicopters. I just meant more attacks on Russian soil against Russian military targets, by any means available to them.
    3
  639. No, I’d say throwing a 60 year old tank into the modern battlefield is just a really inefficient way for 4 men to commit suicide….
    2
  640.  @ericp1139  I did, Russia cannot be at war forever. And it’s losing an entire generation of its young people in the trenches of this stupid war.
    2
  641.  @ericp1139  Russia can’t be at war for 20 years, and the only whittling away here is Russia future and its image of strength
    2
  642.  @ericp1139  and yet, it’s been 6 months and not only are they still not even out of donbass, but they’ve failed to Kharkiv too. While lose more of Kursk in 4 days then Ukraine has lost in the last year of war.
    2
  643. Except their not. If they where, the Russians would be in Kharkiv already, not scrambling to defend Kursk 😂
    2
  644.  @TheRealBillBob  it looks to me their only 20kms from a huge nuclear power plant.
    2
  645.  @TheRealBillBob  you realize Kherson was supposed to be “Russian forever” right?🤡🤣
    2
  646. So…Kursk 2.0?….
    2
  647.  MrSaiga308  oh boy, so we can see them get smacked outside of Kyiv by stJavelin and Mr. HIMARS agin? Cant wait to see burning Russian tank columns again!
    2
  648.  MrSaiga308  so why was 1st guard tank army doing in Izyum?
    2
  649.  MrSaiga308  really? losing the only force left in northern Ukraine, the northern pincer st Izyum that was suppose to help surround slovensk, and not only the Russians only bridgehead over the Dnipro river, but a “annexed” city that was suppose to be “Russian forever”….. …..*for a bombed out, useless wasteland that used to be called “Soledar”* …… That was a fair trade to you? God I hope your not a stock trader pal.
    2
  650.  MrSaiga308  huh, I guess all those Russian tanks that have been burning and throwing turrets for months must just have “poofed” out of nowhere along with 1st Guards Tank Army at Izyum right?
    2
  651.  MrSaiga308  was the bombed out wasteland in Soledar worth giving up all of Kharkiv oblast, Izyum, Sumy, Chernihiv,Lymen and Kherson and leaving behind all that equipment to the Ukrainians?
    2
  652.  MrSaiga308  same here buddy. Have you seen a map lately or you just hiding in your parallel reality because Russia can’t seem to win?
    2
  653.  MrSaiga308  only to the Russians, who can’t still seem to cope with losing 8000km of terrain, a city that was going to be “Russian forever”, ever increasing western support, and there “3 day super special operation” almost being a year old now….
    2
  654.  @dukeford8893 hey, the Ruskies wanted to play a stupid game, they get a stupid prize
    2
  655.  MrSaiga308 ya fat chance. More like a lot of dead Russians and free Ukraine.
    2
  656. The ruskies brought it apon themselves.
    2
  657. So Russia can start another war it can’t win? 😂🤡
    2
  658. Best use of my tax money I’ve seen in years, and I hope we keep it coming 👍🇺🇸
    2
  659.  @Trenyng seeing ruskies stacked like card-wood is the best use of my tax money I’ve seen in years 👍🇺🇸
    2
  660. At this rate, their won’t be a Russia soon….
    2
  661.  @mikephone7085  traitor
    2
  662. 10:50 the hell do you mean “special forces?” You mean the guys who ARNT high on Gnat or the guys who actually have a clue on we’re the bullet comes out of?
    2
  663. Hey, Putin f@cked around, and now he’s finding out 🇺🇸
    2
  664. The guy is actually standing by his people as they fight for their sovereignty and freedom from Russia. What’s not to respect of the guy?
    2
  665.  @truthwarrior1489  yes
    2
  666. “If firefighters fight fire, and crimefighters fight crime, what do freedom fighters fight?”
    2
  667. The downside, all the Florida people will go else where and make everywhere Florida....
    2
  668. Then we should ban the Bible and quron too
    2
  669. So….South Africa?
    2
  670. God, people still complain about Iran-contra to this day. Who cares anymore?
    2
  671. We remember. There all dead now. Now I have no issues supplying Ukraine with more and more Lend Lease to kick Russian ass with.
    2
  672.  @Bang_Dzat  Turkey said they only have an issue with Sweden joining. not Finland. NATO is still going get new members soon. And Putin can’t do anything to stop that.
    2
  673. NATO is collapsing as it’s about to gain 2 new members and someday Ukraine too?
    2
  674. The US doesn’t bomb hospitals.
    2
  675.  @LaZyGoKu2 America last, if Russia wins.
    2
  676.  @smartlucker4011  yaya I saw.
    2
  677.  @kdubs9111  ok. I’m going to laugh when I’m right again, like I have been for almost 30 years now. Afterwards, you can shove that overpriced degree of yours way up there where the sun doesn’t shine, ok? 👍
    2
  678.  @kdubs9111  the US is not going to default. If you actually watched US politics, you’ll see the government does this same song and dance every other year, and then passes a new spending plan at the 11th hour. The media just makes it a big deal for views. You still got many more counties to list to bud 😉
    2
  679.  @kdubs9111  no please go on. Because so far only like 3 countries really matter on that list.
    2
  680.  @kdubs9111 name them. I’ll wait. 😊
    2
  681. Cope 😂
    2
  682.  @joshuapaul2022 so, why’s the Russians beginning to retreat on Bakmuts flanks?
    2
  683. Isolationism has never benefited America, and you will be only helping are enemies.
    2
  684. So, how much military aid has India and China given Russia?
    2
  685.  @renevargas8616  where’s your evidence the west has given up? The Czechs just secured 300,000 more shells for Ukrainians to use, the Danes are to wing them their ENTIRE stock of artillery shells to use, the Germans and Turks are building arms factories INSIDE Ukraine as we speak to help supply them, and the US has a 60 billion dollar package awaiting approval as we speak. And that’s just a month after the EU approved 50 billion in funding just last month too, so I really don’t see the west giving up Ukraine now, or in the foreseeable future bud.
    2
  686.  @realdaybreaker8013  the US literally created the largest military force in human history within 7 months of Pearl Harbor, so don’t tell me we can’t build Ukraines army up further within a year. Withdrawing from a city you’ve gone through the trouble of officially annexing is still a defeat my guy. And it’s one that makes you look weak to the world. And again, that Z-boy double think is in full effect here. The Ukrainians are weak, and on “their last legs” (for the 5th Time apparently), but apparently all the NATO weapons and support are also “escalation” and the main reason Ukraine hasn’t been overran yet and have made them a formidable enemy, according to the Russians 🤷
    2
  687.  @A_Takacs  you said Ukraine only began in 1917. That’s WAY younger then the Mongols
    2
  688.  @A_Takacs  Ukraine can trace its history back to the mongols. Same as Russia. Ukraine is as much of a country as Russia is
    2
  689.  @bakedinspiration  pffff, you think the dust has settled, as the Ukrainian have just cross the Dnipro again, are about to be in Robotyne soon, and are about to take Klishciivka back? My guy, the offensive isn’t over yet.
    2
  690.  @bakedinspiration  if its to get Wagner killed in yet another attack on kyiv (this time with Ukrainians already mobilized and with over a year to set up defenses), then sure. but was it really a smart idea to make Putin look weak as hell and cost the lives of Russian troops on their own soil for a troop redeployment? like, theres "5D Chess", and then theirs this Re Tard-ed....what ever the hell youd even call this....
    2
  691.  @bakedinspiration  I know right? prigozhin becomes the third invader in history to ever reach Moscow and managed to pull off the fastest and longest road March in modern history, while also killing multiple Russian pilots and soldiers along the way ,and managed to make Putin bend the knee and pardon him? What the actual fuck is going on anymore? What is this timeline?
    2
  692.  @bakedinspiration  well those “2,000 mercenaries” just took Rostov, and now there’s fighting in and around Voronezh….and a 40km long convoy heading to Moscow….
    2
  693.  @bakedinspiration  so…..you Wagner can take Moscow faster then Bakmut?….😉
    2
  694.  @bakedinspiration  and I’ll say again, Russian doesn’t even have a fraction of those “13,000 tanks” operational at this time. Simple math doesn’t account for poor logistics, maintenance, internal corruption, the horrific Russian climate, or the obsolescent conditions of those tanks.
    2
  695.  @bakedinspiration  no. They do not. If they did, they wouldn’t be busting out the T-62s, or T-55s apparently if they had all that armor left. Probably because most of that armor hasn’t actually been maintained very well since the 1990s, stripped for parts by corrupt officials or the Russian military needing to keep other units in working order, or have been sold off to other nations since then. Covert Cabal has several videos on this topic if your curious, as does Kaboda.
    2
  696.  @bakedinspiration  sure does. Because you know, I didn’t see and recovery gear with those conscripts Looting the vehicles….. it also doesn’t mean the Ukrainians are just going to stop their offensive, because it lost a few vehicles in the process. I mean, the Ukrainians captured T-90s around Izyum, (one of which ended up at a gas station not too far from my house here in Louisiana), does that mean Russia lost the war then and there?
    2
  697.  @bakedinspiration  lol. I don’t know what news you follow, because I’ve seen man videos and photos of Russians surrendering and Ukrainians in towns about 10km into the Russian lines.
    2
  698.  @bakedinspiration  except they haven’t retreated back at all, nor has Russian artillery ever routed an attacking force. The Russians and their fans have some silly idea that artillery is any way a good replacement to actual QRF or counter assaults.
    2
  699.  @bakedinspiration  that they’re launching there offensive and now have taken the towns of Novomaiors’ke and Urozhaine in the last 24 hours? 🤷‍♂️
    2
  700.  @bakedinspiration  laugh if you want, the Ukrainians just took another town in the south as of this morning.
    2
  701.  @bakedinspiration  I’m coping? The Ukrainians advanced across more territory in 5 days, then Russia did in 5 months at Bakmut in the south. And in between then and now, it supported raids into russia with the free Russian legion. Who by the way, STILL hold parts of Belgorod oblast. The fact Russia is STILL trying to fight for Bakmut at this posing is beyond me, but hey, if they don’t care what happens in the south, not my problem. Next stop, Melitipol . 👍
    2
  702.  @bakedinspiration  damn straight. We got reports of Ukrainian units 10km in Russia lines now in the south, and the flanks of Bakmut aint looking good now. I guess that’s what happened when you put the TikTok brigade on garrison duty instead of actual soldiers. Make me almost feel bad for Wanker Group dying for 10 months for nothing…..
    2
  703.  @bakedinspiration  just two more weeks huh? 🤣
    2
  704.  @bakedinspiration  oh you mean how Russia has “totally out match them” with their air-force that has been almost nonexistent since the start of this war and the armor thats progressively getting less modern as time goes on? And then they ran away from Kyiv, snake island, Kharkiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kupyansk, Lymen, Izyum land Kherson? Still “ just two more weeks to take bakmut “comrade? 🤣🤡
    2
  705.  @bakedinspiration  not yet. but with those additional Migs now incoming from Poland and Slovakia, I’d say the F-16s coming not long after. I can see the Ukrainians taking back more land in the near future for sure👍
    2
  706.  @bakedinspiration  good. And I will keep voting for anyone who keeps up the Lend lease to Ukraine👍
    2
  707.  @bakedinspiration  feels good seeing Russians get stack like cardwood with my tax money👍👍🇺🇸
    2
  708.  @bakedinspiration  man, you tankies are so funny. You’ve gone so far left, your comeback around and now support blatant imperialism 🤡
    2
  709.  @bakedinspiration  Vietnam still won in the end my guy.
    2
  710.  @bakedinspiration  so what your saying is, the Russians can’t turn the lights off in Ukraine, unless they bomb NATO who’s providing the aid? Yep. Sound like Vietnam again🤡
    2
  711.  @bakedinspiration  so how did they survive the winter then buddy?🧐
    2
  712.  @bakedinspiration  oh you mean the same power plants that were suppose to “freeze Ukraine” this winter and didn’t? And the same government buildings that haven’t been in use sense the Russians unable to capture Kyiv ? 🤡🤡🤡🤡 What a waste!
    2
  713.  @bakedinspiration  did it destroy the air defense or did the Russians just waste a ton of money on same style attacks that haven’t yielded any tangible results in 8 months?
    2
  714.  @bakedinspiration  cool. So, are the Ukrainians surrendering yet? Or are they still fighting like they have after the other 8 months of constant missile attacks already?🤡 And gee, I thought those super-duper-hyoersonic- wunder waffens were suppose to bring the west to their knees. You telling me Ukraine can’t even be beaten by them now? 🤣
    2
  715.  @bakedinspiration  indeed👍😉
    2
  716.  @bakedinspiration  no, us pro-Ukraines are laughing are asses off at the “second strongest military in the world” become barely the second strongest military in Ukraine 😂
    2
  717.  @bakedinspiration  they arnt. That’s why they have 10,000km of land, 2 major oblasts and 7 cities back under their control, while Russia hasn’t even taken Bakmut in the same time span🤡 And as for the food situation, I’d say it’s not great since the Ruskie conscripts were begging and looting for food from the Ukrainian civilians back when this war started. The few expired rations they had probably didn’t help out either I can only imagine how bad it is now🤣😂
    2
  718.  @bakedinspiration  don’t know, but I hear Russians issue out patato instead of grenades. Those are more valuable then their soldiers I hear 😉
    2
  719.  @bakedinspiration  no, the Russians will get nothing, when they get kicked out of Ukraine eventually😂
    2
  720.  @bakedinspiration  Russia had 40% of Ukraine a year ago. They’ve lost half of that, in exchange for a bombed out wasteland once called Bakmut now🤡
    2
  721.  @bakedinspiration  if they take land at the rate they have for the last 8 months, then the Ukrainians will be at melitipol by the time Russia has finally taken donbass 😉
    2
  722.  @bakedinspiration  and maybe we’ll see the Russians evacuate Savastopol like we did Saigon back int the day too 😉
    2
  723.  @bakedinspiration  pfff, all Russia is doing is making The same mistakes we made in Vietnam. Except we never gave up any land back to the NVA, nor did we ever retreat from battle against an enemy 1/10 our strength 😂 My brother in hell, Russias isn’t even fighting 2% of our military budget in Ukraine Their just facing our ColdWar era junk that’s been payed off since the 80s, being used by “the most corrupt country in Europe”, and they can’t even take a bombed wasteland after almost 8 months of WW1 style fighting 🤡🤡 Wasn’t Russias suppose to be a “nuclear great power” ?🤣🤣🤣🤪
    2
  724.  @bakedinspiration  if Russia could “bomb the fuck out of Ukraine” anytime it wanted, then your telling me their purposely getting There asses kicked in a bloody attritional battle and purposely letting NATO equipment reach the frontline??? My god man, not even my pro-Ukrainian ass could make the Russians look even stupider 🤣🤣🤣🤡🤡🤡
    2
  725.  @bakedinspiration  they wouldn’t be throwing away T-90Ms, putting Sailors into the mechanized infantry, or pressing attic warfare variants of the Tor and BTR-50s into service if they Werent🤡🤡🤡
    2
  726.  @bakedinspiration  hey, if the Russians want to keep feeding meat into a Grinder, instead look elsewhere, that’s their problem. Glad to see my tax money turn the orcs into hamburger 👍🇺🇸
    2
  727.  @bakedinspiration  wow gee, would you look at that. another 2 weeks have past and the Russians still don’t have Bakmut captured yet. I guess it’s just “two more weeks” again until somehow the wasteland the Z-boys fab over everyday falls and they get to repeat this stupid game again for another 6-7 months on the next town too right bud?🤡🤣🤪
    2
  728.  @bakedinspiration  will do buddy. I mean, gee, Bakmut must be a super critical rail hub, road junction, bridgehead, power junction, port, airfield, fuel depot, and have plenty of Russian civilians still to welcome there occupiers in with flowers after such a long fight and high cost of resources for Russia too, right? Right?🤡🤡🤡😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
    2
  729.  @bakedinspiration  still waiting to here your copium about the strategic value of Bakmut for the cost of Russia losses in the last 7 months. I’m dying to hear🤡
    2
  730.  @bakedinspiration  you actually think Russia is going to be at this for years ??? My god. And here I thought I had a low opinion Russias military performance. Imagine being “the second strongest military in the world” and you can’t even take over the “most corrupt country in Europe” , and it takes you YEARS to defeat it😂🤣😂🤡
    2
  731.  @bakedinspiration  and I’m still waiting for an answer to a very simple question: what has Russia gained by taking Bakmut, and how does this effect the rest of the war going forward. I’ll wait.
    2
  732.  @bakedinspiration  you know the Germans killed more people then the European Allies did combined right? Does that mean Germany really won ww2 to you bud?
    2
  733.  @bakedinspiration  there losing by: -taking almost 5 times the land then Russia has in the last 7 months in a fraction of the time? -, including Russia’s only bridgehead over the Dnipro and a city that Putin claimed would be “Russian forever”? (Kherson), -and by securing more NATO support by showing the west investment isn’t misplaced ?(almost 300 western tanks and AFVs are coming, along with 10 Additional Mig-29s soon bud) Man if that’s “losing”, I can’t wait to see Ukraine start winning for real soon.👍
    2
  734.  @bakedinspiration  your comparing this bombed out town that Russia spent 7 months bombarding and struggling to take, to the 10,000+km and 2 major cities and oblasts the Ukrainians retook not even 4 months ago. I’d call that one hell of a cope if I ever saw one🤡
    2
  735.  @bakedinspiration  nice deflection. Now tell me: how much closer is Russia to winning this war?
    2
  736.  @bakedinspiration  cool. So what did you Z-boys get after 7 months of re-enacting Vurdun may I ask?
    2
  737.  @bakedinspiration  yep. See you then when Russia still hasn’t taken a bombed out town in the middle of nowhere 👍
    2
  738.  @bakedinspiration  who said Ukraine can’t win? They’ve done it 9 times now, and they’ll do it again at Melitipol once those tanks arrive. And the best part of all this? Russia has several Mountains worth of corpses, it’s International reputation destroyed, and it’s biggest Geo-political enemy getting larger…. AND NATO hasn’t even shown up yet to fight 😂😅🤡 Apparently all the Soviet era weapons in the world, after 6 months of fighting , can’t break through some trench line in the middle of a bombed out wasteland, let alone take Donbass already.
    2
  739.  @bakedinspiration  what? Wasn’t the bunch of drunken ruskies suppose kick an army of they/thems out Bakmut after yet another 2 weeks of constant fighting and bombardment? With that kind of progress, Ukraine will be in melitipol before your know it! Especially with all the tanks and ammunition their about to get 😉
    2
  740.  @realdaybreaker8013  ya, I’d say the window of opportunity to end this war sooner is closing fast, and gee, it’s almost like a military needs a constant supply of weapons ammo to keep fighting or something….. No wonder the Russians have been struggling this war. It and it’s Z-boy fans can’t understand the concept of logistics 🤡
    2
  741.  @bakedinspiration  see you in 3 months when melitipol is retaken 👋
    2
  742.  @bakedinspiration  ya, there taking a bombed out wasteland at the cost of 2 major cities, there northern pincer around slovyansk, their only bridgehead over the Dnipro and only land threat they had left to Odessa. Not to mention 8,000km of other terrain loses back to the Ukrainians, and supply routes, all for a bombed out town in the middle of nowhere and a mountain of corpses and further NATO aid to Ukraine. No wonder Russia is such a shithole, if they take such bad trade deals like this😅
    2
  743.  @bakedinspiration  again, don’t need to. Unlike the Z-boys who go ballistic when they take another bombed wasteland after months of losses.
    2
  744.  @bakedinspiration  I don’t have too. The people I support are actually winning. Unlike the Russians.
    2
  745. So will Putin.
    2
  746.  @Floridarollin  cool fan fic bro. Now tell Me, why did Russia leave 9,000km of terrain, Sumy, Chernihiv, Izyum, Lymen, Kupyansk, Kharkiv, Snake island and Kherson if it’s causalities are so ridiculously low? Hell, why arnt they in Kyiv again already, if apparently the Ukrainians have lost there entire pre-war army by now? 🤡
    2
  747. Basically it’s entire adult population at his point. Russia would ruin its self mobilizing anymore of its population, unless Russian women are also slated to be called up soon.
    2
  748. What have “all Muslims” ever done for the Palestinians?
    2
  749. They’ve been “getting at us” for the last 80 years. What changes bud?
    2
  750.  @dave4deputyZX  yes. That’s all I think the US would do. Mexico isn’t Brazil. It’s not Cuba. It’s not Chile. It’s not any of the other nations you mentioned. It’s our second largest trading partner and the place almost 15% of our population at descendants from. At best, the US would just simply pull its investments out. At worse, they would blockade Mexico. But we would not invade it. It’s simply too big of a country and a large portion of the US population would not support it. We’re not Russia. We don’t invade a country millions of people have family in.
    2
  751.  @DARKSTAR-mn8ee  how the hell is Russia winning after losing half its gains my guy?
    2
  752. By losing half its gains, failing its winter offensive, and now having its capital hit with drones?
    2
  753.  @raymundoceballos5310  we’ll see, because I heard the same fricken thing about Russia moving its troops to the Ukrainian border was a “lie” too.
    2
  754. So what if Guyana says “no” bud?
    2
  755.  @ColinCornelius-wb6bt  apparently I won’t, because no one is using this “petro”
    2
  756.  @ColinCornelius-wb6bt  used by who?
    2
  757.  @vascoapolonio2309  uh ya? Half our congress have been just waiting for a chance to get rid of Manduro, and our conservative population would love to see a socialist country lose in a war.
    2
  758.  @Ziegfried82  says who?
    2
  759. The Bible prophesied Venezuela would invade Guyana?
    2
  760.  @laloelsalamanca who’s suffering? I love watching the Russians getting their shit kicked in with my tax money 🇺🇸👍
    2
  761.  @hyhhy  no, definitely Islam.
    2
  762. @Cook-e1d and now Ukraine is getting lots of aid from NATO to defeat Russia.
    2
  763. @Cook-e1d oh ya, sure. Millions of tons of food, steel, oil, mechanical parts, a dozen whole factories, hundreds of locomotives and rolling stock, thousands of aircraft, tanks, trucks, and millions of pairs of uniforms and medical supplies. But totally the Soviets didn’t rely on foreign support to keep fighting 🤣🤡
    2
  764. @Cook-e1d your right, that was the Soviets. And look who won in the end?
    2
  765. There’s not “two fronts” here though. And Hitler wasn’t fighting irregular forces.
    2
  766. And used by literally the entire world
    2
  767.  @MandNsvideos665  Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia are all trade partners of Israel, as is Turkey, Cyprus, the EU and the US. Most of that trade comes in over land, or via the Mediterranean Sea, not the Red Sea. And if Houthis keeps attacking random civilian ships, im going to love to see the Houthis defend against a 12 nation coalition (which would include India and china oddly enough) from intervening to protect their trade in the region.
    2
  768. Why? Would you rather him praise Russia’s stupid war?
    2
  769. …..kinda?…..
    2
  770. Apparently the people disagree. They’re young men fleeing by the thousands to any country they can get into.
    2
  771.  @Mysteriesofpolitics  Afghanistan yes, by harboring terrorists reponsoble for 9/11. And Iraq did attack our Allies Kuwait and Saudi Arabia back in 1991, hence that conflict. And by your logic, is Russia planning on invading Estonia, Latvian, Lithuania and Finland now soon too?
    2
  772. Oh yes, it’s the US and NATO totally invading Ukraine right now 🙄
    2
  773. No. We just want to see Iran as a actual republic instead of a theocratic hell hole. We’d actually like it stay together.
    2
  774. The Ukrainians have taken over 150km of terrain back from the Russians, and apparently reentered Bakmut this last week.
    2
  775. Not as funny as the state of the Russian military 😂
    2
  776.  @danielfokwerki  no, it shows Russias army is full of cowards and their reason for this war is BS.
    2
  777.  @r2com641  yes. Right. They are a independent country and they can do what ever they want.
    2
  778. Sure. If Mexico wanted to, they could do what ever they want
    2
  779.  @ccdsds3221  it really wasn’t.
    2
  780.  @ccdsds3221  which wasn’t even close to the law Georgia just passed.
    2
  781. No, we don’t.
    2
  782. It depends, how many rubles you make putting stupid comments in videos like this?
    2
  783. Ya, advancing in the other direction 😂
    2
  784. Since January. Source: trust me bro😂
    2
  785. Pfft that’s news to me here buddy.
    2
  786.  @ivanovich4163  it’s been going on. How do you think Ukraine keeps getting all these US made weapons and supplies?
    2
  787. Why would Poland invade Ukraine when it’s the biggest supporter behind America?
    2
  788.  @drunkbulgarian8141  no, I mean the ones Russia planted there to try and colonize Ukraine, Estonia, Latvian and Lithuania.
    2
  789. Why do so many of “their citizens” live in other countries?
    2
  790. Your right, which is why they’re using anti-ship and anti-air missiles to bomb land targets now….
    2
  791.  @redcrown5154  did you miss the Coup attempt last month, the RFL raid at Belgorod the month before that, the constant sabotage attacks on Russian railroads and factories, or the Russians having to nationalize *McDonalds* just to keep their service industry afloat? Or was the 0.11 rubles to the dollar not evidence for you that Russia is sitting on a house of cards right now?
    2
  792. Call it propaganda all you want, it won’t change the fact it’s true.
    2
  793. Ya, because there guys are riding around in Mystery mobiles and dump trucks. While being supported by reactivated museum pieces 😂
    2
  794. So basically the all the counties that actually make anything and have the ability to influence things outside there own borders and arnt third world shit holes? Gotcha 👍
    2
  795. While your at it, read up on the Holodomor too
    2
  796. ATACMS was approved and we’re sending them over within the month
    2
  797.  @johnjames5842  it’s not lost. Far from it. Russia has lost half of its gains so far, and with our help, it will lose the rest.
    2
  798. Screw that. We should only accelerate the Lend Lease to Ukraine until the Russians pack up and go home. Anything less, is just another temporary ceasefire for the Russians to rebuild and comeback later to finish the job.
    2
  799.  @ArnavSharma-bj4ct  any yet, the Ukrainians still got over the first two Lines of Russia little Maginot line rip off, and took robotyrne. Avdiivka isn’t even 15 miles from Donetsk itself, and the Russians have been fighting their since 2022, and only now are staring to show any results. after turning it into a unusable f&cking wasteland before hand But ya, let’s also just ignore the ruskies losing at the gates of Kyiv, Irpin, Chernihiv, Sumy, Kharkiv, Kupyansk, Izyum, Lymen, Snake island, and Kherson too while we’re at it too right? aT LeASt wE GoT 19 HoUSes CoMrAdEs 🤡
    2
  800.  @ArnavSharma-bj4ct  lol, they took 5 months and 10s of thousands of causalities to bomb Avdivka into a wasteland and take a few houses. A place that’s literally a suburb of Donetsk city! What a victory form the army that was supposed to reach the Rhine in just 7 days not even 30 years ago 🤡🤣
    2
  801.  @ArnavSharma-bj4ct  the Russians called up 500,000 more troops? I thought they were winning comrade 🤡🤣
    2
  802. What? The virgin island? Samoa?
    2
  803. Because the fascists were defeated before there mass killings really started. Communists weren’t. If things turned out differently, fascists would have killed FAR more people in the name of insane racial cleansing policy’s and mass enslavement.
    2
  804. The Iraqis tried that. No challenger has been killed by ATGMs yet.
    2
  805. Because they’re known to make Russian tank turrets pop? Just ask the Iraqis
    2
  806. Except their not, because the Russians can’t seem to punch a hole anywhere despite having so many guns available.
    2
  807. So Russia can be a nuclear wasteland too?
    2
  808. Except the US isnt even fighting 😂
    2
  809. So what are they going to do if Leo2s actually show up?
    2
  810. I mean, they’ve taken causalities my guy. At least they got 200+ old Soviet ones refurbished by the Pols and Czechs to tie them over for now.
    2
  811. Oh, so tell us, what weapons did the US have in Ukraine that could possibly threaten Russia?
    2
  812.  @markkane8261 and neither does the Russians apparently. 😂 Because stopping NATO expansion was one of those goals, and look how that turned out 🤡
    2
  813. Lol, cope.
    2
  814. So why has the US spent over a decade bombing and fighting ISIS?
    2
  815. Oh ya, it’s totally not because Russia has been fighting ISIS in Syria for the last 10 years already right?
    2
  816. Isis has attacked the US several times, and has tired (and failed) to attack Israel on several occasions.
    2
  817. They also attack US civilians, US troops, our Allies…..interesting isn’t it?
    2
  818. ISIS has been around longer than 2012, and they still exist even today. Russia did a terrible job getting rid of them. It makes zero since that the US would use Islamic terror to attack Russia, seeing how its spent the last decade and a half trying to fight said terror itself.
    2
  819. But Russia isn’t profiting off the refined stuff India is selling. They’re actually losing tons of money selling crude oil to India at a massive discount.
    2
  820. Because their arnt any. Foreign volunteers are not mercenaries.
    2
  821. BlackWater also doesn’t have artillery, tanks, mechanized infantry, drone detachments, prisoners for recuirts, and even air assets like Wagner does.
    2
  822. Because we need some one to do base security, cooking, vehicle maintenance and laundry and not use actual soldiers to do it?
    2
  823. What do you mean “afford”?
    2
  824.  @awesmohamed5341  and their are just as many over here who like to say “do it Russia, no balls”.
    2
  825.  @ebiekem  then you really haven’t been paying attention, because the Russians have threatened the Baltics many times in the last few years. Most recently with the use of Wagner to siege the Suwalki Gap between Poland and Lithuania. Russian ships and planes have repeatedly entered Estonian airspace and waters too, along with the usual deployment of mobile nuclear forces near the Estonian and Finnish borders over the last year.
    2
  826.  @silverwolf6866  lol. “The random internet person doenst agree with me, so he must live in his moms basement”. classic comeback my guy 🤡 As a truck driver I got to say, seeing ruskies getting smoked by my tax money is friken awesome to see👍🇺🇸
    2
  827.  @silverwolf6866  or you know, maybe should go back to Russia if they want to be Russians so badly. Makes sense to me.
    2
  828. Hell ya. I love being the Arsenal of Democracy again 👍🇺🇸
    2
  829.  @mikevarga6742  ya. Still more proof Russia won’t win then.
    2
  830.  @mikevarga6742  I’d like to point out the US killed 2 million Vietnamese back in the day, and still lost the war to that country, who ALSo has a fraction of Americas population. And that classic Russian tactic you talk about is probably the reason why Russia never demographically recovered from WW2. And finally, screw that isolation crap. no more appeasement for the Russians. The Ukrainians are willing to fight for there freedom and independence, unlike those stupid afghans we helped for 20 years. And I like being the Arsenal of Democracy again.
    2
  831. Funny. Russia has taken military losses not seen in Europe since WW2, And those supposed “11 other nations” haven’t even shown up to battle yet 😂
    2
  832. Meanwhile, Russia has a coup attempt not even a year ago, has had refineries bombed by modified Cessnas despite having the “best air defenses in the world”, and now is fighting ANOTHER rebel occupation of Belgorod in just the last year….
    2
  833.  @ФомаКиняев-ж2ш  no, I’m talking about Russias fascism.
    2
  834. Sukoi. Soyuz. Same thing 😂
    2
  835. lol, no. Yoon is solely responsible for this
    2
  836.  @ThePolymerisst  ya, it’s hilarious he cant see the Haitians are going to butcher each other without outside intervention. But knowing that racist, he’s all for it.
    2
  837. It’s not a lie to say Russia can’t afford to expand its military, when its already struggling to train and equip the one it has already.
    2
  838.  @kristjanrom9429 no, it very much is a paper tiger. It can’t even defeat “the most corrupt country in Europe” after a year of fighting. It wouldn’t last a month against NATO head-on.
    2
  839. It did the last 3 times we went in.
    2
  840. If they didn’t do it in may, they’re not going to do it for the duration of this war.
    2
  841. What about the rest of the Ukrainian military or other volunteer units?
    2
  842.  @annabellelee4535  if we did, we wouldn’t be a nation, let alone a super power.
    2
  843.  @ThreeEyedWarlord2207  oh, so what great enemy has Russia defeated since WW2? I’ll wait.
    2
  844.  @Rob_F8F  Russia is a nuclear armed “great power” that supposedly is capable of overrunning the Baltics in 72 hours. Ukraine is a under developed nation and supposedly “the most corrupt country in Europe”. But somehow, has fought Russia to a standstill after a year of war. At this point, I’m convinced Russia only peer rival is khazakstan…. Maybe.
    2
  845. Then america would quickly lose its super power status.
    2
  846. Yet meanwhile, Russia, a nuclear armed “great power” is being pushed back by the same weapons in Ukraine. And want to k ow something else? russia lost to the Taliban too
    2
  847. lol. “When” he becomes POTUS? What makes you so confident bud? 😂
    2
  848.  @bafanamahlatse1923  1. Oh i don’t know, maybe the last 2 years of losing Everything from the majority of their pre-war tank fleet, most of the Black Sea fleet, several strategic bombers, 400,000 troops (KIA and WIA)….. 2. Nuclear arsenals are honesty irrelevant at this point. They don’t play any factor in the current war what so ever, and nuclear deterrence is practically dead now. 3. Ya, kinda. Wouldn’t you think so?
    2
  849.  @bafanamahlatse1923  it hasn’t managed to defeat Ukraine, it’s international image of strength has been ruined, NATO has expanded to even more of Russias borders, and its lost the majority of its military capabilities.
    2
  850.  @pheenez7881  yes.
    2
  851. Yes. Because the Russian army isn’t “stronger”. It’s much weaker than it has been in decades. It’s just unfortunately still bigger than Ukraines.
    2
  852.  @mastermariner490  oh good, so Georgia and Moldova can finally retake the and Russia stole from them?
    2
  853. Which is why I’m happy to see my county supporting the Ukrainians. It’s awesome to see our gear actually fight a good fight for once. 🇺🇸
    2
  854. Seeing ruskies getting stacked like card-board has been the best use of my tax money I’ve ever seen 🇺🇸👍 I hope Ukraine liberated all its land.
    2
  855. The Ukrainians don’t seem to mind taking back their country….
    2
  856. Don’t worry buddy, we got long range missiles coming soon. Belgorod will soon be in a sea of fire
    2
  857. God this old stupid argument….. Why would Ukraine give away weapons it needs to kick the Russians out? And if we were worried about f16s ending up in enemy hands, we wouldn’t have given them to Iraq, which we have.
    2
  858. Well, the F-16 is more then a match for the SU-30, it has the same EW capabilities as the SU-35 with the right Pods, and it could actually do BVR against the MIG-31 with radar guided missiles.
    2
  859.  @iattacku2773  well Iran and Russia I’d agree. China is a threat to us, but a distant one. We got enough meat shields….I’m sorry “allies” to protect us from them over there.
    2
  860.  @ThePandaKZ  which would give Poland the authority to use Article 5, and probably bomb Wagners bases in Belarus as a result. That, or the very least, have NATO enter Ukraine’s border regions to protect the supply lines
    2
  861.  @ThePandaKZ  lol, how the hell is a mercenary group going to pull over a guerrilla war against the entire EU? 🤡
    2
  862. What’s Wagner going to do against the EU? 😂
    2
  863. Because a more diverse alliance of nations defeated it in said war.
    2
  864.  @TDH_1962  your right, some People never learn that appeasement never works. And let me tell ya, seeing Russians get stacked like cardwood is the best use of my tax money I’ve seen in years👍🇺🇸.
    2
  865.  @TDH_1962  ok chamberlain, let me know how rewarding dictators turns out 🤡
    2
  866.  @TDH_1962  no. No more appeasement. The Russians fucked around, and now their about to find out.
    2
  867.  @TDH_1962  then we should have no limits to our Lend Lease to Ukraine. It’s not like the US needs all those Land systems anymore anyway.
    2
  868.  @TDH_1962  1) I’d like to point out, the US can’t lose a war, it hasn’t even shown up to fight in the first place 2) your only looking at US production of ammunition. We also have the Czechs, Slovakians and Spanish, who make far more artillery ammunition then we do a year already. They too are about to expand production of artillery rounds this year too. And If money is an issue, the world knows America has that covered. And finally, it’s not like our European or Pacific Allies need all that artillery ammo right now anyways. All of them are in peace time as is, and we made those stockpiles to fight Russia anyways. Why worry about “depletion” of ammunition if the other guy is too worn-out and spent to threaten you in the end?
    2
  869.  @TDH_1962  yes i did. Did you think the west wouldn’t adjust there military procurement and production abilities accordingly?
    2
  870.  @TDH_1962  which is why ammo production across NATO and it’s other Allies (like Australia and South Korea in particular) are increasing there ammunition production this year. The US is opening a new ammunition plant in Texas this year, which will raise US monthly production to 70,000 rounds per month. Same for HIMARS rocket ammunition too. A Projected 850 a month.
    2
  871.  @TDH_1962  the Ukrainians used that maneuver warfare doctrine to good effect around Kyiv, and at the Kharkiv counter attack. They took on two weeks, what Russia struggled for 2 months to take during the summer. And then there Kherson, where the NATO doctrine of striking logistic lines and “stetting the battlefield” allowed Ukraine to retake the city, even against Russia artillery advantage.
    2
  872.  @TDH_1962  yes it is. I want to point out, the US dropped more munitions on Vietnam, then it did in all of world war 2 combined , killed 2 MILLION Vietnamese, and still lost in the end. Russia will suffer the same defeat, it it stays so stupidly focused on kill counts
    2
  873.  @TDH_1962  you mean the same tactic we used in Vietnam, and lost with?
    2
  874. Ya, Russia went from 40% of 20% of Ukrainian territory under its control….but yes its Ukraine losing somehow 🤡
    2
  875.  @tizumajstor  that still not a justification for an invasion. Especially if the people their are doing all they can to resist the Russians.
    2
  876.  @tizumajstor  well for one, it’s not their land . It’s someone else’s land, and the locals arnt too keen on cooperating with the Russians bombing and conquering their land. you would think the Russians would have learned that lesson from both their and our experiences in Afghanistan. But apparently Putin didn’t major in history. And Russia really should care about Finland. Not only is it 2 hours away from St. Petersburg, but it’s actually close to joining NATO soon. Closer then Ukraine has EVER been to joining.
    2
  877. Except sandel wearing goat herders, snowy Forest hunters, some Japanese conscripts and Ukrainian farmers of course……
    2
  878.  @limpfish8206  the best way to free up funds for the well being of Americans, is to get rid of an excuse for that budget to be so bloated. Like demolishing Russias ability to make war later. Unfortunately, that means a lot of Russians got to get killed to do that.
    2
  879. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out vatnik 👋
    2
  880. I guess this is cool and all. But I highly doubt we’ll be getting into many tank fights with the Chinese in the pacific.
    2
  881. Man, fuck Russia’s response at this point. I say send 30 launchers to Ukraine. With the ATACM missiles.
    2
  882. Arma mod makers, get on it!
    2
  883. Not very good ones then. Most of them are there on ideological grounds.
    2
  884.  @getsomeboy321  no, they won’t. Theyve lost most of there gains so far, and can’t even beat the “most corrupt country in Europe” after a year of fighting.
    2
  885. Why would you not want to fight alongside people fighting for their homes, freedom and independence from an invader?
    2
  886. Good thing not many have done that tben
    2
  887. No they won’t. They would be rewarded and emboldened to invade and annex more counties. They’ve already got Moldova in their sites as well, and Georgia is still weakened from the invasion they did in 2008. We need to do what ever we can for Ukraine to achieve victory and kick the Russians out. Only that will bring lasting peace.
    2
  888. You’ll be lucky to keep Konigsburg Ivan
    2
  889. Because the Russians are vulnerable there?
    2
  890. No, there fighting the vulnerable Russian troops there
    2
  891. No, they’re Ukrainian.
    2
  892. You’re comparing apples to oranges here. They sent a small team of special forces to another country to hurt Russian units there to draw Russian resources out of Ukraine and put more strain on Russias war effort.
    2
  893.  @ali-haider5788  I really doubt Russia has more then many 2,000 troops in Syria at this point. Compared to Ukraine, the Russian forces in Syria are vulnerable to attack by a better equipped force. And attacking them does drive the cost of Russias war even more. I don’t think the Iranians care about the Russo-Ukrainian war, and I doubt the Ukrainians would start attacking their guys in Syria. Same for Hazbolla.
    2
  894. Arms 3 mod makers, please get on it! Or at least get CUP or RHS on it !
    2
  895.  @wewuzkangz2505  complain and moan to a rando about it on the internet apparently?🤡
    2
  896.  @wewuzkangz2505  lol, why you complaining to me about it ?🤣
    2
  897.  @wewuzkangz2505  lol, Ukraine doesn’t even have anywhere close to the wests air power or modern weapons. We’ve given the Ukrainians our last generation surplus gear we’re replacing right now anyways, and it’s ground the Russians to a halt.
    2
  898. They won’t die in a trench. France isn’t Russia, and will actually fight like a modern army.
    2
  899.  @wewuzkangz2505  your right, you can’t. Not without saying hello to my 12 gauge.
    2
  900. Well ya. You can’t invade a country unarmed, so it’s not a military issue.
    2
  901. That’s ALOT for the EU. The US only makes like a dozen new Abrams in the same span. (That’s not a flex, that’s actually impressive for Germany)
    2
  902. Like where?
    2
  903.  @soyounglee5985  it’s kicked them out of half of what they conquered so far, and has caused massive casualties on the Russians. So i hope we keep the weapons coming and kick the Russians out of Ukraine.
    2
  904.  @soyounglee5985  it is most certainly NOT normal to lose land to another nation in war, especially if YOUR the invader . This is the equivalent to Italy invading Greece, and by sheer stupidity losing more land to them then they themselves took in the first place. Except it’s worse, because Russia is suppose to be a nuclear “super power”. And last I checked, lobbing missiles at infrastructure, shelling a city to dust, and sending waves of conscripts and prisoners at an enemy didn’t help the Russians out against this same sandal wearing goat herders with AKs either, now did it??
    2
  905. So why did the Russians leave Kherson, Lymen, Izyum, Chernihiv and Snake island then if our “wonder weapons” don’t work then? Why do they complain and make nuclear threats everytime we announce another Lend Lease shipment?
    2
  906.  @mikebigun  ok, show me one destroyed then. The US is keeping track of all of them.
    2
  907.  @mikebigun  all of them.
    2
  908.  @shyamsulannuar3861  it could end tomarrow if the Russians go home already. Otherwise, I’ll keep watching with glee as my tax money stacks more Russian bodies like cardwood and helps Ukraine take more land. 👍
    2
  909.  @bobhunt4402  your opinion is just silly and wrong, and by your logic Afghanistan should have been a resounding Russian victory, but hey what ever floats your boat comrade.🤷
    2
  910.  @bobhunt4402  Afghanistan shared a border with Russia back in the day too, yet the Russians still lost 5x as many men and material as the US did in half the time, despite the US being on the other side of the planet. And you only fight a guerrilla war, when you can’t fight conventionally, like Ukraine can. And Russia hasn’t won a major war since 1945, and it shows.
    2
  911. 1) maybe 2) what are you smoking?
    2
  912. Because why would they not join NATO after this mess? NATO membership is the only thing that will ensure the Russians never come back again.
    2
  913. The Krynky offensive did its job. It’s a sign of desperation that the Russians are throwing Chechens and border guards at 2 Ukrainian brigades that have taken more land in 6 days then Russia had in 6 months
    2
  914.  @akangagu47  still doesn’t change the fact there’s no NATO forces invading Russia right now 😂
    2
  915. lol, that’s some fine copium there comrade 😂
    2
  916. Unless your enemy has just as many old-school AA guns, mounted machine guns, high caliber rifles…… Then your just throwing good men and machines away….
    2
  917.  @wigon  if it’s wired guided, then it would actually have a shorter range then most AA guns. Like, an AA gun can usually shoot 3-5 miles, while most wire guided missiles only have about 2 miles of wire to use. And if it has FLIR cameras and a laser designator, then it’s not as cheap as people think it is. If your going to put that into a “cheap” aircraft, then just build a drone for the same cost and not risk crew lives.
    2
  918.  @wigon  do they? Because how the hell is it going to aim those missiles? It literally has no computers onboard.
    2
  919. It also would just make since to make more WW2 era flak and AA guns then to counter them…..because they have no armor protection and are actually slower then most WW2 planes….
    2
  920. So can chinas existing helicopters. Infact, so can everyone else’s helicopters
    2
  921.  @tedjones-ho2zk  and 6,000 probable casualties, because this thing would get shredded by old school AA guns, mounted heavy machine guns, high-caliber rifles, hunting shotguns ect. Meanwhile it has no way of flying at night, no way to move cargo, medivac personnel, and no armor to protect its internal machinery ot its crew and passengers.
    2
  922. At the cost of half a million of its own troops, and most of its inventory of weapons…
    2
  923.  @mitalichakma  that’s why 2,000 ruskie tanks were turned to scrap metal before a single western MBT even showed up, and and the Russians are using attack sheds to replaced losses 🤣
    2
  924. lol, ask the Russian turrets in low orbit how bad our junk is😂
    2
  925. Ya, and that’s smart. Because there taking an already purpose built APC, and making it better armored. Not neutering a tank to do a job it’s not designed for.
    2
  926. 40K modelers: “write that down, write that down!”
    2
  927. Any Arma 3 modders that can make the XM30 ?
    2
  928. I’m curious. Is this more of a COIN style perspective on urban combat? It seems like it’s not really accounting on fighting actual armed forces in urban environments.
    2
  929. Not at all. None of the US troops assigned to European deployments have been transferred to the Middle East.
    2
  930. Cool. We’ll just send another mountain of ammo (or 2) over.
    2
  931. Apparently the BTR the Ukrainians and Russians use is the same way. That’s why they ride on top of the damn things too.
    2
  932. Hey, great for field test !😊
    2
  933. ILOVETHESANDBOX ILOVETHESANDBOX ILOVETHESANDBOX ILOVETHESANDBOX ILOVETHESANDBOX
    2
  934.  @Deno2100  "30 years a head of US in tank tech" gets its tanks wasted by a 1990s missile system and Amazon drones with grenades'.... cope harder vatnik.
    2
  935. Ok chamberlain🙄
    2
  936. Ya, I’d say it was.
    2
  937. Ya, no. An attack by Wagner will be considered an attack by Russia.
    2
  938. He can’t. Because he’s not in control of the military, congress is.
    2
  939. So why haven’t they destroyed the HIMARS yet, or stopped all of Ukrainians current tanks yet?
    2
  940. Well apparently there performing just as bad as they did around the major cities early on. Because it turnes out, guided missiles and artillery also excel in open terrain, never mind the fact the mud is still horrible right now over there. And then you got Ukrainian SOF and drones constantly fucking over Russian logistics, meaning their “rapid advance” just keeps getting bogged down due to supply issues.
    2
  941.  @j.robertsergertson4513  enjoy watching Russia lose like they have in most of their wars 👍
    2
  942. We will, especially after watching the USAF give the Russians the same treatment we gave Sadam in ‘91😉
    2
  943. (Ready with the HAZMAT suit….)
    2
  944.  @ignatvassilev2390  reach the Sea of Azov. But first, more importantly, is Tokmak.
    2
  945. Yes. Yes they will.
    2
  946. Russia still haven’t taken back Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Lymen, Sumy, Chernihiv, or snake island back yet……
    2
  947.  @gezalesko3813  the US isn’t the one invading Ukraine. The Russians are.
    2
  948.  @gezalesko3813 your right. Russia should go home already.
    2
  949. What is the Chinese and Iranian equivalent?
    2
  950.  @DmitiryPopyoutopov  wow, Ukraine lost more western tanks then it was even given and more armored vehicles then it and the entirety of NATO has combined? , but for some reason its Russia who fled from half its conquests so far? Is that what the troll farms are pushing now these days? 🤡🤣
    2
  951. You mean after thousands of Chinese ones burned beforehand? Like the thousands of BMPs the Russians lost before the first western AFV even showed up in Ukraine?😂
    2
  952.  @calitaliarepublic6753  I thought same thing about Ukraine too. And they went on to fight a nuclear armed “great power” to a stand still. Taiwan would be able to defend itself from China. Because unlike Russia, China can’t just March across the Taiwan strait and invade. Amphibious landings are the hardest military operation that can attempted.
    2
  953.  @LtBRS  ok, we’re not talking about pipelines, we’re talking about roads and bridges.
    2
  954.  @joni8090  no, not at all. At least my country can actually make stealth aircraft in larger numbers then a bakers dozen.
    2
  955. No, we acknowledge the Soviets did that first. And we acknowledge Russia is a bastardized mockery of the Soviet Union.
    2
  956. Ok well: 1) the Ukrainians are just as well versed in winter fighting as the Russians are, and like it or not, General Winter doenst take sides 2) as far as the US is concerned, this is the most cost effective war we’ve fought in 2 decades. So the funding isn’t stopping anytime soon 3) in about 4 months, the Eastern European Mud season starts. It will be like the start of the war all over again, with the Russians confined to major Highways and open to ambushes again. 4) only victory brings lasting peace. A “peace treaty now” would just be a ceasefire for Russia to rebuild its forces with. No way Zelensky will agree to it.
    2
  957. Indeed. I guess too many 74’s “fell off the truck” back in the 90s…..
    2
  958. Please, by all means, give us an example
    2
  959. Cool. But you can’t unbomb Serbia 😂
    2
  960. It is. Get over it.
    2
  961. For the Russians to leave Ukraine
    2
  962. lol, no. They’ve read there history of the last time they where under Russian occupation.
    2
  963. lol. Looking at the ruble and Russian corruption, that wall will never get built 😂
    2
  964. Very useful. Probably the best IFV in the Ukrainian military right now.
    2
  965. Why would the CIA have anything to do with this?😂
    2
  966. “Propaganda” is just Russian for the truth
    2
  967. I feel like this is...based off someone else’s skits....
    2
  968. Whoooo ARMA 3 shoutout!
    2
  969. Well I’ll be damned, the military resurrected the Comanche? I mean they brought back land warrior, so it only made since to bring back yet another failed early 2000 project,
    2
  970. why dont you talk about "the ghost of kyiv"? the first fighter ace of the 21st century??
    2
  971. Not before the Russian ones fly first.
    2
  972.  @SmokeDimi  welp, get ready to be surprised again later bud ; )
    2
  973. You still think there going to be at Odessa, even as there abandoning Kherson to the Ukrainians???
    2
  974. So….it’s really useless then?
    2
  975. So your a US military vet that wants to hear Russian propaganda all day too?
    2
  976. Task and purpose, did we get you hooked on Arma now or something? It’s addicting isn’t it?
    2
  977.  @donodono2287  so what would you do instead bud?
    2
  978.  @donodono2287  if the world was in my hands, we would have gotten involved directly last year when this mess started
    2
  979. They would Sink the Black Sea fleet, and blockade at Petersburg, Kaliningrad, and Vladivostok Then probably move a few brigades of NATO troops into western Ukraine to send a message.
    2
  980. More like, send our ColdWar crap out on one last blaze of glory.
    2
  981.  @valenrn8657  ya. And so will NATO. Did you forget we also had Canada, Norway, and Iceland in the alliance too?
    2
  982.  @alexanderpepkin4110  yes. They will. If they weren’t, why didn’t the Soviets just invade west Germany then back in the day?
    2
  983. Fuck that. No more appeasement for the ruskies!
    2
  984.  @fordwrc2006  Russia is NOT a super power 🤣
    2
  985.  @Robert-xy4xi  appeasement has never worked. Sic sac Tyranis!
    2
  986.  @Unsgusa2024  if you could, you’d be in Kyiv by now. But your struggling to hold Kursk instead 🤣🤡
    2
  987. You can’t even enter Kyiv 3 years later, and now you think you’ll somehow get through Poland and Baltics too? 😂
    2
  988. Meanwhile, said Leo’s and Bradley’s are moving last Robotyne and Verbove over the Surovikin line this week….
    2
  989. after regaining 10,000+km of land, Kherson and destroying Russias winter offensive at Vuldamur?
    2
  990.  @ahmedalsharman  again, Russia. If NATO had “trained Ukraine for 8 years”, why did Ukraine not even have a fraction of the western hardware it has now back then, or not launched any offensives into Donbass in those 8 years? And in what universe does Ukraine, who has no nuclear weapons, threatens Russia, the worlds largest nuclear armed power, with invasion?
    2
  991. Still Russia, because NATO isn’t planning on invading Russia anytime soon. Unlike Russia, who’s started the largest land war in Europe since WW2…..
    2
  992.  @antique-bs8bb  they didn’t? There still reporting it right now?
    2
  993. So what’s with Russian mail bloggers going ballistic over this strike?
    2
  994. Because it’s barley destroyed anything of value the west has provided, that’s why 😂
    2
  995.  @richardmarsden5610 NATO never had any to begin with.
    2
  996.  @samoldfield5220 who coping? I’m not defending a nuclear armed superpowers inability to establish air supremacy over a country 1/10th its own size, 2 years later.
    2
  997.  @elliotyourarobot  so?
    2
  998.  @elliotyourarobot  or you focus on sinking the Chinese fleet before it ever reaches Tiawan to begin with🤷‍♂️. Why fight to chinas advantage when we should fight to ours?
    2
  999.  @elliotyourarobot last I checked, tanks, howitzers, APCs and small arms are useless in a sea and air fight. We still have plenty of air and sea reserves to fight China in the pacific. Because a land war on the Chinese mainland is suicide.
    2
  1000.  @elliotyourarobot the hell are we going do with this military junk except let it sit around and collect dust and waste money in storage here bud?
    2
  1001.  @elliotyourarobot  defeating a long time rival and enemy of our country isn’t putting America first pal?
    2
  1002.  @jtkrpm1  lol, is that your counter point bud? 🤡
    2
  1003.  @jtkrpm1  we’re not firing WW2 era 105mm round now are we bud?🤡
    2
  1004.  @jtkrpm1  fat chance bud. We’ve got at least a dozen counties making ammunition, 2 of which are in the Pacific
    2
  1005. Because demolishing Russias ability to make war in the future will free up defense funds for domestic projects in the long run. And hey, I love seeing ruskies stacked like card-wood with my tax money👍🇺🇸. I love being the Arsenal of Democracy again.
    2
  1006. Hmmmmm
    2
  1007.  @niblet112  it’s not “pro-Ukrainian”, it’s just the facts of the state of the Russian military at this moment.
    2
  1008.  @niblet112  apparently it doesn’t have the later, because Belgorod just got invaded today, and the largest drone attack on Russia soil so far has hit 6 different oil refineries within 24 hours….
    2
  1009.  @niblet112  so, why does the largest national in the world need more land?
    2
  1010. Why would Russia want Ukraine, when it’s already the largest country in the world?
    2
  1011. Yes.
    2
  1012.  @natnaelghirma2617  then trenches work pretty well, since no one is willing to use nukes.
    2
  1013. What good are nuclear weapons against other nuclear weapons?
    2
  1014.  @chadimirputin2282  least there not T-62s and BTR-50s 🤡
    2
  1015. Source: trust me bro
    2
  1016. The same dudes also took back Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Kupyansk and Lymen too. I say the training did wonders👍
    2
  1017.  @jimmyoconnell6167  ok, so you know that every NATO country has fought a war at least once in their history then. Unless your the Stolen Valor “vet” I think you are…
    2
  1018.  @antique-bs8bb  it ain’t sarcasm. It’s the truth.
    2
  1019.  @hussainfreeman4541  well see Ukrainians back in Melitipol in the coming months alright 👍
    2
  1020.  @hussainfreeman4541  it’s not “15 tanks”, it’s close to 200 MBT’s with over 200+ Additional IFVs and AFVs coming along too. Oh, and even longer ranged HIMARS munitions coming not long after….
    2
  1021. They said the same thing about HIMARS. Yet it’s Russia who didn’t stop running away for 6 months after it showed up…
    2
  1022.  @IrfanKhan-uh9yt  1) no, Russia still doenst have air superiority over much of Ukraine. If it did, HIMARS wouldn’t be an issue. 2) all that supposed “Russian air superiority” didn’t stop Ukraines 2 massive counter attacks last year, not stop the Ukrainians from moving troops and supplies the far east of the country for over a year of fighting. I believe the Abrams will do just fine, especially if it’s backed up by the Humvee Avengers, Gepards, Shilkas, and MANPADS the Ukrainians have already.
    2
  1023.  @TheRealNeonwarrior  we really don’t. Arguably, are gear was far better then the Germans, and we actually adapted to mobile warfare over time better then the Germans did as well.
    2
  1024.  @andrewclark3236  ya, i don’t trust the words of former Nazis
    2
  1025. I’m sorry, are you high? Be that loss ratio makes no since. That would be the entirety of a division being destroyed 5 times .
    2
  1026. 9:22 Medal of Honor 2010 disagrees…
    2
  1027. Ukraine has plenty of US lend lease coming for the foreseeable future. Their not running out of steam any time soon.
    2
  1028. Cope harder.
    2
  1029. Well, it would cut a major rail connection that’s supporting Russia operation in Kharkiv. So there’s that
    2
  1030.  @ivanfiorani1363  ok so, how did the Ukrainians manage to advance 350 square kilometers into Russia with 2 brigades, if their is an entire Corps of Russians on the otherside?
    2
  1031.  @ivanfiorani1363  because where else would they get the troops from? Everything they have is already tied up in Ukraine, and the troops in Kursk are either fleeing or surrendering right now.
    2
  1032. You assume they’ll still have Volchansk after this.
    2
  1033. Sure vatnik, now go finish up your vodka before you send another wall of text 🥴
    2
  1034. Or the Ukrainians don’t bother crossing the river and flank around Zaporizhzhia instead
    2
  1035. Probably high. Not going to lie
    2
  1036.  @2Dracula2  best news I’ve heard all day.
    2
  1037. What about Kharkiv? Because it’s not the Ukrainians pulling out of the area
    2
  1038.  @reinbooo1885  you sure? Like, they had troops on north sides of the Dnipro, had a huge chunk of the northern areas and almost all of Kharkiv under their control back in 2022.
    2
  1039. NATO not even in Ukraine
    2
  1040.  @OliverCassandraJacobsen  ya, on the ground the Russians are starting to send men on freaking motorcycles and gold carts now, because even BMPs are becoming extinct at this point 🤣
    2
  1041.  @OliverCassandraJacobsen  there still driving around and killing Russians. I can’t see too many T-90/80/72:termiantor/ or even t-62 crews around anymore.
    2
  1042.  @OliverCassandraJacobsen  it would have still kept rolling along, and its crew would be alive, rather then in the lower stratosphere like most Russian tank crews 🤡
    2
  1043. If they did, the tank would never have been captured Ivan 😂
    2
  1044. How’s is any of this propaganda? And what happens if trump loses bud?
    2
  1045.  @sergeybobkov951  literally no one has claimed that.
    2
  1046.  @gomazinho90  there where no “negotiations in Istanbul” so why would I mention a work of fiction? Besides, why wouldn’t the Russians just come back if the Ukrainians didn’t honor some agreement? And I said 20k. Not 250k
    2
  1047.  @gomazinho90  if you where a “realist”, you would see that Russia will not win this war.
    2
  1048.  @gomazinho90  lol, better then your orcish language Ivan 🤣
    2
  1049.  @gomazinho90  why? So they can take Belgorod too?🤣
    2
  1050. Oh, is that why Putin just sacked Gerasomov?
    2
  1051.  @dissco.partysan3333  no I don’t. I want America to fight and stop standing by.
    2
  1052.  @dissco.partysan3333  because I’d rather help the US wipe the floor with the Russians. The Ukrainians need our help to win.
    2
  1053.  @dissco.partysan3333  ya no. That’s how we got in this situation in the first place. No more appeasement.
    2
  1054.  @dissco.partysan3333  because i want to see america finally impale the Russian bear, like we should have done.
    2
  1055. God I hope we get involved directly. We would wipe the floor with the Russians.
    2
  1056. At the moment, the Ukrainians seem to be focusing on destroying Russian ammo supplies and supply lines around the city first. I Wouldn’t expect any real offensive until it’s softened up first.
    2
  1057.  @triariuss  on a large scale, it most certainly does. Because that’s just ammo dumps. Now the Ukrainians have shown they can hit bridges, and (just today) railroad line and trains. Knowing how rail-dependent the Russian forces are, I’d say there available supplies and operation mobility is about get a major hit. This is why we have get the Ukraine ATACM’s or even more HIMARS ASAP.
    2
  1058.  @triariuss  it sure as hell can mess up there logistics big time. Sure they could always scatter the ammo dumps, but now there reload times are increased, and they can’t put too many rounds in each dump, least HIMARS finds it and destroyes most there shells.
    2
  1059.  @caractacus22  ya sure buddy. With what ammo do they think there going to use? HIMARS will just destroy it.
    2
  1060.  @dakedakinson64  you mean like they did in April, may, June, and July? Yet here we are.
    2
  1061. So they can win faster and drive the Russians out for good?
    2
  1062.  @Arhatu  I don’t remember caring 🤷‍♂️
    2
  1063.  @Arhatu  no, I think the feilds of burning Russian tanks and another 8000km of terrain recaptured will make leo2 sales shoot through the roof. Just like what the last 6 months of Ukrainian success did for HIMARS
    2
  1064. He’s been around since 2019, what are you talking about?
    2
  1065. Putin was on meth, when he came Up with this stupid war plan 😂
    2
  1066.  @setajucizbun7073  how about the Russians actually grip their testicles, and grab a gun to “defend their motherland”, instead of trying to avoid conscription all the time?🤣
    2
  1067. lol. Arnt you suppose to be in Kursk comrade?😂
    2
  1068.  @trotgun1563  they wouldn’t be marines manning a carrier though. Not even the US does that, unless it’s an actual marine landing ship, which are like smaller carriers.
    2
  1069. Ya, but we wouldn’t be de-crewing a super carrier to get more infantry in a war….
    2
  1070. Because those are very specialized personnel they’re now going to have to replace, if they ever want to have carrier capabilities in the future. And restarting naval training with no pre-existing crew to train people with is damn-near impossible. Look no further then Japan being unable to replace its losses after midway back in the day.
    2
  1071. Are you kidding? All they have to do is drop food on these jokers and the NK troops will just give up for more.!
    2
  1072. There are no US or Canadian troops in Ukraine.
    2
  1073. In what universe, is using a nuke considered “de-escalatory”??
    2
  1074. Man you vatnik bots are getting desperate here.
    2
  1075. Maybe the Kharkiv front is a feint for Kherson? (IDFK at his point)
    2
  1076.  @pomg6512  I know. It’s almost like you need a constant supply of weapons to win or something🤡
    2
  1077.  @alekseym9815  oh ya sure. Such a “victory” the Taliban won, seeing how they can’t afford to keep the lights on, keep any of that gear they captured running properly, and now get the “fun” task of playing counter- insurgents against ISIS-T and anti- Taliban militas. But hey, they played a stupid game for 20 years, so I hope they like there stupid prize in the end. And honestly, I still want to see more Lend Lease coming to Ukraine. I love watching my tax money stack Russian corpses like cars wood in 4K online. 👍🇺🇸
    2
  1078.  @alekseym9815  it’s corrupt to shit, yet it seems to be able to not only hold the Russians off, but able to seize land back from the Russians as well, as we’ve seen in the last 4 months. Apparently Ukrainian casualties arnt that high, because if they were, you’d think the Russians with “30 times the firepower” would have broken through by now somewhere along the frontline. Yet they haven’t. Because Russia really doesn’t have that much firepower it says it has buddy.
    2
  1079.  @alekseym9815  apparently not many, compared to the Russians. Other wise, Kherson would still be in Russian hands. And what, you think the Ukrainians can’t be trained to use our gear? Or do you really want Russia to fight NATO forces? Because they wouldn’t last a month against NATO.
    2
  1080.  @alekseym9815  making progress? What, you mean outside Putin’s drunk imagination? Or do you mean progress back into their rear areas, like we saw at Kherson? And let me guess, your one of the moronic Vatniks who think there’s like half a million NATO troops in Ukraine too right?
    2
  1081. So, why haven’t their lines broken and they’ve taken back 6k kilometers of land and a city the Russians claimed would be “Russian forever”, while the Russians can’t even break through a bombed out wasteland after 6 months of fighting?
    2
  1082.  @RAMANKUMAR-qp6ez  so Russias claims and annexations are bullshit, since they won’t fight for a city that suppose to be, according to Putin himself, “Russian forever”. And Izyum might be small, but it was Russias only bridge head over that northern river, AND was supposed to be the northern pincers the forces fighting in Bakmut we’re supposed to link up with. By taking it back, they’ve made the entire Russian assault on Bakmut pointless . If the Russians won’t fight to defend Kherson,Izyum Lymen, and the rest, how are the expected to fight for Donbass and Crimea ?
    2
  1083. They took back Kherson, Izyum, Lymen, Chernihiv, Sumy, all of Kharkiv oblast and snake island. The hell are you talking about?
    2
  1084.  @groupvucic2235 well with such high supposed losses then, how are they still holding the line and managed to carry out 2 large scale counter offensives against that Russians?
    2
  1085.  @groupvucic2235  my brother in christ, you actually think Ukraine, at any point, had a million soldiers ?? Not even my pro-Ukrainian ass could believe that!
    2
  1086.  @Sharkoon030 they said that back in August.
    2
  1087. If the Ukrainians lost 400k troops, there wouldn’t be a Ukrainian army left my guy.
    2
  1088.  @typedef_  and I’ll take satisfaction in watching my tax money stack Russian corpses like card wood in 4K online each day, till the ruskies go home. 👍🇺🇸
    2
  1089.  @typedef_  sure thing. Let me know how “just defending donbass” works out when they run back to Russia with their tails between their legs
    2
  1090. The Russians are no better.
    2
  1091.  @AyOuB.God-soldier  yet they still claim “the Ukrainians are on there last legs” constantly. Which one is it Vatniks?
    2
  1092. You literally just commented….
    2
  1093. well....i can see some more lend lease instore for the Ukrainians. best bang for our buck in decades! you go boys!
    2
  1094. Not a long time Viewer I see
    2
  1095. Apparently that’s bullshit, otherwise the Russians wouldn’t have packed it up and gone home. I hope we keep sending over Lend Lease too.
    2
  1096. You say that, but the Ukrainians routinely capture Somalians, Nepalese, Indian, Malians, Nigerians, Chinese and even amercians in the Russians units. Why would this be any different?
    2
  1097. Hey, we dreamed of Kherson being liberated. And that came true too. Bakmut will hold
    2
  1098. Bye bye 👋
    2
  1099.  @davidlamont5793 he won’t support Russia, so no worries there
    2
  1100.  @projectedone  lol “desperation”. More like its desperation Russia can’t seem to drive the Ukrainians out of its own country, and now is calling a general mobilization
    2
  1101.  @projectedone  lol “desperation” , yet they even got close air support over Kursk backing up their latest push. 🤡
    2
  1102.  @projectedone  well would you look at that. The Ukrainians are attacking in Kursk again 🤣
    2
  1103.  @projectedone  ya, and it looks like west of snagost now.
    2
  1104.  @projectedone  feel silly seeing how it’s not?
    2
  1105.  @projectedone  feel silly that it’s not, and the Ukrainians are even further west now?
    2
  1106.  @projectedone  feel stupid now that it’s not and the Ukrainians are west of Snagost now?
    2
  1107.  @projectedone  lol, sure bud. Ukraine totally lost a division worth of troops, (2x more then their are Ukraines in Kursk to begin with) yet Russia hasn’t driven them out of Kursk 🤡🤣
    2
  1108.  @projectedone  lol, no they didn’t. The Ukrainians are still in control of much of southern Kursk oblast 3 weeks later. Go ask the folks of Sudzha who’s in charge right now 🤣
    2
  1109. Kursk, Kherson, Virchonsk, and Kypyansk,
    2
  1110.  @hongshi8251  they really don’t. When Russia got over ambitious, suffered too many losses, or were forced to endure the costs of a pointless war for too long, they’ve always broken or at the very least, turned on their idiotic leaders eventually. The Tsars, Brusnev, Gorby, Yeltsin, and now Putin are finding that out now.
    2
  1111. Russia will be lucky to still have a unified county in 10 years
    2
  1112. So, who’s in charge of Kherson again comrade?
    2
  1113.  @alekseym9815  lol, sure bud. A Ukrainian general of all people purposely killed his own guys that are hard to replace. Let me guess, RT. Told ya? 🤣🤡
    2
  1114.  @alekseym9815  then their purposely blind, or really suck at studying Russian history or geopolitics. Because it’s clear as day Russia isn’t winning this war
    2
  1115.  @alekseym9815  nah, I don’t particularly like ruskie propaganda
    2
  1116.  @alekseym9815  there having great success in Kursk now, and Kharkiv is once again Turing into a disaster for the Russians. And hey, why couldn’t Russia beat off a battalion of Ukrainian troops from their beachhead in almost 2 years of fighting? 🤡
    2
  1117.  @alekseym9815  Russias economy isn’t doing well at all. It’s not even in the top 10 best performing economies for the last 2 years now. 🤣 And meanwhile, the Ukrainians offensive into Kursk is going very well. They’ve taken a pumping station that controls the majority of Russias export capacity to the west now, and Russian refineries have been going up in smoke for 3 months now.
    2
  1118.  @alekseym9815 they arnt.
    2
  1119. Let’s talk about how Kursk is doing these days shall we? Or the Russians failed offensive in Kharkiv? Or maybe the fact Russia has lost 40% of its oil production over the last 3 months?
    2
  1120.  @Rtg5637  an, what’s the matter, deleting my comments because you don’t like them bud?
    2
  1121.  @Rtg5637  accept reality. The Russians arnt advancing anywhere, and still are no closer to knocking Ukraine out of the war now then they were almost 3 years ago. By your own logic, the Ukrainians are still winning, seeing how Russia has lost most of what it took in 2022 by now.
    2
  1122. My brother in hell, they’re begging north Korea for more troops, and have been resorting to using attack sheds and motorcycles to attack trench lines, because they’ve ran out of everything else
    2
  1123. Nah, he’s got plenty of toilet paper already..,
    2
  1124. lol, is that why the Russians are pulling out of Kharkiv still? Or why they can’t seem to punch through the lines anywhere 3 years later? 😂
    2
  1125.  @A_TAYLOR06  literally both sides have been doing a WW1 nostalgia trip.
    2
  1126.  @ВладимирВ-э3п  5% of weapons, sure. But almost all Soviet logistics vehicles were American made, as well as most of there armored transport and reconnaissance vehicles. On top of that, hundreds of American made rail cars for there trains, as well hundreds of thousands of pairs of boots and coats, millions of tons of ammo, steel, aluminum, medical supplies ect. It’s a lot more then guns lend lease provides.and it’s those “soft factors” (and all the intelligence the US is gathering for Ukraine) that’s keeping Ukraine in the fight. And we can keep it up for quite some time.
    2
  1127.  @stiannunn5113  oh I’m very aware what’s going on in Kursk. Russians are panicking and barley putting up a fight, and Ukraine is not holding 74 Russian towns and villages in the area after just a week of fighting. And Russian fans online are coping hard as hell.
    2
  1128.  @Peacewar2020  why? He’s not the one leading it. And he would be very impressed of the Ukrainians advancements in the last week.
    2
  1129. lol, “over soon”? Just like your 3 Day super duper special Olympics operation comrade? 😂
    2
  1130.  @Peacewar2020  I KNOW their weak in Kursk. If they weren’t, the Ukrainians wouldn’t have even gotten over the border, let alone taken 1000 square kilometers in a week.
    2
  1131.  @imwelshjesus  ??? Ok,,..
    2
  1132. Saving them, to make money later.
    2
  1133. What do you mean? There still advancing in the south.
    2
  1134. Same with the Russians. They only got pushed out of Kyiv, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Sumy, Izyum, Lyman and soon Kherson, but hey their still “winning” right vatnik?
    2
  1135. Strykers are easier to maintain, they carry more and they share parts with more of the western vehicles sent over. Perfect for Ukraines infantry-heavy army.
    2
  1136. Like they did at Kherson? Ya ok buddy. I hope the Russians don’t leave too many goodies behind like they did at Kharkiv when they inevitably run away.
    2
  1137. Have you been under stock the last 3 months when Ukraine took back 8000km of land, Kherson, Izyum, Lymen and all of Kharkiv oblast back in the same time span?
    2
  1138.  @trevorcrook5753 because don’t see how the donbass would suddenly see a mass-collapse of the Ukrainian lines. I mean, it was suppose to collapse in April after mauriopol fell, in may after Izumi fell, in June after Severdonesk, and then in July when slovyanks was the next target. And that was when they had all this numerical artillery advantage, limited local air superiority, and a numerical troop advantage after retreating from Kyiv. Yet here we are. Now that Himars has limited there artillery ammo supply, more western supplies of armor and artillery has arrived, and at least 10k Ukrainians are being trained per month in the west, I can see the Russians starting to losing ground in the south. And a bloody stalemate in the east, as we’ve seen for the last 6 months.
    2
  1139. Ya, by the end of august the Russians are going be losing ground.
    2
  1140. @Slava Ukraine against a Ukrainian force with 6 months of entrenchment? If it was so simple, why didn’t they do it already?
    2
  1141. For what? Letting Ukraine fight back?
    2
  1142.  @duckman5274  it’s not fiction, we did it in 1991. And seeing how badly the Russian military functions, we could do it again.
    2
  1143.  @GGkorok  so the Texans can finally live there Red Dawn fantasy? If only Putin was so kind….
    2
  1144.  @FProductions64  we will. At least we have a place to stay, unlike the Ukrainians who’s houses keep getting bombed. I’ll gladly pay more if it means we can get more weapons and ammo To fight with.
    2
  1145. The Arsenal of Democracy once again.
    2
  1146. So why did Russia call it “ a red line” if the west sent tanks, if it’s “no big deal really” 🤡
    2
  1147.  @thephoenix756  no, Russia will just hit another defences line for months on end again, while Ukraine takes back meltipol
    2
  1148. We are though
    2
  1149.  @spetsnaz5917  why should I cope? All this shows me is the Russian political system is a joke. Wagner has killed over a dozen of Russian military pilots, and many Russian soldiers and cops in this stunt, and has led to the destruction of civilian and state infrastructure in Russia. he’s literally beaten the Nazis record in terms of time to reach Moscow ! and he’s getting OFF THE HOOK with no consequences???? this is like if Guy f@cking Fieri led a mercenary army to within 2 hours of Washington DC to overthrow the American government, after killing dozens of police and national guard memebers along the way, and then gets pardon by the president, and we’re all just to suppose to go back and pretend nothing happened. could you f@cking imagine what Amercia would be like after that kind of sh!t show???
    2
  1150. And their freedom.
    2
  1151.  @tad27612  oh let me guess, I guess Kherson is “Russian forever” to you? 🤡
    2
  1152.  @666Ekinox  oh hey, did France run out of ammo today and is completely defenseless? 😂
    2
  1153.  @666Ekinox  no. It is not. Not since the days of Napoleon, when a nations army maybe numbered a hundred Thousand at the most ,has that been the point of war. The point of modern war, is to seize critical land and destroy the enemy’s ability to make war, and to seize critical resources and infrastructure in the process. What you are describing is the kind of Doctrine the US used in Vietnam, and lost with. You cannot defeat an enemy, if your unable to prevent them from being resupplied (in the case of Vietnam, from the USSR and in Ukraine’s case, NATO), occupy his critical logistic infrastructure (in Vietnam’s case, the port of Hai Phong and the Ho Chi mhn trail, in Ukraines case Odessa, Lyiv , Kharkiv, and Kyiv) and center of leadership and control (Hanoi for Vietnam, Kyiv for Ukraine). The US also dropped an ungodly amount of munitions of the Vietnamese for 10 years (more then all its munitions in WW2 combined in-fact), and destroyed the NVA several times over. And still lose in the end. Russia is making the same mistake and Ukraine, and it will lose just the same.
    2
  1154.  @666Ekinox  and yet, the Russians didn’t stop running away for 6 months and still haven’t taken donbass after a year of throwing that amount shells around. It’s almost like it matters more WHAT you hit, then HOW MANY TIMES you hit something.
    2
  1155. Or it will make us just drill for are own fuel. America is begging for its domestic oil industry to boom again.
    2
  1156.  @yourneighbour3309  old enough to stop believing in imaginary friends unlike you 🤡
    2
  1157. Atheism is the only truth
    2
  1158. And they’ve learned from it
    2
  1159.  @michaelpelzek8882  you should go grab a gun and go show your vladdy daddy how great you are. He could really use you in Kursk right about now comrade 🤣🤡
    2
  1160. Why’s Iran continuing to support groups like Hazbolla and the Houthis, when all they’re doing is starting wars?
    2
  1161. When it actually becomes a world war
    2
  1162.  @memyselfandi8544 Jesus doesn’t exist.
    2
  1163. You really think hypothetical aliens are our top concern right now bud?
    2
  1164. Coal mines? In the 21st century?
    2
  1165. Not at all.
    2
  1166. lol, you wish the CIA was doing this huh?
    2
  1167. Hard to believe you actually believe that
    2
  1168. How does one become a millionaire collections old Cold War gear and ammunition?
    2
  1169. They said the same thing about retaking Kherson….
    2
  1170. Ok prove it wrong. But when the Ukrainian flag is flying over Kherson again, good luck explaining that one to us bud 😊
    2
  1171. Fall back from Kherson and see what happens. Russian logistics are in HIMARS range once more. Kherson is Ukrainian
    2
  1172. Probably summer offensive realistically.
    2
  1173. So, is Assad in power in Syria or not?
    2
  1174. And we hate the way you type comments
    2
  1175. No. No more appeasement. We should do everything in our power to defeat Russia.
    2
  1176. The Russians there belong to the 810th naval infantry, and thanks to the Ukrainians destroying the bridges there, there basically now surrounded by UAF forces on Both sides of the border
    2
  1177. Meanwhile, the Russians can’t keep a bridge up in Kursk, and now are getting attacked again from the western direction…
    2
  1178.  @constantinethecataphract5949  the hell they don’t.
    2
  1179. That doesn’t work in the 21st century comrade. This isn’t the 1940s anymore
    2
  1180. If they had that many troops in Belarus, then why on gods green earth have they not gone for Kyiv again?
    2
  1181.  @scipioafricanus1  there’s no NATO forces in Ukraine, let alone Kursk.
    2
  1182. NATO what?
    2
  1183. There’s nothing civil about this, and they’re two different countries. So it’s just a war.
    2
  1184. The Russians can pack up and leave Ukraine anytime.
    2
  1185. I don’t understand why Russia insists on throwing the lives of its soldiers away and its dwindling military stockpiles for Ukrainian territory it doesn’t need and have zero chance of ever holding.
    2
  1186.  @MrSnapy1  then you are a traitor to your nation and people
    2
  1187.  @MrSnapy1  I’ll ask again. Would you give up with your nation being invaded?
    2
  1188. So why have they fled from half their gains so far then bud? 🤡
    2
  1189.  @UnaliverOfChildren  and now they can go fight Iran for 20 more years, as of today 👍
    2
  1190.  @UnaliverOfChildren and the people of the Belgorod people’s republic have the right to defend themselves against the Russians government who’s thrown them into a pointless war.
    2
  1191. Meanwhile Kyiv, Hostemel, Irpin, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Kupyansk, Izyum, Odessa, Lymen, snake island, and Kherson are still Ukrainian…..
    2
  1192.  @CitadelVL  oh no, not the BARS and Russian police!
    2
  1193. So why are they still there fighting bud?
    2
  1194. You mean you can’t believe how based they are for being the first military force to invade Russian territory since WW2?😊 And hey, they’ve taken back half of Russia’s gains so far. That’s what I’d call winning.
    2
  1195.  @prosimulate  I don’t know, zelensky is the worlds best comedian though. He’s made all of Russia into a joke.
    2
  1196.  @JahNgomba-ir2zi  I’m not coping. That would be the ruskies creaming themselves after they spend 13,000 lives and 4 months trying to take a suburb of donensk city after bombing it into a wasteland, after losing half their original conquests gains not even 2 years ago….
    2
  1197.  @JahNgomba-ir2zi  not at all. The Ukrainians still got over the first 2 line of it eventually, and it wasted Russias reserves to the point where now they can’t launch any major offensives. Why do you think it took 4 months to take a suburb of donensk city or why they can’t kick some rebels out of Belgorod over a month later still?
    2
  1198.  @jaopeke  don’t know.
    2
  1199. Bye bye Ivan 👋
    2
  1200. Could it be that since the US isn’t a combatant in the war, it makes no since for the Russians to even send us a ceasefire proposal?
    2
  1201.  @Guadalajara1937 accept their not. The Russians have less of Ukraine today than they did 2 years ago.
    2
  1202. He’s in the process of losing one.
    2
  1203. Honestly, I don’t care if we have to strip the Army reserve to keep Ukraine going. We don’t need the US army for a hypothetical war with China anyhow.
    2
  1204.  @АлександрСысоев-ц3б  says who? Because Russia doesn’t have a great track record of winning wars.
    2
  1205.  @АлександрСысоев-ц3б  cool, because Russia isn’t going to win, so keep dreaming.
    2
  1206.  @АлександрСысоев-ц3б  it can, and it will. I don’t see Russia throwing away 1/3 it’s current population just so it, (the largest country in the planet as it is), can have more land.
    2
  1207. Lol. You act like Russia can’t lose 😂
    2
  1208.  @bigmoe9856  ok, but if those rubles cant purchase anything outside of Russia, what good is it as a trade medium? Russia, despite what some of the Vatniks claim, is not self sufficient, and does need a steady import of goods to keep certain industries running. (I’m particular, advanced weapons manufacturing, it’s airline industry, ship building/maintenance, information technology industry ect). China can help, but their going to want dollars for goods, not rubles. Because China, in turn, can’t use rubles anywhere else in the world. Same applies with India, which is why Russia has billions of rupees it can’t do anything with now.
    2
  1209.  @chasx7062  ok, but our dollar is still accepted everywhere, and we barley buy foreign uranium anyways.
    2
  1210. So, why’s the ruble worth 10 cents right now?
    2
  1211.  @adamelghalmi9771  there’s no pipelines going into the Suez Canal bud.
    2
  1212.  @adamelghalmi9771  and how does it reach Egypt? That right, via the Red Sea
    2
  1213.  @AuroraColoradoUSA  the future is now old man.
    2
  1214. You mean, utterly based
    2
  1215. In the words of Mao, “nuclear weapons, are paper tigers”.
    2
  1216.  @seancidy6008  and? Did Russia nuke Afghanistan because it lost?
    2
  1217.  @Archangel55 which it won’t.
    2
  1218. More useless redlines comrade?🥱
    2
  1219.  @astranger448  ya, and Russias got 400,000 of their own now. For reference, that’s nearly as many losses as the US suffered dead in WW2, in just 2 years of fighting.
    2
  1220.  @astranger448  who won in Afghanistan? Who won Vietnam? It wasn’t the largest economy, that’s for sure.
    2
  1221. Because we thought it was just the Iraqis using there equipment wrong…..
    2
  1222. 1991 doenst count as a victory to you pal? 😂
    2
  1223.  @jamesng7320  so the Russians lost WW2 then, according to you??🤡🤡🤡
    2
  1224.  @politics4304  Russia hasn’t won a war since 1945, and it lost plenty of wars before that too bud. It will lose this one too.
    2
  1225. Only on the internet 😂
    2
  1226. You actually support a war of aggression and imperialism against the Ukrainian people?
    2
  1227. Cope Ivan.
    2
  1228. Good old Red Storm Rising
    2
  1229. No, we do not.
    2
  1230. Because you’ll have bigger problems I’d Putin gets his way
    2
  1231. They said the same thing about Ukraine, and here we are 2 years into the 3 day super-duper-special Olympics operation Ivan 🤡
    2
  1232. Huh, I guess Russia just loves giving Ukraine BTR-82s then..,
    2
  1233. Knowing there level of corruption, probably not many.
    2
  1234. Then why are the Russians being pushed back then?
    2
  1235. Apparently the Russians can’t fix there own crap either. Because ether keep leaving It behind for the Ukrainians to pick up. But I appreciate the competition Russia has presented America when it comes to Lend Lease shipments to Ukraine 👍🇺🇸
    2
  1236. Apparently not, because they’re pushing the Russians back with them constantly.
    2
  1237.  @maxfax319  probably from wreck ones they salvage from. Or if there similar enough, from the older soviet era BTR-80s Ukraine has (though they don’t have many of those, most of them are the 70 variant or the BTR-4 ones the Ukrainians make domestically)
    2
  1238. The first one shown is a Russian BTR-82. It has the turret of one, which Ukraine doesn’t employ.
    2
  1239. 1) they haven’t been repainted yet 2) my brother in christ, they can’t even beat Ukraine, the hell are they going to do against America?
    2
  1240. With American made ATGMS, yes. 😉
    2
  1241.  @JustChillingNahhhhMean  I’m not afraid.
    2
  1242. Fat chance. The MIC has far more influence on congress then the Russia sympathetic republicans do.
    2
  1243. OR TASS
    2
  1244. They’ve taken a lot of land back in the last 4 months, including Kherson. And all Russia has to show for its losses, is Thousands of dead, and another bombed out town on a front that lost its value in October when the Ukrainians broke the would-be Russian pincer in the north at Izyum.
    2
  1245.  @POLARTTYRTM  again I’m not coping. At least I haven’t been making the same video about “the imminent fall of Bakmut” for the last 11 months. 🤡😂
    2
  1246.  @VishalSharma-wu5ln  cope with what? The Russians wasting $75million in missiles to damage one Patriot? 🤡
    2
  1247. You mean there going to by even more now? Because Russia just gave Patriot its best advertisement in its history 😉
    2
  1248. The entire Ukrainian military isn’t all just hanging out in Kherson you know.
    2
  1249. Seems to be a lot of “tactical withdrawals” for an army that was suppose to be attacking and winning not to long ago. But hey, what does the average Joe with a IQ bigger then 1 know right? 🤷‍♂️
    2
  1250. Yet their the ones advancing, while the Russians haven’t stopped running since September
    2
  1251. Nope. Confirmed not destroyed today.
    2
  1252. Same for the Russians back in March. And now they have to fight an enemy who loves the cold too. the first since they fought the Finns back in the day.
    2
  1253. NATO won’t get involved directly unless Russia uses nukes. And what makes you think these conscripts will, somehow , be better motivated fighting the full force of NATO, if Ukraine alone is giving them this hard of a time?
    2
  1254. Ah yes, they only have 4 weeks of NATO training compared to 10 and only a billion dollars of new gear a month coming in. I guess the Russians 2 days of training and rusty AK is totally adequate for the task of taking Kyiv …again…..for real this time…
    2
  1255.  @sigmasix3719 so, why are they running away now?🤡
    2
  1256. Hey, at least you Russian admit you want to be North Korea.
    2
  1257. (The third world at least)
    2
  1258.  @jamesbond1231  no I’m serious. Who the hell thinks the Dutch burnt down the German Reichstag ? Is that really a thing people think?
    2
  1259. Who the hell think the Dutch burned the reichstag down? There not even in the same country!
    2
  1260.  @dominicchaize1112  no more appeasement. And i think you should take a look at the US MIC before you even think America is running out of ammo and gear to send.
    2
  1261. what are you drinking if you think Russia can somehow still win this war?
    2
  1262. Ya, I’d say taking just 75% of a bombed out wasteland that use to be a city after 9 months of fighting, while losing 10,000km of terrain, 7 smaller cities and 2 major oblasts in the span of just 4 months last year, is most defiantly, NOT winning….. Especially considering Russia is supposed to be “the second strongest military in the world”….😂
    2
  1263. Filthy Russian oligarchs using their fellow Russians as cannon fodder and Putin’s corrupt regime trying to rebuild the Soviet Union.
    2
  1264.  @josephkush1032  damn straight.
    2
  1265.  @josephkush1032  I highly doubt that. The Z-boys online would be celebrating it like it’s the battle that’s going to end the war. Like they did st Bakmut for 8 months.
    2
  1266.  @josephkush1032  like where? They’re literally about to enter Robtyrn in the south, they’ve taken the Olinsky bridge in Kherson oblast, recently just took Klishchiivka in the east, and apparently they have units that have reentered Bakmut too.
    2
  1267. And sherpa hole punched into Russian lines to be exploited soon.
    2
  1268.  @Upper-cr1kh  Obama actually sent weapons, Humvees, and trained the Ukrainians (though not to the same scale as Biden has). Trump meanwhile, tried to black mail Zelensky to get some dirt on his political opponents for an election.
    2
  1269.  @Upper-cr1kh  my brother in hell, the Russians had special forces operating in Donbass for YEARS under trump and constantly sent more shipments to the Donbass separatists. Meanwhile, trump actively abandoned FOBs to the Russians in Syria in order to appease the Turks, which degraded US influence in the region and strengthened the Russo-Syrain forces in the region.
    2
  1270.  @Upper-cr1kh trump wouldn’t have supported Ukraine as much as Biden has. He would have rewarded Putin for his actions, and we would have an even bigger war on our hands later.
    2
  1271.  @pc_suffering6941  welp. You can always go back to Russia bud. It literally next door to you.
    2
  1272.  @quagmoe7879  fighting Russian propaganda and disinformation helps keep the Ukrainians physical and material support coming in.
    2
  1273.  @quagmoe7879  so you’d rather support a nation that has started the largest war in Europe since WW2 and is blatantly trying to conquer one of its neighbors? Are you really that compelled to cope and make up excuses for Russias inability to win this war or even defend its own oblasts from the Ukrainians counter-invasion? Because it really doesn’t matter what you say, it won’t change the fact the Russians are still losing ground in Kursk and most of their units there are surrendering the first chance they get.
    2
  1274.  @quagmoe7879  man, I WISH I was paid to argue with morons online all day. But it’s funny to watch people simp for a dictatorship and then have to cope when said dictatorships image of strength is routinely broken.
    2
  1275.  @quagmoe7879  its simply the facts of the situation in Kursk.
    2
  1276.  @quagmoe7879  again, it’s simply the facts on the ground. Now Belgorod has even declared a state of emergency, as the Ukrainians are still moving in Kursk to the north and west.
    2
  1277.  @quagmoe7879  so why is Russia evacuating the oblast? 🤡
    2
  1278.  @quagmoe7879  “kurks is untouched”, ya no kidding. The Russians their arnt even putting up a fight. Probably why Ukraine now has Sudzha, and didn’t have to bomb into a wasteland to do it.
    2
  1279.  @quagmoe7879  cool, so what’s your reaction looking at Kursk these days? 🤡
    2
  1280.  @mark9099  lol, imagine coming to the YT comments to have a “constructive” conversation. That’s pretty sad bud. 😉
    2
  1281.  @mark9099  tell ya what, when the Ukrainians get back in meltitopol, I’ll come back here and see how well this aged, ok?
    2
  1282.  @joshuabeckham2387  it most certainly is. And it’s a problem that the Russians have done now 3 times. They tired this same stunt at Mariupol, and then had to abandon Kyiv, Sumy, Chernihiv and Kharkiv city in order to sustain the siege, and then focus on donbass. They did it again at servedonesk, we’re they forced the Ukrainians to retreat, but spent too much of there manpower and supplies to capitalize on their success, while also having to give up Snake island, the blockade of Odessa and the Mykolaiv advance in the process. They did it once again at Kherson, throwing what they had at the Ukrainians, only to lose all of Kharkiv oblast, Kupyansk, Izyum, and Lymen in the process, and still lost Kherson in the end to. And now at Bakmut, like serverdonesk, even if they take the city, they’ve spent too much to actually exploit thier gain, and will inevitably lose land back to the Ukrainians on the other fronts they’ve ignored, probably in he south.
    2
  1283.  @dec2 and then eventually get pushed out of thousands of kilometers of land when there logistics, morale and communications break down….
    2
  1284.  @SamuelFeltman-gs4hm  ya. I’m not holding my breath. China is doing now, what Russia was doing at the start of February 2022, right before they invaded.
    2
  1285. Same
    2
  1286. I mean, looking at history, I’d expect the euros to adopt authoritarian systems once again. They did it for thousands of years, why not now?
    2
  1287.  @robzilla730 ah yes, the country that: -decriminalized domestic violence -whose money is near worthless -who’s nationalized mcdonalds to keep it service sector from collapsing, -who flaunts nuclear war threats around every month -who 30% of its population still didn’t have indoor pluming in 2023 -and starts the largest land war in Europe since WW2 . Totally “has their shit together” 🤡
    2
  1288.  @fullm3taljacket  ok boomer
    2
  1289.  @somethingsomething8511  ya, no. Never mess with old timers. They far more knowledge and experience in their crafts and feilds then us punks can only dream to have. That is far more important in this age of technology, rather then physical fitness.
    2
  1290.  4th reich  cope harder deutschbag. It’s cringe to hang on to a failed ideology, like communists do.
    2
  1291. Same.
    2
  1292.  @NikephorosCaesar  your point?
    2
  1293.  @pierren___  they can, but the US military has only one instance of this happening enmass. And it didn’t end well for the confederate army traitors in the end.
    2
  1294.  @manbabymonke  your right, no one had a reason to be there. so why get involved with a bad crowd if you know bad things is going happen? Let alone bring a gun with you?
    2
  1295. What? Grant’s mid west campaign and the Siege of Vicksburg are the stuff of legends. The man broke the confederacy’s back.
    2
  1296. The US in the 30s? England in the 70s/80s? Germany form the early 60s to the late 80s?
    2
  1297. Your delusional. Keep your stupid Q crap out of my town, or better yet, my country if your so hell bent on destroying your life for stupid cause.
    2
  1298. This
    2
  1299. Are you kidding? Russian propaganda has infiltrated the minds of many congress men, right-wing media figures, and our online discourse.
    2
  1300. And the US military and police have no history of ever rebelling against their chain of command in the last century and a half. The last time that happened, it didn’t end well for the rebels.
    2
  1301. Christ remake this. The audio is terrible!!!
    2
  1302. What do you mean? Most of our media theses days shows the Soviet side of things in WW2. Just look at how many video games we have were play as the Soviets, or books we have that show the Eastern front from the Soviet perspective. It’s only really the most ignorant ultra-nationalist here that ignore the Soviets role in the war.
    2
  1303. No it’s still bad, but at least in the US, information is free and available for people to have views that conflict with official stories.
    2
  1304.  @Antrplg  the US is not a “controlled democracy”. And I bet you can’t even explain how it would be.
    2
  1305.  @Antrplg  how in the world, is the US “authoritarian” in anyway?
    2
  1306. So basically anyone but Fox News to you is “propaganda”? I think you have consumed too much propaganda your self at this point.
    2
  1307. No, but it makes you a rather conflicted individual to us.
    2
  1308. Why would they stay abroad? Once the wars over, wouldn’t they go back home?
    2
  1309. Hello from America. How’s the weather?
    2
  1310. I mean….seeing what the Russians have brought of cold storage (pun intended) for Ukraine…..probably
    2
  1311. So….how’s it feel to live the late USSR nostalgia trip?
    2
  1312. Wait….do they speak the same language?
    2
  1313. Wait till the second man. It kicks you hard
    2
  1314. Well now NATO is growing again, thanks to Finland and Sweden. Great job Putin, really showing NATO who’s boss by making the Baltic Sea a NATO lake. Thanks buddy.
    2
  1315. Define “woke” for me. I’ll wait.
    2
  1316.  @davormasnic4856 coming from the country who claims Ukrainian history, culture and sovereignty do not exist, and have spent the last year Turing every Ukrainian town they come across into a wasteland….
    2
  1317. Sorry you can’t time travel back to the 1960s boomer.🤡
    2
  1318. By smashing Putin’s army to pieces and strengthening NATO without losing a single solider? 😂
    2
  1319.  @hdhdnfbxbdbd  Id think they don’t seem To know what a “lost war” looks like, because a nation that’s “losing” doesn’t fight a nuclear power to a stand still, and regain over 10,000+km of land and many cities back from said nuclear power. And by all means, seeing us get some revenge on the ruskies has been the best use of my tax money I’ve seen in years.
    2
  1320.  @hdhdnfbxbdbd  tell them what? You want me to explain geo-politics and long term strategic needs of a country to 3 kids? I mean I can try, I don’t know if they’ll really register it….
    2
  1321.  @peedless4844  so you’d rather just let Putin kill as many as Ukrainians he wants, reward him for his stupid war and be on his energy leash instead, because things are a little bit pricier for you? Good to know. I meanwhile will enjoy watching my tax money vaporize ruskies, even if I have to pay slightly more for it. You guys also had near- limitless and clean domestic energy available to you….and then you decided to denuclearize…..
    2
  1322.  @peedless4844  yes, I have. I live in northern Louisiana.
    2
  1323. I keep hearing that, but I’ve barley noticed.
    2
  1324.  @vangogh9971  and yet, you shill and root for them like a vatnik….
    2
  1325.  @Freespeechrestrictedonyoutube  I’d say give it a year, and Putin will eat his gun.
    2
  1326.  @hoggarththewisesmeagol8362  who then sell their goods in more valuable US dollars….
    2
  1327.  @hoggarththewisesmeagol8362  performs better how? If it’s worth less then a pound or dollar?
    2
  1328.  @hoggarththewisesmeagol8362  oh so that’s why it takes 78 of them to make a dollar? 🤡
    2
  1329. Then your watching too much RT, Tass and Sputnik.
    2
  1330. Could you give us your opinion on Stalker 2 ?? I want a Russians opinion on it.
    2
  1331.  @RRRR0707  no, if anything I think we should have let Georgia in immediately after the Russian invasion ended. And lol, they can’t even push out of Donbass, but you think they’ll capture most of Ukraine still? 🤣
    2
  1332.  @RRRR0707  lol, ok sure. You just expect the Russians to: -drive off the Ukrainians beachhead in the Dnipro (which they haven’t managed to do since it was created last august) -conduct a large scale Crossing and bridging operation the Dnipro river, UNDER FIRE (because remember, the Russians destroyed every bridge in the lower Dnipro when they retreat from their in 2022) -retake Kherson, which now has 2 years of fortification and is larger then Bakmut and Avdiivka combined (and would put their logistics in the same issue they were in 2022, being separated by the Dnipro river) -then have them move on Mykolaiv and capture it (something they couldn’t do even with all the troops and surprise they had back in 2022), which is a city about the same size of Kherson. -then cross ANOTHER river east of that (again, under fire) -to then lay seige to Odessa, which would be larger and more dug in if a target then any other city the Russians have tried to attack this whole war. Like, do you even live in this reality bud? Or do you actually think the Russians are willing to fight until 2050 for Odessa? 🤡
    2
  1333.  @RRRR0707  lol, of course you talk to your cat. Typical leftist
    2
  1334.  @RRRR0707  lol, of course you talk to your cat. Your a crazy Leftist like every pro-Russia moron here 😂
    2
  1335.  @RRRR0707  oh ya sure. They totally don’t make the iron curtain that split europe in half for almost a century or anything. or have invaded 3 other nations border in them in the last 20 years line or anything right? 🤡
    2
  1336.  @gerchop9304  and what do you mean “all ports are gone?” The land border with Poland and Romania is still active, Kyiv and Lyiv airports are still in use and getting supplied, most of the Ukrainians rail network is still intact and Odessa is still open and in Ukrainian hands.
    2
  1337. I’m sorry, who’s paratroopers got slaughtered at Hostemel? Who’s troops for irradiated by digging trenches at Chernobyl? Who’s couldnt take Kharkiv after 3 months of fighting? Who let a couple of outdated hinds blow up a refinery in there own territory? Who retreated from Kyiv? Who’s flagship is at the bottom of the Black Sea? Who hasn’t secured air Superiority after 80+ days of fighting? Who’s supply convoys are constantly bombed to pieces by cheap Turkish drones? Who has lost 600+ tanks in 3 months of war? Who’s Chechens brigades have been mauled to hell? Who’s electronic warfare tech is useless against Starlink? Who’s ammo and fuel dumps in there home country keep mysteriously exploding? Who’s lost 7 generals over the course of 3 months? Oh that’s right, RUSSIA’s!
    2
  1338.  @cocos8903  ya, we should have put the kraut generals and scientists on trial too.
    2
  1339. Ya, logistics win wars, but artillery is still king of the battlefield. …..once the shells arrive….
    2
  1340.  @nitishpandey9002  only until our leaders finally let us off our leash.
    2
  1341. The simple answer is: we don’t have any to give, except maybe something like what we use on our warships, which don’t translate to land systems all that well. The long answer is: Israel is very protective of there Iron Dome system, and idk if they want it exported.
    2
  1342. Beats dying for our glorious leader for life in Ukraine or coming back to nothing but poverty and corruption at home. 🤡
    2
  1343. Meanwhile, the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians into a stalemate with just our obsolete surplus from storage….
    2
  1344.  @muckle8  and that’s not worth being free of Russian tyranny and not repeating the mistake of appeasement to you? The people the Baltics states, Ukraine, Poland and rest of the old eastern bloc do not agree with you.
    2
  1345.  @muckle8  no one in Europe is struggling, let alone the Baltic states 🤡
    2
  1346. Cope harder tankie 😂
    2
  1347. Well, the UK and maybe Canada would. It’s kinda hard for the rest of Europe to deploy their troops to the otherside of the world
    2
  1348.  @muckle8  lol, like you even know they exist 🤣🙄
    2
  1349. Cope harder Ivan 😂
    2
  1350. You’re right, that’s why Sweden joined NATO.
    2
  1351. They’re didn’t join Russia bud 🤡
    2
  1352. Because Ukraine was totally a threat to Russia right?😂
    2
  1353. You could have asked the Vietnamese the same thing back in the day. Yet, they didn’t seem to mind, and fought in regardless.
    2
  1354. It could end tomorrow too, if Russia packed up and went home.
    2
  1355. He’s the best comedian in my opinion. He’s made all of Russia into a joke
    2
  1356. @Emmanuel Goldstein no, but the man needs a wheel barrel for sure. How else can he get around with such massive balls?
    2
  1357. @Emmanuel Goldstein hmmmm Putin cock must be tasting fine these days….eh?
    2
  1358. How about a coward?
    2
  1359. Ukraine can supply the east just fine. If it couldn’t, it would have collapsed months ago. I’m highly doubtful on that casualty number too. Because combined with the other supposed Ukrainian casualties people like to throw around, Ukraine has lost its entire army twice over now. yet somehow still was able to launch 2 back to back offensives AND hold the line until the east . Oh, and as an American, despite our economic difficulties, I hope we counter to support Ukraine. Best use of my tax money I’ve ever seen in my life.
    2
  1360. Cope harder vatnik. If any of this was true, Kyiv would be in Russian hands and Putin would be looking over into Poland by now.
    2
  1361.  @HilarityBribo  no, they would throw out the Russian invaders that don’t even think Ukraine is a country,
    2
  1362.  @HilarityBribo  lol. Of course you think I’m a bot vatnik. Just for that, I hope we send even more Lend Lease now.
    2
  1363. Are you kidding? I love seeing my tax money stack Russians like cardwood👍🇺🇸
    2
  1364.  @palerewin  they’ve lost half there gains form last year, and are having to not only conscript ore troops, but are pulling obsolete equipment from storage more and more, just to keep up with losses. I call that struggling. And please tel me your not one of those morons out here that think Ukraine has like 300,000 “NATO mercenaries” fighting for it, are you?
    2
  1365.  @palerewin  so you think Russia is going to attack NATO directly when it’s already struggling with Ukraine as is, and hasn’t attacked NATO yet despite all the “red lines” crossed at this point? Why?
    2
  1366.  @palerewin  history shows the side that manages to retake its land from an aggressor usually wins in the long run. So I say Ukraine is going to win this if we keep the Lend Lease up.
    2
  1367.  @palerewin  so who has Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Lymen, Kupyansk, Sumy, Chernihiv, and snake island now? Hint: it’s not Russia.
    2
  1368.  @palerewin  so why has Russia done nothing but retreat for 6 months and had to conscript 300,000 more soldiers ? Hell, why are they considering another 500,000 to be conscripted if their casualties are so low?
    2
  1369.  @palerewin  no, we didn’t, We never flatten Bagdad, Faliujia, Bathra, or Mosul the way Russia has done to Mariupol,serverdonensk, and now Bakmut. Hell, if we had taken even a fraction of the losses Russia has taken by now, we would have just gone home by now.
    2
  1370.  @palerewin  oh, ya sure bud. I guess the Russians are just “liberating” Ukraine via Artillery shells and cruise missiles right?🙄
    2
  1371. Germany isnt invading Russia this time. And Russia can’t even destroy Ukraine, let alone push past it.
    2
  1372. They have….what do you think the 16 billion has been?
    2
  1373. Maybe if the Russians didn’t “liberate” Ukraine with artillery they would have something more to show for there efforts in this stupid war.
    2
  1374. They have the SSO, SBU, Jager and airborne units still bud.
    2
  1375. on paper
    2
  1376.  @mikemunro811 theirs oil in Norway, Romania, and offshore deposited in the North Sea. And if that’s not enough, there’s always Algeria, Canada, the US, and maybe Venezuela to get fuel from. There’s no need for this supposed Ukrainian gas deposited I keep hearing about.
    2
  1377. US here….what recession? Im making more money then I have in 2 years.
    2
  1378. That would work, if Russia was still a command economy, like back when it was a communist country. Doesn’t work with a modern free market economy.
    2
  1379.  @HealzHS  I will. Have fun with the HIMARS we sent over to Ukraine commie 👍🇺🇸
    2
  1380. It was a beautiful country once. Then Putin came along.
    2
  1381. How? The Logistical situation says otherwise. Throwing more men into a meat grinder doenst help supply in anyway. If anything, it just makes them die quicker against better western weapons.
    2
  1382. Funny, Russian tanks did finally made it Kyiv. There crews came in pieces… Cope harder vatnik.
    2
  1383. Nope. Not with all the NATO support, and the Russians failing to break their morale.
    2
  1384. Hmmmm some good copium right here boys.
    2
  1385. No more money for Africa then 😂😅
    2
  1386.  @hgkghkhgkgh8378  and then fight 32 other nations at the same time? I think Morocco would be better off looking after it’s own people with the money it would get off oil, rather then starting a pointless war with NATO 🤷‍♂️
    2
  1387. For money?
    2
  1388.  @Lightendaltrax  no, go on, make your point. Because Im curious how, after everything, their somehow still not going to pull through this war, according to you. Like, if this was back in April or may, I could understand but now…..ya kinda hard to see your point.
    2
  1389.  @Lightendaltrax  really? After resisting for over 6 months and dealing seriously losses to the Russians, and currently counterattacking , you still think there just going to fall eventually?
    2
  1390. Ruskies go home
    2
  1391.  @sheriflashin  well then, tough luck Russia.
    2
  1392. So why Russia leave Kherson?
    2
  1393. Ya I’d still say Putin failed in that regard too. Thanks to Lend Lease, Ukraine is more heavily armed then it was when the war started almost a year ago now.
    2
  1394.  @ra5294  after 6 months of digging in and NATO resupply?
    2
  1395. Ah what’s the matter? My reply’s tuning your dreams bud?
    2
  1396.  @ReturnoftheLightning  not at all, unfortunately. Just had those Patriot Front f$ ckers in my home town doing a rally not that long ago. Fascism is unfortunately on the rise again….
    2
  1397. Ethno-nationalism, ultra nationalism, religious dominionism, Fascism….
    2
  1398.  @erikanders3343  I am sure as hell not pro-Putin. Was simply making a point about nukes being widespread once this war is over.
    2
  1399. If we want natural resources, theres plenty of other places we can’t get them.
    2
  1400. Ya, the Ukrainians. Bet there backed up the by the combined US and NATO MIC.
    2
  1401. @@storozhevoy4715 ya, I understand Russia is having some manpower and training issues then🤪
    2
  1402. Ya no. No more appeasement toward the Russians. I hope NATO gets Finland and Sweden and turns the Baltic Sea into a “NATO lake” now. And Ukraine gets fast tracked to NATO membership after this mess is over. The Russians have shown they cannot be trusted or ignored.
    2
  1403. Or just buy American and Saudi fuel….
    2
  1404. How stupid is Russia for giving the EU an excuse to further develop “green energy” and get off Russian oil influence ?
    2
  1405. At least you’ll have shelter and your families. The same Cant be said for the Ukrainians right now being bombed constantly by Russia, and losing many of there loved ones in the process.
    2
  1406. Or just buy American fuel….
    2
  1407. Man, why do people harp so much on Korea? Do they really think it was better for North Korea to conquer South Korea?
    2
  1408. Yet he’s ok with Finland, (who shares a larger border with Russia AND is closer to its second largest city), joining NATO?
    2
  1409. On paper only.
    2
  1410.  @nickpope8056  perhaps lay off the copium buddy.
    2
  1411.  @nickpope8056  what, we only have Putin to thank for growing NATO. Best recruiter the alliance has had in decades.
    2
  1412. All power to NATO. The Baltic Sea will soon by our Lake!
    2
  1413. In a defensive war, you trade land for time. Western Ukraine is still free, as is Kyiv and Odessa. Ukraine is getting more weapons in as time goes on, and Russia pays for every “victory” in blood. That’s how these wars usually go, until the aggressor calls it quits.
    2
  1414.  @coderentity2079  ya, that’s all they got. Russia at this point is just a giant North Korea.
    2
  1415. The “Unstoppable military advance” that was stopped at Kyiv, pushed back from Kharkiv, Sumy, and Chernihiv. Has barley advanced more then 12km in a month in a half and has a handful of bombed cities in the middle of no where to show for its losses. Truly, the “second most powerful military in the world” everybody.
    2
  1416. Ya, and the US lost Afghanistan in the end.
    2
  1417.  @urbandiscipline8858  and now TWO more nations neighboring it are joining NATO. Finland alone has a larger land border with Russia than Ukraine does. And that’s not even considering NATO will soon surround the Baltic Sea once Sweden and Finland join, potentially cutting off Russian Baltic Sea trade and naval activity in the event of a war.
    2
  1418.  @muuserino6845  then join the Russian army. They’ll make you cannon fodder to our superior “F**gt” weapons in no time.
    2
  1419. So your saying we need to send another 300 trucks and humvees ? No problem!
    2
  1420. Why’s that?
    2
  1421. A bit on the nose though...
    2
  1422. Tell that to the Vietnamese, Polish, afghans, French, and Norwegians that.
    2
  1423.  @NotApplicable555  not at all. Afghanistan cost us 3 trillion dollars over 20 years. (About 13 billon a month). The entire amount of aid to Ukraine I’ve the last 6 months has only been about 14 billion. Ukraine by far is the more cost effective to us then Afghanistan, and I’m glad my tax money is finally doing something good for once.
    2
  1424.  @Palach624  I mean, between all the Soviet flags, hammers and sickles and red stars in their gear…. ….and them backing ”peoples republics” in the east of Ukraine……
    2
  1425.  @sillytorque  it’s nothing compared to Russias. And regardless, they are the victims of an ongoing invasion.
    2
  1426.  @rhodium1096  pfff ok buddy, sure. The same country’s who’s SAMS boomerang back to their launchers, tanks whos turrets pop off at the sight of anti-tank weapons, ammo that, apparently, cooks off in hot weather*, missiles that can’t hit anything smaller then a shopping mall, sends troops in with guns with no optics, and aircraft using *iphones for Navigation because they don’t have gps in them. Russian weapon’s technology is a fucking joke.
    2
  1427.  @yusrisaadun5497  what, all the hammers and sickles on there gear, tanks flying Soviet flags, all the red stars on their aircraft or the fact their backing “peoples republics” in the east of Ukraine not evidence enough?
    2
  1428. God I hope so.
    2
  1429. laughs in American military spending and stockpiles
    2
  1430.  @Siempre1978  ya, you lost me at “Russia defence ministry”. The same guys who said Moskava sunk in a storm, Ukraine had mutant soldiers, the Crimean airbase blew up because of cigarettes……ya not a good record of being credible.
    2
  1431. Well, NATO would then have a reason to enter Ukraine to prevent further attacks then. Because unlike Iraq, Putin would actually have (and used) WMDs.
    2
  1432. “We won’t go quietly, the legion can count on that….”
    2
  1433. The aircraft carrier is not a “big target”. It’s the apex predator of naval warfare.
    2
  1434. Yes
    2
  1435. I’m still thinking they will have F-16s flying by next year. We apparently have been trying Ukrainian pilots for months.
    2
  1436. What else are you exspecting to magically show up? They already have most of there tactical air wings and Strategic bomber forces out in force, what else do you think they have?
    2
  1437.  @acidbot666  I’d like to point out that Russia lost to the exact same afghans cavemen too, with rusty British guns and stolen Soviet crap. And god I wish I was a comedian. I can’t beat zelensky though. He’s made the whole of Russia a joke…..
    2
  1438. Oh they would be. We just haven’t sent a lot to Ukraine, yet . NATO would have ended this war and kicked the Russians out in about 2-3 months.
    2
  1439. Ya, because you were covering up the entrances/hatches or rendering perfectly good MBTs and AFVs useless by then.
    2
  1440.  @smooth247fyi  so, why did the Russians lose in Afghanistan if they outnumbered the afghans in literally every category?
    2
  1441. Yet, no khinzal or KH22 has managed to hit Kyiv in close to a year now….
    2
  1442. Not really, as they still haven’t managed to take control of the air, degrade Ukrainian air defenses, destroy Ukrainian long range fire effectively from the air, or any real CAS missions since the first day of the war.
    2
  1443.  @toetz4491  says Russia, yet they seem to prefer hitting Odessa lately. You know, the city that current doesn’t have a Patriot system deployed there
    2
  1444.  @toetz4491  they really don’t. The only ones that have the tendency to do that, is the shit Soviet made systems Ukraine still has.
    2
  1445. They really don’t. We’ve seen some of Russias best gear and troops in Ukraine. The reality is, their “best” doesn’t even hold a candle to NATOs left over gear and better training on the UAF’s side.
    2
  1446. “Neutrality” went out the window when Putin invaded. Ukraine already put in an application for NATO membership over a week ago as a result.
    2
  1447.  @nelsonjackson7967  he sure would. He is the best comedian in the world after all. He’s made all of Russia into a joke🤣
    2
  1448. oh no, not all 20 T-14s! what will we ever do?🤡
    2
  1449. so what with all the Russian telegram posts milking the image of a destroyed Loe2 and a bunch of Bradley's?
    2
  1450. no, if anything, all we've done leading up to this war is OVERestimate the Russians constantly.
    2
  1451.  @Phantom-bh5ru  imagine losing more tanks over the course of a year then all of NATO has combined and think I’m the one coping 🤣
    2
  1452.  @Phantom-bh5ru  hard for a T90 to even face a western tank,when it keeps getting wrecked by Javelins and Drones…
    2
  1453. How many Russian crews have successfully been saved by their tanks armor now comrade?😂
    2
  1454.  @ktm8848  meanwhile just yesterday, the Ukrainians expanded their beachhead at the Kherson bridge, and reach the outskirts of Robotyne. Don’t pretend you Vatniks suddenly trust Mark Millet either, because you’ve been calling him incompetent this whole war 😂
    2
  1455.  @ianlarge9016 meanwhile, Russia is has been pulling museum pieces out to keep fighting after losing more tanks then the entire NATO alliance ever had combined, while even using some as VBIEDS against Ukrainian positions in the last couple Of weeks. The only “Netcentric” part of the Russian army, is its troll farms constantly coving for its plethora of f@ck ups and incompetence in this war .
    2
  1456.  @kuunoooo7293 it’s not over used if it keeps happening 🤷‍♂️
    2
  1457.  @tomk3732  then your not actually looking for the videos.
    2
  1458.  @tomk3732  my guy, there’s videos still coming as late as last week of Ukrainian MI-8s performing missions along the frontlines, and if the Mig-29s were gone, the Russians would be bombing western and central Ukraine right now with their Air Force. But their not. Infact, the Mig-29s are responsible for the Russian air defense latest losses, as they are the planes equipped with the HARM anti-radar missiles.
    2
  1459.  @tomk3732  we constantly see Ukrainian helicopters in action, what are you talking about? The Ukrainian airforce is also what’s been launching the StormShadow missiles into Russian lines lately.
    2
  1460.  @tomk3732  don’t know, I’d ask the Vatniks about that too. They went from saying “Ukraine has no tanks left” to “wE kIlLeD LeO2”, conveniently forgetting about all the tanks they lost in the process between then and now. And apparently Ukraine hasn’t lost that many of those either, because they’re still using plenty of them today.
    2
  1461.  @tomk3732  I love how Ukraine takes a few leopard losses, and every Vatnik just magically forgets the literal thousands of T-72s,80s,,90s, and now 62s and 55s the Russians have lost, long before the Leo’s even showed up…..
    2
  1462.  @_imtellingmum_  I’ve seen zero T-55s used by the Ukrainians, meanwhile the Russians are suing T-55s as VBIEDs against the Ukrainians. Because apparently you don’t fight in Syria without taking a few notes form ISIS…..
    2
  1463.  @_imtellingmum_  ya, that’s probably why there taking huge T-72 losses as well, as there sending essentially “last ditch” styled, down-graded tanks into the fight. So much so, that’s we’re starting to see more and more T-62Ms and evens t-55s in use against the Ukrainians along the front now.
    2
  1464. No, they got about 100 T-90s with optical parts missing.
    2
  1465. Because most videos with T-90s usually have them burning or throwing their turrets into the air 😂
    2
  1466. Cabal, in light of a certain recent conflict, you think you might come back and “modernize” this video if needed?
    2
  1467. No. Id expect Ivan to bring back horse backed cavalry in a few months, seeing how they’ve brought back motorcycle infantry again like it’s 1939 or something…
    2
  1468.  @TheLoyalOfficer  there is no real difference, because it’s neither. It’s an artillery towing vehicle from the 50s and it belongs in a museum, not a battlefield.
    2
  1469.  @esbenm6544  not at all. It’s simply the facts
    2
  1470. Ya, and Ukraine took back half of Russian gains despite all that artillery….. And you know why?
    2
  1471. The US didn’t need artillery. And no more appeasement to Russia.
    2
  1472.  @tomk3732 ll the artillery in the world is useless, if it doesn’t have the ammo or supply capabilities to keep it firing. Something the Ukrainians have been taking advantage of, with all the recent StormShadow attacks on Russian supply lines. The fact most of it is also Towed guns also means the Ukrainians can destroy them and relocate well before they can counter the Ukrainians back.
    2
  1473.  @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe  idk, his videos on Finland join ing NATO and Europe moving away from the energy dependence on Russia dont paint a good picture for a pro-Russian narrative.
    2
  1474. Caspian report is actually pretty neutral as online reporters go. He and Cabal here about at the same level.
    2
  1475.  @tomk3732  still a loss for Russia bud. It still makes me giggle seeing the ol’ “we didn’t have enough troops” argument even a year later. “The second strongest army in the world”, and it can’t even properly garrison regions it fought so hard to take in the first place.
    2
  1476.  @tomk3732  amazing. Not a single thing you said is right. Artillery does not win wars. Even in WW1, artillery constantly failed to dislodge enemy forces dug in to a position, even when fired in the millions of rounds (as seen at the Somme, Vurdun, the 1916 spring offensive, and the 1918 “Kaiser battle”.) It was the invention of the tank, and combined arms tactics pioneered by the Entente that finally broke the stalemate in 1918, not artillery. Artillery, even years later in the Second World War, failed routinely to destroy or dislodge dug in opponents. Even with naval-sized gun fire support, As seen at places like Leningrad, Stalingrad, Omaha beach, monte casino, Okinawa, Tarawa, Iwo Jima, and many other places. Artillery worked for Napoleon, because every army of that period still stood out in the open in tight formations like idiots, or hit behind large mid-evil fortress walls. Had napoleon fought against trenches, or a more dispersed, loosely formed enemy, he would have never won a single battle. Artillery. Doesn’t. Win. Wars.
    2
  1477.  @blue_ish4499  ok show me a source that isn’t 3 weeks old. Because if you’ve noticed, we have seen any KA-52s in action since early June. Probably because Ukrainian air defense has been moved up, and the StormShadow has been causing hell for them at their Bryansk helicopter base. Just like HIMARS destroyed most of Russia gunships on the ground at the airbase outside Kherson last year.
    2
  1478.  @tomk3732  artillery was NOT the deciding factor of WW1. Tanks, aircraft and the introduction of combined arms tactics was. Artillery is a logistics heavy tool that, at best, can suppress an enemy unit or position. Artillery in its entire history has never completely destroyed an enemy unit, position or managed to hold any sort of terrain by its self. The fact the Russians and their fan boys think artillery will somehow make up for the poor training, bad leadership, terrible communications and crippling corruption issues in their command structure, is absolutely laughable. The Russians, if they were smart, should pack up and go home, before they see their country collapse again for the third time.
    2
  1479.  @tomk3732  yes, but the difference is, Russia has been forced to retreat several times now, despite all that artillery. I’m lost to the pro-Russian crowd obsession with artillery, as it has never been a major factor in winning a war.
    2
  1480.  @tomk3732  the hell the don’t lose crews. HIMARS has been very busy lately killing of Mista, Urgan, and Pion guns as of late, and they’ve started to use air-burst munitions against those obsolete towed guns. I don’t even want to know how many crews are going to get killed once the cluster munitions start showing up in bulk.
    2
  1481.  @junkrat1  nuclear armed “great powers” like Russia dont “regroup”, let alone give up any inch of land back to a non-nuclear power in a conventional war. Especially not the regional capital they officially annexed into Russia proper and declared “Russian forever”. And apparently they do run straight into mine fields, because the Russian failed at Vuladar, Kyiv, and in their own counter attacks in the south by doing just that. (The later of which, they constantly run into their own minefields ) Great Super-duper-special Olympics operation that Russia has going on its 500+ day now. Would recommend again.
    2
  1482.  @junkrat1  oh ya, that’s why they ran across the Dnipro and blew the bridge behind them as they went right? Because they totally still hold it, right comrade? 🤡
    2
  1483. So, why’s Russia not in Kyiv or Kherson anymore comrade?
    2
  1484.  @PlacidDragon  that still far more then the Russians managed to gain at both Vuladar and Bakmut over the winter and spring combined. And no, I don’t think the Russians would like seeing a city they spent 10 months and thousands of lives capturing being recaptured by the Ukrainians in just a fraction of the time and effort. I think it would destroy Russian morale losing the city their media hyped up for almost a year.
    2
  1485. No. They haven’t. If they were effective, the Russians wouldn’t have retreated form Kyiv, let alone abandon Kherson, Kupyansk, Izyum, Kharkiv, and Lymen. Nor would they struggle to take Bakmut for 10 months while re-enacting Vurdun.
    2
  1486.  @frankrenda2519  my brother in christ, Russia has lost all that, And NATO hasn’t even shown up to fight yet 🤣🤡
    2
  1487. Lol. Russia has lost more material then the west has combined, and NATO hasn’t even shown up yet 😂
    2
  1488.  @cyclomb  ya, because the Egyptians signed a peace treaty and haven’t even tried to attack Israel since 1973. Probably because they got tired of getting their asses kicked trying to invade Israel constantly. Oh ya, and the Israelis now have nukes….
    2
  1489.  @cyclomb  they needed the strategic depth.
    2
  1490.  @ricardoaguirre6126  no, but I did check out the miniatures game based off of it. It seems like a cool novel.
    2
  1491. Good work Caspian, but you are a little late to the party. They already kicked Russia out of Swift, and Ukraine is pleading to join the EU now, apparently.
    2
  1492. But the resulting damage would cripple China.
    2
  1493. So is bombing hospitals, churches, apartments, malls, markets, monuments, grain silos, and water treatment plants….. But that hasn’t stopped the Russians so far…..
    2
  1494.  @simonhall1328  the European Union is a military organization?
    2
  1495. Lol. America would feel just fine if the Canadians pointed all their non-existent missiles at at us. Because we know for a fact their wouldn’t be a “Canada” left within an hour of using those missiles on us….
    2
  1496.  @that90sguy77  why?
    2
  1497. Nope.
    2
  1498. Too late. They already put their application to join the alliance last august. The only thing stopping them from beginning to process is this war going on right now. So unless Russia just wants to be at war for the rest of its existence, Ukraine will join NATO once the war is over.
    2
  1499. ⁠ @bleulung Finland just joined NATO, and you don’t see WW3 breaking out do you?
    2
  1500.  @georgewallace8933  not at all. Once the war is over, Ukraine will begin the ascension process
    2
  1501. They literary put their application in last august, and being a “buffer state” is worthless.
    2
  1502.  @cezaryadamski8786  and those commodities payed for Russias military rearmament which is now bitching Ukrainian civilians and starting the largest land war in Europe since WW2.
    2
  1503. How exactly is the EU going to suffer?
    2
  1504. Not as bad as ruskies trying to do “Eurasianism” again for the 5th time in a century…..
    2
  1505.  @KrunoslavStifter  and Kherson is Russian forever and Ukraine doesn’t have an army anymore for the 5th time right? 🤣
    2
  1506. Yes, I do think we’ll give Ukraine m1 tanks. Along with Bradley’s, TOWs, LAVS, more m113s, more artillery, SAMS, ect. Because we’re doing it now. Hell, we got Ukrainians here in the states training on F-16s right now. And Congress said tanks could be next on the agenda to send over, after we train some Ukrainians on them first.
    2
  1507. Ask Belgium how neutrality worked out for them….. twice
    2
  1508. Ah shit, here we go again…..
    2
  1509.  @DanielNotWise  oh Kokon gol? That was like in 1937, and do you actually think the Japanese army had a snow balls chance in hell against anyone they wasn’t the Chinese at that time?
    2
  1510.  @patrickmcglynn5383  oh, you mean the 1905 war.
    2
  1511.  @hasagireportlesovich2843  no. Thanks to to Russia it didn’t. And now we’re getting some payback on the ruskies for that. And I’m all for it👍🇺🇸
    2
  1512. No. The influx of western supplied guns has actually made it a rarity these days.
    2
  1513. Hey, it’s the fallout 3 assault rifle!
    2
  1514. Around 14:00 maybe the pistol belonged to a nationalist Chinese ariforce pilot?
    2
  1515.  @dedster3164 that still doesn’t explain how it’s not an invasion. 🙄
    2
  1516.  @slobodanmitic1354  “social welfare?”
    2
  1517.  @slobodanmitic1354  I find my tax money has done a better job stacking Russians like card-wood then I ever could hope to do.
    2
  1518. Who can’t get involved these days? It is a major world event with huge consequences for us all going forward.
    2
  1519.  @dedster3164  I want to support a people fighting for there home.
    2
  1520.  @dedster3164  oh what’s the matter buddy? You Arnt capable of making counter points or googling literally any war map on the Ukrainian conflict right now? Come back again real soon🤡
    2
  1521.  @dedster3164  literally any map right now buddy. Kherson is Ukrainian again.
    2
  1522.  @dedster3164 no, the map and the Ukrainians retaking Kherson proved that.
    2
  1523. Cry harder
    2
  1524. Well there not entirely wrong. It sure as hell not the threat we thought it was back in the 80s.
    2
  1525. Funny, Ukraine didn’t put in their application for NATO in until AFTER the Russians invaded. What a self fulfilling threat Putin made.
    2
  1526. Bye bye👋
    2
  1527. Sit back and have fun shooting the Russians with my best buds off the back porch. The most heavily armed civilian population in the world would water at the mouth at opportunity to use our 2nd amendment rights like this. They’d face a rifle behind every bush, hill, and tree. And seeing how they’ve faired in Ukraine, they’d soon get stranded barley over the border with no supplies or support, and get annihilated by our military. So come on Russia! What you waiting for! Come and make my day!
    2
  1528. Ask china. They threw half a million “volunteer’s” over the border and pushed us back south in ‘51.
    2
  1529. Welp, see you in a month Moon when none of this shit happens bud👋
    2
  1530.  @randomargument972  I’m a fine looking bastard I’d say. Unlike you vatnik😉
    2
  1531.  @randomargument972  man, didn’t think i would get a dose of this much Q-t@rd stupidity in one comment 🤡
    2
  1532. Ya, it saw how NATO will send its friends train loads of weapons capable of fighting a nuclear great power 10x its size to a draw.
    2
  1533.  @arlokino and so will Russia…
    2
  1534.  @mubby1 we will. Because that’s the entire point of NATO.
    2
  1535. Because they know Russia won’t f@ck with them now.
    2
  1536. The real question is: was Germany really stuip by getting rid of nuclear power? It’s almost like this wouldn’t be an issue if they just kept there reactors
    2
  1537. Which is leading to them taking their land back and helping to kick the Russians out. How is that not helping end the war?
    2
  1538.  @КириллМакаренко-с4у  cope, the west hasn’t even shown up the the fight, and the Russians are still losing 🤡
    2
  1539.  @propanbutan4634  meanwhile: NATO hasn’t even shown up to the fight
    2
  1540.  @ulpl8007 Ukraine didn’t have a reason to flood its beachheads, make a crossing over to the Russian side of the river near impossible for themselves, and didn’t have the firepower to destroy the dam even if they wanted to.
    2
  1541.  @propanbutan4634  they really can’t. If they could, they would have by now, and Ukraine has adapted its defenses in the mean time
    2
  1542. Or it will use up what’s left of Russia current equipment reserves, when the demoralized conscripts they have leave it all behind again and run away. Like they did at Kyiv, Kharkiv, Izyum and Lyman.
    2
  1543.  @gullyside01  yet we’re about to make the Baltic Sea into a “NATO lake” once Finland and Sweden join and have managed to help Ukraine push Russia back for 4 months straight with ever more deliveries of modern weapons. All without losing a single solider and with outdated gear we’ve had in storage , if i may add. How is bombing civilian infrastructure going to change any of this?
    2
  1544. By make us stronger and growing NATO? really?
    2
  1545. And then Russia is glassed in retaliation. Because believe it or not, Russia is not the only nuclear power in the world comrade.
    2
  1546. They don’t? Because North Korea is a back water state stuck in the 1970s and sits about 1 bad harvest or delayed aid delivery away from a mass famine constantly. It’s called “the hermit kingdom” for a reason.
    2
  1547.  @joriankell1983  if it means hurting Russia, your damn right.
    2
  1548. You’d rather live a slave to Russian oil oligarchs? Shame. I thought you euros where “sophisticated” compared to us.
    2
  1549. Ah yes, totally not the guy threatening nukes every month for 7 months right ?
    2
  1550. Hey, the Ukraine’s thanks Putin for leaving behind a corps worth of gear near Kharkiv. Russia basically became Ukraine biggest arms provider within a month. The CIA really appreciate the T-90M Putin left for them to pick up too 👍
    2
  1551.  @neonationalist1772  no, I can stay on topic. I don’t have to blame the media everytime im wrong unlike you comrade😂
    2
  1552.  @neonationalist1772  no, the Soviets records🤣.
    2
  1553.  @neonationalist1772  neither did the Russians. And they left after just 10 , with twice the casualties as the US 😂
    2
  1554.  @neonationalist1772  oh so why’s Russia not winning and had to runaway from 10,000km of terrain and two major oblasts last year? i guess you also don’t have a problem with more Lend Lease being sent now either, comrade? 🤡
    2
  1555. Not if it in NATO first. 😉Does Russia want to fight 31 counties at once directly?
    2
  1556. Well said. Paul had also let me down as of late.
    2
  1557. So many video games will probably be made about this war. Or at least inspired by it
    2
  1558. So why is Putin so worried about it expanding?😂
    2
  1559.  @nmr6988  firstly no, the national guard is not under federal jurisdiction unless it is first federalized. Which hasn’t happened for a long time. The guard is always the ones who are called in during natural disasters and civil unrest. Secondly, border defense against what? Texans? Arkansans? Louisiana doesn’t need a border patrol filled with Meal Team Six drop outs. All I see here is a governor making a armed organization that only answers to him. Anybody would see this as a bad thing.
    2
  1560.  @DaniG.German883  and only the truly ignorant could take that single terrible documentary as fact, while choosing to ignore all the evidence and sources from 80 years of research, stating the opposite.
    2
  1561.  @doliniplanini2260  no they didn’t. If you actually look at the election results prior to 1933, the NSDAP barley got 3rd place, behind the communist and social democratic coalitions. Even in the following federal elections just prior to them taking power, the Nazis lost 34 seats. That’s not really what I’d call a land slide victory at the polls my guy.
    2
  1562. Because deporting your own citizens to other nations is always a good option right 🙄
    2
  1563. I know right? I’ve met like, 1 Jewish person in my life. Their not a very common group of people, even in the USA. I don’t get the hate either.
    2
  1564. Not a bad idea!
    2
  1565. Better. 2 of those nations actually have modern weaponry made with the last 20 years at least.
    2
  1566. Ya that’s Germany war strategy circa 1943/44
    1
  1567.  @yiannis.demetriou9696  no, those actually are comparable. The Russian still use the same model Kornet ATGM as Hasbolla had back in 2006.
    1
  1568. As if the Merkava today are the same as the ones in 2006🙄
    1
  1569. With the modern Merkava tanks that Israeli designed specifically because what happened in 2006?
    1
  1570. Because Iran is providing weapons to Russia?
    1
  1571. And it will make even more Ruskie tanks win turret throwing contests in the process 😂
    1
  1572. Least their more competent then the ruskies with their T-72s and T-90s 😂
    1
  1573. So we should give them more supplies so they take less causalities. Gotcha. 👍
    1
  1574. What? The collection they emptied to throw it at Ukraine? 😂
    1
  1575.  @TheRealBillBob  lol, you probably said the same thing about Kherson too.
    1
  1576. Well ya, there worn to crap by now.
    1
  1577. I wish we could, but the joke that is the Russian military just doesn’t know the meaning of the sunk cost fallacy
    1
  1578. He’s not. Cope harder
    1
  1579. Don’t know. We still haven’t seen Proper SEAD used by either side to test that
    1
  1580.  MrSaiga308  that your a moron with your head so far up ‘Vlad’s @ss you can smell his prostate cancer? No I figured that out quite a bit ago.
    1
  1581. You don’t know how Lend Lease works do you? They only pay for what can’t be sent back after the war.
    1
  1582.  @jackbrown8052  assuming the sanctions go away and their economy is in any real position to do that, that is….. Remember, the T-14 was first designed in the early nineties and wasn’t produced until 2015. It’s 2023 and they haven’t made more then maybe 20(ish?) vehicles, and no way of really making more. Maybe they’ll have enough chally knockoffs around 2048 for a nice parade line….assuming Russia is even around then…
    1
  1583. Assuming they can actually replicate any bit of it with all the sanctions on their manufacturers. And even then, the chally is outdated by almost 30 years by now, with a newer tank coming soon. Maybe Russia could put a prototype out in about 15 years, but by then it’s working with further dated tech compared to the west.
    1
  1584. Hey, least the Vietnamese put them to work against the Chinese and Cambodians effectively….
    1
  1585.  @KP-xi4bj  obviously, because my sentences aren’t a word-salad comprised of whatever I heard on Fox News. Can you even describe what “Woke” even is?
    1
  1586.  @KP-xi4bj  …..what?…… Is english even your first language?
    1
  1587. About 10 years ago, it was taught it was a loss. Don’t know about now.
    1
  1588. ….and losing against their own insurgents with it….
    1
  1589. Not nearly as much as we left in Vietnam.
    1
  1590. Mexico wants to lose a million people?
    1
  1591.  @CcsRespira  feidel came close in ‘61, and Kim’s father had to beg China to bail him out ‘51. But I guess you tankies don’t study much in school huh?
    1
  1592. No, we’re going finally have an excuse to remove Manduro
    1
  1593. Ya…no….
    1
  1594. Still waiting for the pics of the “bio-labs” bud. Or is RT, Tass and Sputnik not brainwashing?😂
    1
  1595. There “winning” by losing 2 major cities and oblasts, 10,000km of terrain, an entire marine brigade in their botched “winter offensive” and still can’t take a bombed out wasteland Called Bakmut after 11 months* of fighting? My brother in christ, if that’s “winning” I cant wait to know what losing looks like. 😂
    1
  1596. Either way, it’s back in Ukrainian hands. Which means Russia left/surrender one of its annex regions. So much for being “forever Russian”.
    1
  1597. I’d the ruskies were smart, they’d remember the last time they invaded a nation in the winter. And that nation didn’t have anywhere near the amount of foreign support Ukraine has now.
    1
  1598.  @humptydumty4975  damn man, such a harsh name for texas
    1
  1599.  @humptydumty4975  earth, we’re Russia is a paper tiger apparently.
    1
  1600. Except the Ukrainians are actually fighting for their country and winning , unlike the afghans
    1
  1601. Ya ok buddy. Sure. I hope this was satire, otherwise id say get help for your Copium addiction.
    1
  1602. Cry some more tankie 😂
    1
  1603. No, now we’ll just support Ukraine even more, and make then the 32 or 33rd member when it’s all done.
    1
  1604. Ya, to the west. Definitely not to the Russians having to do the fighting 😂
    1
  1605. No, we never needed them for nukes. Just to blockade st Petersburg
    1
  1606. Ah shit, here we go again.
    1
  1607. Welcome to Louisiana, most corrupt state in America.
    1
  1608. It must.
    1
  1609. Ukraines weapons can actually hit something that’s not a school, hospital or an apartment block, unlike Russias…..
    1
  1610. So should Putin.
    1
  1611. Don’t be surprised when the rest of us shoot back then bud.
    1
  1612. I’ll stand by my republic. To hell with Q and all the idiots who follow him! Jesus can stay his melodramatic butt it heaven, if there is one.
    1
  1613. Religion is the oldest propaganda that exists.
    1
  1614. This was a test. Feel free to add to it if you like. I want to see if this works.
    1
  1615. What kind of drones do they make?
    1
  1616. @Johannes Cailles Guttenburg ok I’ll give you that one. Though, thankfully it didn’t develops into a actual insurgency…..or at least not yet.
    1
  1617.  @mydearfather5192  well ok, but that was 200 years ago. Perhaps I should Have said, no Modern day rebels.
    1
  1618. No more appeasement. When the ground hardens, the Ukrainians need to prepare to wreck Russian tank column’s again. And we’ll gladly give them the missiles to do it too.
    1
  1619. This war could end tomorrow, if Russia just went home.
    1
  1620. Explain. I’ll wait,
    1
  1621.  @loona_mew  never!
    1
  1622.  @loona_mew  not until you go to english school.
    1
  1623.  @codeagent47  good.
    1
  1624. God is dead, and we have killed him.
    1
  1625.  @jdbc94  is there something significant with some random date?
    1
  1626.  @jdbc94  bro, I’m a historical arms collector. Also, what are you insinuating?
    1
  1627.  @jdbc94 no. If it hasn’t happened yet, after everything last year and before,, it’s never happening.
    1
  1628. It’s the end of American exceptionalism. That’s what’s going on.
    1
  1629.  @nomasker1360  I’ve constantly find people on the internet that go around calling themselves “Patriots”, all the while wanting to cause death and destruction to those they don’t agree with. Wishing to fight your fellow countrymen isn’t patriotic. It’s just stupidity. And the Proud boys in particular infuriate me as they put there precious bible a head of our nations great Constitution and Bill of Rights. A real patriot would care more for that then some fictional deity.
    1
  1630. What a funny way to spell traitors.
    1
  1631.  @mattwood7158  mighty stupid of you to use a bullshit documentary to base your opinions around. Research better.
    1
  1632. Oh no guys, he’s got a gay-ass hashtag. He must be serous!
    1
  1633. And do what? Try round 3 with isreal and lose again?
    1
  1634. This.
    1
  1635. No, we support Egypt because it sits on the most vital trade choke point in the world, the Suez Canal.
    1
  1636.  @MysticShadow21  alright. Name another one.
    1
  1637. How many nations has america annexed into itself ?
    1
  1638.  @jessicachandler2604  ya, I do. Trump isn’t going to fix anything in only 4 years. He had his run, now let’s vote someone else in with fresh ideas.
    1
  1639.  @jessicachandler2604  again, for 4 years. And then what? He can’t run again.
    1
  1640.  @jessicachandler2604  for like 4 years. Then what?
    1
  1641. Ya, and then what?
    1
  1642.  @rockycomet4587  treasonous? For what?
    1
  1643. It’s not hard to do. He still sucks.
    1
  1644.  @n225bw  never.
    1
  1645. Christ, this is insane
    1
  1646. I mean, it helps if you got multiple jobs and can swap between them on days you can’t work one because of COVID restrictions.
    1
  1647.  @davidz2808  yep.
    1
  1648. Call it
    1
  1649. Call it
    1
  1650. Boy, vice would have a feild day looking at the Gulf Coast infrastructure. Some of our bridges and levees were made in the 30’s!
    1
  1651.  @Komodo1312  the USA
    1
  1652. Same
    1
  1653. Please no. 2020 was hell, 2021 so far hasn’t been better. Can we just have some peace for once?
    1
  1654.  @torresanderson3448  if god exists and is as smart as he’s made out to be, he will want no part in our stupidity we have on display.
    1
  1655.  @kammy66  and Russia is sacrificing its future while making NATO stronger.
    1
  1656. You stand with nothing then
    1
  1657. Sus
    1
  1658. “Be all you can be”?
    1
  1659. The government shouldn’t give churches tax exemptions so they can play make believe about a man in the sky. Prove me wrong-
    1
  1660. Looks like the NCR won’t have a interest in new Vegas after all…..
    1
  1661. Same.
    1
  1662. I liked the name.
    1
  1663.  @fikrufissaha9245  then I hope Russia f@cking loses. Badly. The west might be flawed, but it beats living under a near-theocratic neo-fascist state like Russia.
    1
  1664. The Ukrainians don’t seem agree with that. Or they wouldn’t be fighting so hard.
    1
  1665. They said that back in June At Severdonesk, yet the Ukrainians are still holding the line.
    1
  1666.  @endtimes814 no, they’ll just get a stupid prize for playing a stupid game.
    1
  1667. How? It’s been 10 months and Russia has lost most of its gains.
    1
  1668. Their ahead by abandoning all their summer gains and only major city they’ve captured without much of a fight ? 🤡
    1
  1669.  @garry8390 10 months buddy. Still waiting. Maybe the Russians should stop surrendering land without a fight, because the nuclear threats are getting old Vlad 🤡
    1
  1670.  @baliaz369  so….the Russians haven’t even “de-nazified Ukraine” then? Because killing Azov off at Mariupol was their only achieved objective this whole war. I guess it was yet another Russian lie. 🥴
    1
  1671.  @DT-gun  indeed, compared to a possible Russo-NATO war, it is no big deal
    1
  1672. He’s more of a man and leader then any of those scumbags in congress, that’s for sure.
    1
  1673. With repeated strikes by NATO supplies precision munitions.
    1
  1674. By…who?
    1
  1675. Because Ukraine corruption is no where near as bad as Russia, and is overblown by pro-Russian supporters in an attempt to try and cut off western support that currently kicking the Russian military’s ass right now.
    1
  1676. Least our guys don’t go into battle without being provided body armor, night vision gear, optics for their guns, or have to ask their girl friend to barrow there tampons for “medkits” ….unlike Russia’s dollar store army….
    1
  1677. By that logic, the strain civil war would be the more logical culprit
    1
  1678. And?
    1
  1679. Ok, but without ammo, (And the added logistical strain of dispersing the depots), how is Russia suppose to make use of the artillery advantage when there batteries eat through there remaining ammo supplies at an alarming rate (given Russia’s love of artillery) and they can’t restock quickly or efficiently?
    1
  1680.  @mk007.  we did it before, while also suppling the Allies with millions of tons of lends lease supplies for over 5 years in a world war against the axis. If such a conflict came again, I’m confident America could do it again.
    1
  1681.  @mk007.  don’t need luck. Just need China and Russia to start WW3 already.
    1
  1682.  @mk007.  we did it before. And we’ll do it again. Our MIC and oil industry are going love the profits there about to make. We’re not the biggest arms producer in the world for nothing.
    1
  1683. Well then, I guess we’ll just have to send even more weapons and ammo to them.
    1
  1684. And failing to do so.
    1
  1685. I haven’t found a solid source on it.
    1
  1686. Damn. They beat North Korea to that money pot….
    1
  1687. to hell
    1
  1688. You forgot the zimmer telegram too….
    1
  1689.  @cosmicdebris2223  ya. Good thing amercia spends so much on its military then. I don’t want to hear another friken liberal or Euro tell bitch about our defense budget again.
    1
  1690.  @cosmicdebris2223  then it’s a good think it’s not just Germany giving leo2’s. Spain and Poland are giving as many 70 between them.
    1
  1691. That hasn’t stopped the Ukrainians from using there tanks in offensives effectively, as we saw at Kharkiv and Kherson.
    1
  1692. 1) no. Anti air missiles don’t have that kind of explosive force 2) if you look at any maps, theirs no military installations anywhere near the hospital. There is the Finnish and Korean embassy’s next door though, so where the Russians trying to kill diplomats?
    1
  1693. If Russia didn’t want a “proxy war”, its shouldn’t have invaded Ukraine. If they don’t like it, they can go back to Russia anytime.
    1
  1694.  @LaZyGoKu2 your right, that’s a war crime too.
    1
  1695.  @Ronolein  no, it didn’t. And air air missile cannot demolish a chunk of a large concrete building like this did. The missile strike in Poland was also a Russian missile. NATO showed weakness then not declaring article 5, so now Russian missiles go through Polish territory even more now.
    1
  1696. Anti-air missiles don’t have that kind of explosive force.
    1
  1697. That’s a year and half away. In the mean time, let’s focus on doing what damage we can to Putin’s military.
    1
  1698. No u
    1
  1699. Another pro-appeasement dictator apologies commentor with no real brain
    1
  1700. It’s very much our problem.
    1
  1701.  @Gene2tek he doesn’t down play anything. Just the truth.
    1
  1702. Winter is on no-ones side
    1
  1703. Hello, commie
    1
  1704. With what? Like the guy said, they don’t have the weapons with the range to do it…..yet…..
    1
  1705. They’re putting up a great fight for a “lost” army alright. Putin should realize he’s lost in the long run already.
    1
  1706. ATACMS missiles
    1
  1707.  @smartlucker4011  ah ok, my bad.
    1
  1708. Oh ya? We’re can I find this “evidence”?
    1
  1709. They were shelling that much a day, but now there ammo dumps keep blowing up, along with all there ammo… Kinda hard to sustain fire when the ammo thins out.
    1
  1710. Only in your heads vatnik
    1
  1711.  @Connor_Roush  no there losing it as we speak.
    1
  1712. This war could end tomorrow, if the Russians would just go home already.
    1
  1713. About time! Been saying we should send them over since June!
    1
  1714. Man, imagine thinking Ukraine is going to run out people still, 2 years later.
    1
  1715. After the events of Bucha….I say the Ukrainians have some serious steel In there spines now. They know what will happen if they fail. It’s like the Malmedy massacre all over again. This didn’t break the Ukrainian’s will, it will only make them fight harder now.
    1
  1716.  @magratea123  no, apparently the Ukrainians are actually back in Bakmut as of last week.
    1
  1717. Apparently not, because there making gains around Bakmut now.
    1
  1718. Seeing ruskies getting turned to red-powder has been the best use of my tax money I’ve ever seen 👍🇺🇸
    1
  1719. Except The US didn’t bomb fallujah into a wasteland, and BlackWater wasn’t combined arms force with all the bells and whistles the US military proper had…. Nor was the US fighting the actual Iraqi army a year and a half later still.
    1
  1720. My brother in christ, the last time zelensky “begged” the Russians lost 10,000km of land and 2 major oblasts not long after 😂
    1
  1721. So, why’s Russia lost half its gains so far while NATO literally just got a new member state on Russias border last month? 😂
    1
  1722. They we’re together last time. It didn’t help them.
    1
  1723. Compared to now, the war on terror was peaceful.
    1
  1724. Ya, the destruction of the fascist state of Russia
    1
  1725. The Ukrainian Air Force is still flying pal. those Migs and Frogfoots hitting Russians are very, very real.
    1
  1726.  @realdaybreaker8013  so why hasn’t Russia reached Lyiv yet bud? Looks like those “purpose driven” weapons are just Soviet Made Shit that can’t match the quality of Western weapons. If they could, Russia would still be holding Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Lymen, Snake island, Chernihiv, Sumy, and would be in Kyiv by now! Oh, and somehow, Russia has “been preparing for this war for many years” but, simultaneously, “miscalculated the wests response to this war”? Does double think coke stock standard for you Z-boys? 🥴
    1
  1727.  @realdaybreaker8013  and that will somehow make the west a) stop giving weapons to Ukraine and b) somehow make Ukraine back down? Fat chance bud. Putin will just be convincing NATO to further increase Lend Lease support to Ukraine now.
    1
  1728.  @realdaybreaker8013  so, why can’t Russia win against a nation that “doesn’t exist?” What are you fighting? Ghosts?🤡
    1
  1729.  @bakedinspiration  my guy, throwing convicts into a battle isn’t a sign of strength. It’s a sign of desperation. And it hasn’t stopped them from losing half their territorial gains so far. Nor has it stopped the Ukrainians from taking 10km (possibly more, since reports seem to be at least 24 hours old) out of the Russian defense line to the south.
    1
  1730.  @bakedinspiration  my brother in christ, you still think Russia hasn’t gone all out? God, your fricken swimming in the copium pool my guy 😂
    1
  1731.  @bakedinspiration  “oh no guys, Ukraine lost some Leo’s and Bradley’s in an offensive, I guess it time to start learning Russian” 😂 My brother in christ, the Russians have lost more armor then all do NATO has combined in the last year of this war, and they didn’t even have half of Ukraine to show for it. Hell, I’ve been asking my states senator to send more Bradley’s to replace the ones they lost.
    1
  1732.  @bakedinspiration  and here’s to another 2 weeks of Russia wasting more of its military power for a town with no strategic value and that will have no effect on the war going forward pal👍😂 See you in 4 months when Ukraine is partying it up in Melitipol again👍
    1
  1733.  @Floridarollin  ya. Same for the Russians too bud. The lost to the same sandal wearing, AK wielding farmers too😅
    1
  1734.  @Floridarollin  most statistics also say, a “super power” really shouldn’t be struggling to break a WW1 era defences doctrine a year into a offensive war either….
    1
  1735.  @Floridarollin  there making mince meat out of their own men alright. And they don’t even have half of what they had last year to show for it all.
    1
  1736.  @zadovrus1624  yes all of them. From July onwards. Why do you think the Ukrainians were able to use western gear so effectively after just receiving them?
    1
  1737. Yes, but Ukrainian mobilized personnel, since at least July, have been sent into NATO counties for 120 days of training before going to the front. They get trained in the UK, Poland, Denmark and Germany by NATO personnel.
    1
  1738.  @krishnachaitanya1220  if they were a joke, the Russians wouldn’t be breaking out the T-62s and Mosins 🤡
    1
  1739. Well, let’s see: -the Russians have resorted to buying Iranian drones to make up for shortages of missiles, as well as repurposing anti-air/ anti-ship missiles for land attack. -they’ve had to buy artillery rounds from North Korea because they started running out of that ammo starting in mid summer -many Russian forces have deserted , that’s why they mobilized another 300,000 people….which caused 700,000 people to leave Russia to avoid said mobilization . Which would also explain Russia reliance on DPR/LPR milita, Chechens and Wagner merc’s on the frontlines
    1
  1740. So they can get bogged down again when the mud season starts? Literally like what happened this last February, except with with even more NATO supplies weapons to worry about?
    1
  1741.  @jaemate21  says who? The US has supplied Ukraine non stop with weapons and munitions for 9 months, and theirs no end to our Lend Lease in sight.
    1
  1742. Ya, I’m suspicious of your reasoning. The last 9 months have shown Russia as anything but capable of winning this war.
    1
  1743. “Ah you know, France didn’t surrender back in the day, they just dropped there gear and left that’s all” 🤡
    1
  1744. Teach us, oh wise one!
    1
  1745. Bring it Ivan. Our guns are getting cold here.
    1
  1746. Why, so Russia can recover and comeback again later?
    1
  1747. No, if Mexico wanted to join the Warsaw pact, the worse we would do would be pull all our investments out of the country and eat some popcorn watching the entire nation collapse in on itself.
    1
  1748. “From the Halls of Montezuma….”
    1
  1749.  @raymundoceballos5310  well their past that option, as they’ve declared it part of their nation without Guyanas approval, AND have told the army to prepare to occur territory now.
    1
  1750.  @againstviralmisinformation510 we have 12 groups. We have 4 available for this issue.
    1
  1751. It’s not.
    1
  1752.  @againstviralmisinformation510  ok, so Venezuela has the right to invade another country because?
    1
  1753.  @againstviralmisinformation510 how the hell is the US at fault for Venezuela invading another nation?
    1
  1754. NATO won’t. The US might though.
    1
  1755. Ya ok bud. Let me know when you buy anything in “BRICS dollars” 😂
    1
  1756. Hamas is very much now defeated. There’s barley and fighting in the ruins of Gaza these days.
    1
  1757. Cope leftoid 😂
    1
  1758. Bye bye 👋
    1
  1759.  @MandNsvideos665  the Yemeni people have only ever fought a half trained army lead by a idiotic monarchy for the last decade. They really wouldn’t do very against the US military in a actual fight. And it’s not just the US and UK, it’s now india and China sending ships into the region too, and after the latest strike on a Russian oil tanker, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Russians show up too in reponse. The Houthis want to fight all the major powers in the modern world by attacking civilian ships, they’re welcome to it. They won’t do well in the long run.
    1
  1760. Anyone who supports Russia supports imperialism.
    1
  1761.  @sinoroman  so is the US, but I’ll gladly drop more money on lends lease. The only good fascist is a dead one.
    1
  1762. How? You Z-bots been saying the same crap since march, yet here’s Ukraine, still fighting 6 months later. And taking back some of their land too. I’m sure they can call up another million to face the Russians 300,000 too.
    1
  1763. Reality is anti-Russian. Bad Logistics don’t give a damn who’s side your on.
    1
  1764. The US doenst make its people vote at gun point.
    1
  1765. And it’s going to be a glorious to watch two armies who specialize in winter combat go at each other.
    1
  1766.  @Mysteriesofpolitics  its a product of crappy Russian engineering like Nordstream
    1
  1767.  @Mysteriesofpolitics  I guess you also think Chernobyl was US sabotage too…
    1
  1768. No, that’s just shitty Russian engineering for ya.
    1
  1769.  @Atheneon  what’s wrong with that?
    1
  1770.  @Atheneon  attacked? What, is that what we call it when a nations citizens want greater liberties and don’t want to have there personal lives interferes with by a “ morality police” ?
    1
  1771.  @Atheneon  oh I want those theocratic regimes gone too. Would have been a much better investment to invade them rather then Iraq honestly.
    1
  1772. Fat chance bud.
    1
  1773.  @marcomongke3116 Russia doesn’t have the reserves of men or material for that kind of conflict.
    1
  1774. Huh, who would have thought people don’t like being invaded by Russia and would prefer to join the west instead?
    1
  1775. You should feel bad for yourself, and your brainwashing that makes you think Russia is a better choice.
    1
  1776. Russia gained 2 Georgian regions after the war.
    1
  1777. I love how people act like homosexuality is the worse thing ever,and some how the crap-hole that is Russia is somehow a better option 🤡
    1
  1778.  @ccdsds3221  again, no we haven’t.
    1
  1779.  @ccdsds3221  yes, it sure is. There’s no way Ukraine isn’t going to be a NATO member in the near future.
    1
  1780.  @hyhhy  and now Ukraine is going to join NATO, wether Russia likes it or not.
    1
  1781. Lol. BRICS doesn’t even function as a cohesive group. 2 of its members can barley keep the lights on (brazil and South Africa) and just suck their other 3 dry with aid hand outs. Oh ya, and the strongest members (India and China) hate each-other and directly compete against one another
    1
  1782. You say that, but people keep telling us to lift the blockade constantly. If it’s so ineffective, why are people so bothered by it?
    1
  1783.  @MatthewChenault  again, now that their country is being invaded, you just expect them to roll over and take it? Any idea of “well X person could have done Y to prevent this” is irrelevant at this point. And I hope they fight like hell for their independence. The Ukrainians are free to do what ever they want.
    1
  1784. It’s not over till the fat lady sings. America was in a similar situation in 1776, and we pulled through.
    1
  1785. Well that would mean the west just suddenly stopped assisting Ukraine. Which is very unlikely right now. Next to impossible in fact.
    1
  1786.  @Truspio  better then nothing.
    1
  1787. Well Russian cities have been attacked by ballsy Ukrainian helicopters raids and missile attacks, a Russian cruiser was sunk last week, the Ukrainian capital is still secured, the UAF is still contesting the skies, and Russian tank crews are still getting fried by advanced ATGMS l. Sure, Ukrainian cities are being bombed, but the Russians, over 50 days later, still haven’t taken there objectives, and are running out of readily available men and material.
    1
  1788.  @kiro6119  in two months, both sides will be fighting with sticks if they haven’t came to an agreement yet. But there’s no fricken way Russia is winning this shit show of a war.
    1
  1789. Bro, what the hell do you think the last 2 months of conflict have been? If this isnt a war to you, I don’t know what is.
    1
  1790.  @MrFYGY  I definitely would. It’s not a great set up they have, but hell it beats what ever the hell the Russians have for a “democracy”
    1
  1791.  @MrFYGY  well, it will shine better then Russia at the least.
    1
  1792. It’s in the field. Why do you think there holding a 10,000km long frontline ?
    1
  1793. Oh boy, let me guess, you euros would make an empire that last 1,000 years too? We’re have I head that one before🤷
    1
  1794.  @baronvonlimbourgh1716  then idk what he’s talking about, because jan6th failed to spark a civil war, and the Canadians right wing don’t have the support it needs to overthrow its government.
    1
  1795. NA?
    1
  1796. No, but I expect more drone and missile attacks in Russian facilities around belgorod
    1
  1797. Yes. Just like how America “liberated” Iraq.
    1
  1798. Mobilization will only lead to greater amounts of lend lease to Ukraine. Expect American tanks, helicopters, planes, more artillery, and several mountains of ammo for it all to come should the Russians fully mobilize.
    1
  1799. Poland didn’t have 31 other countries or todays technology to protect itself with back then
    1
  1800. As oppose to the Russians who are actively invading another Slavic country and attempting to destroy its people, history and culture?
    1
  1801.  @kev492001 last I checked, no one is occupying German land or trying to bomb it. Nuclear power is by far the best source of energy you can ask for, and I wish we would invest in it more.
    1
  1802. Ya, that’s totally why Russia nationalized Renault, McDonald’s, any western planes that were in the country, and now has to sell oil for Pennie’s on the dollar just to get by right?
    1
  1803. So why does it take 900 rubles to buy a dollar?
    1
  1804. So, why does a dollar buy 900 rubles and Russia always wanting western sanctions lifted if it’s doing just fine?
    1
  1805. Last I checked, it was Russia that was invading Ukraine, not the US.
    1
  1806. What? You missed the ruble falling to 0.11 to the dollar, the RFL’s raid on Belgorod, the constant sabotage acts in Russia, and Wagners coup against Putin or something?
    1
  1807. If they don’t want ww3, the Russians better.
    1
  1808. Why are all these UFO sighting all ways on Thermal vison? Makes it hard to make it out. Also, if it’s giving of heat, its mostly like mechanical right? Also, are those waves it’s running by in the back round? Is it fly just above the water?
    1
  1809. well, at least we got the internet and video games to keep us entertained. The virus can’t cancel those.
    1
  1810. So why do they keep trying to throw more and more missiles at Kyiv, if it’s been destroyed already?🤡
    1
  1811. Feels good knowing they arnt and the Russians now have to throw 3x as many missiles at Kyiv just to hit another apartment bloc now 😂
    1
  1812. No. Now we should fund Russia’s next Vietnam war
    1
  1813. Welp in that case, I hope we send 10 more batteries along with the F-16s, if it’s “no big deal” 👍🇺🇸
    1
  1814. Source: my ass.
    1
  1815. Tell that to the Russians. There the ones invading and stealing Ukrainian land right now.
    1
  1816.  @Valen-rt3uj  you also don’t see the Russians firing off as much artillery as they once were. Or being able to effectively assemble and supply an assault, as we saw at Vuladar over the winter.
    1
  1817. They said the same thing about HIMARS, yet it’s still actively kicking Russian A$$
    1
  1818. Nope.
    1
  1819. Screw that, seeing the Russians getting wrecked by my tax money has been awesome to see. 👍🇺🇸
    1
  1820. We don’t need this crap anyway.
    1
  1821.  @kyleepryor1439  to us. The US.
    1
  1822. Yes. They are. No more appeasement.
    1
  1823. Source: the Russians. Trust me bro🤡
    1
  1824. So why did Putin start arresting hypersonic missile scientists after Patriot shot down 5 of them? 🤡
    1
  1825. So why do the Russians keep having to throw more and more missiles at Kyiv? 🤡
    1
  1826. Isolationism never works
    1
  1827. Seeing the Russian conscripts getting vaporized daily by my tax money has been worth every penny 👍🇺🇸
    1
  1828. They’re not the ones invading Ukraine right now….
    1
  1829. F Russia
    1
  1830. I’m ready to watch the Ukrainians retake meltipol not long after they show up.
    1
  1831. Boy, NATO let there shaving standards go huh? A lot of the German soldiers look kinda like Vikings
    1
  1832. Your point?
    1
  1833. I’d wish we would support them with Lend Lease too.
    1
  1834. Ukraine is beating back a super power with our aid though. I would love to support these rebels too, but then we would have another proxy war to support against China this time.
    1
  1835. Aw shit, here we go again.....
    1
  1836. We’ll see you in hell Z-boy. Hope we only send Ukraine more stuff now going forward
    1
  1837. By putting a dictator in charge? F@cking cringe 🤡
    1
  1838. Trump did almost start a war by killing the second most powerful man in Iran….
    1
  1839. Hope he sends them F-16s, tomahawks, ATACMS, And another 300 tanks now👍
    1
  1840. Ya, and hope we f@cking impale the bear now!
    1
  1841. There not “nuclear rounds”, there super-armor piercing munitions. We’re not giving Ukraine nuclear weapons
    1
  1842. He can’t even hood the ground he has, the hell are you talking about?
    1
  1843. They’re fools for fighting for there country?
    1
  1844. They are NOT nuclear weapons. On destroys tanks. The other destroys cities How the hell are they equivalent?
    1
  1845.  @coffeelink943  there not being used against us though. Their being used against Israel, and their not even the good stuff like what our actual forces have.
    1
  1846. Enjoy seeing Russia spend its self to oblivion trying to defend another 1,000km of border while also fighting in Ukraine😂
    1
  1847. Nope.
    1
  1848.  @RomanHistoryFan476AD  ok 1) that should be perfect terrain for ATGMS then, as tanks can’t hide behind terrain features for protection (as the isreali’s found out in ‘73 against Egyptian ATGMS) 2) you know, that excuse just doesn’t fly anymore, because the Russians have shown there non-export gear and their own crews dont perform any better then the Iraqis did back in the day.
    1
  1849. You say that, but we’ve got footage of Boths sides tanks engaging at ranges equivalent of your average Warthunder match happening from time to time.
    1
  1850. No. Just 10 now . More will most likely follow. Just like how 4 HIMARS became 28 eventually.
    1
  1851. So why did they run away from Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Lymen and Snake island then comrade?
    1
  1852. They haven’t even gotten out of donbass in nearly a year my guy. Keep dreaming
    1
  1853. Like that’s any better. Thier just brain dead then.
    1
  1854. So NATO can enter the war?
    1
  1855.  @umbro12  for hydrogen warheads ????
    1
  1856. Apparently their keeping the Russians from securing air superiority a year later still.
    1
  1857.  @harmless6813  “HIMARS isn’t real, it can’t hurt you” - Russian officers. Probably.
    1
  1858.  @goldenknightevans1596 because it would. You don’t see Russia nuking the US for supporting Ukraine do you?
    1
  1859. Oh ya sure. A “pawn” ever actively been fighting and bombing the last 10 years, and that has carried out multiple attacks in both America and its Allies…..
    1
  1860. lol, of course Ivan says “ISIS is fighting in Ukraine”. Just like how there totally was “bio-labs” and “disguised NATO troops” too huh? 🤡
    1
  1861. ⁠ @yahiaelshakhs4283 ISIS is not a “tool of the CIA”. If it was, it wouldn’t have conducted multiple attacks on the US and it’s Allie’s over the last decade now, and we wouldn’t have spent the same amount of time fighting and bombing ISIS to oblivion in Iraq and Syria.
    1
  1862. No, ISIS.
    1
  1863. Not at all.
    1
  1864. Because Ukraine didn’t do it, and they’re already invading Ukraine?
    1
  1865. lol, why would the CIA back a group we’ve been fighting for 10 years, and Ukraine support an attack that gives them no strategic value whatsoever?😂
    1
  1866. Yet, ISIS has attacked the west multiple times over the last decade and a half, while themsleves being all but destroyed by Western powers in Iraq and Syria. Why would they start taking orders from their worst enemy’s?
    1
  1867. And learn why it’s all BS, and the west doesn’t control any extremists groups…
    1
  1868. Russia wouldn’t be nationalizing McDonald’s, Renault, What ever western bank assets it has, selling oil at a steep discount to its Asian neighbors and Turing to Iran for cheap drones if it had plenty of cash and over hyped missiles left in its stores…..
    1
  1869. No, we laugh at the coming price reduction of Russian mail order brides😅
    1
  1870. I hope we take Russia and China down with us.
    1
  1871. So why hasn’t Bakmut not fallen, despite being almost surrounded for 3 months bud?😂
    1
  1872. Maybe?
    1
  1873. They have. Check their previous videos from about 3 years ago.
    1
  1874.  @georgewilliams7301  they have close to 11,000 guns, of both western and Soviet sources.
    1
  1875.  @awesmohamed5341  I feel fantastic here in America. Because I know there won’t be a Russian very long after it makes the stupid decision to push the big red button.
    1
  1876. It means everything, because Russia is about to lose all that land.
    1
  1877. No, most of humanity will simply not exist afterwards.
    1
  1878.  @ebiekem  talk is cheap. Russia should invade Estonia if it’s such a problem, and test NATO theory of collective defense.
    1
  1879.  @ebiekem ok, watch them do nothing.
    1
  1880. Bye bye 👋
    1
  1881. No Russia would have still done it.
    1
  1882.  @onebed123  that’s the best part. They’ve taken all these losses, and NATO HASN’T EVEN SHOWN UP TO THE FIGHT If they did, the ruskies would be kicked out of Ukraine within a month.
    1
  1883. Because he’s lost more personnel in a year, then the Soviets lost in 10 years in Afghanistan combined
    1
  1884. And you can join them in hell too.
    1
  1885. Ya. Tom Clancy lied to me 😔
    1
  1886. No, Ukrainians are not recognized as citizens under Russian occupation.
    1
  1887. Your right, we’re a culture. And I’d have it no other way.
    1
  1888. Pfff …afraid? Fuck no we’re not afraid of Putin! He fucked around, and now he’s finding out just how much power we here in the war actually have.
    1
  1889.  @marshinz5696  this is information available everywhere. God damn California alone has a bigger economy then Russia
    1
  1890. No. They won’t. Just like how they didn’t inevitably win in Afghanistan, Poland, Crimea, or in the First World War either.
    1
  1891.  @ФомаКиняев-ж2ш  oh I don’t know, maybe the blatant war of aggression against a “brotherly nation”, the annexation of land it doesn’t need as the largest nation on earth currently, the repeated attempts to destroy the Ukrainian peoples history and culture, the rampant militarization of Russian society, the increasing centralization of public services and industrial and around its central government, ect,
    1
  1892.  @ФомаКиняев-ж2ш  it’s blatant invasions if its neighbors, the territorial annexation of foreign land (despite being already the worlds largest nation as is), its attempts to destroy the culture and history of places it conquers, the centralization of public services and industry around a strong central government, its narrative of the superiority of the Russian people and its culture ect.
    1
  1893. And got what out of it for their troubles?🤡
    1
  1894. Indeed. I fully support lend lease.
    1
  1895. Thanks
    1
  1896. Oh, and the invading Russians are so innocent right? What a joke.
    1
  1897. Bye bye 👋
    1
  1898. Which is what all dictators do when they can’t feed their people.
    1
  1899. How many north koreas are actually fit and equipt enough to fight?
    1
  1900. No, Ukraine will just have more foreign corpses to dispose of.
    1
  1901. Eh, ukriane has plenty of milita and national guard units in the rear for that. All the better units are still in the east and south.
    1
  1902. NATO isn’t the one invading, now are they?
    1
  1903. Eh, kinda. Not completely though.
    1
  1904.  @hzmt12 hey, if the Russians really don’t want to fix their demographic issues, I guess we could….
    1
  1905.  @0HOON0  I thought the same thing about Ukraine, and now look where we are.
    1
  1906. Then your going to pay for it when the Russians decide they want another country or Alaska back under there control.
    1
  1907. Really hoping we kill the bear soon.
    1
  1908. What happen to him?
    1
  1909. Quite a few people actually.
    1
  1910. The US can wipe the other guy off the map and make his country a toxic wasteland in retaliation too bud. You know that right?
    1
  1911. Ok 1: we can always build more plants 2: cyber warfare really isn’t at the level you would expect 3: do you really want interment camps back? Because that’s how your back interment camps in America…..
    1
  1912. Huh?
    1
  1913.  @shad0wrune  like america needs these parasites called “allies”
    1
  1914. That changed recently with the arrival of Iranian drones on the Russians side. Now isreal wants to give Ukraine anti-drone weapons
    1
  1915. Ukraine has been on the attack for like 4 weeks now, and has liberated 6,000 km back from the Russians. What do you mean there “f’ed” ? And America has plenty of fuel, food and weapons available for our Allies.
    1
  1916.  @chuapg1518  how the hell are we suppose to sell gas “cheaply” across the Atlantic? At least you’ll have fuel in a pinch if you need it. Maybe in a couple of years, as more facilities are built in the west, it will become cheaper to ship it over.
    1
  1917.  @leadfarmer9396  literally right now, Russia is constantly threatening the EU with the shut off switch on its oil to get its way in negotiations . That’s the black mail I’m referring to.
    1
  1918.  @leadfarmer9396  energy of course
    1
  1919.  @leadfarmer9396  America has no reason to black mail Europe. We’ve been Allies for over 80 years.
    1
  1920. No. There saying No to Russias black mail for the foreseeable future.
    1
  1921. All things come to an end eventually. But at least they still got America and Canada to help.
    1
  1922.  @realitycheck3672  don’t know. Because they can’t seem To control it themselves with that ISIS-k cell there : )
    1
  1923. Did they? Because they couldn’t push us out until we, more or less, got bored of the war. And now look at them. Fighting their own insurgents while struggling to keep the lights on and their country fed. Some “victory”
    1
  1924. Not even close to the truth. The Russians Airforce still doesn’t have air superiority THREE YEARS later, and now artillery ammo deliveries are resuming.
    1
  1925.  @fk4410  the Z-boys online keep saying Russia will take Odessa by the end of May, so there’s that. And lol, the only thing the Russians are out producing the west in, is body bags, graves and scrap metal.
    1
  1926. lol, if Ukraine has “lost”, why’s Russia still fighting? 😂
    1
  1927. The collapse of Russia is still a few years away off unfortunately
    1
  1928.  @bafanamahlatse1923  it’s coming from about 2+ years of combat footage, and visually confirmed loses.
    1
  1929. Not at all Ivan. Russia has shown itself to be nothing more then a joke for the world to laugh at, and has lost most of its military capabilities without a single US soldier lost 😂
    1
  1930.  @seeitasitis  in the grave?
    1
  1931.  @Zero95011  lol, no they didn’t. Just like all the other weapons that have been sent to Ukraine, they got sent over untouched and have been in use for over 2 years now.
    1
  1932. With what spare troops bud?
    1
  1933. You actually think Russia can keep this up for 20 years?? 😂🤡
    1
  1934. Yes, we do. They started this stupid war, and now there going face the consequences. No more appeasement to the Russians.
    1
  1935. It’s a “failed state” that’s ground the Russian military to a stand still and has liberated 10,000km of its land back since the start of the war
    1
  1936. They wouldn’t be fighting as hard if they didn’t want their land back that Russia stole.
    1
  1937. They want to keep taking back their own land
    1
  1938. The Ukrainians are not mercenaries.
    1
  1939. Lol, “when”? 😂
    1
  1940. F@ck that. No more appeasement to the Russians.
    1
  1941. Why? Because Russia will be the biggest bitch country in the world, because they can’t win against a country 1/4 population and a 10th the size?
    1
  1942.  @monkofdarktimes  ya, the same guys Russia “wiped” out 7 times now? Yet keep conveniently finding more “Nazis” 8 months later? Probably would help them to stop trading more captured Azov fighters every prisoner swap.
    1
  1943. They seem Quite content on kicking the Russian fascists out. And we’re happy to help them out.
    1
  1944.  @monkofdarktimes  hey, Putin fucked around, and now he’s finding out,
    1
  1945. Huh, I thought NATO was a bunch of gay loving soy boys. Yet some how, there kicking Russian ass over and over again, Strange how that works right?….
    1
  1946.  @FlamingBasketballClub like hell we are
    1
  1947. Eh, a sino-American war is going to cause FAR worse issues then just inflation my guy.
    1
  1948. There’s still the chance of a blockade however.
    1
  1949. Cool story bro 👍
    1
  1950. Yet, the Russians took 11 months and 60,000 casualties to take Bakmut while the losing 2 major cities and oblasts (as well as their only bridgehead over the Dnipro) back the Ukrainians in the process. The US meanwhile, still has 0 casualties so far, and now are about to hand over F16s to Ukraine…🤣
    1
  1951. Or you know….invest into said Oil companies and help bring the price down…
    1
  1952.  @marcux83 🤣😂🤡
    1
  1953. I’ll take our they/them army over Russias was/were army anyday.
    1
  1954. lol, you wish eh Q-Tarrd?😂
    1
  1955. How so?
    1
  1956.  @ThePandaKZ  if Wagner attacks any part of polish territory, yes, that is grounds for article 5. If Belarus is housing Wagner, they will be considered a co-belligerent.
    1
  1957. Oh ya, because these SO much better🙄
    1
  1958. Alright, throw down a source for your “facts” then.
    1
  1959.  @haneef4189  that wont stop their cities being reduced to radioactive dust along side American cities.
    1
  1960.  @haneef4189  why? its not like we dont have thousands of nuclear weapons too.
    1
  1961.  @haneef4189  and?
    1
  1962.  @haneef4189  Islamabad wouldn’t be around much longer after that either.
    1
  1963. Ya? And so will the Ukrainians.
    1
  1964. The only freezing are the orks of the asiatic horde
    1
  1965.  @beelan101  that hasn’t stopped them from running for 9 months. Besides, they can always get loaned a few extra diesel locomotives from Poland, Slovakia and Romania if they need them. Again, the Kherson offensive wouldn’t have worked without the rail lines working. I got to hand it to the Ukrainian railway workers. The guys are working miracles keeping the trains running.
    1
  1966. Good thing they have diesel locomotives too and US fuel stocks in Europe then.
    1
  1967. America isn’t the one invading Russia. And Ukrainians love the cold too. Just ask the French and krauts back in the day.
    1
  1968. Yes but when has the Russian military actually fought in the winter under battlefield conditions last? 80 years ago now? The footage of there camping gear and lack of proper winter supplies online is telling a different story.
    1
  1969.  @sideshow4417  if your point was the Russians are going to somehow be super effective in this climate, against an enemy who’s ALSO very well versed in winter combat, then ya no , I don’t agree with you.
    1
  1970. No? Last I checked, they invaded Russia, not the other way around.
    1
  1971.  @InsightsAbroad  ya, no. No one on this country is going to want to throw their lives away because some rich guy didn’t win an election.
    1
  1972. And if it doesn’t?
    1
  1973. The Centauro can’t move infantry now can it?
    1
  1974. They said that about Javelin too….
    1
  1975.  @TDH_1962  ok chamberlain.
    1
  1976.  @tizumajstor  I can see I read more then you. Or at the very least, not in denial that Russia can lose a war.
    1
  1977.  @nemiw4429  indeed. We fought for 20 years in Afghanistan and didn’t even close to to even suffer the low estimate of Russians causalities. And gee, the ruskies didn’t too well in Afghanistan either last I check. I mean, isn’t Afghanistan just the model of communism these days ???🤡
    1
  1978.  @tizumajstor  no I actually read history
    1
  1979. Maybe, but that’s literally any vehicle’s fate in that kind of environment. Probably why AA-stykers are going the sent too.
    1
  1980. Yet somehow the Ukrainians BMPs, m113s, and BTR-4s have….
    1
  1981. Indeed. Our guys have never had most of there equipment and ammo sold out the back door by their commanders for the sake of a new beach side mansion.
    1
  1982. Damn, I can’t believe he shot himself. Two bullets to the back of the head. What a shame.
    1
  1983. Haha, no. Russias corruption is FAR worse in comparison to US procurement corruption. You don’t see US troops going into the battle with faulty body armor, no options on there guns or lacking night vision because their commander blew the funds on his new Yacht….
    1
  1984. No, they’re there to protect their biggest oil import route from Sudan up the coast.
    1
  1985. You Vatniks have been saying the same crap since April, yet Russia appears to be the only invader in history who progressively loses territory over time.
    1
  1986. You mean the same russia who’s just went to north Korea to get more ammo and has been apparently been pulling tanks out from the 50s to use as VBIEDs ? 😂
    1
  1987.  @abstractapproach634 why would we stop supporting the inevitable Ukrainian victory?
    1
  1988. Right, which is why Ukraine is actually using 203mm ammo we used to use back in the 60s for the old M107.
    1
  1989. Not at all. That “old school artillery” over in Ukraine would be scrap metal if the US got directly involved. Because artillery can’t outshoot the reach of a plane.
    1
  1990. We’re not….
    1
  1991. And yet, they still haven’t been in the offensive for months now, while also not being able to stop Ukraines counter attacks with all that artillery. What a waste.
    1
  1992.  @ricardokowalski1579  hey, I’m all for giving Ukraine every shell we have, because the US really doesn’t need much artillery given our AirPower advantage.
    1
  1993.  @ricardokowalski1579  one side has over a thousand modern stealth fighters, manned by pilots over 70 years of experience in multiple contested airspaces, as well as air defense systems that can shoot down even hypersonic missiles effectively, The other has an airforce that can’t even secure air superiority over a year into a war with a nation 1/10th its size, while It’s air defense has been hit-or-miss (mind the pun) so far this war. Even around its own capital. It’s not hard to imagine who would dominate the other in a hypothetical war.
    1
  1994. That’s only because Ukraine can’t risk it’s small Airforce against Russian air defense, while Russia doesn’t have effective SEAD weapons/training to destroy Ukraines air defenses. If the US was in this fight, our stealth aircraft would clear the skies of Russian jets, and destroy their air defenses with relative ease, which would then lead to the rest of the Russian ground forces melting beneath American AirPower.
    1
  1995.  @avinashtyagi2  ya ya, I’ve heard the same story many time before. And then the Ukrainians breakthrough and the Russians make up the next cope story of why their lines broke….again….
    1
  1996. i heard the same story at kherson too....
    1
  1997. Like where?
    1
  1998. All the macho ads in the world couldn’t save the Russian military in Ukraine. The Stupid commies are dying in the thousands at the hands of weapons made by “the woke west”. And I love watching it.
    1
  1999. And our fucking amazing technology.
    1
  2000. Bye bye then 👋
    1
  2001.  @2000rayc  what the afghan commandos left behind that are busy fighting the Taliban guerrilla style so their tribes don’t get genocided?
    1
  2002. Their training won’t do them much good in a foreign country. Especially when they have there own rebels to deal with right now, and a border war with Pakistan…
    1
  2003. Their defiantly not NATO soldiers. Veterans perhaps, but there not ordered to go and fight in urkiane
    1
  2004. At least we recover our dead. The ruskies leave their fallen “comrades behind to feed the crows and dogs🤡
    1
  2005. The pols have outlived everyone of its enemies and conquers
    1
  2006. The only ones “dragging” Poland into war, will be the Russians.
    1
  2007. They’re more likely to kick it bud.
    1
  2008. Non of Poland’s new gear has been sent to Ukraine.
    1
  2009. If the Russians had treated their former “Allies” and republics better, they wouldn’t have joined NATO the first chance they got. Poland and the Baltics were practically breaking down the door trying to get into NATO once the Soviets were gone for a reason.
    1
  2010. lol, you think Ukraine is going to invade one of their biggest Allies? 😂
    1
  2011.  @maozedung7270  you want peace, then prepare for war. Appeasement doesn’t work.
    1
  2012. It’s not Warmongering. It’s a basic study of Polish history
    1
  2013. Russia can stop invading Ukraine anytime. If not, then it shouldn’t be confused by its neighbors keep building up their own militaries.
    1
  2014. America isn’t the one invading a “brotherly” nation right now. And America has never had any problems with Poland, unlike Russia.
    1
  2015. With 31 other nations backing it up, it does.
    1
  2016. No. This is called the Russo-Ukrainian war.
    1
  2017.  @vanyadavydov2403  not at all.
    1
  2018.  @norger  like your son? 🤡
    1
  2019.  @norger  like your son Ivan? 🤡
    1
  2020. Who’s says they won’t? They said they wouldn’t attack Ukraine too.
    1
  2021. They don’t.
    1
  2022. Hitler didn’t win the war in the end.
    1
  2023. ….he doesn’t…?
    1
  2024. Crappy, let’s be real…. If the war in Ukraine has shown us anything, the original modern warfare from 2007 is still up to date, because the Russians military still haven’t entered the 2010s yet, let alone the 2020s.😅
    1
  2025. 7:47 “sorry, I can’t hear you Over the sound of are artillery crappy!” - the Russians, probably
    1
  2026. Yawn. Iran couldn’t even defeat Iraq back in the day, the hell are they going to do against the US?
    1
  2027. Shame on the Russian for starting this crap. They can go home tomorrow if they want the war over so badly.
    1
  2028. Ukraine will not lose. The last 6 months have proven that
    1
  2029.  @lathalassa  ok tell me what the rest of the world outside the US, EU, China, India, Japan, South Korea makes. I’ll wait.
    1
  2030. So basically the only productive parts of the world outside of China and India or are neutral? Russia is screwed then.
    1
  2031.  @xsu-is7vq  so where does Egypt, Saudis Arabia and Poland get there’s from?
    1
  2032. No, the Marines got rid of theirs because there useless for the pacific theater and a pain in the ass for the USMC smaller logistics to handle.
    1
  2033. They Probably won’t arrive until late spring/early summer. We got to make them first. But the Leo’s will tie them over in the mean time👍
    1
  2034. The Israeli army still uses the Merkava, what are you talking about bud?
    1
  2035. So Russia can make a whole 10 of them for parades in 20 Years, just like the Armata?
    1
  2036.  @moritzpollich8252  I mean, the rounds hot…and there’s a empty shell bin the floor anyway….
    1
  2037. Indeed. They’re good, but I won’t fuss if at least a dozen are lost. If it gets Ukraine more land back, they did their job.
    1
  2038. Not like we need all this crap anyways.
    1
  2039. Don’t know
    1
  2040. 6. Russia actually invaded though, and we don’t have missiles or spec ops in Ukraine.
    1
  2041. Yet
    1
  2042. Send them! They make great sniper rifles.
    1
  2043. Who said anything even remotely close to that? We’re literally just chilling here in the west. We could care less.
    1
  2044.  @soyounglee5985  at the rate Russia and it’s fanboys have been consuming it, their won’t be much left when they finally lose this war.
    1
  2045.  @yeshuamaure8039  so why couldn’t Russia hold 8000km of terrain, Kherson, snake island, Izyum, Lymen, Chernihiv, Sumy,…..or hell, actually take Kyiv and end the war right then an there if they’re doing “so well” against the Ukrainians then Buddy? why the hell are they throwing prisoners into the war if their army and the separatists are doing so well then for that matter?
    1
  2046.  @yeshuamaure8039  why wouldn’t he? Wouldn’t you ask for more weapons and gear of your country was being invaded? Isn’t having more gear always a good thing to have when, you know, your at war ? And oh boy, the Russian tool Soledar. It only took them 6 months and most of what they captured this entire war, but hey, least ol’Vlad has another bombed out wasteland am I right?
    1
  2047. Oh so that’s why the Russian ran away from Kyiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Lymen, Izyum, snake island and Kherson and keep threatening nukes everytime we send another Lend lease shipment? Cope harder buddy 😂
    1
  2048.  @Miami1991  ah ya sure pal. So why didn’t they stop doing that for 6 months , all the whole threatening to nuke the west if we didn’t stop sending lend lease, if our gear is is “ineffective” then?
    1
  2049. so why did russia back off from kyiv, pull put form Kharkiv, and leave Kherson then buddy, if our weapons weren't making a difference??
    1
  2050.  @bobhunt4402  it will be more of a win then Russia has had since 1945, that’s for sure,
    1
  2051. Not at all. Ukraines future is bright, unlike Russias
    1
  2052.  @islandwills2778  why the hell would you use this a transport, when all it can carry is just 2 passengers and no cargo, and is slower and more unprotected then a 1930s biplane?
    1
  2053.  @islandwills2778  I mean sure, but this things speed is slower then most ww2 era aircraft, and it has zero protections for its crew and passengers. And “buzzing the ground” is exactly how you take a .50 cal or a flak round to the cabin/engine compartment, which would kill the entire crew/engine. It would be like trying to attack a modern military with a Sopwith Camel.
    1
  2054.  @demonsemen1  a lot, especially considering these things are barely faster then your average biplane, and have no protection.
    1
  2055.  @country_flyboy  ya that too
    1
  2056.  @OSTemli  assuming it reaches its target that is, and doesn’t far taken out by littering anything that can throw lead into the air. Like, your average solider with his rifle could shoot this thing down.
    1
  2057. Shooting them down wouldn’t be hard though, and old-school AA guns are just as cheap to build.
    1
  2058. Oh you know, just use an actual helicopter…..
    1
  2059. Well we make 150 F-35s a year, we can make 2 dozen apaches every coupe of months, and we could definitely churn out cheap, low tech WW2 styled Anti aircraft guns just as fast as they can make a gyro-copter.
    1
  2060.  @larryclemens1850  so is a 40mm Bofors, a ZU-23, a 50 .cal MG, a hunting shotgun …..
    1
  2061. Ya, so is a little bird helicopter……which China already has its own version of, so why this gimicky shit?
    1
  2062. How about equally as many old-school AA guns to counter them?
    1
  2063. I mean, that would just be asking for a Flak Barrage to shoot them down, and then strand what ever amount of the the landing force that survives without resupply, medivac, or reinforcements on a open beach miles away from home……
    1
  2064. Except the RLI weren’t a professional army with plentiful anti-air weapons, and last I checked, the RLI won in the end….
    1
  2065. No, we’re just accepting the truth of the situation.
    1
  2066. Cope tankie
    1
  2067. Not at all. The majority of these turtuke tanks never reach their objectives or make any meaningful difference to a battle. Especially not their crews.
    1
  2068. No, it’s because they’ve lost almost all of them now, and are scraping the barrel for replacements.
    1
  2069. Because it really shows how desperate the Russians are.
    1
  2070. The turtle tank is a Russian invention….
    1
  2071. At this rate, Ukraine.
    1
  2072. Because they don’t. The Ukrainians don’t use turtle tanks because they’re a terrible idea.
    1
  2073. Russians: (*because their dead*)
    1
  2074. Are we talking about the same jumbo Sherman? Because I don’t remember any attack-shed variant of the Sherman 😂
    1
  2075.  @mitalichakma  lol, at least we’ll still have tanks to send to the Ukrainians. All ivan has left, is attack sheds and golf carts 🤡
    1
  2076.  @marcelOberauer  the Ukrainians arnt coping the design. There not a single Ukrainian turtle tank anywhere.
    1
  2077.  @marcelOberauer  lives arnt cheap. And for the price their paying, there getting a terrible trade in return
    1
  2078.  @marcelOberauer  not really. It would be better for the Russians to melt down these old clunkers and make some purpose built heavy-APCs for the job, like, “a Russian Namer” or something instead. They would at least have less personnel losses compared to the horrible chances anyone riding in a turtle tank has.
    1
  2079. Suddenly Iran must be regretting buy all that useless Russian air defense….
    1
  2080. So, how much you want to bet almost none of the Russians will get this kit because they procurement guy imbezzels the most of the funds for it like usual?
    1
  2081. Ok, I was going to say, I don’t think this stuff would have worked well in environments like, say, the Battle of St. Lo or Hue city.
    1
  2082. No. We shouldn’t. We’re not Russia.
    1
  2083. Until they get MANPADS….
    1
  2084. I didn’t know the cartels were a country….
    1
  2085. Screw that. Russia is the bigger threat
    1
  2086. You mean the ones who could even run a homeless camp in seattle for more then a week? Man, some terror group….
    1
  2087. traitor
    1
  2088. Because your going to pay 5x as much at the store when the ships can’t access the global trade routes efficiently because the Red Sea is blocked off.
    1
  2089. Yes.
    1
  2090. Germany; “NATO, turn off my based inhibitors!”.
    1
  2091. Why?
    1
  2092. lol. Not this time Ivan
    1
  2093.  @a10warthog28  pook had an Addon?
    1
  2094. Just took a look at it on the WS….and it’s already been copyrighted. I wonder why?
    1
  2095. In country or from a relocated factory?
    1
  2096.  @Deno2100  no I’m not a bot, I’m just a guy that can actual except the reality that, yes, Russia is a paper tiger, and is currently getting its ass handed to it by Ukraine. But I’m guessing I’m talking to a guy who thinks the retreat Kyiv was a “feint”, Moskava sunk from bad waves, and all these other major defeats to Russia were simply “smoking accidents”, right? Once again, cope harder vatnik.
    1
  2097.  @Deno2100  funny. Because the Russians are also Ukraine’s biggest provider of tanks.over 400 tanks provided to Ukraine infact. Their even nice enough to leave them in perfect running order too. Plus leave them fully stocked. Im sure the CIA and DOD are loving the T-90Ms those poor conscripts left for them. 👍
    1
  2098. We have no business rewarding Russia for this war.
    1
  2099. Don’t know🤷‍♂️
    1
  2100. Ya, I don’t take my military analysis from a convicted wife beater like McGregor.
    1
  2101. Funny, they said Vietnam had no chance too back in the day, and look how that turned out…..
    1
  2102. There’s only 150ish countries in the world….
    1
  2103. We may not have a choir in the matter
    1
  2104. And if trump ain’t in office?
    1
  2105.  opo_ski  won’t need to if we give the Ukrainians what they need to win with no restrictions
    1
  2106.  @armoredlumberjack1999  then you are a deaf person
    1
  2107. Easy, that’s our entire current military forces and no one is “revolting” here in the west.
    1
  2108. Better then a bunch of Z- tardds
    1
  2109. Not really. Neither side has a kamikaze drone yet that can one-shot armor.
    1
  2110. No. As funny as that would be, T-72s are made it Russia. Ironically, they were also made in Ukraine back in the days of the USSR. Though….I hear the modern ones use lots of Chinese made electronics….
    1
  2111. He’s an 11 bravo. What do you expect?
    1
  2112. Ya, hell they don’t even have secure comms, 65 days into the invasion, a lot of there NCOs are coordinating there men via CELLPHONES…..
    1
  2113. So…tankettes then? Because you really can’t make a cheaper MBT
    1
  2114. So….just mobile metal coffins then?
    1
  2115.  @pinyaposka9671  no I heard about it alright. Ive followed this war for 8 years, and just kinda thought it was going to be stuck in limbo forever. And then Putin’s army invaded and made this war a hot conventional war, breaking the peace that Europe had enjoyed since 1945. As for Azov, ya I’m glad there all dead or captured now. Now I have no problem supporting the Ukraine’s with what ever they need to secure there sovereignty from Putin.
    1
  2116.  @pinyaposka9671  for now, it would seem that the Russians have the upper hand. But then again, they did at the start of this war, until the Ukrainians were able to muster a proper defenses and counter attack. Make no mistake, this is a big set back to the Ukrainians, but if they can fallback to another defenses line hold on till the next aid package arrives, then I think another Kyiv/Kharkiv counter attack scenario that liberated the area is possible. Or you know, if Putin had any brain cells left in his head, he would try and just call it here and take what he has in a negotiated ending. But knowing Putin’s arrogance and stupidity, I doubt it.
    1
  2117.  @pinyaposka9671  so your saying Russia is willing to fight for a decade or more for what…..a small part of a nation? You know how much money we wasted on Iraq and Afghanistan? How many dead and wounded we took? Can Russia’s economy and population handle that? And mind you, no one was suppling Iraq or the Afghans with modern equipment constantly, nor was the US severely sanctioned like Russia is right now. We just passed the new Lends Lease act today in Congress, meaning our entire non-nuclear weapon Arsenal is available to the Ukraine with out the red tape that usually would come from normal weapon transfers. We can keep sending Ukraine weapons, ammo, and fuel for far longer then Russia can keep fighting. Like come on, I knew the Russians were kinda arrogant, but hell, I thought you guys were at least SMARTER then us.
    1
  2118.  @pinyaposka9671  well that assumes the US would fight a country with said weapons to begin with, and NOT screen there vehicles properly with more then 200 dismounted personnel. Or not having constant air support, secure comms, reliable logistics, actually motivated soldiers… ….You know, like Russia wish it had 65 days into a “special military operation”…..
    1
  2119.  @pinyaposka9671  well at the least, Putin will have enough land to burry his dead along the Sea of Azov. As for Odessa, fat chance of him taking it. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s as fortified as Kyiv is by now. The Ukrainians have had 2 months to dig in and get constant resupply from the west.
    1
  2120. When the Russians only have like 200 dismounted infantry to screen a entire battalion sized force, ya, stupid shit like that happens all the time. And yet, they still keep using BTGs as there main unit. Absolute idiots.
    1
  2121.  @monkofdarktimes  it’s definitely the truth. We have footage of Ukrainian troops past the Russian defense lines.
    1
  2122.  @ignatvassilev2390  man, it’s really amazing. I heard how Ukraine was never going to retake Kherson this century too… And then they did, in about 4 months.
    1
  2123.  @gezalesko3813  lol, you think Ukraine was going to invade Russia ? Seriously?🤣
    1
  2124. 1:00 this guy has the right idea!
    1
  2125. you want the global economy to collapse? because that's how you make it collapse.
    1
  2126.  @LtBRS  I know infrastructure is extremely hard and costly to destroy compared to the reconstruction costs. What’s why is extremely difficult to put road and rail networks out of action, and bridges are usually hard to hit as a target as it is, let alone if they are defended or fortified.
    1
  2127. You assume those can be destroyed easily.,,,
    1
  2128. Wait, like, M41 Walker Bulldogs?
    1
  2129. Ah yes, everyone knows your “useless” for standing your ground and fighting a “global power” 10x your size to a stand still and retaking most of his conquests back 🤡
    1
  2130. Arma 3 modders, you know what to do!
    1
  2131.  @farright118  ya. They’ll have to find more room to bury them all.
    1
  2132.  @farright118  what makes you think the Russians will somehow get a victory once the ground dries? They had a whole summer where they took virtually nothing of value, then loss almost all of it shortly after. And US aid hasn’t slowed, though, I think the EU is starting to get tapped out in their available lethal aid.
    1
  2133. No it really doesn’t. That’s show you lose 28 million people in a war and never demographically recover from it.
    1
  2134. At least the Ukrainian ones get sent to the west for 120 days of NATO training before being sent to the front. Cant say the same for the Russians
    1
  2135. Cry harder. The truth hurts sometimes snowflake.
    1
  2136. 12:22 ya….because that totally not just going to make them frag their own NCOs once in the field right? Probably explains the discipline issues the US had in the field in Vietnam.
    1
  2137. It could end today, if the Russian would just go home already.
    1
  2138. Thanks Putin. Best salesmen the US MIC could ask for!
    1
  2139. My brother in christ, what kind of weapons do you think we left behind? You think we had this kind of stuff in friken Afghanistan? Really?😂
    1
  2140.  @TRPilot06YT  what…it’s true….
    1
  2141. Apparently Rhodesia sucked at both then…
    1
  2142. Hey, I took the vaccine 3 years ago. And I’m still here bud😂
    1
  2143. Middle of the road.
    1
  2144. Oh ya, I forgot they used those.
    1
  2145. No, the Ukrainians have actually punch several holes in the Russian lines as of this week, primarily due to them fighting at night. The only thing really giving them issues is Russian KA-52s and land mines, and both are starting to be dealt with after earlier setbacks at the beginning of the month.
    1
  2146.  @skp8748 Turkey and Poland already have those systems……there not 3rd world countries…
    1
  2147. Not even remotely buddy.
    1
  2148. *they do*
    1
  2149. No?….
    1
  2150. I fucking hate we don’t give Ukraine even more equipment so they can kick the Russians out faster.
    1
  2151. You mean the powerful Taliban who still have their children blown up by ISIS-k every other week and now might have to deal with a Iranian/Pakistani invasion(s) soon?
    1
  2152. The Swiss army doesn’t issue night vision?
    1
  2153. And now they’ve sold them off by now. Or broke them. Thanks Abdul…..
    1
  2154. And the US solider will drop those 60 combatants quite effectively.
    1
  2155.  @skp8748  Japan didn’t “bloody” America if that’s what your implying. Unless it’s the French, because ya the Japanese and Vietnamese fucked them up.
    1
  2156.  @RayRay-uw6ms  it hasn’t been proven wrong…
    1
  2157.  @skp8748 ya, probably why they got their asses kicked by the Japanese and Vietnamese too….
    1
  2158. Unless we sink said army before it even lands ashore…..
    1
  2159. US cruise missiles can still work without satellites.
    1
  2160. Bud, if anything the Ukrainian war has shown me, it’s if gladly fight for the US any day. The alternative is a nightmare.
    1
  2161. (Psss, no one tell him about the air and sea battles we currently have in the war in Ukraine…..)
    1
  2162. Or we just sink the Chinese forces before they ever get to shore to be a problem with there numbers 🤷‍♂️
    1
  2163. Question: why did they put ACOG scopes on the SAW rather then a Red dot or Holo sight?
    1
  2164. Spent? They have no shortage of man power despite 10 months of war, and Americans Lend Lease isn’t ending anytime soon.
    1
  2165.  @steveb8883  compared to Russia, it’s far better of a democracy. It’s actually had more to then one president in 20 years, unlike Russia.
    1
  2166. No e
    1
  2167. Then your watching an idiot that simps for tyranny
    1
  2168. Tends to happen when you have a civil war fueled by a hostile neighbor arming rebels after taking your country’s land
    1
  2169. Why go to Russia? So he can become a political hostage?
    1
  2170. @ and there’s your problem. Your trust AI results
    1
  2171. @gorillawayfarer operation what?🤣
    1
  2172. Kursk is in Russia, and the Ukrainians went into it back in august. What would you call that?
    1
  2173. No. They wish they never gave up their nukes more.
    1
  2174. Neutrality gets you know where in life, and if you don’t like it, then pack your army up and leave Ukraine Ruskie
    1
  2175. There are, and we have many on film dead now.
    1
  2176. Says who?
    1
  2177. @ lol, I know you can’t.
    1
  2178. @ “Thousands of videos” yet not a single one has surfaced in 3 years of war. Go figure 🤷‍♂️
    1
  2179. @gorillawayfarer no, I just to don’t believe Russian propaganda while also reading the Russian people of Ural region complain about that very thing
    1
  2180. Russian. This Russian territory occupied by Ukrainian troops.
    1
  2181. Cool story bro, now go cry somewhere else 😂
    1
  2182. Nah, just balls of steel
    1
  2183. Do it. No balls.
    1
  2184. Better then raiding/scouting with humvees. And they would make a good support vehicle for the Bradley’s and Marders
    1
  2185. To put Nazis in the ground? No problem!
    1
  2186. TIBERIUM? In the Name Of Kane!
    1
  2187. Would it though ? I feel like that country is just terrible for tanks
    1
  2188. Ya, I uninstalled Tarkov and Warthunder because of this war. Im Not supporting Russia anytime soon.
    1
  2189.  @SmokeDimi  so, still think that the Russians arnt abandoning Kherson as the Ukrainians March onto the local airport my guy?
    1
  2190.  @SmokeDimi  so you let the Ukraines get closer so they can then hit more of Russias ammo dumbs with HIMARS, and further damage there logistical abilities and sustaining artillery operations? You sound like the one of the same morons who takes the idea of “Moskava was promoted to submarine” seriously….
    1
  2191. What ever happened to the AT-4?
    1
  2192.  @beachbummer3434  at higher and higher munitions costs, due to all the air defense Ukraine now has. Probably why they’ve resorted to using Iranian drones and repurposing SAM and anti-ship missiles for ground attack roles. And it’s not doing much to break Ukrainian morale. If anything, it each attack just secures more Lend Lease supplies for Ukraine.
    1
  2193.  @beachbummer3434  you could make the same argument for NASAMS and Iris-T too. Yet they seem to be working just fine
    1
  2194.  @beachbummer3434  the Russians literally said sending patriots would be a “escalation” last week. Apparently it wasn’t too big of a deal for them then.
    1
  2195. then russia really shouldn't be having such a fuss over them then....
    1
  2196. then why is Russia fussing so much over them and calling them a " Escalation " then?
    1
  2197. so they can lose the Black Sea fleet not long after?
    1
  2198. Cool.
    1
  2199. Your not wrong. Our guys haven’t gone into a war without night vision, body armor, sufficient fuel and ammo, spoiled rations, malfunctioning missiles, tanks, vehicle, sufficient supplies of GPS gear, precision munitions, secure comms ect……. Mean while, all this has happened to the Russian military in Ukraine.
    1
  2200. Sure. I’d love to see how our military is so corrupt it can’t field with out working tanks, goes into battle with out enough fuel, no night vision gear, defective missiles, and heavily expired rations, due to corruption. I’m waiting.
    1
  2201. Considering we all considered Russia the second strongest military power before feb. 24th 2022, yes. Yes it is.
    1
  2202. There still here and fighting 130+ days later. Ukraine’s win condition is simply to stay free of Russia until they go home.
    1
  2203. Not nearly as much as the Russians can come up with copium.
    1
  2204. Still better the Russian propaganda.
    1
  2205. The Ukrainians do have these in service. They were seen entering Lyiv by train this last spring.
    1
  2206. Can we get the Cross-coms from GR now?
    1
  2207.  @demiron4505  you said “Ukraine already lost”, which is simply not the case, seeing how they’ve retaken all the terrain and towns I mentioned before, all the while still holding the line in the east and still fighting the Russians day after day. And I hope we keep the supplies coming to them to keep it up. Appeasement is how we got into this mess
    1
  2208.  @demiron4505  your point is not reality.
    1
  2209. Yet Russia lost 8,000+km of land, 2 major cities and oblasts, there only bridgehead over the Dnipro over the last 6 months and only had a bombed out wasteland called “soledar” to show for it.
    1
  2210. Thanks UK.
    1
  2211. Ya, but Germany didn’t have 30+ counties back it up back in the 40s, and Germany isn’t invading Russia this time.
    1
  2212.  @stinkypete891  maybe the Russians will claim to have destroyed the UAF for the 100th time this war, only for another Ukrainian Mig to come flying in again…..
    1
  2213.  @stinkypete891  ya that that, but Ukraines BTR-4s have done a number on them already,
    1
  2214. No, we just don’t store an ungodly amount of junk in reserve like Russia does, and the US seems to be the only Western nation capable of producing….well anything military related at a sustainable level.
    1
  2215. Why? So they can go to war with 31 additional counties?
    1
  2216. When the Mexican migrants start lobbing missiles at our cites or rolling into our country on tanks, then come back and talk.
    1
  2217.  @MrThartofwar  and losing
    1
  2218.  @MrThartofwar  your right. Ukraine says “bring it on” .
    1
  2219. Oh boy, a whole 3 a month…..
    1
  2220. We don’t have a lot of these. They probably had to get pulled out of storage and put back into service first. Alternatively, 7 months ago, we didn’t think this war would have lasted 7 months more….
    1
  2221. No. We really don’t have a lot of these in our Arsenal. There pretty rare. We’d have to strip some our guard units unless we got more put back in service from Cold storage.
    1
  2222. No more appeasement for dictators
    1
  2223. None of that compares to what Russia has done to Poland.
    1
  2224. Ah yes, hundreds of the 60 total leopard 2s have been destroyed. Source: trust me bro 🤡
    1
  2225. If that’s the case, then Russia is also running out tanks, seeing how we have T-62s, T-55s and apparently T-10s being deployed into Ukraine now.
    1
  2226. Hey, if the Russians can pull T-62s out, and it’s no big deal, why not Leopard 1s?
    1
  2227.  @off6848  what didn’t age well?
    1
  2228. Traitor
    1
  2229. Biden isn’t the one invading Ukraine now is he?
    1
  2230. Better a They/Them army, then Russia’s Was/Were army of corpses 😂
    1
  2231. Including Russia
    1
  2232. Dumb question; but how do you get selected to be in the “most hated unit in the United States Army”?
    1
  2233.  @ahmedalsharman  ok, so why was Russia supply said “rouge militia” then?
    1
  2234.  @ahmedalsharman  maybe google yourself and see that not only Donetsk and Luhansk look great despite “8 years of shelling” and the fact only about 306 civilians died in Donbas between 2014and 2022. Most of those (298) are the people who died in the Malaysian airlines flight 17 shot down by Russian backed -separatists and with a Russian-supplied missile.
    1
  2235.  @ahmedalsharman  ok, so why was the Ukrainians military only 200,000 strong including reservists and why was it only using Soviet-originated equipment until 2022? The only western supplies gear in the Ukrainian military prior to 2022 were some decommissioned Humvee’s and a tiny amount of small arms. You didn’t see any Western artillery, AFVs, drones, communications gear, or any thing remotely close to what the UAF has after the Russian invasion. Never mind the UAF is 3x the size it was now, then it was during those 8 years. And even then, the UAF isn’t even close to NATO standardization or integration. For the simple fact, Ukraine is not a NATO member , and didn’t even have the ability to join until Russia invaded it last year.
    1
  2236.  @venturehunter3456  bud, Putin literally just came out and said “the decision to supply ATACMS is a mistake by the US” and Russian bloggers are reporting this to be one of the most serious attacks in the war in a long time.
    1
  2237. So why are Russians make such a fuss about it?
    1
  2238.  @antique-bs8bb  ya, it is, considering Ukraine didn’t have that capability until the last month.
    1
  2239.  @ashfaquezskv4558  where? 🤡
    1
  2240.  @ashfaquezskv4558  at this moment, it appears starting to be fought in Russia, by other Russians 🤣
    1
  2241.  @ashfaquezskv4558  where?🤡
    1
  2242. Then your blind as hell.
    1
  2243. You mean the same Taliban that only came out to fight when American jets left?
    1
  2244.  @samoldfield5220  air superiority means being able to use your AirPower over any stretch of a enemy nation. Not just the immediate frontline. If the Russians actually had air superiority, the Ukrainians wouldn’t even have a frontline to begin with, because all the supple lines, command and control centers, and troop concentrations in the rear areas would have been bombed to hell, long before they even reached the front. But their not. Because Russia still can’t control the skies over 2 years later.
    1
  2245. And they planned horribly
    1
  2246. Got to love conservatives. There so pumped to fight, until they’re not 😂
    1
  2247. You Z-boys said that a year ago, yet here they retaking more of their land back as time goes on
    1
  2248. You know that means more jobs for us right?
    1
  2249. Oh they are. They wouldn’t be using drones from Iran and pulling out WW2 era munitions if they weren’t.
    1
  2250. No balls ruskies
    1
  2251. Knock knock
    1
  2252.  @niblet112  not my fault the Russians are using minority’s and foreigners to fill their ranks. We got plenty of footage of these troops too in Ukrainian captivity.
    1
  2253. Ya. What a joke it was 😂
    1
  2254. It’s not like the other guy has anything better🤷‍♂️
    1
  2255. Maybe. Assuming the A3 doesn’t have a trophy system.
    1
  2256. Better then the ruskies T-90s 😂
    1
  2257. 1 decent electronic warfare system and a good airforce is all It takes to keep the tank relevant in the wars to come.
    1
  2258.  @TheyCommanderBacara  ok, so when has that stopped anyone from using tanks?
    1
  2259. The Depleted Uranium armor: “that’s cute” 😂
    1
  2260. Compared to what? The whole 20 T-14 prototypes? Or the hundreds of T-90Ms that have their turrets orbiting the earth by now? 🤡
    1
  2261. 1) air cover by the worlds largest airforce’s 2) more precision counter-fire then the UAF could ever hope to have in their side 3) battalions worth of mine clearing vehicles, tools and engineers
    1
  2262. lol, the same Russians who can’t defeat some rebels in Belgorod?
    1
  2263.  MarcelDaman1957  yet, losing Kherson also got rid of Russias only real threat to Odessa it had left, and it’s only bridgehead to access western Ukraine with. It also doesn’t help that by not defending a city that was supposed to be “Russian forever”, Russia promises and claims have lost all value. The loss of Kherson is probably the biggest reason the west is encouraged to send tanks, AFVs and possibly fighter jets now.
    1
  2264. No more appeasement for Russia
    1
  2265. And yet Russia has learned nothing from Afghanistan, Chechnya or Syria. They just go from war they can’t win to another instead of actually bettering their country….
    1
  2266. Because the Russians love to throw their people away at the Ukrainians until they run out of ammo.
    1
  2267. No, they would be proud of us not making the same mistake in appeasing dictators like they did.
    1
  2268. Because who’s going to invade the UK?
    1
  2269. Pfff, the Russians haven’t even dealt with HIMARS yet. Imagine what 14 of these backed by 100 Leo’s will do!
    1
  2270. @@dawnrazor2571 what’s the joke? German seems to be doing just fine 😉
    1
  2271. Because an island nation doesn’t need a large land force, I’d the enemy can never land on it to begin with.
    1
  2272. Wouldn’t you, if the Russians invaded your country?
    1
  2273. Screw that, no more appeasement!!
    1
  2274. That’s not how that works. We had Presidential elections even during the civil war and 2 world wars.
    1
  2275. Yes. And I hope we keep it up 👍🇺🇸
    1
  2276. No. Biden finally getting some Balls.
    1
  2277. So, what about AI controlled turrets in tanks to kill the drones?
    1
  2278. @ ya, no. They don’t. You’re talking about replacing an entire division worth of tanks, plus crews, 5 times. I call BS. If that’s was the losses of that division, the Germans would have won the Normandy campaign, not suffer one of the largest strategic defeats in history within 3 months.
    1
  2279.  @Withnail1969 because it’s that, or have to fight the Russians our selves later
    1
  2280. It’s not worth the effort to process all those POWs, and it may convince them later to do the same thing in the face of more Ukrainian counter attacks. Why fight if you can just scare the enemy away?
    1
  2281. If he could, his guys would be at the Polish border by now. Instead he can’t stop running away 😅
    1
  2282. Good job vatnik, here’s your 5 sheets of toilet pap-I mean rubles comrade. 👍
    1
  2283. How so? Because so far, not a single Russian media point has been proven to be correct.
    1
  2284. If they weren’t running out of missiles, they wouldn’t be buying Iranian drones to do the same job, or be looking into buy Iranian missiles now would they?
    1
  2285. No, now there using up the ones they saved incase of a war with NATO. I guess it finally occurred to them Iranian drones probably don’t like the cold all that much.
    1
  2286. No, we still think they have about 2000 left, but that’s including ones their saving just in case for a war with NATO. Probably why there looking into buying a few Iranian made ones.
    1
  2287. That still leaves 70% still here.
    1
  2288. Then feel the whirlwind
    1
  2289. They may not be out, but there definitely running low. It’s been months since the last mass missile strike, and even then, it’s far fewer missiles being used then back in March. 83 compared to 2-300 missiles used months ago.
    1
  2290.  @georgekaradov1274  same could be said for Putin an his cronies. Less super yachts in cypress and more investment in modern tech, training and logistics would have gone a long way for the Russian army. They probably wouldn’t have to steal supplies from Belarus or buy ammo and drones from North Korea and Iran, if they didn’t pocket all the money. And again, despite America’s vast reserves, Russia by far out supplied Ukraine for us. America couldn’t supply 300+ soviet made armored vehicles and other supplies. I guess those Russian unmotivated conscripts are to thank for the T-90Ms the CIA is testing out here in the states. Thanks comrades 👍
    1
  2291.  @georgekaradov1274  1) we’ll send hundreds of more trucks, replacement electronics for the rail roads, tools, ect. 2) “NATO is running low on stocks” LAUGHS IN US SPENDING SND STOCKPILES Bro, we have SO much stuff left over from the war on terror. Literally thousands of Humvee’s trucks, artillery, thousand of tons ammo, guns, APCs, radios ect. it’s not even funny. We can keep Ukraine in the fight well into 2023.
    1
  2292.  @georgekaradov1274  probably they’ll eat all the MREs we keep sending over or what ever the Russians left behind, as we’ll as the literally mountain’s of ammo we’ve sent over the last 8 months. Both western and Czech/Polish made. And hey, we can always send fuel and trucks to move it too
    1
  2293.  @georgekaradov1274  that’s a question for the Russians my guy. They left all that behind too.
    1
  2294. Don’t worry, the Russians resupplied them well last month. Including with tanks!
    1
  2295. Based.
    1
  2296. Ok and ? There shouldn’t be any infrastructure left, 8 months later vatnik.
    1
  2297.  @mohammadraihan4107  ya, because Russian propaganda is so much better, right?
    1
  2298.  @mohammadraihan4107  then they really messed up then and are going to lose
    1
  2299. Still waiting for the “second strongest army in the world” to show up. It sure as hell not Russia.
    1
  2300. Ya? So what did it cost Russia? All it’s summer gains, it’s only bridgehead over the Dnipro and Kherson?
    1
  2301. Stranded? How so?
    1
  2302. Ya, whatever’s. It’s been “only a matter of time” since February last year. Yet Ukraine continues to put up a fight almost a year on.
    1
  2303. Fuck that. No more appeasement.
    1
  2304. And then they’d face a rifle behind every blade of grass. I’m no fan of neo Nazis, but it’s not with the cost of Russian “liberation”.
    1
  2305. He’s really not, the Russians themselves are admiring to have lost land in Kursk.
    1
  2306.  @mav45678  oh there was definitely fights in Crimea. Several dozen Ukrainian troops died in 2014.
    1
  2307. Nah, it’s definitely liberating. The locals arnt even bothering to put up a fight here
    1
  2308. Ok so show us a source there bud, because the Russians online are claiming the Ukrainians are now 20+KMs deep.
    1
  2309. Yes, because it’s really happening
    1
  2310. 3 years later Ivan. We’re waiting.
    1
  2311. lol, no. There’s no Americans in this war, no matter how much you cope comrade 🤣
    1
  2312.  @haraldhardrade7539  changing the subject like you did isn’t a response either
    1
  2313.  @haraldhardrade7539 and invading another country is legal?
    1
  2314. Not nearly as many as have died on the Russian side in the last 6 months, with not even half the same advances the Ukrainians have achieved in Kursk.
    1
  2315. Is pretty irrelevant considering the Ukrainians are invading Kursk.
    1
  2316. He was also a “PDO-phile”….hence why he was a “former” US general…
    1
  2317. Cope harder vatnik. You Z fascists are losing again!
    1
  2318. They can’t hold it apparently with their logistics bombed to hell and their troops are unmotivated
    1
  2319. Better in Ukrainian hands then Russian once’s. It’s the only major city Russia has captured relatively intact this whole war.
    1
  2320. Yes. Exactly.
    1
  2321. Tell me, how is taking back your land, fight or not, not considered liberation? I guess Paris wasn’t liberated back in the day because they’re was no “battle of Paris”?
    1
  2322. Why? Did the Ukrainians already enter Kherson?
    1
  2323. Nah, that would be Scott Ritter
    1
  2324.  @solidfoelife  lol, “50 nations” arnt even fighting. They’re losing to Ukraine with outdated leftovers from the west 🤣
    1
  2325. Meanwhile: Russia is begging North Korea for troops
    1
  2326.  @kartikeyatiwari2502  the US could. And it’s insulting to think a Corps sized unit of the Russian military couldn’t take khakiv city. It probably would help if you used your air-assault guys in, you know, an air assault to capture key positions for your troops to advance down. Or you know, have air supremacy 3 years into a war. Or used their massive material advantage and launch a large scale armored offensive to envelop the city. Because by all accounts, the Russians apparently sent dismounted infantry with some haphazardly put together tank platoons in as support when they attacked back in May. And now they’re paying dearly for it.
    1
  2327. lol just like “Kyiv was a feint bro” ?🤡
    1
  2328. lol, the only thing people are parenting here, is Russia is a military super power 🤣
    1
  2329. Ya, they arnt build sheds around it and charging a trench with it….
    1
  2330.  @WilliamSudek  we haven’t been training the AFU since 2016, nor did we arm them nearly as well as we have now. The Ukrainians arnt losing either. The Russians have blown through so much of their inventory, they’ve resorted to using attack sheds to support their now motorcycle and golf cart mounted cannon fodder in human wave attacks. as a nuclear armed power mind you And of course you wouldn’t buddy up with us, traitor. You probably don’t even have the guts to do anything for this country, let alone your life.
    1
  2331. Meanwhile: we haven’t even shown up to the fight yet, and Russias ran out of actual tanks. So now their sending in the attack garden sheds with inoperable guns 😂
    1
  2332.  @albane2885 out producing us in junk.
    1
  2333. You forgot the Russians lost to the same goat farmers or somthing?
    1
  2334. His phone
    1
  2335. Except it doesn’t. Nor does it stop ATGMs, artillery, mines, other tanks….
    1
  2336. There was a helicopter pilot who defected about this time last year.
    1
  2337. And?
    1
  2338. More empty nuclear threats? 🥱
    1
  2339. It’s not fantasy, it’s simply the facts
    1
  2340.  @andrejensen7837  well bud, it’s up to the American people to decide that. They said he wouldn’t lose in 2020, and see how that turned out huh bud?
    1
  2341.  @robbiedorresteyn4619 they have supply lines back to Ukraine established
    1
  2342.  @gomazinho90  they didn’t send 500k though. That’s the thing. They sent about 20/30k into donbass, because they thought they would take Kyiv and end the war quickly.
    1
  2343.  @gomazinho90  yes. Why else do you drop a regiment of paratroopers at the gates of an enemy capital and reinforce them with several elite armor columns?
    1
  2344.  @gomazinho90  ya sure did bud. I bet you also think Russia will just March into Kyiv any day now too, huh?
    1
  2345.  @B5152g  latest gains were? You still haven’t given me a location.
    1
  2346.  @B5152g  “look comrades we took more empty fields and another bombed-out village, such a tactical gain!”
    1
  2347.  @ronin8898  that still doesn’t make sense for Poland to hand over so many weapons, push other NATO members to also support Ukraine , and actively train Ukrainian troops, if they’re planning on “invading them”. You Vatniks are really something else when your on Krocodile
    1
  2348. You really think Poland, Ukraine second largest supporter is going to invade its ally right afterwards and risk its NATO membership? And you Vatniks call us “brainwashed”🙄
    1
  2349. Who says we can’t ?
    1
  2350.  @mauriciofernandez3843  yep, and ill love seeing more burning t-90ms too 👍
    1
  2351. lol, imagine thinking a 50 year old tank with none of the modern electronics is “our most advanced weapons systems” 😂
    1
  2352. lol, so let me get this Straight. Supposedly, 2/3rds of the UAF is dead but the Russians can’t even take Kharkiv, took almost a year to take Bakmut, and still are no where near the Dnipro river (let alone Kyiv), and still don’t have air superiority 3 years into this war? 😂 My brother in christ, they’re losing a naval war to a country without a navy! 🤣
    1
  2353. It really isn’t. They operate leopards just fine
    1
  2354. Meanwhile: the Russians are using attack sheds because they’re running out T-series tanks…
    1
  2355. Meanwhile, all the T-90Ms have done nothing to change the war in Russia favor, nor have the “termiantor tanks” they hyped up. The T-80 is an endangered species these days, and. Now the Russians are using attack sheds made out of ancient T-62s because they’ve ran out of everything else 😂
    1
  2356. Ah, your feelings hurt?😂
    1
  2357. Nah, someone else is going to be easing other peoples children if they f$ck with us
    1
  2358. There on the way. Due by the end of July.
    1
  2359. Meanwhile: the Ukrainians arnt out of manpower yet and somehow Russia can advance much despite supposedly killing 2/3rds of the entire Ukrainian military 😂
    1
  2360. There no NATO “boots on the ground” in Ukraine.
    1
  2361. We’re not begging North Korea to come bail us out of a war 😂
    1
  2362. Indeed. We should do so.
    1
  2363. You should be wishing the Norks the luck.
    1
  2364. American. Lots of American made weapons.
    1
  2365.  @gerhardris  well as far as I’m concerned, Russian “military doctrine” is utter stupidity made manifest. A nuke, especially close to the Polish border, will only give NATO an excuse to intervene directly in the war.
    1
  2366. We’ll just look at the time, it’s HIMARS’ o clock….
    1
  2367. Of what?
    1
  2368. Ya? And when was Russia’s? Selow heights in ‘45?
    1
  2369.  @tedteddington6223  yes they did. They said the additional 30 HIMARS Ukraine was promised were to be custom built. This was announced last august.
    1
  2370. They said that about HIMARS and Patriot too…..
    1
  2371.  @pomg6512  sure bud. I guess that’s why Russia has to refurbish 800 t-62s and had to conscript another 300,000 guys right after that too right? Because they took so few causalities right? 🤡
    1
  2372.  @pomg6512  oh no, the “this guy doesn’t agree with me, I guess he’s a unemployed slob” comeback. Real classic buddy🤡 But since you asked, the Ukrainians basically routed First Guards Tank army from the field back into Russia proper, while capturing about 200 vehicles. Including (by photo evidence) 3 T-90Ms. At Izyum, Ukraine, by photos taken, got at-least 100 POWs there too.
    1
  2373.  @pomg6512  lots😅. I love watching Russians getting their shit kicked in. Best use of my tax money in years 🇺🇸👍
    1
  2374. “There’s no panic in Izyum, Lymen, Kupyansk or Kherson” right vatnik? No Russians or tanks got left behind right?🤡
    1
  2375. I mean…we could divert some Egyptian ones…..
    1
  2376.  @RAMANKUMAR-qp6ez  a lot of things are real. Except Russia prospects of winning this war, that is.
    1
  2377.  @RAMANKUMAR-qp6ez  so? A single squad thinks about withdrawing somewhere in the vicinity of Bakmut. Doesn’t mean much,
    1
  2378. No, the ones that stopped short of Moscow, and sent to maili as punishment.
    1
  2379. You will do anything but admit the Russians are getting defeated by the Ukrainians, won’t you?
    1
  2380. lol, BlackWater doesn’t hold a candle to Wagners size, capabilities or warcrime record. BlackWater are at best, over priced security officers. Wagner meanwhile had enough men and weapons to try and coup the Russian government a year ago
    1
  2381. A lot more than the Russians are.
    1
  2382. No, not ISIS. And the CIA did not create ISIS
    1
  2383. Not at all.
    1
  2384. Indeed. Hence the snail paced gains and high losses
    1
  2385.  @chadhaire1711 still doesn’t change the fact he’s a traitor
    1
  2386. We have. That’s why we support Ukraine.
    1
  2387. He’s joined the armed forces of an enemy nation against an American ally.
    1
  2388. He’s expressing his treason
    1
  2389. He has betrayed America and its people
    1
  2390. Those “better trained” Russian troops are about to get their shit kicked in by the Ukrainians then, because Russia busted handed them 11 months of combat experience, allowed them time to mobilize 700,000 troops, and more western weapons to arrive. I highly doubt Russia waited 11 months and took embarrassing defeat after defeat as some kind of “ploy” or “strategy”. I think the Russian are honestly just that stupid and over confident in their abilities.
    1
  2391. wow, this has to be the most bizarre cope post ive seen. you vatniks cant just admit you suck at this war, so you either claim NATO/the US is directly involved, or something secretive must be causing all these events. cope harder. your ego has already been broken.
    1
  2392. @@oliverjacobsen2847 then Russia shouldn’t have invaded in The first place, because most of Russia’s available manpower, equipment and maneuver units have now been spent, with basically nothing to show for it. If they wanted to keep there forces intact, they would have stayed in Russia
    1
  2393.  @ChR1St0p4eR  war is not the ocean. “Eb and flow” has a cost to it in blood. Why did Russia even bother invading and bleed for that land, only to give it up and have their logistic capabilities, available manpower and equipment reserves used up for nothing?
    1
  2394.  @JordanWallace-nb4id  Ok sure bud, I guess the other 20+ nations it was allied with, all the Lend Lease support, and Stalin himself begging the rest of the Allies to open up another front again the Nazis had nothing to do with their victory I guess….. Oh and please tell me buddy, what great enemy have the Russians beaten in 80 years ?
    1
  2395.  @JordanWallace-nb4id  no there’s just bad at warfare and can’t ever admit to their fuck ups
    1
  2396.  @NK-ne9uf  glad your willing to see Russia fight to its last man too. So many Russian women for us in the west to pick up after this shit show is over. 😂
    1
  2397.  @NK-ne9uf  indeed. That’s why they through waves of prisoners at the Ukrainians instead. And Russia can keep throwing all the missiles it wants. Still hasn’t broken the Ukrainians morale yet, nor stoped NATO support pal. 😉 And it isn’t going to stop Ukraine from taking back kremenia back either soon.
    1
  2398.  @NK-ne9uf  hey, they left Kherson, A city that’s suppose to be “Russian forever”, thanks to HIMARS. And hey, that 10:1 artillery advantage the Russians are suppose to have means nothing in the end, if all their ammo keeps going up in smoke, also thanks to HIMARS. I say that’s one hell of game changer, because the Russians didn’t stop running for 6 months after HIMARS showed up😂.
    1
  2399.  @NK-ne9uf  oh I bet the Russians sleep warm. Especially when they sleep on there ammo supplies and mr. HIMARS pays them a visit. Or you know, the many “smoking accidents” the ruskies sure like to have around all there artillery munition stockpiles. 😉
    1
  2400. If it wasn’t, why are they buying Iranian drones and using SAMS as inaccurate cruise missiles?
    1
  2401. Cope harder. Putin fucked around, and now he’s finding out.
    1
  2402.  @trevorcrook5753  I guess taking back 8K km of terrain and the only major city captured by Russia was nothing at all to you tankies? Pathetic. You realize the one industry American has kept at home is the military industrial base right? It’s like the 3rd largest employer in the United States economy. And it’s growing again to meet the demands of this war. Most of the stuff we’ve sent maybe old, but it’s still leagues above what the Russians have apparently. Because they haven’t stopped retreating in 4 months, and wouldn’t be constantly threading the west with nuclear war if our lend lease wasn’t making a difference. And for all Russias has thrown at the Ukrainian power grid, the frontline has still held on regardless. By now, the Ukrainians are switching over to diesel locomotives for their rail systems, and thier repair crews are getting quite good at fixing Russian battle damage. The liberation of Kherson wouldn’t have been possible if they weren’t.
    1
  2403.  @trevorcrook5753  the US still has plenty to send my guy. Our lend lease isn’t ending anytime soon. Far from it. Our Military industry is actually ramping up to start mass production of artillery rounds, drones, and replacement missile systems. For all that talk of “NATO weapons ending up on the black market”, I sure do see a lot of Ukrainian troops in NATO gear and riding spring in NATO vehicles in all these offensives they’ve pulled off. You’d think with so much of our lend lease, supposedly, ending up on the half market, they wouldn’t be able to take back any land huh? It’s almost like that Russian bullshit in an attempted to stop the supply of American weapons that’s kicking thier asses right now. And I’d study some maps more my guy. Compare what they had back in February to what they have now, and it’s Barley half of what the Russians started this war with .
    1
  2404.  @trevorcrook5753  in 4 months, Russia hasn’t retaken a single town the Ukrainians retook in there counter attacks, and thanks to them blowing all the bridges when they left Kherson, they can’t recapture it anytime soon. And hey, looks like the Ukrainians are perfectly capable of escalating the war, with the recent drone and rocket attacks inside Russia itself. And NATO aid isn’t ending anytime soon pal.
    1
  2405.  @trevorcrook5753  thats still less then half of what they captured back in February, and they’ve now lost more after losing Kherson. A place, mind you, Putin himself said was “Russian forever”.
    1
  2406.  @Stein871  not tell me where Connecticut is.
    1
  2407.  @Stein871  it’s south east to Poland, north of Turkey, east of Romania, south of Belarus and west of Russia.
    1
  2408.  @Stein871  funny, because according to all the maps, Russia is the first country in history to invade a nation, and constantly lose land as time progresses.
    1
  2409.  @Stein871  and? They still got Kherson, they now have Crimea in missile range now, and can now free up troops for more offensives. And best of all, they didn’t have to fight a mini-Stalingrad for it. This is a absolute win for Ukraine. Now go take your daily Copium dose vatnik,
    1
  2410. Ya, those same farmers also defeated the Russians too back in the day, and still deliver defeats to them in Syria and Mali even now. If farmers can do that, then there’s no way Russia is winning in Ukraine
    1
  2411. @ because they matter of fact will be at war with Ukraine, and Ukraine will be fighting now TWO nuclear armed nations.
    1
  2412. I’d imagine the Ukrainians are motivated to protect their homeland from a hostile invader and historic oppressor, like Russia.
    1
  2413. The US hasn’t even given 100 billion to Ukraine in almost 3 years. And would you negotiate with an invader?
    1
  2414. lol, so Russia isn’t announcing the deployment of North Korean troops?😂
    1
  2415. Not likely. The US alone has 42 billion set aside for Ukraine for just 2023. And compared to our last wars, this has been penny’s on the dollar for us.
    1
  2416.  @Sharkoon030  Vatnik
    1
  2417. Source?
    1
  2418.  @phoenixzappa7366 meanwhile, Kyiv wasn’t a feint, Kherson isn’t Russian forever, Russia is losing a naval war against a country with no navy, and somehow mange to lose the 6th battle Of Kharkiv…
    1
  2419. Meanwhile, the Russians pulled out of most of the city and now are begin North Korea for back up…
    1
  2420. It literally runs along side Kaliningrad. What do you mean “Russia isn’t in this waters”??
    1
  2421. Why? Don’t the Germans, Swedes, Finn’s, and Danes all have submarines and navy divers?
    1
  2422.  @cte4dota  after the past 6 months of stupidity the Russians have put on display, you still think they know what their doing?
    1
  2423. Contractors don’t operate any of those systems. Ukrainian personnel that have been trained on them too.
    1
  2424.  @JoeyRay-fz1qe  these western mercs will probably just assist the Ukrainians in maintaining gear, maybe the odd ex-USAF F-16 pilot or two.
    1
  2425. Meanwhile, Wagner didn’t do very well against an enemy that can actually fight back…
    1
  2426. No, it hasn’t.
    1
  2427. The majority of PMC in US service are logistics oriented.
    1
  2428. Incredible dumb infact,
    1
  2429.  @alexpug5162  so, par for course with Russian offensives then? By kremlin logic, it would be a great success.
    1
  2430. All the Russian artillery in the world hasn’t crushed the Ukrainians in 6 months.
    1
  2431. None of it is classified or up to date
    1
  2432. You Vatniks said the same thing 9 months ago, about how Kyiv was going to fall too….
    1
  2433.  @projectedone a mushroom? 😂
    1
  2434. We’re not. That’s why we’re not supporting Russia
    1
  2435. Stop spamming the same stupid kremlin backed defeatist message. No more appeasement!
    1
  2436. For the Russians sure.
    1
  2437. Ok.
    1
  2438.  @davidlamont5793 yet he is, by supporting Russia
    1
  2439. He’s not. Stop coping Ivan
    1
  2440. God isn’t real.
    1
  2441. It’s not terrorism to support a nation fighting for its survival. Stop supporting Russian tyranny
    1
  2442. Considering non of the 300,000 who got conscripted don’t want to fight, I don’t see how a million more would be suddenly ready to fight for foreign land their stupid government conquered.
    1
  2443. I prefer combat footage on Reddit. Had a lot more interesting shots of this war.
    1
  2444. Unless the enemy is Russia. There air defence doent seem to last long against concentrated SEAD/DEAD campaigns. For god sakes, Ukraine still has CAS runs being carried out and an ungodly number of drone strikes on Russian troops. “What air defences doing” ?
    1
  2445. No point. They don’t need Russian land.
    1
  2446.  @jordiewest1692  no they haven’t, they haven’t taken the Ukrainians seriously since February That’s why they keep taking huge losses and that’s why now there getting their asses kicked left, right and center. The Russians believed their own propaganda WAY to much,
    1
  2447.  @jordiewest1692  that’s not what the men themselves are showing online. For god sakes, there being told to use there wives pads and tampons for medical goods, and to buy there armor and back packs.
    1
  2448.  @jordiewest1692  still. With all the other stuff we’ve sent over, it will be pretty difficult for those poor conscripts, with a week of training , go get with in rifle range of any thing. Let along fight effectively. Most of those poor bastards don’t even want to be there
    1
  2449. With what? Rusty AKMs, mosins and T-34s versus all this NATO supplied gear and 700,000 pissed off Ukrainians?
    1
  2450. Most of those times, Russia was the defender. Here their the aggressor, and other guy had the full backing of the most developed economies in the world. The only thing Russia is going to come back with, is body bags.
    1
  2451. lol, you wish tankie. 😂
    1
  2452. lol, they barely had a battalion across the river, and the Russians couldn’t drive them off. And all the FABs in the world are useless, as they haven’t managed to break Ukrainian lines anywhere on the front in over 2 years of use.
    1
  2453. Ya they “volunteer” at gun point.,,
    1
  2454. Which is why we should get Ukraine into NATO as soon as this is over.
    1
  2455. Hey, if it works, it works.
    1
  2456.  @Princip666  ya, and the blood and gore of those stupid VDV and spetsnaz that got slaughtered at Hostemel, are now growing sunflowers near Kyiv. All those wrecked, Soviet-made shit cans the ruskies call “tanks” will make fine scrap metal for the Ukraine to rebuild with. Once they clean them of communist orc corpses first, of course. I sure do love the smell of dead communists. Smells like victory to me.
    1
  2457. How’s the 3 day operation going 6 months later vatnik?
    1
  2458.  @MrThartofwar  been hearing the same crap since mauriopol, yet here they are, still playing WW1 again.
    1
  2459. No, just the Russians trying to use what supplies they got left before winter kills there Logi again.
    1
  2460. Maybe, but then they would be square in the middle of a new Cold War, with a bigger NATO, a even more-US aligned west, and economy that’s barley getting by with discounted oil and next to know major tech-imports available. Not what I’d call a “strong position”.
    1
  2461. No. The Ukrainians will just fight a guerrilla war, like the afghans fighting the Soviets.
    1
  2462. Selling the even more corrupt communist police state that’s Russia as somehow, in any way , being the “good guys” is something to behold. The gullibility of leftists and alt-righters is really something else I tell ya.
    1
  2463.  @ВладимирВ-э3п  I guess we only delayed the Soviets defeat with lend lease back in the day too huh? No matter what you say, im still going to support giving more and more weapons to Ukraine. And americas leadership seems to agree.
    1
  2464.  @ВладимирВ-э3п  for 6 months, with nearly 200 western supplies howitzers, 300 west Ed supplied AFVS, thousands of ATGMs, MANPADS, small arms and grandes, severs mountains of ammo, and ever increasing numbers of long range missiles. And we got plenty more to give.
    1
  2465.  @HereticalBuilder  with lends lease, they have the industrial capacity of the US military industrial complex. And we can keep them fighting for a long while to come.
    1
  2466. That is the stupidest explanation for this war I think I’ve ever heard. The west can always make more weapons and ammo. The US is gearing up to do just that within the next year.
    1
  2467. @Scrotie McBoogerballs your point? They’ve held on for 6 months so far. If morale was a real problem, they would have broken back in March.
    1
  2468. @Scrotie McBoogerballs who’s says they run out of troops anytime soon? We got 30,000 being trained in NATO counties on bi-monthly basis. And Russia isn’t going to suddenly overrun Ukraine anytime soon.
    1
  2469. Then I guess we’ll just keep giving Ukraine what it needs to keep hitting back.
    1
  2470.  @stiannunn5113  lol, I don’t watch the news. I simply watch the facts
    1
  2471. Cry harder tankie.
    1
  2472.  @Peacewar2020  the Americans had reserves near by, where as Russia does not. The Germans had massive ive issues with fuel and ammunition. Something Ukraine does not have. And if your were counting men and vehicles lost, you would conclude then that Russia is losing this war.
    1
  2473.  @candecar000  oh ya? So how do they speak Ukrainian so fluently?
    1
  2474.  @vlajkodzudovic9957  you too buddy. Have a good day. 👍 Hope Kosovo gets its EU membership soon too.
    1
  2475. Good. Now how about some of those Patriot missiles or Bradley’s?
    1
  2476. Or we just give the Ukraines more defense against these attacks and more weapons to hit Russian targets with. These attacks have only accelerated the delivery of new NATO weapons.
    1
  2477. So aiding a enemy nation that’s going to turn around and use that money to bolster its military is somehow beneficial to the people of the EU?
    1
  2478.  @vlajkodzudovic9957  it’s almost like it was a civil war or something.
    1
  2479. What? The Russians took all these military loses and greatly depleted the abilities on the ground on purpose ? Are you high?
    1
  2480. Buddy….they just made major advances a week ago. Why are you surprised at the consolidation efforts are slow? If Russia would have consolidated early on, they wouldn’t have lost all the land they have so far. It’s like asking “why did the Allies wait a month to break out from Normandy? They only conducted the largest naval invasion in history!”
    1
  2481. They didn’t get decimated after Mariupol. Or serverdonensk Or when the Russians were at the gates of Kyiv. So why now?
    1
  2482. Ya sure buddy. The “real attack” all the Vatniks keep hyping up, apparently has been coming since last March.
    1
  2483. Then why did they invade from 8 directions, including toward Kyiv at the start of this stupid war?
    1
  2484.  @docaml so why hasn’t that fire advantage caused a major breakthrough in 6 months or stopped all the Ukrainian counter attacks in their tracks then?
    1
  2485.  @VideosfromMariupol  if the ruskies can’t cross the Dnipro again, they’re losing the war. And they’re well on the way to that
    1
  2486.  @VideosfromMariupol  and then the Russians lose it all again in about 3 months. Which is what happens to Izyum and Lymen. And then Mariupol probably around late summer too.
    1
  2487. They are. Because their about to lose kremnia and Ukraine is getting western AFVs now.
    1
  2488. Hey, still waiting for the Russians to find the “bio labs”, Ukrainian satanic wizards, NATO spec ops and the Ukrainian airforce to be “destroyed” for the 8th time now Vatniks…..
    1
  2489. Until the last Russian goes home
    1
  2490.  @teoteog3984  so what’s with the ferry they set up?
    1
  2491. He’s been doing that all war, and it still hasn’t broken the Ukrainians. If anything, it’s just going to make them want to fight more.
    1
  2492. The same was said about the Soviets in 1941. And look how that turned out in the long run.
    1
  2493. lol, this ain’t WW3. Trumps appeasement will only lead us to warz
    1
  2494. lol. And Russia invading and occupying Ukraine wasn’t “escalation”? 😂
    1
  2495. The US didn’t attack Russia. Ukraine simply returned Russia the favor for all the bombings
    1
  2496. We sent 16, and the Russians really don’t like showing proof of the “destruction” of HIMARS or seems.
    1
  2497. Ok 1) show me proof of there destruction, because the DOD is keeping a close eye on them and 2) don’t worry buddy, we got plenty more toys to send to the Ukrainians 😊
    1
  2498.  @turkiye8598  Ukraine took his reputation and fear.
    1
  2499.  @snidecommenter7117  apparently that’s in place already, because plenty of the weapons we send make it to the front and kill the orcs
    1
  2500.  Hunter Brandon  hey, we got plenty of lend lease to send.
    1
  2501. We did. It’s called Lend Lease. They can have anything short of nuclear weapons. The only variable is training time, and stockpile supplies.
    1
  2502. And as of yesterday, I think it’s confirmed the ATACM missiles have arrived.
    1
  2503.  @felixthecat4536  I do. And they want more weapons to kill the bastards who took everything from them. The Russians .
    1
  2504. Well that didn’t age well. Just yesterday Ukraine used both western anti-radar missiles and appear to now possess ATACM missiles for there Himars.
    1
  2505.  @k-ron7403  we have 31 on the way, and they’ll be ready by April
    1
  2506. No, they still would only have about 15% occupied still. And then they lose it all not long after western armor arrives.
    1
  2507. Nope. Their still in Rostov and Voronezh
    1
  2508. Not at all. Wagner just killed Russian forces on their own soil and got close to deposing Putin in Moscow. The crisis has only begun, no matter what Potato man has “negotiated”
    1
  2509. Are you kidding? Wagner has killed several police officers, national guard troops, and Russian pilots.
    1
  2510. I doubt this is the end of this story. Wagner had beaten all of Russia historical invaders in their time to reach Moscow and several Russian pilots (god knows how many ground troops and police) are dead now. If Putin’s position was weak before,It’s beyond saving now.
    1
  2511. Ok. Refute his claims. I’ll wait.
    1
  2512. How can you idiots keep thinking Russia is winning, when it’s lost half its gains, and, again , is claiming to have “defeated the Ukrainians offensive” on the first day….. But now are suddenly rushing reserves into the area and we have dozens of videos of Russian troops being captured coming in….. Sounds like Kherson all over again.
    1
  2513. Yes.
    1
  2514. Then you must be blind, because Ukraine has more professional troops then Russia dies in theater right now, the Ukrainians air-force is still operational, and plenty of manpower left to draw from. Russia meanwhile is a majority conscript army, that hasn’t acheived air supremacy a year into this war, and has been forced to recruit from Prisons and pull out museum pieces to keep its forces in any sort of fighting conditions.
    1
  2515. Cool fan fic bro. Meanwhile, I’ve seen now close to a dozen videos of Ukrainians taking Russian POWs, planting flags in towns 15km into the Russian lines, and the Russians shooting their own guys as they retreat…. Not to mention the Russians moving reserves in, despite the “Ukrainians offensive failing in day one”…..just like it did at Kherson, where the Russians “defeated the Ukrainians”, but still ran away in the end😂
    1
  2516. Opens the center? You mean the Russians will just hit another defence line for 6 months while there back lines are pounded to hell? like they have done on literally every front this war???
    1
  2517.  @VangelVe  then you would support Russia just going home already and leave Ukraine. Since they won’t, they need to bleed enough until it’s too costly for them to carry on. That’s why I support giving Ukraine as many weapons and supplies it needs to kick the Russians out and take back their country.
    1
  2518.  @VangelVe sure buddy, nice fanfiction. I guess you’ve never seen someone with dozens of shrapnel wounds try desperately to get out of a freezing cold ditch before they die. They scorm like a tortoise on its back…. Anyhow, let me guess, this time the Ukrainian army will break right? It’s not like this is the 5 th time the Z-boys have screeched this same line this war…..only to run into another Ukrainian line down the road and get stuck for another 6 months, while the Ukrainians take back more land else where…… You know like after Mariupol…and Serverdonensk….and now Bakmut. Maybe by 2030, the Russians will finally have Donetsk if they give up Savastopol like they did Kherson for it.
    1
  2519. Yet, Russia can’t break through Bakmut after 8 months of battle , even after relocating units from the Kherson and Kharkiv fronts. And they wouldn’t have conscripted 300,000 more men if they had a professional core left to use.
    1
  2520. No, they’ll take another bombed out wasteland again, and then run into another Ukrainian defense line for 6 months. Just like after Mariupol and serverdonensk…
    1
  2521. So, why did Russia need to mobilize another 300,000 men, and leave Kherson, if Ukraine didn’t have an army anymore?
    1
  2522. We get to see miles of burnt convoys and tank columns again, like we did last year.
    1
  2523.  @steverodgers7866  ok, they assumes we don’t enter a war with China without SK, Japan and Australia’s helping out too. And last I checked, land based systems are pretty useless in a sea and air war, like what we would be fighting with China. And hey, why not use what we got to weaken Russia first? That’s what it was made to do to begin with ,wasn’t it?
    1
  2524. Pfff, ok buddy. Sure. laughs in the Sierra army depot 😂
    1
  2525. Yes and no. Taking ground will convince the west to send more aid, and ruin Putin’s image over time, while inflicting massive casualties on the Russians will convince them to do to the negotiations tables.
    1
  2526.  @666Ekinox  apparently enough, because Ukraines artillery is still firing to this day.
    1
  2527.  @666Ekinox  and you Z-boys have been saying the same thing since Lend Lease started, and we’ve only increased the amount of support as time has gone on. So let me know when it two days France somehow runs out of all its ammo, and can’t even defend its self as it sends 30 light tanks, thousands of guns, and more ammo to Ukraine at the same time👍🤡
    1
  2528.  @666Ekinox  lol. If NATO was actually involved directly in this war, Russia wouldn’t last a month.
    1
  2529.  @666Ekinox  so again, why do they need all that to fight an army that’s apparently been destroyed 8 times now?
    1
  2530.  @666Ekinox  apparently not Russia. Apparently Russia needs almost a million men and a year of constant fighting to crush an army 1:4 of its size🤷‍♂️ And man, for an army that has no tanks apparently, they sure had a lot of them March into Kherson and Kharkiv not even 4 months ago…. Infact the same men and tanks marched into Sumy, Chernihiv, Izyum, Kupyansk, Lymen, and seem to be about to March in to Kremenia as well….. Funny that for an army that apparently is on its 8th mobilization isn’t it? Odd that Russia, despite taking so few losses apparently, has to abandon 8,000+km of land, the gates of Kyiv and Kherson to “preserve the lives of there troops”, while also conscripting another 300,000 men, isn’t it? Probably because the Russians have taken severe losses and the Z-boys can’t seem to cope with it other then writing fanfictions online 🤡
    1
  2531. So who’s holding Bakmut, advancing in kremenia and holding the rest of the 50,000km+ front then bud?
    1
  2532. The Ukrainians seem to disagree with that.
    1
  2533.  @r.williamcomm7693  Ya 1) Mexicans arnt rolling over a border with tanks and lobbing missiles at our cities like Russia is doing to Ukraine. All the drugs in the world can’t do the damage Russia has inflicted on Ukraines cities and people. 2) ya, we had really stupid leaders back in the day. But it’s not like you need to place nukes next to an enemy nation anymore. Technology has advanced FAR beyond the 1960s bud.
    1
  2534. No, we would be just fine with that. Mexico isn’t a threat to us, we have e enough nukes to level China in retaliation, and civilian population that’s armed enough to give any invader hell from second they stepped over the border. Hell, I’d love to use my second amendment rights on some PLA f@ckers 🇺🇸👍
    1
  2535.  @rickyluman3915  are you living in the same reality as the rest of us? Israel has lost no meaningful support over the last year of fighting over there.
    1
  2536.  @michaelpelzek8882  ISIS was not even close to being eliminated under trump, and we had over a dozen combat deaths in Afghanistan under trump.
    1
  2537. No it very much would have happened under trump. All these countries leaders are too arrogant to have some American president tell them what to do.
    1
  2538. We literary had enemies from Algeria to Syria back in the 60s.
    1
  2539. Iran isn’t nuclear…
    1
  2540. You know, they keep saying that every time a new package is sent over, and then it makes all the difference in the world. Then the Russians complain about how US aid is killing them and they’re making no progress again….
    1
  2541.  @memyselfandi8544 least they don’t turn their dead into bloody cubes for transport comrade 😂
    1
  2542. No?
    1
  2543.  @Fanboy-hf1iu yes. Yes it is.
    1
  2544.  @memyselfandi8544 because the ruskies were using them since the start of the war.
    1
  2545. Hot take: all politicians are idiots and often don’t want to rock the boat so they don’t ruin their careers.
    1
  2546. So, what keeps sinking Russian warships and downing planes?
    1
  2547.  @maxbounce  ya, I don’t trust the side that claims to have a “7:1 advantage in artillery” but some how had to leave most of its territorial gains and somehow can’t take what is a essentially a suburb of a city they’ve controlled close to 10 years now, even after 6 months of attrition….
    1
  2548. Not at all. We’ll see plenty of them being used in Ukraine, but not nearly as many of them will be lost compared to the insane amount of Russia gear that had been lost in comparison.
    1
  2549. By that logic, the UAF should have been completely destroyed 3 times almost 2 years ago now, yet the Russians still arnt in Kyiv..,.
    1
  2550. It might be the average of the count
    1
  2551. Nope. It’s ain’t going to be WW3
    1
  2552. Cope and seeth vatnik
    1
  2553.  @stinkypete891 lol, from what? We haven’t loss 700,000 men for nothing 😂
    1
  2554. Then leave vatnik
    1
  2555. Bye bye 👋
    1
  2556. Cope
    1
  2557. Get off the crack man. Even my pro-Ukrainian a$$ wouldn’t believe that
    1
  2558.  @stinkypete891 no, but Russia did after it left Afghanistan
    1
  2559. So, how did Afghanistan defeat Russia?
    1
  2560. The US built 3 nukes while fighting the largest war in history
    1
  2561. After this? Heck no, no one will EVER surrender their nukes now, seeing how it’s proven to be “independence insurance” from bigger countries
    1
  2562. Go back to your crappy apartment in Moscow comrade, your drunk.
    1
  2563. “What’s rightfully theirs”?🤡
    1
  2564. Zelensly is the best comedian in the world, that’s for sure. He made all of Russia a joke, and Putin his clown.
    1
  2565. That still a loss my guy. That’s them throwing in the towel.
    1
  2566. Not until Russia is driven out. Only victory can bring lasting peace.
    1
  2567.  @jessejames6349  good for the Ukrainians 👍there the ones taking their land back
    1
  2568. Last I checked, NATO isn’t directly fighting. And I’ll gladly support the brave Ukrainians with my tax money.
    1
  2569. So? That still a defeat for Russia.
    1
  2570. They still haven’t countered attack in the north like they said they would. So I doubt it.
    1
  2571. Probably. But that’s one less city they have.
    1
  2572. He fucked around, now Putin is finding out!
    1
  2573. Yet, by retreating, the Russians now put more of there logistics in HIMAR range. Meaning any artillery they set up, will quickly run out of ammo after HIMARS wrecks the ammo dumps and rail lines behind those defenses.
    1
  2574. He’s smoking bad weed by showing the truth?
    1
  2575. Still better then Russia, losing thousands of troops spamming there far heads against Bakmut for months with no results to show for it.
    1
  2576. Hey, still waiting for that “devastating attack” that was suppose to happen after they left Kyiv, Izyum, Lyman, Kharkiv, and snake island.
    1
  2577. Crimea is smoking.
    1
  2578.  @robrob9050  we’re seeing that the Russian border isn’t defended very well. That’s for sure.
    1
  2579.  @robrob9050  they still have committed the actual assault brigades for the offensive to any battle yet. So they have the people they need ready.
    1
  2580. No, we really don’t
    1
  2581. You mean the back stabbing chamberlain
    1
  2582. Right, because it’s not 2 power blocs of nations fighting across the plant. It’s literally everyone (including ally’s of each-other) competing for their own agendas
    1
  2583. There’s no US group involved
    1
  2584. We have the largest military industrial base on earth, we quite literally are the only ones that can compete with Russia in terms of war production.
    1
  2585. Not at all. The Ukrainians would just keep fighting regardless.
    1
  2586. No more appeasement! How many world wars does it take for you isolationist children to get it nailed into your tiny minds??!
    1
  2587. Had what?
    1
  2588.  @aymenyahyaoui1771  it’s not. The west has no intention of stopping aid to Ukraine.
    1
  2589. Oh so tell bud. I’ll wait. 😊
    1
  2590. Yet, the Ukrainians retook Kherson last year, a place that was supposed to be “annexed” into Russia. And the Russians didn’t use nukes.
    1
  2591. Funny, NATO isn’t even in the war yet😂
    1
  2592. Are they? Because that PMC didn’t do a damn thing at Kharkiv, Irpin, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kupyansk, Snake Island, Izyum, Lymen and Kherson…..
    1
  2593. ⁠ @CyrilSneer123 destroy them with what? The BARS troops that blew the bridges the first chance they got? The Russian police that got hastily handed AKs and told to fight tanks and MRAPs? The SU-34s that couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn at the border check point? Or the SU-25 firing unguided rockets at Russian villages? Or how about the MI-8 the raiders shot down, because you know, MANPADS exist….
    1
  2594. No, it seems the Russians civilians are the only paying for it, because the Russian military’s first response, was to use BM-21 Grads and SU-34 bombers against insurgent held villages….
    1
  2595. The Russian military actually did do just that. They used Grads, SU-25 and SU-34 bombers against the insurgent held villages.
    1
  2596. Except it wasn’t. Because there wasn’t any major battles around Bakmut 80 years ago, compared to Kharkiv, Kyiv and Savastopol.
    1
  2597.  @prosimulate  except it’s not. They’ve lost most their gains up to this point back to Ukraine, and are now getting invaded by other Russians.
    1
  2598. Yet, Ukraine still exists, and currently, Russia border is looking pretty vulnerable.
    1
  2599. No, believe it or not, the right wing has extremists too.
    1
  2600. No, just in reality.
    1
  2601. @ ah…. Granted trump is a wild card, but I’m going to say that’s probably not going to happen. Not while HTS has some ties left to Al queda or isis. Now, buying gear from Turkey, that’s a bit more realistic here.
    1
  2602. The US stockpiles are fine. What are you talking about?
    1
  2603. Ukraine we can do. Taiwan we can do. We care don’t care enough about Africas problems to really do anything their, but hey, if the French want to, more power to them.
    1
  2604.  @deesmith6363  I can tell you don’t really study wars with that comment.
    1
  2605. Their “winning” by losing most of their gains, almost having a coup against Putin barley a month ago, and having their currency worth less then a US dime?
    1
  2606. NATO will survive not winning a war. Russia meanwhile has a history of leaders not being in power long after losing a war.
    1
  2607. Ukraine still has Odessa and access to the Black Sea, and their offensive is still ongoing. Meanwhile, the Russians have lost Irpin, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Kupyansk, Izyum, Lymen, Snake island, Kherson and all the little towns and villages in between for the last 500+ days. And at this rate, they’ll lose Crimea too.
    1
  2608. @PatagoniaArieslol, our guys ain’t ruskies bud😂
    1
  2609. Why? Because Ukraine gets money from Russia to send gas through. And Russia get money from the gas being exported from it. If Russia wants to blow it up, they’ll lose another source of income. If Ukraine blows it up, they’ll also lose a source of income.
    1
  2610. Sucks to be anywhere, because radiation doesn’t stop at city limits or borders.
    1
  2611. Better then the “ Kyiv was a feint” network or the “Bio-labs R us” channels
    1
  2612. Name one.
    1
  2613. I don’t know man, you seem to have an issue with Ukraine and it’s people to me.
    1
  2614. No thanks. It’s crap.
    1
  2615. That last part isn’t true. The American strategic reserve could maybe run america for about 2 weeks in current consumption rates.
    1
  2616. So you’re saying even Russias nukes are inoperable?🤡
    1
  2617. The US isn’t even fighting in this war. And the Russians seem to very much want this war, so the Ukrainians have been forced to defend themselves from their former oppressors for their very existence. And lol, what “missiles” are you referring to that could ever possibly threaten Russia.
    1
  2618. And yet, he never did.
    1
  2619. You boys really are scrapping the bottom of the barrel, huh?
    1
  2620. Ya, that’s just BS. Nukes arnt computerized like that. Most are from an age of analog technology.
    1
  2621. Indeed. If Russia sent its entire force into the donbass, the west may have just let them get away with it.
    1
  2622.  @jamesng7320  that’s not what you said. You said “retaking land that was originally yours is not winning a war”. My brother in hell, most of the Easter front back in the day was the Soviets retaking their lost land from the Nazis. It’s not until near the end of the war did they even start getting into foreign land. Hell, I guess you think bill Vietnam and Afghanistan were resounding American victories, since the Vietnamese and afghans never reached or took US soil too, right? 🤡
    1
  2623. Aw what’s the matter, too Salty seeing Russia fail?
    1
  2624. Lol, what are the Houthis going to do against Europe😂
    1
  2625. Not really. It never works out for the armies who try that strategy.
    1
  2626. I know, just look at this comment with no real response to it 😂
    1
  2627.  @Shakenbeer  that’s why there going to try and force a vote
    1
  2628. US aid isn’t gone. Its just waiting approval in the House.
    1
  2629.  @Kaiserboo1871  then your blind as a bat.
    1
  2630.  @mekelopte7071  the US does not use Russian oil. Why would it? It’s literally got one of the largest oil industries in the world
    1
  2631.  @mekelopte7071  no, we don’t.
    1
  2632.  @РоманСаратов-у9и because they make T-72 turrets fly at least 300m in the sky.
    1
  2633. Nah, we don’t need beaten up humvee and outdated Blackhawks
    1
  2634. They seem to suck at both it seems.
    1
  2635. Indeed. They’re making the Russians look stupid again 😂
    1
  2636. Their training to go back and fight the Russians my guy…
    1
  2637. Seems to have helped them quite abit around Kharkiv and Kherson.
    1
  2638. What British separatists and with what arsenal at this point vatnik?
    1
  2639. And it’s glorious. Welcome Aboard Sweden!
    1
  2640. lol, we haven’t even shown up to fight yet and Russia has lost hundreds of thousands of its own to our Surplus 😂
    1
  2641. Only if you’re Russian.
    1
  2642. What a shame, anyway….
    1
  2643.  @brianporter9508  nah I don’t think I will. 🙂
    1
  2644.  @brianporter9508  idk, ask the Soviets. They seem to love begging for Lend Lease all the time while “winning” against Germany. Ditto for the UK and China too.
    1
  2645. I’m pretty sure Ukraine doesn’t use BTR-82s . And they could have washed off the Russian markings to avoid friendly fire.
    1
  2646. C&C is just a video game bud.
    1
  2647. If it’s own young men and futures.
    1
  2648. Idk Lysol? Fabreez?
    1
  2649.  @maxfax319  you should get that checked out then 🙂
    1
  2650. Or Arizona. Or Nevada. Or texas. Or redeployed form Saudi Arabia. Or Kuwait. Or you know, the dozens of other bases we have in deserts
    1
  2651. Yes and no. Yes, as a support vehicle, but on the front line use it’s been replaced by Oshkosh MRAPS.
    1
  2652. Sorry, I don’t remember caring to ask 👍🇺🇸
    1
  2653.  @ИосифВисаррионыч  same on you for following the Clown known as Putin into this circus you call a war. 🤡
    1
  2654. Cope harder comrade Ruskie 🤡
    1
  2655. You mean the T-90s put missiles from the 1980s have been popping the turrets off of? 🤡 By the way, the CIA loves there T-90M the ruskies left in such good shape in Izyum 👍
    1
  2656. And kill 10-20 enemy tanks in the process👍
    1
  2657.  @TheRelativy  so what’s keeping Russians armor armor at bay if Ukraine apparently, for the 5th time so far (according to the Z-boys) has no tanks left?
    1
  2658. They’ll get a bunch of caskets instead😂
    1
  2659. They haven’t even burned any of the HIMARS yet🤡
    1
  2660. Perhaps the Russians should first try and make sure there tanks don’t compete in any more turret-tossing completions first🤡
    1
  2661. Pfff, why, so they can get creamed by NATO air power 😂
    1
  2662. No more appeasement.
    1
  2663. Ya there not out of vehicles. But more tanks is always appreciated
    1
  2664.  @gbgbgbgb1 when will the Russian bots finally admit this war isn’t going well for them?
    1
  2665.  @Stockfish1511  8,000 square kms of land and a regional capital is alot of ground retaken my guy. It’s been 10 months of war, and Ukraine has yet to run into a manpower problem. NATO has at least 60,000 replacement Ukrainian troops being trained every 120 days, and US lend lease has no end in sight to supply them all. And my brother in christ, it’s been 10 months. What do you mean “this is only getting started”? Russia is the first country in history to invade another nation, only to lose most of what they took in less then a year. This makes the Italian invasion of Greece look competent in comparison!
    1
  2666. Yet the piece of shit T-62s the Russians have will???
    1
  2667. You first Ruskie 👍🇺🇸
    1
  2668.  @tomkozisek  tell that to the headless VDV, the burnt/smashed conscript T-72 crews, and blown apart ka-52 pilots. They probably wish they could have ran away crying. Instead, there fucking dead. And good riddance.
    1
  2669. Nah, I hope we get to fight them soon. Forget poking the bear, I want us to fucking impale the bear.
    1
  2670. We lost in Korea? That’s news to me, seeing how South Korea still exists. And last I checked the Russians didn’t win in Afghanistan either . God you Vatniks are like bad Poker players, with your constant “feints” and “traps” that never seem to happen.
    1
  2671.  @night_wolf9734  copium addict 😉
    1
  2672.  @drjacob2276  hold up, you claim the 80,000 dead Russian figure is exaggerated but then turn around and claim 75,000 Ukrainian casualties on the same sentence. What makes you think one is true and the other isn’t?
    1
  2673. Ah yes, just like the Nazi withdrawal from paris was totally not a defeat right?
    1
  2674.  @rolanduuspalu5505  what? You think Ukrainian refugees are going to start an insurgency against Estonia?
    1
  2675. The EU economy is fine. A little rough right now, but it’ll live. And relocating a population that’s hostile to you back to your own country just sounds like a great way to have a domestic insurgency start.
    1
  2676. Neither. Both sides are equally experienced in winter combat and both sides know how dumb a winter offensive is (well, hopefully, seeing Russia stupidity thus far, I won’t hold my breath). Honestly, I predict more WW1 style combat with a shit-ton of snow thrown on top.
    1
  2677. Idk, check live leaks or Reddit.
    1
  2678. He hasn’t been right yet. So why now?
    1
  2679. Indeed. I hope send more hunter killers and predator drones over
    1
  2680. The Ukrainians can as well. Living through a man made famine and back to back Nazi and communist occupation right afterwards will do that to a people.
    1
  2681.  @USER351  what? Other then Russia invading for stupid reasons and giving NATO a chance to grow again? Or Putin F—cking around and now finding out why America doesn’t have universal healthcare?
    1
  2682.  @USER351  I have, and it still makes no since. Why would Russian soldiers suddenly get more motivated if, hypothetically, they were told they were now going to fight 30 more counties, with better tech and training, if just Ukraine alone is giving this kind of trouble already?
    1
  2683. Why? Ukraine still has tons of TDF units and even more NATO weapons to help. And what if Poland start putting more troops on the Belarusians border?
    1
  2684.  @Republic3D  I hope so too, but only victory will bring lasting Peace for Ukraine. Anything less is just a temporary ceasefire so Russia can lick its wounds with and rebuild it military.
    1
  2685.  @Republic3D  I think the T-72s are being taken because the Russian factories can’t make up for the losses so far in the war (hence why there now modernizing 800 or so T-62s right now). As for the 20,000’reservists….I mean what are they going to do against 60,000 or so Belorussians that either don’t want to fight, don’t follow orders or, worse, turn on them green on blue style ?
    1
  2686.  @Republic3D  I’d say a lot. Because the Belarusians repeatedly have been doing what ever they can to sabotage the Russian efforts in Ukraine. (The Belarusian railroad sabotages early on comes to mind, as well the Belarusians volunteer battalions fighting In the Ukrainian side). It’s not like ol’Luka is very popular with his people. Not to mention the Ukrainians still have tons of milita, border guards, and TDF units in the rear for just such an scenario. And again, tons of more NATO supplied weapons then they did in February. I just can’t see how trying the same tactic twice will some how work out for the Russian side. It reminds me of the Italians trying 14 times to break Austro-Hungarian lines back in the day.
    1
  2687. Or Ukraine just doesn’t bother and keeps it troops in the east. They have US intelligence assets helping them. I doubt they’d station troops their if Belarus really was just pulling a feint.
    1
  2688. So Belarus will fail too.
    1
  2689. They would be over extended….if the Russians didn’t leave an entire tank corpse worth of gear behind to resupply the Ukrainians.
    1
  2690. Oh ya, Russia so strong, losing its flagship Moskava, losing an entire paratrooper battalion on day one, losing literally thousands of tanks , taking at least 20,000 casualties, giving constant nuclear threats to us when we send Ukraine more aid, and can’t even control the skies 7 months into a war against a much smaller enemy. Russia is a f**king joke.
    1
  2691. Do they also have a time machine? Because the KGB isn’t a thing outside Belarus anymore.
    1
  2692. We really weren’t for over 8 years. Most of us forgot about it. And Then Russia decided to start the largest land war in Europe since WW2, and gave us a chance to finally kick in their teeth.
    1
  2693. Because Putin won’t stop at Ukraine.
    1
  2694. I hope your being sarcastic, because the guy is already a old geezer
    1
  2695.  @БидонКадыкавич-х2ц  you don’t see the irony of calling a supposed president a supreme ruler? One that honestly isn’t leaving power till he’s dead, and has had close to two generations grow up with only him in power? That throws nuclear threats around, throws massive military parades yearly, and counties to isolate his own country from the rest of the world? Ya, sounds like North Korea to me, but much bigger.
    1
  2696. I say bring it on Ruskie. I too will die for my nation if the time comes. Your nation’s crimes of the last 100 years have not been forgotten by us. May the most desperate man win.
    1
  2697.  @justinmocio4618  I mean who do you call a “shot caller”? By that logic, bush, Obama, and trump were all just figure heads.
    1
  2698. Hey, at least our leaders change every 4 years. Cant say the same for Russia.
    1
  2699. For now. But we can always replace our president. The Russians, not so much.
    1
  2700.  @zinakushnir5455  I’m looking forward to you learning proper english vatnik
    1
  2701. After seeing there performance in Ukraine, we’re not afraid of them anymore. Hell, I’d love to wipe the floor with them, if Biden would just give our military the go ahead already.
    1
  2702. Depends who’s running in the next election.
    1
  2703. No one lives forever
    1
  2704. You say that, but nobody is scrambling to move to Russia. Everyone with the ability to do so is leaving Russia, and has been since the fall the iron curtain. Not like the Russians would ever welcome foreigners into there culture to start with,
    1
  2705.  @Svetlana_Zakirova  keep watching the Suwalki gap in the in the coming months, as well as the balkans. You may be surprised.
    1
  2706.  @sj9367  thousand of dead Chechens, Syrians and Ukrainians would disagree with ya there bud.
    1
  2707. At killing people?. He sure is!
    1
  2708. Ya and you what? We can vote him out every 4 years. Mean while, the Russians only seem to be able to change leadership and the business end of a gun.
    1
  2709. At ruining Russia
    1
  2710. Then move to Russia. I’m sure you be happier there.
    1
  2711. A cadre of Oligarchs, military officers, and intelligence operators isn’t a deep state to you? Because that’s the Russian government for you.
    1
  2712. So you’d rather have a communist in charge?
    1
  2713.  @one_step_sideways  like hell they can. If they could, he wouldn’t have modified the Russian constitution to give him longer terms. Never mind all the opposition either a) being jailed or b) getting killed around election time.
    1
  2714.  @one_step_sideways  why? At least in 2 -6 years, we wont have Biden anymore. Russia will have Putin for at least another decade, and no way to get rid of him.
    1
  2715. You act like that’s a good thing.
    1
  2716. Ya, and Putin is one of them.
    1
  2717. Knowing there history, I’m not holding my breath.
    1
  2718. Man, you probably think the sky is a hologram too don’t you?
    1
  2719. Ya. All rioters belong in prison.
    1
  2720. Oh ya, because Antifa is mostly 30-40 year old white guys with previous military or police experience, have years of skills in there professions, have families, own business…. ….oh wait, no they don’t!
    1
  2721. And some lead, to be safe.
    1
  2722. Obviously plenty, judging by how many stupid Q-tards in this comment section keep being it up. The best case of "Whataboutism" i have seen in recent memory. what's the matter guys? i thought law and order was your thing.
    1
  2723.  @calsand6  again, I highly doubt. He’s not the anti establishment new comer out of no where he was back in 2016. He’s a former president that plenty people now understand how he operates and what his goals are. To be fair, if Biden is still around in 2024, I think he might just barley win re-election. I sure as hell not voting for either of them.
    1
  2724.  @calsand6  no, trump did not win. Just like how gore did not win, nor did Hilary. I’m sick of this stupid argument.
    1
  2725.  @phoenixmistertwo8815  yes please, because one report from a obscure news network is not what I’d call a reliable source. I check on that fund too, and it’s been around since 2016. Long before Harris was even Vice President. Also, you nearly lost me when you mentioned George Soros, as he seems to be always the center of every Anti-government types lately. It’s funny to think this guy can pay so many people off and not a single one of the supposedly THOUSANDS of people he pays goes and brags about it. Weird right? So, got anything else bud?
    1
  2726. Ok, go on. Show me a source of a rioter being bailed out by a democrat. We’re waiting to see this supposed high level corruption you guys keep going on about.
    1
  2727. No, just a perverted abomination of what America is.
    1
  2728. Ya, at this point, too many old timer republicans hate trump to much to nominate him as candidate. Trump could still run independent and have a good chance of winning though, unfortunately.
    1
  2729. Your right, these traitors are halarious and stupid.
    1
  2730. American here: we’re not going anywhere
    1
  2731. My brother in christ, then Ukrainians are IN Kherson right now.
    1
  2732.  @tagorechandmeah425  ok. Good luck with that Vatniks. Thanks for blowing all the bridges for the Ukrainians : )
    1
  2733. Bye bye commie 👋
    1
  2734. No, Russia doesn’t allow people to leave either. That’s why close to 700,000 fled while they had the chance
    1
  2735. It also shows the Russians arnt doing well either, and that the US basically knows Russias plans before their units do.
    1
  2736. And the Black Sea fleet sunk by NATO, never mind thousands of Pol’s seeing their chance for some vengeance against Russia
    1
  2737. Flanking attacks from where ? They’ve got the Russians stuck in a couldron, with the Sea and Dinipro river on there flanks.
    1
  2738. Basically Skyrim world travel in a netshell
    1
  2739. Why don’t the Russians GO HOME already?
    1
  2740. Better, we’ll send them the weapons they need to free their country
    1
  2741. Seeing Russians get stacked like cardwood has been the ant use of my tax money in years 🇺🇸👍
    1
  2742. Glad to see my tax money put Russians in the dirt 🇺🇸👍
    1
  2743. No more appeasement for the Russians. And I like seeing my tax money vaporize Russian conscripts 🇺🇸👍
    1
  2744. And they keep taking back more of their country from the Russians
    1
  2745. Hey, the Russians seem to think our weapons are worth constant nuclear threats, so we must be doing something right 🤷‍♂️
    1
  2746. Lol, this isn’t the 1960s anymore bud. We didn’t need Ukraine to station missiles in jt.
    1
  2747. No, they will liberate their country from the Russian invaders
    1
  2748.  @fallenkeith5885  it’s literally right next to Zaphoriza oblast…..
    1
  2749.  @shazmohd7803  go ahead, tell me Kherson is Russian forever again😂🤣
    1
  2750. And on the battlefield.
    1
  2751. Bring it, put your money where your mouth is traitor.
    1
  2752. You know, as the technology for making Drones becomes more common place, won’t there Counter measures become come place as well.? We made tanks. Some one made anti-tank guns and launches. Now even insurgences have things like ATGMS. So, if drones become more common, won’t the weapons to counter them become common as well?
    1
  2753. What did he have some super villain museum in his house?
    1
  2754. And the US just, for some reason , doesn’t just retaliate with nukes back ?
    1
  2755.  @Tyi276  I think your overestimating china, who not only has infringed apon the sovereignty of other nations before, but has not shown any willingness to economically or militarily support any other nation outside of China. America meanwhile, has done both those things time and time again.
    1
  2756.  @Tyi276  I did, and I think it’s not going anywhere. France would lose too much not being in NATO.
    1
  2757.  @Tyi276  so why did it literally get another member just last week then bud?
    1
  2758.  @Tyi276  I mean sure, it might, but odor of the developed world is with the US. For example, it’s going to be tough seeing France give up its position in NATO, it’s influence over west Africa and its independent military policy in favor of being in alliance with China and at odds with all its historical Allies. And a lot of these countries trying to join “BRICS” have this same issue. I’m still trying to figure out what the hell South Africa and Brazil add to BRICS except more Welfare checks for China and India to sign.
    1
  2759.  @Tyi276  yes, because China and India are the 2 main members of BRICS. You’d think they would be coordinating with each on issues rather then competing, like Mexico and america do
    1
  2760.  @Tyi276  india is already a member of BRICS, and that hasn’t stopped them from Having border skirmishes with fellow BRICS member China. And I really don’t see what Mexico gets out of cutting its self off from its biggest trading partner, America, not what Turkey gets for cutting itself off its biggest security provider. In any case, I recommend watching Whatifaltists video he did in BRICS last month, so you can see how dysfunctional this “alliance” is.
    1
  2761. How the hell is Mexico, our second largest trading partner behind China not an ally? Turkey is a member of NATO, and I don’t see India being an enemy any time soon.
    1
  2762. Yes, they can. Which is why cutting off oil to China is not really possible now, so the priority should be sinking as much of the PLAN as possible instead.
    1
  2763. I think your just and Incel that’s too much of pussy to actually do something with your life. But hey, maybe that’s a good thing. If you can’t make it out of your moms basement, your definitely won’t make it in the military 😂
    1
  2764. As if we need a large US military (especially the land forces) with our huge networks of global Allies and the worlds largest Air Force and navy )by tonnage) to back them up with
    1
  2765.  @pc_suffering6941  nice whataboutism comrade. if you want to be Russian so badly, go back to Russia.
    1
  2766. Why “sadly” for you?
    1
  2767.  @quagmoe7879  what new information, other then the Ukrainians have taken more settlements as of today?
    1
  2768. The leaked reports also state both sides have less then 100,000 dead, which makes me wonder if there not accurate or purposely false information.
    1
  2769. Your right. Unlike Ukraine, the US can end the war almost immediately, if it unleashed its submarine force on the Chinese landing force while it tries to cross the strait. After that, destroying the PLAN over a period of time would end the war outright.
    1
  2770. Are you kidding? The war in Ukraine alone has sparked a mass military industry expansion in the west in the last year and a half that wasn’t seen in the 20 year long war in Afghanistan.
    1
  2771. Lol. We haven’t even shown up to fight yet, and Russians can’t even take a bombed out wasteland after 9 months of fighting 😂 Putin’s going to fight to the last Russian at this rate.
    1
  2772. And what if it happens by the end of this month instead?
    1
  2773. Oh ya because the ruskies and Chinese did so well against the afghans and Vietnamese too right? Oh wait….😂
    1
  2774.  @Admiral_Jezza  well Vaush also asked a lot of good questions, to which Whatalthist ignored and just kept rambling off statistics and information from books (even if they had nothing to do with the question) instead of Addressing the questions Vaush had.
    1
  2775. That debate was embarrassing to Whatifalthis. I actually lost a bit of respect for the guy.
    1
  2776. To give you an idea of Chinese nuclear strike capabilities in the 60s: poor. Hell the soviets nuclear capability was very poor during OTL Korean War, essentially relying on a B-29 knock off (NATO callsign Bear) And the TU-16 (NATO callsign Badger) China in turn had a knock of of the TU-16 (which they still use to this day). It’s operational range could threaten Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and Thailand, but not the US mainland. Honestly China’s best option in a nuclear war in the 60s would have been against US assets in Asia or in the tactical role against our ground forces in Vietnam. In turn (assuming the soviets don’t get involved, as they had parallel capabilities in the 60s) we would have glassed China with our massive fleet of nuclear armed B-52s (capable of crossing the pacific in one trip), and our land and submarine base ICBMS.
    1
  2777. My brother in christ, all we’ve done is over estimate Russia. They’re really not as strong as they say they are.
    1
  2778.  @j.c.denton2060 if it wasn’t, the Soviets would have won the Cold War 🤷‍♂️
    1
  2779. This is nothing but cope.
    1
  2780.  @quagmoe7879  your autistic
    1
  2781.  @harrymason4300  only to tree hugging old men talking to themselves in there shitty little shacks in the wilderness, thinking there next Socrates…..as they put bombs in peoples mail boxes…… Because that will totally bring down the industrialized world……
    1
  2782. Not at all. There are far less operational nuclear weapons then there where pre-1991. Theirs also far less delivery platforms then they had back then too. If a nuclear war happens today, it would be no where near as horrible as, say, the Cuban missile crisis going hot.
    1
  2783. Touch grass.
    1
  2784. Or you know, fight the fascists/communists and kick there teeth in before they become a problem. Just saying.
    1
  2785. Arnt we all
    1
  2786.  @innosam123  and what makes you think a another hypothetical one here would be any different? Sure, foreign involvement would be very limited, I’ll agree on that, but im not confident the many accelerationist groups or racial supremacy groups that would come out of the wood work are going to care much about stability.
    1
  2787.  @innosam123  which they probably will.
    1
  2788. Which is why it wouldn’t be “left vs right” rather “crazy ideology one vs crazy ideology 2 vs religious cult vs police vs self defence militia vs military vs neo-Nazis vs communist vs…..” You get the idea. Literally dozens of factions fighting it out. Making the Syrian civil war look tame in comparison.
    1
  2789.  @somethingsomething8511  congrats. Your the Syrian rebels and Russian conscripts getting their asses kicked right now.
    1
  2790.  @StarboyXL9  hail the Republic
    1
  2791.  @WilliamMcAdams  I…..what’s with the warhammer reference? How the actual fuck does that have any relevance on what we’re talking about? Are you actual high? Or did you hit your thick head on something bud?
    1
  2792.  @historyrepeat402  you aren’t an American then, that’s for sure.
    1
  2793. I’m convinced the military would either become its own faction out right, or stand by the federal government. Their is no history of rebellion or insubordination in the us military, save for our one Civil war. And it didn’t end well for the rebellious soldiers.
    1
  2794. I agree with this statement.
    1
  2795.  @Grafknar  oh no, not a bunch of middle aged men with families and careers and degraded health!
    1
  2796. @Smally Bigs the asymmetric war wasn’t on our home turf. You can’t just quite, pack up and go home if home is where the war is . The US military would fight much harder and would have a greater incentive to win, if it was their homes and families at stake at the hands of terrorists.
    1
  2797.  @haroldfarquad6886  will do pal 👍
    1
  2798.  @haroldfarquad6886  preferably, don’t get involved with those people. It never ends well.
    1
  2799.  @prettyboyjeremy  if he did, why did he come from out of town?
    1
  2800.  @manbabymonke  again, he didn’t have to be their with the trouble makers. Let alone with a gun.
    1
  2801. In what fucking universe does a civil war “relieve tension” and not cause generational trauma and resentment among the survivors? Are you actually high?
    1
  2802. Ya, I agree a lot with MR.Z second video. I don’t agree much with his politics all the time, but that video was very accurate.
    1
  2803. Space aliens?
    1
  2804.  @monad_tcp  you’ll be surprised. The American left has been one of the biggest reasons why gun and ammo sales have been through the roof after 2020. A lot of leftist are getting armed now, and for the first time in decades, leftist militias are a thing again in America. Don’t be too shocked, if a war does happen, that the left shoots back.
    1
  2805.  @dairoleon2682  how the hell do you not know about at least the siege of Vicksburg? It literally help split the confederacy in three!
    1
  2806. Makes you think how insecure men are that they think soy is some kind of “anti-male” juice.
    1
  2807. Don’t count on it bud.
    1
  2808. @fd-to7excalm down, your acting like a snowflake.
    1
  2809. And the rest of us will gladly fight said dictator.
    1
  2810. Much homo
    1
  2811.  @matheuspinho4987  No problem kid👍
    1
  2812. Good luck with that bud, don’t forget to take the trash out upstairs for your mom either😉
    1
  2813. That guy is an idiot.
    1
  2814.  @liaratsoni8556  that’s what a communist would say…
    1
  2815. Well I’ll be damned, and actual Podasist.
    1
  2816. Pfff...Australia is easy to invade. You take its 4 major coastal cities and you basically have the whole thing. Kinda like Canada... HOI 4 taught me that.....
    1
  2817.  @hansloyalitat9774  dogfighting? Who do you think they would be fighting? I assumed it would be just other guerrilla forces that have no AirPower. The Cessnas are perfect for that. Honestly, they would be better off getting a bunch of SAMs or MANPADS to take on enemy planes vs having to train fighter pilots and maintain very expensive modern aircraft.
    1
  2818. How so?
    1
  2819. Indeed. If we weren’t, we wouldn’t have contrarian views like this comment.
    1
  2820. F
    1
  2821. The truth is, I’d the Russians would go home already, this war would be over in days. Until then, I hope we keep the Lend Lease up 👍🇺🇸
    1
  2822. The majority of the internet would disagree with your last part bud. I don’t know about you, but I did protest the Iraq war back in the day for 3 years, but damn it, you can only take getting eggs thrown at you and called a “traitor” for so long….
    1
  2823.  @Anticommunism99  ya, it is. 46 presidents to Russias 2 is proof it is still a better system
    1
  2824. F
    1
  2825. Like?
    1
  2826.  @danielh1771  so basically, it’s a weird right wing den for creators that no one but their own echo chambers listen to on a daily basis ?
    1
  2827.  @danielh1771  I don’t know what universe Bitchute and Rumble are “blowing up” in but it sure isn’t this one. I don’t know any people who “Bitchuters” or “Rumblers” , but I can name 10 professional YouTubers off hand. And CNN “collapsing” is news to me (pardon the pun), because their still the most watched news channels in the world, despite there lack luster reporting.
    1
  2828.  @irinaromanova6200  fuck. Like has Putin ever heard of the “sunk cost fallacy”, or does he think that’s “western propaganda” too?
    1
  2829. The greatest act of patriotism, is to call out your counties bullshit. You Vatniks can’t even call this mess “ a war” without a one way ticket to the gulag.
    1
  2830. They can try. They’ll lose.
    1
  2831. It tends to be more accurate though. Their recent success and Russia’s many humiliations have shown that much.
    1
  2832. Keep coping and crying vatnik. How’s it feel to have zelensky make Russia the biggest joke in the world? Best comedian ever!
    1
  2833. No. He’s the one with more then 2 working braincells.
    1
  2834. Aw yes. Give thousand apon thousands of people who hate your guys guns and ammo. Great idea Putin 🙄
    1
  2835. How?
    1
  2836.  @jadenjerries2094 like what?
    1
  2837. How about no. Because it’s not false.
    1
  2838.  @Olga-obzor  welp. It’s 48F here. Chilly, but then again, it was 72F yesterday.
    1
  2839. Hahahah you funny vatnik
    1
  2840. Hahahah you funny vatnik
    1
  2841.  @jeandurtal8404  no I just think your conveniently ignoring the last 70 years of our media relegating black people to token characters and comedic relief, of the literally thousand’s of white stars and characters in our media and culture but hey, I guess you morons out there can’t handle a sizeable part of population sharing the lime light too for once. Have a good one buddy👍
    1
  2842.  @jeandurtal8404  sure go on. I’m really curious what other crap your going to copy paste over from other Incels in the internet these days.
    1
  2843.  @jeandurtal8404  again, I live in a state that’s population is close to 40% black, and have never seen any of that crap here. And go ahead buddy, name something we’re black people are “lionized” here. I’ll wait.
    1
  2844. Bruh, I’ve lived most of my life in Louisiana. Never been told to bow down to a black person once. It’s not like the Russians know how non-white people are like anyway. They’d have a heart attack if they came to New Orleans.
    1
  2845.  @francisdrake6093  ah yes because we’re the ones that invaded Ukraine right? And Russia can’t even hold what it’s got so far, let alone win this stupid war IT started.
    1
  2846. It’s fighting for survival by starting a war it didn’t have to fight? It could all end tomorrow, if the ruskies went home already.
    1
  2847. Bye bye buddy 👋
    1
  2848.  @samstoned  why? Watching the Russians get completely fucked online in 4K has been the best use of my tax money I’ve ever seen.
    1
  2849. If you believe Russian propaganda, I don’t think you have a brain. Because your perception of the war changes by the month, while your told your constantly “winning” by running back further by the month…. Still waiting for the Russians to show off the “bio-labs” they’ve found and Satanist cults their fighting….
    1
  2850. I hope that sarcasm
    1
  2851. literally a Metal Gear game plot
    1
  2852. Black Water probably wishes it had the manpower, materiel, and political power Wagner has….
    1
  2853. After this stunt, no. This takes the cake for most inane political stunt of the 21st century.
    1
  2854. Oh man, what a difference 🙄
    1
  2855. don’t drink it Roman. It might be from the FSB
    1
  2856.  @sammiller6631  it’s had an Airforce the entire war.
    1
  2857.  @islammehmeov2334 and Houthi rebels can’t even cause a single US loss in over a year of fighting…
    1
  2858.  @bowser3017 yes, it does. For one, Ukraine wouldn’t have an airforce still, almost 3 years into a major conventional war.
    1
  2859. Should it be a war crime to completely bore a countries population to death? Because I feel like this is what we’re trying to do…..
    1
  2860. im sorry NFKRZ...
    1
  2861. Anyone else getting BF2142 vibes from the buildings and the snow? Just the wide open ness and these huge buildings contrasting with the flat snow really gives off that look for me.
    1
  2862. Fat chance. They have NATO protection now.
    1
  2863.  @wieran666  same
    1
  2864. “Sergei, defend the Burger House”
    1
  2865. It’s a losing strategy. Trust us, it doesn’t end well.
    1
  2866. F
    1
  2867. Yes, because Russia is such a paragon do conservatism right comrade? 🙄
    1
  2868. Seeing ruskie conscripts get vaporized by my tax money has been awesome to see👍🇺🇸
    1
  2869. That’s because your actually allowed to know the real state of your country. The majority Russians will truly never know how bad they have it. And the few that do, did what Roman did, and left for greener pastures. It’s hard to love your country, until you see how other people have it.
    1
  2870.  @toromontana8290 he wants to claim ethnically Canadian lands back from America? 🤡
    1
  2871.  @j0hn00arthur if woke means being anything else but what Russia is, not a bad deal I’d say.
    1
  2872.  @Freespeechrestrictedonyoutube  nah, odds are he “falls out of the shower” into some bullets instead…..
    1
  2873.  @gytis296 least based Pol.
    1
  2874.  @witherdaway8762 you will never be a great power again, comrade tankie🤡
    1
  2875. It’s about 80 rubles to make 1 dollar, give it take some change.
    1
  2876.  @ЛюдмилаК-х5з no, Ukraine will kick every last Ruskie back to Russia. Seeing Ruskie conscripts get vaporized has been the Best use of my tax money in decades 👍🇺🇸
    1
  2877. In what way bud?
    1
  2878. Based.
    1
  2879. Good job buddy. Best of luck to you.
    1
  2880. No, the CIA ones would like a cross between low budget porno and a high school PSA with crappy writing.
    1
  2881.  @aresnir2725 and I for the life of me can’t understand why.
    1
  2882. Indeed.
    1
  2883.  @andrereloaded1425 how many nations has America annexed into itself again?
    1
  2884. Not at all.
    1
  2885. Neutrality only enables fascism. Sweden stood by and did nothing as the Nazis destroyed Europe, and the Swiss could have decimated the Nazi economy if they had stood with the Allies and nationalized the Nazis gold reserve they held.
    1
  2886.  @RRRR0707  take your pills man.
    1
  2887.  @Yuushiboy  except Gotland apparently.
    1
  2888. Ain’t that crazy? 80+ days later, and no air Superiority has been achieved. That’s heresy to the American military.
    1
  2889.  @gerchop9304  bro, Iraq took us 43 days to take, and we didn’t even take a quarter of Russia has lost! We sure as hell didn’t lose 600+ tanks and AFVs, a capital ship, and dozens of expensive planes and helicopters either. If even the rumored 13,000 dead and wounded they have suffered is even half tight, that’s still 2x more casualties then we Americans lost in 20 years of war in the Middle East…..IN 2 MONTHS of fighting!
    1
  2890. Russian fascists kill civilians everyday
    1
  2891.  @BruceLee-pr1md  your right, it is funny watching the Russians fail so hard.
    1
  2892. Indeed.
    1
  2893. Well they’ve probably been used up by now, or simply ran out of batteries for them, being that there cut off from friendly forces.
    1
  2894.  @АртемМельников-с9п  I don’t speak that language and I don’t have a translation available right now.
    1
  2895.  @АртемМельников-с9п  Ukrainian loss are high too. at least 10,000 dead or wounded (military at least), at least 200 tanks and AFVs destroyed, 20 fixed wing aircraft destroyed, and if i had to guess, most of there older soviet era towed artillery. its less than Russia's losses, but sill very high unfortunately.
    1
  2896. Ya. Most definitely
    1
  2897. It’s kinda nuts a single American billionaire is basically keeping Ukraine comms and recon abilities alive. This one guy’s product is saving a country.
    1
  2898.  @jeanclaudejunior  what are you going on about?
    1
  2899. So why does Putin not wanting it to expand?
    1
  2900.  @sexynelson100 cope harder vatnik. It’s not NATO invading Ukraine right now.
    1
  2901.  @astroboirap I know, you really need to take a shower commie. Been in your mom’s basement too long.
    1
  2902. Cope harder tankie
    1
  2903. If Putin doesn’t like it, he should pull of of Ukraine then.
    1
  2904.  @Pilky-Bs2Mc  no, he’s just being dramatic
    1
  2905. Why, because you’re a Ruskie conscript?
    1
  2906.  @rae6918  nope.
    1
  2907. And if he loses?
    1
  2908. They didn’t even take a city, they took a suburb of a city they controlled for 8 years prior…..
    1
  2909. You think a US spokesperson has any control over a British prime minister ? 😂
    1
  2910.  @neilkaippallil8390  no they did not. There’s plenty of footage through out the war of the Ukrainian Air Force flying missions against the Russians. Lucky for them, the Czechs and Pols still made parts locally for their own Migs, and have been supplying them with spares.
    1
  2911.  @neilkaippallil8390  the Ukrainian aorforce is most certainly not destroyed. Just last week, Poland agreed to upgrade Ukrainian SU-24’s to fire SCALP long range missiles. And UAF SU-27s and mig-29s are still flying around defending the Ukrainians cities. And then Theres ATACMS and Tatchka-U’s Ukraine has too. and the increasing amount of drones they’re getting.
    1
  2912. And then Ukraine will do the same,…because by abandoning Kherson, Ukrainians artillery and HIMARS can hit Russian back line, including parts of Crimea.
    1
  2913. Cope harder bud. Their not the ones running away.
    1
  2914. For Russia
    1
  2915. They’re not the ones defending, nor are they getting lend lease like last time.
    1
  2916. By losing 5 cities in 3 months?
    1
  2917.  @LordLebu  probably because there’s a lot less Middle Aged Russian men around these days to take up line space 🥴
    1
  2918. Pretty good. How’s the fast food situation in Moscow?
    1
  2919. Perhaps Russia should have treated its former Warsaw Pact “comrades” better, because they wouldn’t have joined NATO out of fear fear being invaded like Ukraine is now.
    1
  2920.  @Sveta7  oh yes, because it’s the US that’s invading Ukraine right now….
    1
  2921. Hey, I love seeing my tax money in action. The war could end tomorrow, if Russia just went home already.
    1
  2922.  @84dorgy84  hey, still waiting to “freeze to death” here in my cozy home and with my non-toilet paper money Ruskie 🇺🇸
    1
  2923. Eh, we’re going to need our HIMARS back after wards.
    1
  2924. To bad the Ukrainians don’t intend to cross the river anyways 🤷‍♂️
    1
  2925. Why? Because your a sore loser Ruskie?
    1
  2926. Pacifism is inherently pro-fascist. And compared to Afghanistan, this is the best investment of our tax money we’ve made in decades
    1
  2927. But we are removing them now. It’s slow going, but it’s happening,
    1
  2928. I’m not worried. Given there performance last time, they won’t last long in a fight.
    1
  2929. Why? That guy was an idiot.
    1
  2930.  @zollen123  I mean cool, but that’s how you get mutinies. Which given Russian history, seems to be the norm when things look bad for them.
    1
  2931. They probably can’t afford to mobilize more people.
    1
  2932.  @jeremybeau8334  again, they said the same thing about Kherson, Lyman, Izyum and Kharkiv, and now look we’re they are. Russia is a joke
    1
  2933.  @jeremybeau8334  they said they “weren’t going anywhere” about Kherson. And now look who has the city now. Putin Fucked around and now he’s about to find out why America doesn’t have universal healthcare. And I’m all for it! And when the Ukrainians take back Crimea one of these days, I’ll be back here to lick up your salty vatnik tears!
    1
  2934. Hey, he’s still the worlds best comedian. He made all of Russia into a joke.
    1
  2935.  @keithknechtel7460  with American oil from Our fuel dumps we have over there. Europe might have a entertain crisis sure, but America is just fine
    1
  2936.  @keithknechtel7460  you are aware diesel locomotives are thing right? And the Ukrainian railway workers have been doing wonders to keep the tracks up. Kherson couldn’t have been won back with out them repairing the rails near Odessa constantly.
    1
  2937. Cope harder buddy, our tax money is beating a supposed “super power” on the battlefield, without a single one of our guys being in the heat of it. I’d call that best use of our tax money in decades.
    1
  2938. They’ve said that before. Still waiting pal
    1
  2939. Count only the amount of Russians our weapons kill.
    1
  2940. I’m sure some Ukrainian mother or father considers their child funeral bill to be rather obscene too. But hey, least you have a roof over your head right?
    1
  2941. Oh ya? Like who?
    1
  2942. We won’t spare any Russians either then.
    1
  2943. Makes you wonder if it’s actually a diversion at all.
    1
  2944.  @ThomasTomiczek  I’m sure they getting trained in Poland, Romanian, and Germany. Because that’s were there picking their weapons up from.
    1
  2945. Wouldn’t surprise me if they still have some of those milita guys from the start of the war somewhere in the rear being trained up to be actual soldiers while all this other fighting is going on.
    1
  2946. So what the hell are they fighting for then if they just shell and flatten everything? Their invasion is just stupid.
    1
  2947.  @alinpetrescu2309  ya, and they are going to have less meat later on, as the people they lose now won’t be making more Russians later down the road. This war has only worsened there demographical decline.
    1
  2948. I know right?
    1
  2949.  @giawou6615  the Ukrainian people, their history and their culture go back FAR longer then the modern state of Russia, or the Soviet Union. All the way back to the Kievian Rus peoples thousand of years ago. Anyone who actually learns history, instead of willing swallowing Russian propaganda all day would know that.
    1
  2950. It’s almost like BOTH combatants are great winter fighters or something, because they were in the same military force not too long ago….
    1
  2951.  @imperium_vox  we’ll wait no more. Because they gunning for Crimea next year.
    1
  2952.  @palerewin  no, they don’t.
    1
  2953. So why do the Russians use theres? Sense they don’t have air support either.
    1
  2954. It takes literally a few weeks to train a tank crew.
    1
  2955. The EU does. And Germany now is giving there consent to the rest of the counties to send there’s over.
    1
  2956. Ya. Good job France
    1
  2957.  @HilarityBribo  a real American would support Ukraine in its battle for its freedom and independence from a foreign invader.
    1
  2958.  @palerewin  I find it hard to believe because 1) Ukraine would run out of money by now with that many mercs, 2) people in the west would start wondering were hundreds of thousands of their loved ones went in Peace time and 3) even mercenaries ( that arnt part of Wagner) would see how much of a meat grinder the frontlines this war is and “Nope” out of it. They might want money, but all the money in the world is useless of your dead.
    1
  2959. Or at least some US bases.
    1
  2960.  @ddurb8656  how about no? He’s free to make what ever he wants.
    1
  2961. Why? None of our guys are fighting in Ukraine.
    1
  2962.  @Padenie  I mean hey, TASS is a website, go check it out for yourself bud. : )
    1
  2963.  @Padenie  TASS is Russian news.
    1
  2964.  @Padenie  no that’s just listening to TASS
    1
  2965.  @Padenie  sure buddy, I guess Moskava sunk in a storm too huh? And the Ukrainians Have the power of satan helping them out too right? : ) And now suddenly ukriane is making WMD’s? gee…. where have I heard that bullshit before??? What Russia ran out of good excuses for this stupid war and just started copying America?? 🤷‍♂️
    1
  2966.  @Padenie  in good time? What like how Kyiv was going to fall in a week? How all of Ukraine’s eastern forces were suppose to be encircled? How the Russians were suppose to take back all the ground they lost in the north? Ya ok buddy sure….I guess when the Russian leave Kherson too, it will just be a “gester of good will” again, right?
    1
  2967. Cope harder Vatnik. The Russians can’t even take Bakmut, let alone push the Ukrainians all the way back to Odessa at this point.
    1
  2968. Ukriane isn’t the one invading now is it?
    1
  2969. Are they ? Because there still doing better then the russians are right now.
    1
  2970. Probably, we’ve been shipping them tons of it over the course of this war.
    1
  2971. We’ll do just fine.
    1
  2972. Then why do the Russians keep losing ground and have to resort to less industrial powers like Iran for supplies?
    1
  2973. All of America’s politicians are supported by the MIC lobby. And if they want to keep that support, they’ll keep helping Ukraine.
    1
  2974. Cool. Let them waste there ammo. NATO will just give the Ukrainians more supplies to drive the communists out.
    1
  2975. My brother and Christ, they literally struck Sevastopol a week ago with a drone swarm, and we got even MORE supplies going to Ukraine this month.! And let me tell ya, Zelensky truly is the best comedian in the world. He made all of Russia into a joke!
    1
  2976. Would Mexico even want them back? Seeing how they can’t even control chunks of their own country?
    1
  2977.  @chrisbruhe  I hope they join NATO as soon as this war is over then.
    1
  2978. No my friend, there simply drooling over the money there military industrial complex is about to make. Russia is about to figure out how America traditionally makes bank. Warfare.
    1
  2979. And I love it. Take that Russia! That’s for supporting Vietnam back in the day! How’s it feel Putin?
    1
  2980. Well they’ve failed to take any “armies” or any other major cited for that matter. Hell, by not taking the cities, they basically giving Ukrainians all the transport, logistic, communication and manufacturing hubs to use to kill Russians with. This isn’t the 19th century we’re destroying a nation’s army in the felid was the end of a conflict.
    1
  2981. Agreed. Modern weapons and technology have leveled the playing field between great powers and lesser powers.
    1
  2982. Hey, if he didn’t want to face western weapons, he shouldn’t have invaded Ukraine. Now that we got Lends Lease 2.0 in effect, Ukraine basically has the entire US military industrial complex backing them now. Sucks to suck huh Putin?
    1
  2983. True. Our military suffers at asymmetrical warfare. But at least I can rest easy, knowing the Russians suck at it too. 😊
    1
  2984. Could have been avoided if Russia didn’t invade in the first place.
    1
  2985.  @unknownentity8256  noice copium.
    1
  2986. A gold standard? Wow, that’s going to fail SO fast when they realize they don’t have enough gold stored to run a modern nation state. Why do you think we all switched to Fiat currency’s? Wait, you probably don’t. Because anyone with some basic understanding of modern economics would laugh at the statement “backed by gold”.😅
    1
  2987. Who’s “we?” You one of those Vatniks willing to burn the world for some washed up KGB goon?
    1
  2988. Hey, war production got us out of it last time. Some one got to fill all these Ukrainian and Polish weapon orders. Not to mention the energy needs of Europe might just jump start are oil industry again.
    1
  2989. No more appeasement. I say we burry the Putin’s things beneath our lend leases weapons!
    1
  2990. More like, liberating them selves from Russia influence.
    1
  2991. “No problem, we got you fam” - americas 700 billion dollar a year military budget.
    1
  2992. Oh so your planning on invading Finland and Sweden too now? Gee I wonder why people keep joining nato….
    1
  2993. The US is not the brink of collapse? That’s news to me here in Louisiana. I told my friend this, and he spat out his sweet tea. How much copium did you take today comrade? Gotten any of that toilet paper you call rubles lately?
    1
  2994. Then I’m ready to fight WW3
    1
  2995. Are you kidding? Your talking to the country that spent AT LEAST 12 billion A MONTH on the war on terror for 20 years. for about 3 TRILLION dollars total, we got : -our international reputation ruined -aliened our allies -gained thousands of crippled and mentally scared veterans (many of who are living on the streets) -over funded our military at the cost of EVERYTHING else -killed at least half a million civilians of foreign nations, further increasing anti-US sentiment. -gained literally NOTHING for 20 years of fighting in the end. now, for just 13 billion a month (roughly) supporting Ukraine we get: +NATO becoming relevant again +2 new NATO members (Finland and Sweden), and turning the Baltic Sea into a “NATO lake” +our arms industry will see a massive boost in sales, creating plenty of new jobs for our economy +if Biden gets his head out of his ass, our oil industry is about see a massive boom, now that Europe is cut off from Russian fuel. +we get to humiliate Putin and stop any further Russian aggression +plenty of awsome combat footage on the internet to dunk on Russia for decades to come +we get to be the “arsenal of democracy again” and try snd rebuild our international reputation. I’d say we’re making a killing off this war.
    1
  2996. Afghanistan basically I’d what we think
    1
  2997.  user-vv2zl9be9d  they are.
    1
  2998.  @guate4  my brother in christ, the Kherson’s garrison was Russia’s last real threat to Odessa. Not only that, but now more Russian rear-line logistics are now in HIMARS range. Including parts of Crimea. How the hell can you say Kherson had “no military value”?
    1
  2999. And? The Russians are still giving up a regional capital in a area that they annexed into their country. Which technically means, Kherson is the first “Russian” city to fall in this war.
    1
  3000.  @jeanlamourUK  why? There no need to cross the river, and neither side cam really do it without taking huge losses. and now Russian backline logistics, and parts of Crimea, are well within HIMARS range. I call this an absolute win for Ukraine👍
    1
  3001. Ya, that’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Russia isn’t on the defense in its own country this time. And general winter isn’t coming to help it this time either. Cope harder vatnik.
    1
  3002. And climate change might just save the west….what a cursed timeline we live in eh?
    1
  3003. No. The Ukrainians should take back ALL that’s theirs. That means Crimea too.
    1
  3004. For what? They blew every bridge when they ran away, and Russian navy is too scared to leave port right now.
    1
  3005. No. Unlike the Russians the Ukrainians don’t like to make mass graves everywhere they occupy.
    1
  3006. Most likely
    1
  3007.  @Naurrrrrrrrr  France can get gas else where, and who needs gold anymore? 🤡
    1
  3008. You forget the sort where Russia takes that money from The EU, dumps it into its military, and then carry’s out more imperialist wars of annexation and conquest. Like there doing to Ukraine now. No thank you to fueling the Russians war machine.
    1
  3009.  @walterthecat2145  still think this is "a lost war", after the Ukrainians just rolled back all of Russia's early summer gains in the NE as of today?
    1
  3010.  @Lightendaltrax  so....still think that way after all the latest advances the ukranians have made? or do even more Ukrainian flags need to be raised over Russian held towns?
    1
  3011.  @Lightendaltrax  no, Europe had the marshal plan to help them recover. Ukraine will get the same treatment once this is over.
    1
  3012.  @Lightendaltrax  they said the same thing after ww2 about Europe. Now look at them. The same can’t be said for Russia after this mess is over. Forget sanctions, it’s going to be surrounded by NATO members and has lost most of its available military forces.
    1
  3013.  @walterthecat2145  with American help, yes. The fact there’s still fighting a conventional war with Russia, 6 months later is proof to me.
    1
  3014.  @walterthecat2145  because it’s not lost. Hell, it’s not even close to over yet.
    1
  3015. No. It’s awesome to see a country obliterate invaders with our weapons and secure its independence
    1
  3016. Then it’s the most benign dictatorship In history
    1
  3017. Cool fan fic bro.
    1
  3018.  @robsurname4054  and my answer stands. Go home ruskies
    1
  3019.  @robsurname4054  cool history lesson. Now go home ruskies
    1
  3020. And? The piles of corpses it took to take it is hilarious. 😂 All for a salt mine
    1
  3021.  @ra5294  ok, but Ukraine didn’t have the manpower or the amount of NATO supplies weapons it has now either. Any major push made by the Russians would just see its supply units decimated as they get stretched out to support an advance. And then of course, as ukriane gets more AFVs and other vehicles, the ability for them to launch larger, more mobile counter attacks becomes more of an option, as well as provide Ukraine the ability to conduct mobile defences and delaying tactics against the Russians. So, if Bakmut is anything to go by, the Russians are going to be at this for QUITE some time before the Ukrainians break.
    1
  3022.  @ra5294  and then they run into the next Ukrainian defense line and get held up for another 6 months. While the Ukrainians take back more land else where. Probably kremenia
    1
  3023. Or the Ukrainians counter attack and take it back.
    1
  3024. All of them
    1
  3025.  @Ston247  if by “defend themselves” you mean murder unarmed civilians of certain races and ethnicity’s and come up with excuses to Annex neighboring nations lands, then yes. That’s very right wing.
    1
  3026. Ya, that’s right wing bud.
    1
  3027.  @ReturnoftheLightning  no, they’re appearing in real life to. Just a few weeks ago, just before Christmas, I had some Patriot front f@ckers doing a rally in my home town. Fascism is very much a rising issue again.
    1
  3028. Cool story bro. I hope we send more weapons to Ukraine now.
    1
  3029. Who’s afraid? Seeing Russia’s poor performance this war, I hope we intervene on the Ukrainian side. We would wipe the floor with the Russians.
    1
  3030.  @johnswanson4266  dream on. Everyone knows Russia can’t keep this up for ever. Ukraine will be Russia’s Vietnam.
    1
  3031. They said the same thing about South Korea back in the day. Now look at them.
    1
  3032. Only when Russia stops supporting communists.
    1
  3033. Russia should pack up and go home. We’ll keep Ukraine in the fight as long as it takes.
    1
  3034. No more appeasement. We either impale the Russian bear in Ukraine, or we do it in Alaska, Estonia, or Poland.
    1
  3035.  @GEngineerAU apparently they can’t even do that right, seeing how they lost 8,000+km of it back to ukriane, including a city ol’Vlad himself called “Russian forever”. Apparently Putin didn’t get the memo, that you can only “add land” to your country, if the other guy doesn’t fight for it back….. Not that Russia needs any more land….
    1
  3036.  @lynnjenkins8732  exactly. Nuclear proliferation is inevitable now.
    1
  3037. Cool. Guess we’ll start giving nuclear secrets to the Ukrainians too.
    1
  3038. And Russia can’t stop us either.
    1
  3039. Except Yemen is kicking Saudi @$$ and we’re cheering them on. And what do you mean it’s not a “big deal “ when America goes to war? were still getting shit for 2003 , let alone the f@ck-up that was Afghanistan. Pull your head out of you @$$ and maybe you would see that.
    1
  3040. Hey, still waiting bud. Bring it on.
    1
  3041.  @samuelthurman5331  ok, so they use some home made drones, domestic arms, and domestically trained spec ops to attack then. I don’t see the issue here.
    1
  3042. Im sure NATO wouldn’t mind some cross-border raids by special forces. They didn’t seem to mind with the Ukrainian drone attacks on oil refinery’s near Belgorod months ago.
    1
  3043.  @Jay...777  I have no idea where you got that idea. We have tons of basic ammunition and guns left over from the war on terror. The only thing we’re running low on is the more advanced shoulder-fired Stinger and Javelin launchers
    1
  3044.  @Jay...777  well I guess we’ll just send more western made guns and ammo then. We got plenty.
    1
  3045. Indeed. I hope they do. Maybe send some “unmarked” troops in, to give Russia a taste of its own medicine.
    1
  3046. After 13 months of war? Probably. They’ve had since serverdonensk fell last June to prepare emplacements and trenches
    1
  3047. So why did Russia focus so much on it rather then literally anywhere else on the front ?
    1
  3048. Yes, we can. What do you think all these allies we have are for?
    1
  3049. 👋 bye bye
    1
  3050. Fat chance buddy. They haven’t done it yet, and we’ll make Russia pay for every inch.
    1
  3051. How about shove peace up your ass and help us crush our long time enemy. No more appeasement for Russia.
    1
  3052. Buddy, If NATO was actually directly involved, their wouldn’t be any Russians left in Kherson at this point. It would be the Highway Of Death all over again.
    1
  3053. They did have a break through on the northern part last month, but it once again turned into an artillery duel due to the Mud season. In the mean time, at least the Ukrainians were able to hit Crimea with a mass drone attack.
    1
  3054. They had almost 1/3 of Ukraine months ago, and continue to lose more of there conquests. Sounds like losing to me.
    1
  3055. They do??? Because man, I clearly remember them losing 2 million troops in needless encirclements, for over a YEAR untill winter saved their asses at the gates of Moscow
    1
  3056. What do you mean? The counter attack has happened already since September, and it’s still going on, I’ll be it much slower now. It’s just Kherson terrain makes that blitz attack we saw up north difficult to pull off against Russian air and artillery assets. And then theirs the Mud season to consider that just started.
    1
  3057. Sure bro. By the way, thanks Russia for donating a tank division worth of gear to the Ukrainians . The CIA loves the T-90Ms you left for us👍
    1
  3058.  @RaDeus87  against rebels with out proper detection gear, ya it can be confusing. Against the Ukrainian military, with all there western and left over soviet CBRN gear, not so much. If chemicals weapons are used, we will know about it. And we’ll supply the Ukrainians with protective gear accordingly.
    1
  3059. Youve never been around chemical weapons then it seems.
    1
  3060. I don’t think Putin even knows why he’s invading anymore. He changes the invasion’s goals on a bi-weekly bases.
    1
  3061.  @unduloid  as much I’d love the idea of the Ukrainians having the best, stealthy-ist spec ops on the world, and the Russians are just that bad at guarding anything, I highly doubt it was spec ops that did those strikes. ATACMS makes way more since, given the size of the explosions, and distance from Ukrainian lines.
    1
  3062. They do. Apparently, they have the ATACM missiles for the Himars now. They’ve hit Russian targets Crimea twice now.
    1
  3063.  @Startrance85  no that I can agree with. At least you have America to help out in the short run to get to that point.
    1
  3064. You say that, but the EU can bounce back after it gets more energy from the US, Canada or the middle east. In contrast, the EU isn’t letting up sanctions against Russia anytime soon. Infact, I think the EU would just sanction Russia even more in retaliation to its energy cut off.
    1
  3065. As if. Russia doesn’t have anything close to the agricultural giant that is the American mid-west and the Mississippi river basin. Nor does it have nearly the ocean access America does. Or the population to make use of all those resources.
    1
  3066. We will. Thanks.
    1
  3067.  @doomsday8116  I mean, there’s America, Canada, the Saudis, Norway, possibly Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Mexico, and possibly (if we get desperate enough) Venezuela…..
    1
  3068.  @DIOS-M  Looks like America is about to have another good century after all.
    1
  3069. My god, America and Canada are about to have a economic boom like no tomorrow then.
    1
  3070. Ya no. That just asking for a more aggressive Russia and inter-European infighting. (Like, between Turkey and Greece or the infighting of the balkans)
    1
  3071. And do what?
    1
  3072. Hey, American gas is always an option.
    1
  3073. Ya, I’m starting to think that was a FSB propaganda campaign at this point, to keep Germany tied to Russian oil.
    1
  3074.  @darianvergof2508  what? It’s not cheap, sure, but it’s available. And the US isn’t a dictatorship that’s going to black mail the EU at the drop of a hat.
    1
  3075. Do it Poland. Push the button.
    1
  3076.  @abhradipmaiti4820  no I’m just pointing out, North Korea started that war. We intervened on South Korea side. Why is that a bad thing to help defend a nation being invaded?
    1
  3077. Fuck, I hope. Then Ukraine could have a some friends in Belarus.
    1
  3078. Wow, so losing at least 15,000 men, god knows how many tanks, there Black Sea flag ship, there reputation and trade deals with the West, getting NATO 2 more members nations , and getting nothing but bombed out wasteland and ruin cities for there troubles were there goals? Such a “victory” this is!
    1
  3079. Then it’s a good thing there hitting purely military targets
    1
  3080. By blowing up his own rare and hard to replace strategic bomber assets that ALSO degraded his nuclear deterrence?
    1
  3081. What? These arnt NATO made weapons. The only agreement with the US Ukraine has is that they wouldn’t use Lend Lease supplies to hit Russia. They never said anything about old Soviet or domestically made systems.
    1
  3082. V1s are shit.
    1
  3083.  @ivormallatratt2764  we won’t send a nuke, we’ll destroy the Russian forces in Ukraine with our conventional forces alone. If he sends a nuke into NATO territory, we’ll respond in kind.
    1
  3084.  @xXx.......  we’re not the ones throwing nuclear threats around every month. It seems Putin is the one who wants to live in the Stone Age again.
    1
  3085. If they do, NATO will get involved directly.
    1
  3086.  @atlashellwalker9769  u
    1
  3087.  @giawou6615  so threatening Russia nuclear triad by seizing/destroying its major submarine base at Murmansk, seizing its second largest city and manufacturing hub at St. Petersburg, and possibly cutting of Kaliningrad from reinforcements is not an issue compared to Ukraine? Are you serous? Are just stupid? And again, NATO DOENST NEED UKRAINE TO FIRE MISSILES AT RUSSIA
    1
  3088.  @giawou6615  have you ever studied a map my guy? If NATO forces moved from Finland, they’d be in St. Petersburg in an afternoon, and could threaten Russian submarine bases in Murmansk. That’s a HUGE problem for Russia, never mind the stationing of NATO ships and aircraft in Finland. On top of that, if NATO can hit Moscow from Ukraine with missiles, they most definitely can do it from Finland. Not that they would, mind you. Because this isn’t the 1960s and more, and if we really wanted to threaten Russia with missiles, we would simply station more Ohio class subs in the attic, B-52s in Japan, Alaska, South Korea, Norway, England or build missile silos in Alaska and Canada.
    1
  3089. He didn’t do it when the Ukrainians struck Belgorods oil refineries, the Kerch bridge, or in places he claimed were “Russia forever” like Kherson or Savastopl. Putin’s nuclear threats are just him swinging his dick around trying to look tough.
    1
  3090. And? What good is it if it’s all bombed out wasteland? Besides, it’s not like the communists of the LPR or DPR are going to getting back up and thriving again.
    1
  3091. The soviets thought they were fighting a losing war in 1941, yet they pressed on.
    1
  3092. If you can call this “victory”. Over a month and half of fighting for a pile of ruble.
    1
  3093. well said.
    1
  3094. The Russians are using the Chechens, Wagner group, the LPR and DPR as meat shields as well.
    1
  3095.  @coderentity2079  ya, fuck that. No more appeasement, because that’s what got us here in the first place.
    1
  3096. “Stick it to NATO?” Bro, NATO is growing again, thanks to Turkey green lighting Finland and Sweden’s membership yesterday. The Ukrainians will retain there independence, even if they have to give up a small chunk of there country that’s been bombed to hell and back by now and occupied by communists. If anything, Zelensky had shown the west how a real leader should stand with his people.
    1
  3097. Oh it’s quite the opposite. they have plenty of recruits coming in, they need weapons. But most of all, TRAINING.
    1
  3098. Considering the losses they’ve suffered for tiny chunks of land populated only by piles of ruble that used to be cities…… Ya, I wouldn’t call that “a victory” for Russia.
    1
  3099. Within 2 comments, you show your a bot. Sad.
    1
  3100. It is better to die on your feet, then live on your knees as a slave. The Ukrainians know this, because they were slaves to the USSR. And they know damn well what will happen to them if they give up now. Putin had made it very clear.
    1
  3101.  @hellohowruyes5886  that Ukraine can wear down the Russians until they leave. Like the Taliban did to both the USSR and the US.
    1
  3102.  @jeromemendiogarin6279  which is fine, but there not Russian allies. I think they like there trade with the west and China more.
    1
  3103. That is way too simplistic of a prediction. Your forgetting most of the ASEAN nations are very western friendly, (especially on trade), Central Asia is already in the Russian sphere, the African Union….Is a joke to be fair, other then maybe Rwanda and Kenya, and Latin America has always played both sides.
    1
  3104. Oh f—k off. Putin stated this invasion over bullshit reasons and has proceeded to bomb and demolish Ukrainian towns and cities indiscriminately for a imperialist agenda. If this was your nation under invasion, would you just give up and let the invaders have there way with your land and family? he played a stupid game, and won a stupid prize. Turkey just green lite Finland and Sweden’s membership into NATO yesterday. Within a year, the Baltic Sea will become a NATO lake, and add an additional 800 miles of border with Russia for Putin to defend. Never mind the fact the EU just granted Ukraine Candidate status last week, further pushing it to the west geo-politically. All thanks to Putin stupidity. At this point, I hope we send the Ukrainians enough weapons to rebuild there army TWICE over, because they deserve a chance to keep to fighting for there freedom.
    1
  3105. Not as much as the Russians have. What do they have to show for this war 4 months later other then bombed out wasteland?
    1
  3106. Better then appeasing the Russians
    1
  3107. America being a economic juggernaut again thanks to our food and gas reserves and a new Cold War as the world splits again into to spheres of international influence???
    1
  3108.  @jd-jw8hm  we still can. The euros just have to beg Biden hard enough to restart drilling. In a few years, we will surpass Russia as Europe’s main energy provider.
    1
  3109. Or you know, buy American fuels and give us the greatest economic boom we’ve had in decades…..just saying.
    1
  3110. Hey, maybe the US can get its shit together, start drilling, and get the dumb Euros the gas they need.
    1
  3111. Well at least they are free to call this a war, and not a “super special military mission” or what ever the fuck the Russians HAVE to call it, least they get 15 years in jail.
    1
  3112. August 2022: We got American food, gas, and industry backing us…..again…… Seriously, we potentially have the greatest economic boom since 1945 coming our way.
    1
  3113. I’m so fricken ready.
    1
  3114. Well then bought from OPEC or America and Canada. So….more Middle East “adventures” in the future I can see. And I don’t want to hear another European Bitch about America after this. They did this to themselves.
    1
  3115. I hope they start buying American gas then.
    1
  3116. Or but American gas. Please Europe. Louisiana could use the work.
    1
  3117. Happy to see Russia is make NATO revenant again, seeing NATO grow, and making the US the biggest gas station and food producer in the Western Hemisphere.
    1
  3118.  @briancarno8837  I stand by my statement, Azov is now combat ineffective, so I say we give the rest of the Ukrainians what they need to fight off the Russians.
    1
  3119.  @briancarno8837  ok 1) ya go ahead, try and sanction the US. I really want to see how that would even happen. 2) we do hate nazis. Russia has plenty of them in the Wagner Group, there general staff and in their enlisted/conscript ranks. And besides, according to the Russians, they supposedly killed all the Azov guys, so I have no problem backing up the rest of the Ukrainians military. I my self hate imperialists. I protested the Iraq war for 3 years back in the day, and I’m all for helping the Ukrainians secure there sovereignty.
    1
  3120.  @briancarno8837  I don’t get how we got off “Scot free” from invading Iraq. Our reputation with the international community was ruined and still hasn’t recovered. we have literally tens of thousands of wounded, disabled and mentally traumatized veteran to care for now. our defense budget ballooned to insane levels along side our inflation. Again, I’m still waiting to hear why Russia is totally justified in doing the same damn thing to Ukraine and it’s own soldiers like we did in Iraq and to our guys,
    1
  3121.  @briancarno8837  oh it did. And it was wrong for us to do so. So why the hell does that excuse Russia now? I’m curious.
    1
  3122. Oh but not the laws of war or national sovereignty? Gotcha.
    1
  3123. And?
    1
  3124. Sure bud. Keep dreaming
    1
  3125. Victory insures lasting peace.
    1
  3126. Eh, we Americans are fine. And we got tons of crap still to send form storage
    1
  3127. Also, compared to the 3 TRILLION we spent on Afghanistan, this war is a drop in the bucket for us. We can keep this up for quite awhile.
    1
  3128. Finland wasn’t back by most of the developed economies in the world. Nor did it have modern americas Arsenal and intelligence capabilities to use.
    1
  3129. We have been. It’s just listed in the reports. You can see Ukrainian units with our NV/thermal gear online.
    1
  3130. No, I think we ought to send the F-16s, ATACMS, SAMS, and more drones over now.
    1
  3131. Appeasement is not peace. It’s a temporary cease fire at best.
    1
  3132. Oh I wish. NATO would end this war in a couple of weeks.
    1
  3133. America: “we got you fam”
    1
  3134. No. No more appeasement.
    1
  3135. American can always send more ammo. We don’t spend 700+ billion a year on our military for nothing. We still haven’t spent up our Cold War era stocks yet.
    1
  3136. The Russians have been nice enough to hand over a corps worth 😊
    1
  3137. So…russia is just a nuclear armed terror state then?
    1
  3138. No. Increase lend lease! Bury the Russians in munitions!
    1
  3139. Cool. Now the Ukrainians can counter invade “Russia” and get their land back.
    1
  3140. And it won’t matter when the Ukrainians take it all back.
    1
  3141. What’s Russia going to counter attack with? A bunch of 30-40 year olds with rusty AKs and obsolete tanks?
    1
  3142. They literally filed their application to join NATO last week.
    1
  3143. What in 6 months? That’s how long it took last time. Because their still trying to fight like it’s 1941. Hell, look at their kit!
    1
  3144. Easy. They can join NATO. Which, as of a few days ago, they have applied for. As a NATO member, Russia will never touch them again.
    1
  3145. You realize the go-to scape goat for the governments expanded surveillance and emergency powers post 9/11 was “terrorism” right? Not Russia. Russia want even considered a threat again until 2014, after they annexed Crimea.
    1
  3146. BASED
    1
  3147. Your ancestors who got rolled over by Soviet tanks in ‘68 are rolling in there graves seeing this comment🙄
    1
  3148. Let the most desperate man when.
    1
  3149. Not at this rate.
    1
  3150.  @pepega7015  it means we got bigger fish to fry then our political differences
    1
  3151. Hypersonic missiles are used against subs. That’s what would be the end of Russia, long before the ground and air bases stuff got off the ground.
    1
  3152. Yellow13: what about VTOL drones and helicopters as it’s air arm ? You think that could make it easier to make a newer carrier?
    1
  3153. How about take that 1.5 billion and make something like the old Keiv class “aviation cruisers”? A modular carrier/missile ship?
    1
  3154. “Oder 227” is back it seems.
    1
  3155. Work on your bullshit more vatnik. Why the hell would they attempt to take a nuclear power plant deep behind Russian lines with no back up? Think before you write a bad fanfic.
    1
  3156. Work on your bullshit more vatnik. Why the hell would they attempt to take a nuclear power plant deep behind Russian lines with no back up? Think before you write a bad fanfic.
    1
  3157. Cool fanfic bro. How about think of a actually sensible make-belief battle first before you write bullshit, Russia may fight like that, but the Ukrainians arnt that stupid to waste there men. Not like those VDV idiots.
    1
  3158. If they do, we’ll just send the Ukrainians more SAMS, finally approve the transfer of F-16s, and if it gets too bad, we’ll intervene on the Ukrainian side.
    1
  3159. Yes. Russia has basically made the military the best employment option for much the Ukrainian population. And america has enough weapons and ammo to keep the Ukrainians supplied for at east another year and half. Assuming we don’t expand are war production (which we are in the case of himars, and new NATO orders) And so far, it’s FAR more cost effective supporting Ukraine then it was the entire war on terror
    1
  3160. They’ve been doing that,
    1
  3161. You earned your nickel for the day comrade Bot.
    1
  3162. You earned your nickel for the day comrade Bot.
    1
  3163. Wouldn’t matter. America, Poland, Slovakia, and the UK would just keep up the lend lease. Never mind NATO is getting two more members to pressure Russia soon.
    1
  3164. Not really. Russias modern population is pretty old compared to the Soviet Union. And smaller.
    1
  3165. Still more cost effective then supporting the afghans for 20 years. At less the Ukrainians want to fight for there country. And doing a damn good job at it too.
    1
  3166.  @thedave8097  if it did, the Ukrainians would have rolled over long ago. That whole thing about “missing weapons” is bull shit made up by the Russians to convince us to stop sending more lend lease. Because it’s kicking Ruskie ass right now.
    1
  3167. More then Russia did in the bylatkreig back in March. At least the Ukrainians didn’t throw there paratroopers into a meat grinder like the Russians did.
    1
  3168. Oh ya, the Russian tanks are in Kyiv right now…. ….to bad there crews are in 6-7 different pieces though…..
    1
  3169. Cope harder vatnik, I fully support Ukraine even if it make me pay more. I love the sight of dead communists in the morning. It looks like victory to me.
    1
  3170.  @Palach624  no, but that southern has some funny ideas on what “freedom” means…
    1
  3171. Ya, bullshit, the Russians arnt holding back at all. There just a over hyped paper bear.
    1
  3172. The Ukrainians must be doing well then.
    1
  3173. Then they better be prepared for a NATO intervention not long after then.
    1
  3174. laughs in American military spending and stockpiles
    1
  3175. Cool fan fic bro. Cope harder.
    1
  3176. And? It’s still more cost effective then propping up Afghanistan for 20 years, that’s for sure,
    1
  3177. And? It’s still more cost effective then propping up Afghanistan for 20 years, that’s for sure,
    1
  3178. Been hearing the same crap since March, and yet here Ukraine is, still killing Ruskie commies.
    1
  3179.  @matthewvargas2264  America, Poland, Slovakia and the UK disagree. America alone could keep Ukraine going for at least a year and half just with the weapons we got stockpiled up. And that assumes we don’t expand our production lines, which we are.
    1
  3180. If they fully mobilize, then we simply send even more lend lease. And better gear too.
    1
  3181. Oh good. Then NATO has a excuse to intervene.
    1
  3182. Oh good. Then NATO has a excuse to intervene.
    1
  3183.  @jonathanhartley3454  because if you were, Id hope I never catch such a traitor in public here.
    1
  3184. Tell me you ain’t American.
    1
  3185. Cool story bro. Now cope harder vatnik bot,
    1
  3186. Ya, beside South Korea and the former Warsaw Pact counties are soooo bad off these days…… ….oh wait….
    1
  3187. Buddy, after all that’s happened, there’s no fricken way they will ever see each other as “brother nations” again. Too much bad blood now.
    1
  3188. Buddy, after all that’s happened, there’s no fricken way they will ever see each other as “brother nations” again. Too much bad blood now.
    1
  3189. Cope harder vatnik. Well keep supporting Ukraine
    1
  3190. But Putin’s communist regime is a better option?
    1
  3191. But Putin’s communist regime is a better option?
    1
  3192.  @ourpetsheadsarefallingoff6654  indeed. And i hope we keep it up.
    1
  3193. Man, your a doomer. Ukraine still here 6 months later, yet guys like you continue to spout “there only delaying the inevitable” as they give the Russians a bloody nose Time and time again.
    1
  3194.  @v.5442  most of that is rusting away in Siberia, or has long since been stripped for parts to keep the more modern part of it running.
    1
  3195. Cool story bro. I’m American and I don’t care about spending more if it kicks Russian communist ass.
    1
  3196. Then why they still here, fighting 6 months later. after the Russians were at the gates of kyiv
    1
  3197.  @theexterminator1  as if it is. Every month there’s another announcement in the billions worth of aid being sent to Ukraine. It gets covered on fox, the hill, msn, cnn, and every other news broadcasting company you can name. And that’s not even considering Putin’s constant threats of nuclear war every-time we send another shipment. Or all the awesome combat footage coming out of this war on the internet. Nothing keeps support coming then watching your weapons destroy the enemy in battle time and time again.
    1
  3198.  @theexterminator1  and neither is the US in lend lease. We spent 3 trillion dollars on a pointless war in Afghanistan for 20 years. By far, Ukraine is far more cost effective for us.
    1
  3199.  @theexterminator1  yes I do. And I can’t see the Russians putting there supposed 3 million personnel at war without taking them out of the economy to do it. Worse, wartime production takes away from civilian goods sectors that will only bring the quality of life in Russia down further.
    1
  3200.  @theexterminator1  the Russians haven’t declared war yet, because then they’d actually have to follow the Geneva conventions. Never mind there economy can’t support a full-wartime economic mobilization. And I woundnt be so sure they’ll just get donbass. They haven’t even fully secured it 6 months later.
    1
  3201. By the logic, the Nazis, Italians, and Japanese wouldn’t have stopped either. Yet history shows that’s not common sense
    1
  3202. Probably, if they want to keep the public and there political sponsors happy.
    1
  3203. Take your pills Ivan, your yelling at a wall again.
    1
  3204.  @nonentity3154  because we hate communists like Putin.
    1
  3205. Of won’t hurt us Americans. And we’re the biggest provider of aid. The pols and Brit’s seem to agree with our feelings too.
    1
  3206. As if we arnt already there now.
    1
  3207. Thats what we’re all asking at this point.
    1
  3208. And now has two new NATO members to deal with other, one of which shares a 800+ mile border with Russia that Putin had to defend now. Never mind the fact that, as soon as this war is over, we will find ourselves in another Cold War.
    1
  3209.  @noticing33 because they do. At least the former
    1
  3210. They don’t have huge storage yards like this. If they did, the Russians would have flatten them by now. Or, at least you’d think they would have….
    1
  3211. 5:04: that’s a f-22 ain’t it?
    1
  3212. Your not wrong...
    1
  3213.  @vannvanny9244  ok jezz sorry. I’m just curious why some chip factory is worth all the destruction and bloodshed that would come with a war.
    1
  3214. No, infact we should send more tanks to y, so we don’t have to use them later.
    1
  3215. So giving them to another power who’s fighting one of our long time rivals and degrading said rivals ability to make war later isn’t “protecting America” to you bud?
    1
  3216. And I’m all for it 👍🇺🇸
    1
  3217. There hasn’t been a single Abrams in Ukraine yet.
    1
  3218. What? You actually think china can invade America ?
    1
  3219. Ok: 1: because their fighting for there homes against Russia, who’s a long time enemy of ours 2:there not being sent with the depleted uranium armor, but the tungsten replacement the export version have 3: they will crush Russias ability to make war in the future, thus losing the costs needed to US defense.
    1
  3220. If they weren’t willing to fully commit to this stupid war, out of fear of NATO escalation, the. they shouldn’t have invaded then.
    1
  3221.  @bingcrosby1378  the Ukrainian Air Force is still denying Russia air Superiority 7 months later, and have carried out several anti-air defense missions with HARM missiles. Russian simply cannot wage an effective air war. Because if it was America invading, there wouldn’t be a Ukrainian Air Force or air defense units left within 48 hours of the war starting. Let alone 7 months later.
    1
  3222.  @bingcrosby1378  it’s being tested right now,l in Ukraine (successfully) and it has been used over Libya (twice), Serbia, and Vietnam (toward the end of it). The Israel’s have also used it quite effectively against Syria, Egypt and Lebanon
    1
  3223. That’s simply not true. The US and NATO developed entire Suppression of Enemy Air Defense (SEAD) doctrines to do just that with aircraft.
    1
  3224. Ah yes, minimizing civilian casualties as they raping and massacre entire towns when there offensive fails. Or drop cluster bombs and vacuum munitions on the center of Kharkiv. Or blowing up damns to flood near by villages. Or shooting god-knows how much artillery at a city until its nothing but ruins (Mariupol, servedonesk)….. Such great humanitarians those Russians are!
    1
  3225.  @jg3000  unless your crews don’t want to fight and they get abandoned on the side of a road. Or get picked off with missiles, drones and artillery from miles away before they ever really get used. Or the supply lines to support all of them get bombed to crap and they get rendered inoperable. All this has happened to the Russians at least once in Ukraine. Numbers of equipment and weapons be damned
    1
  3226. Honestly I’ve been thinking the same. Their is still China to consider, but, hypothetically, if they went to war and turned out to be just as bad as the Russian in terms of fighting, then maybe we will finally have a reason to drastically lower our bloated defense budget and put the money to more important things for once. Hell, we could get a huge rebate on just selling off a bunch of our crap to our Allies, and act more as a “support” force for our globally connected ally’s. Seems to be working for us with the Ukrainians.
    1
  3227. Indeed. Nukes are “independence insurance” for counties.
    1
  3228. Oh boy, can’t wait to watch more Soviet made crap fall out of the sky. Mean while Ukraine only gets better and better air defense and hopefully (by next year) F-16s.
    1
  3229.  @demimonde3833  and NATO’s small nukes will hit Russian forces. And then the nuclear genie is out of the bottle. No putting it back in after that.
    1
  3230. Oh ya, at least 20,000 dead and wounded and another Cold War about to start with a expanded NATO, but ya, Russia is totally going to be ok……
    1
  3231. We did indeed. And they’re lucky we weren’t allowed to just carpet bomb Haiphong to the ground, bomb north Vietnamese airbases near the Chinese borders, occupy the Ho Cho Minh trail or “accidentally” sink Soviet cargo ships coming in to Vietnam. It Would have been a different war, but still a stupid one we shouldn’t have been involved in.
    1
  3232.  @rafaellastracom6411  no, they wouldn’t. Russia isnt , nor has it ever , been a innocent, rule abiding nation. It’s just as bad as America is in international affairs.
    1
  3233. The Finn’s, Germans, Polish, Hungarians, Czechs, afghans, Georgians, Chechens and now the Ukrainians would disagree with that statement.
    1
  3234. Well apparently it works both ways. Because the Ukrainians have been using A2AD to keep the Russian Air Force back, strike Russian ammo dumps and command centers with HIMARS, and make the Russian navy stay near Crimea in fear of anti-ship missiles.
    1
  3235.  @acidbot666  why? apparently, old obsolete crap in our storage units in Ukrainian hands can kick Russian ass just as good as the actual us army, though slower. Really, the only thing keeping us back at this point, is Russian nukes. Nothing more.
    1
  3236. Oh boy, I can’t wait to watch the USAF and NATO decimate the Russian Air Force with in days of a war starting. I can’t wait to see that scrap heap Russia calls a “carrier” finally sunk in an act of mercy. I’m going to watch in glee as our stealth aircraft fleet disintegrates Russias entire command and control and logistics system. It will be like ‘91 again, but more epic .
    1
  3237.  @MonroeSim  we tried twice that already. Didn’t work out for us in the end. Might as well just make sure they can’t militarily or economically recover anytime soon.
    1
  3238. After this mess of war, the US would win, Most definitely. Without nukes, the Russians would be screwed. The most Russian Air Force would be wiped out on the ground, the Russian Black Sea, pacific, and Baltic fleets rendered unusable, if not sunk in port out right, and the majority of Russian command and control and logistics would be neutralized with in a month of hostilities. After that, Russian tank and artillery bridges would be hunted down and destroyed beneath American air superiority (though, I’d like think we’d just ask there conscript crews to just go home first) I can see Vladivostok, Kaliningrad, and, possibly, St. Petersburg would be under US control in short order, (though we wouldn’t intend to keep them) and a peace deal reach not long after.
    1
  3239. The f-15ex got funded? Awesome!
    1
  3240.  @rhodium1096  no jokes, just facts
    1
  3241. Why would you say that? If the Russians had the ability to feild the SU-57 in Ukraine, why haven’t they achieved air supremacy almost 3 years on?
    1
  3242.  @jg3000  which is really weird. I still can’t wrap my head around how the Russians haven’t managed to carry out a successful SEAD campaign with their larger and more modern airforce in almost 3 years now. The US would have been able to do it, if it was the invader here.
    1
  3243.  @toetz4491  oh he’s fine. The Russians were too busy killing defenseless civilians because they can’t hit anything valuable these days.
    1
  3244. Which they also don’t have….
    1
  3245. 8 months bro. Still waiting. The sunflower harvest will be great next year.
    1
  3246. If the US has any where near the amount corruption, inferior technology, and the “yes men” style leadership Russia has, then ya we would lose. Good thing we don’t.
    1
  3247. Cool fan fic bro. Maybe publish it on Wattapad instead of the YT comment sections 👍
    1
  3248. Bro, you watch too much Sci Fi. As of right now, EMP’s can only be caused by low altitude nuclear detonations. There’s really no other way with our level of technology.
    1
  3249. Because then the Ukrainians will never want to surrender. If the Russians are willing to use nukes in wartime, what the hell do you think they’ll do to them in “peace time”?
    1
  3250. Ummmm….more HIMAR food
    1
  3251. Why would Ukraine invade Belarus in the middle of being invaded its self? Come on bot, think first before you make up crap.
    1
  3252. they didn't think that far ahead....
    1
  3253.  @nelsonjackson7967  he’s such a “die hard” he’s now drafting 30 year olds to go die to still try and take Ukraine a year later while his army has lost most of its gains, and he literally almost got overthrown in a coup led my mercenaries. which he fled Moscow from
    1
  3254. except the scrapyard....or the museum
    1
  3255. and then he left Kherson, izyum, kupanensk, Lymen, and Kharkiv....for the lols? 🤡
    1
  3256. no. Russia doesn't have a guided, course altering, and highly mobile missile launcher like HIMARS.
    1
  3257. lol. and the Russians are just ignoring a propaganda gold-mine for capturing a HIMARS? 🤡
    1
  3258. so why did Russia lose half its gains not even 3 months after it showed up? 🤡
    1
  3259.  @michaelrohandodds1850  if the job is Dying for 10 months to take a bombed wasteland….we’ll they couldn’t even do that, because the Ukrainians are now retaking land around Bakmut now 😂
    1
  3260. the same Russian aviation that has done jack-sh!t this whole war?
    1
  3261. they did, that's why it took 10 months for Russia to take it, and now why its losing ground there to counter attacks.
    1
  3262.  @RingerTV  prove me wrong
    1
  3263. its not in the news lately, because the Ukrainians got all new toys the media refocused its terrible attention span toward. if you look at the decreased amount of Russian artillery fire across the front, and the failure of their winter offensive, you'll see HIMARs is still playing a significant role in the war.
    1
  3264. their "winning" despite losing half their gains so far, lost more equipment then NATO has combined over the course of a year, had their winter counter offensive fail flat on its face, took 10 months to take a bombed out wasteland, had their own territory invaded by a rebel force from Ukraine, and STILL don't have air supremacy a year later?? 🤡
    1
  3265. Because far more T-90s have been lost compared to Leopards?
    1
  3266. So why are the Russian border units around Finland, Norway, Estonia, and China so under-staffed now, and why the Russians pulling out tanks form the 1960s to keep fighting, if they still have “95%” of their military elsewhere?
    1
  3267. Doesn’t hold a candle to the literally thousands of destroyed Russian tanks so far bud.
    1
  3268. It’s not?
    1
  3269.  @nickolajlarsenzarechnov5556  it really isn’t. If it was, Bakmut wouldn’t have been a 10 month slog, the Russians would actually be making gains at Kremmina, the Kherson offensive would have been counter effectively, Vuladar would have been a major breakthrough that would have regained the initiative for the Russians and the Ukrainians wouldn’t be now advancing in Robotyne if the T-90 was such a good tank. And no point in any of these operations, has the T-90 performed well by any metric. Probably why one ended up in my home Stare of Lousiana on the back of a truck, because it’s crew finally realized how much of death trap it really was.
    1
  3270.  @nickolajlarsenzarechnov5556 no, it really isn’t. t-90s have still not broken Ukrainian lines, stoped the last 2 major counter attacks, nor are they stopping the Ukraine now as they advance on Robotyne as of today.
    1
  3271.  @ktm8848 meanwhile, the Ukrainians have been making successful attacks at night the last couple of weeks, because unlike Russian junk, all western made gear had decent night vision optics.
    1
  3272. Because there’s like, what 3 destroyed Leo2s and 20-30 destroyed T-90Ms?
    1
  3273.  @VisibilityFoggy  wait what? When did that happen?
    1
  3274. Well, there probably trying to show off and tease the west. But who really knows.
    1
  3275. Great. Now I have ideas for my Space Engineers server
    1
  3276. Oh so tell us, when was Covet Cabal wrong? I’ll wait,
    1
  3277. No, when this over we’re going to wondering why we ever took the Russians seriously 😂
    1
  3278. Cabal, are you saying that WW3 would actually Regress warfare to earlier point in history, just Becuase modern weapons are so expensive and complex to replace and mass produce? Is large scale wars impractical then, because we eventually run out of high tech toys and go back to the basics?
    1
  3279. Not much. Probably -50ish 105mm mountain howitzers. Nothing fancy,
    1
  3280. There off brand versions of obsolete vehicles so….not good at all.
    1
  3281.  @TheLoyalOfficer  the M113 isn’t even a great vehicle. The US ditched them the minuet they got the Bradley’s and very few US units even have them now. We want to get rid of them so badly, we’re basically handing them out to Ukraine like candy.
    1
  3282. They tried that 3 times now, and ended up losing the “Russian” city of Kherson, most of Kharkiv oblast, and now the Ukrainians have crossed the Surovikin line as of yesterday….
    1
  3283. Ah yes, the Ukrainian army that’s grown to be 4x the size it was at the start, taken back half of Russias gains (including the “annexed” city of Kherson Putin himself said would be “Russian forever”) and as of today, crossed the Surovikin line after a “failed offensive”? 🤡
    1
  3284. lol. Imagine taking military analyst advise from a convicted pedophile and wife beater like Ritter and McGregor 😂
    1
  3285. Well that, and a bunch got shot down on the way in (at least 2 MI-8s splashed into a lake after being hit with stingers, that’s like 48 dead right there) and the KA-52/MI-24s that had in support also ran into the stingers the Ukrainians had in defence. Combined with the rapid counter attack by territorial troops and Ukrainian special forces that day, it’s no wonder they almost got completely destroyed.
    1
  3286. Don’t forget to collect your rubles, Q-sheep.
    1
  3287. Why? Are the Russians running out and are asking for hand outs?
    1
  3288. I think you mean YOUR understanding of Russian military strategic ineptitude is lacking. Yes, they really thought they would simply roll in with a VDV regiment, a Chechen brigade and few battalions of tanks into a city of 3 million and conquer it. Putin was that stupid.
    1
  3289.  @Ph3NiX80  hey, at least I’m not still believing in Ukrainian “Bio/l-labs”, “NATO Mercenaries” and “Kherson is Russian forever” still……
    1
  3290.  @walterwhite5307  not a bot, just stating the facts 😉
    1
  3291.  @walterwhite5307 and most of it is WW2 issue 😂
    1
  3292. Lol, if the Russians were fighting NATO, they would be kicked out in about a month. Because NATO would rule the skies above Ukraine.
    1
  3293. He made like 2 of them….
    1
  3294. Yes. They have, and they will again.
    1
  3295. My god, imagine towed 76mm, 122mm and 152mm guns from WW2 having to be used in 2023
    1
  3296. It always is…
    1
  3297. Ukraine will not fail, and the US is doing fine comrade. Thanks for asking.
    1
  3298. Been hearing the same crap since serverdonensk last year. And then Ukraine took back Kharkiv and Kherson oblasts, and held Bakmut for 10 months while also launching her another counter attack….
    1
  3299.  @tomk3732 meanwhile, the Russians will have lost even more land back to the Ukrainians
    1
  3300. Ya, I’d say if your pulling out D1 obr1943 howitzers and putting old naval guns on APCs form the 1950s, your not very well supplied…..
    1
  3301. No, we’ve sent more m777a then that, and lately we’ve been increasing the amount of m109 paladins, Caesar’s, and Diana howitzers to Ukraine too.
    1
  3302. They have mostly. Probably why lately on the front we see Mosin rifles, D1 howitzers from 1943, T-62, and recently, T-55 tanks as VBIED ‘s. Like something out of ISIS’s playbook.
    1
  3303. Oh ya, because it’s totally believable the Russians have destroyed 100 out of 28 HIAMRS system, every PZ2000, KRAB, ceaser and AS90…..🤡
    1
  3304.  @kentershackle1329  except their NOT 155mm guns, their older 76 and 122mm guns. They have shorter range, less accuracy, and they can’t pack up and move quickly like modern guns. And on top of that, their poorly maintained ammo and parts makes them a hazard for the crews to use. The only thing these guns are going to do, Is get a lot more Russian crews killed.
    1
  3305. I mean, if they really want to use WW2 era howitzers in a battlefield filled with modern artillery, drones and munitions…..
    1
  3306.  @PlacidDragon  169km in the south was taken in the last 5 weeks, while the Ukrainians seem poised to take back Bakmut in a fraction of the time and casualties the Russian took to seize it.
    1
  3307. The Ukrainians have advanced 169km total in 5 weeks, have units reentering Bakmut as of this week, and have secured a foothold on the lower Dnipro, while ALSO, managing to kill 2 Russian generals with in just a week of each other.
    1
  3308. With cost high of modern aircraft and support of those aircraft vs the (relative) low cost of modern air defense, do you think air combat in general may become an after thought as the ways of defeating aircraft become more advance? That’s actually the plot of COD black ops 3. Warfare shifted back to the ground after aircraft were rendered near useless thanks to laser air defense systems becoming common place. A world without air power.
    1
  3309.  @InfoPulse-007  ok so who currently has Klishchiivka and Urozhaine again?
    1
  3310. Because it hasn’t failed?
    1
  3311. Seeing ruskies getting vaporized by my tax money has been awesome to see and I hope we keep it up👍🇺🇸
    1
  3312. The sun will never set on the Climate Change empire…
    1
  3313. After they surrendered….
    1
  3314. Aw shit, here we go again......
    1
  3315. When the big one comes, you’ll find for yourself out why the south got its ass kicked….
    1
  3316. Did you convert rubles to dollars? Because value wise, it really isn’t.
    1
  3317. Best travel cross over ever
    1
  3318. 8:00 wait- why is Russians hydro carbon production set to decrease?
    1
  3319. Ya, we need to deal with these fricken trump supporters trying to make our nation, and the world, a terrible place.
    1
  3320. Do you honestly think NATO would pull a Barabarossa 2.0 and invade a nuclear armed Russia? If so, your delusional. And seeing how Russia is fairing in Ukraine, the Baltic’s would be a massacre for the Russians anyhow.
    1
  3321. Wow was not expecting this to blow up. Can we at least all agree that a war here would be a unnecessary amount of death ?
    1
  3322. He could if he wanted to, and the Mexicans wanted it. America would rest east knowing there wouldn’t be a “Mexico” or “Russia” for very long, if they ever had the stupid idea to use those weapons.
    1
  3323. Libya never had nuclear weapons.
    1
  3324. No, German men will fight and die alongside the pols too. They are all NATO members after all, and are obligated to come to each others side if Russia attacks.
    1
  3325. Only if Russia decides it wants to bleed trying to take the Suwalkii gap too.
    1
  3326. Ya, pre-2022 we thought Russia was actually competent.
    1
  3327. Not at all.
    1
  3328. Have you seen Polish history? Also, it lets them free up old Soviet equipment to give to Ukraine
    1
  3329. ?
    1
  3330.  ISLAMMEHMEDOV  right, because the US totally funds an organization that has attack it and it’s citizens for over a decade now and has been fighting in iraq and Syria since 2014 right? 🤡
    1
  3331. The Taiwanese don’t seem to agree with that statement.
    1
  3332. Obviously not, because the Chinese wouldn’t be planning to invade them if they were.
    1
  3333. Hey, all China has to do, is not invade tiawan, and none of this has to happen. Simple as that.
    1
  3334. Ok Vatnik, I guess Ukraine just wanted to flood it’s one of its own cities and ruin its Dnipro operations just for the Lol’s right? 😂
    1
  3335. Don’t act like China wouldn’t level Taipei if it was given a chance.
    1
  3336. Like who?
    1
  3337. The US hasn’t used a nuclear bomb in almost 80 years. What makes you think the US is just more then happy to use a nuke?
    1
  3338. It looks like we have a Mexican standoff then.
    1
  3339. Bye👋
    1
  3340. But the loss of industry isn’t for China.
    1
  3341. If China invaded Taiwan, all bets are off. Because invading your “brother nation” is shameful in itself.
    1
  3342. If it was nonsense, why is China building up its navy and constantly making threats toward Taiwan ?
    1
  3343. Easy targets for what?
    1
  3344. It’s harder to kill a wind park then it is a oil Pipeline.
    1
  3345. They also control the Baltics sea and North Sea too.
    1
  3346. Ya, the example to join NATO as fast a possible or end up like Ukraine. That’s why helping Ukraine against Russia is important
    1
  3347. If that was the case, we wouldn’t have Hungary, Romania or Bulgaria in the alliance….
    1
  3348. Screw that. We should get Ukraine in NATO as soon as possible.
    1
  3349. Screw that. Putin’s nuclear threats are empty, and Russia has lost wars before.
    1
  3350. Because it’s less corrupt then Russia and hasn’t invaded any of its neighbors like Russia has?
    1
  3351. Yes. It does. So Russia will never invade it again.
    1
  3352. And like all other “red lines” , it will be crossed and Putin will do nothing.
    1
  3353. They don’t have a choice. They’ve quite other wars for less in the past.
    1
  3354. Why did Russia ever invade?
    1
  3355. NATO is “splintered” despite the fact it’s about to gain another member soon, just had one join this last April, and will have Ukraine in eventually? I don’t think you know what “Splintered” means
    1
  3356.  @RaV591  that’s literally the subject of the video
    1
  3357. On the contrary, it has only just begun..
    1
  3358. Biden “destroyed US hegemony” by growing NATO again, demolishing a rivial military powers capabilities without losing a single American solider, and is getting our European Allies off Russian energy?
    1
  3359. LAUGHS IN AMERICAS STOCKPILES AND M.I.C
    1
  3360. Cope harder. The Ukrainians will never accept that.
    1
  3361. Truly, the greatest clown In Russian history.
    1
  3362. Then why did Russia just give 200 of them back this last week to Ukraine? Perhaps Russia should “de-nazify” its self first, seeing how they seem to like shooting up Russian schools.
    1
  3363.  @Avinashm7  oh and the Japanese slaughtering millions of Chinese, Vietnamese, Indonesian, Philippine, Indian and Korean civilians weren’t? We’re talking about the power that gave our foreign women to there soldiers as “pleasure” women, and bayoneted baby’s for fun. (The rape of Nanking anyone?)
    1
  3364.  @indobalkanizer6557  the US had a monopoly of nukes back ‘45. Russia in 2022, does not. And it would not be wise to nuke a country so close to massive military alliance bordering it. Especially if they ever want there economy back to pre-2014 conditions.
    1
  3365. My brother in christ, the Russians them selves are showing us the conditions of there barracks and horrible weapon quality on the internet. The Russians them selves are telling us this.
    1
  3366. Indeed. No more appeasement. I hope we keep the lend lease up and increase it further
    1
  3367. Whataboutism at its finest folks
    1
  3368. Our generation must then rise to the occasion then. History is calling.
    1
  3369. Then why haven’t they? Because it seems they like throwing there money and young men away for fun doenst it?
    1
  3370. That’s right Ukraine. Drive out these orc’s they call “Russians”.
    1
  3371. If 40k soldiers is a “diversion” to the Russians, it’s no wonder there getting there asses kicked.
    1
  3372. So there going to seize Odessa in a week after 3 months of them being unable to? Or the fact there main capital ship is at the bottom of the Black Sea and they’ve lost two of there heavy landing craft over a month ago? There’s no f—king way Russia is going to do this by next monday.
    1
  3373. Oh yes, because America is totally invading Ukraine right now….
    1
  3374.  @jamesmason1347  losing? I’m sorry, who’s missile cruiser is at the bottom of the Black Sea? Who’s air force still doesn’t have air supremacy 70 days into this war? Who failed to capture Kyiv? Who’s paratroopers got slaughtered at Hostemel? Who took a month to take Mariupol even with it completely surrounded? Who’s ammo and fuel dumps well behind the front keep blowing up? Who’s air defences couldn’t shoot down 2 old MI-24’s penetrating their airspace? Who has lost 9 generals in 3 months of war? Oh ya that’s right, Putin’s piece of crap army.
    1
  3375.  @jamesmason1347  I love the smell of burning Russian tankers in the morning. Smells like…..victory.
    1
  3376. Oh good, now we have flags to drape over the coffins of these Orc’s.
    1
  3377.  @beast98demon36  keep coping. Russia’s might isn’t what you think it is.
    1
  3378. Oh they definitely tried. And they failed miserably. You don’t throw away an paratrooper regiment, at least a hundred tanks, APCS, a Chechen brigade, at least 5 generals and dozens of helicopters and planes for a “diversion”. They just don’t want to admit they got there asses handed to them by a “weaker” enemy.
    1
  3379. The copium is strong with this one. They’re hasn’t been any major movements in the south for over a month and in the east there encirclement had ground to a snail’s pace. You don’t throw away almost a hundred tanks, dozens of helicopters and jets and an entire airborne regiment for a “distraction”. The Kyiv assault was a real attack, and a half-assed and over confident disaster on the Russian part. By winter then EU will have US and middle eastern fuel at there disposal, and NATO will have gained Finland,Sweden, Ukraine and probably Moldova as well. the Russians will have toilet paper for money and a future of being China’s Bitch.
    1
  3380. They have sunk the Moskava, harassed the Russian Air Force in the skies for over 70 days, launched a helicopter raid into Russia that destroyed a refinery, have bombed Russian convoys to pieces with drones, defended Kyiv, killed the VDV at Hostemwl airport and recaptured it (TWICE), saved Sumy and Kharkiv from encirclement, have most likely been responsible for all those explosions in Belgorod Russia. Oh, and have attacked Kherson airport over 17 times now, and have killed at least 7 Russian generals. May I list more?
    1
  3381.  @numbersix8919  not since the Russians left the area. Kyiv still has its defense in place, thousands of armed and pissed off citizens and thanks to lends lease, is filled with modern weapons. The capital will be just fine, so those Ukrainian army troops are free to reposition.
    1
  3382. Yes, because throwing away all those poor VDV paratroopers, Chechens, tank companies, helicopters and fight jet units is way too stupid for a “diversion”. It also doesn’t make since for a “diversion”because the Russians didn’t push anywhere else much while it was happening. They faced the same stiff resistance on all fronts form the Ukrainian military and civilians. And if it was a “diversion”, it’s pointless now. With Kyiv no longer threatened, the Ukrainians can free up troops for other fronts, like the south, to keep defending against the Russians.
    1
  3383. We wouldnt have armed them if Russia hadn’t caused a civil war or taken Crimea. If any country wants to Join NATO, there free to do so. If Russia didn’t want that, maybe they should have treated them better, rather than expendable pawns. And Zelensky is a masterful comedian. He’s making Russia look like an idiot to the world by simply standing up to them. And now that Ukraine has American Lend-lease backing them up, they can keep fighting till they drive the Russians out.
    1
  3384. Wait what?
    1
  3385. Welp. Finland joins NATO today, and Russia has done jack sh!t about it. 🤷‍♂️🤡
    1
  3386. So why we’re they ever worried about Ukraine comrade? 😂🤡
    1
  3387. You act like Russia is on the ascent😂
    1
  3388. Ace combat 7s plot too....
    1
  3389.  @glintongordon6811  lol, no. The Russians got their a$$es handed to them at Kyiv, and were forced to retreat with their tails between their legs
    1
  3390. No more appeasement for dictators
    1
  3391. Ya. Russia finding out, after its been fucking around for almost a year now.
    1
  3392. Because none of the major powers are currently fighting
    1
  3393. Ya, that’s why they have Russian guns at their backs so they don’t get any funny ideas
    1
  3394. He’s been right on the money for years now
    1
  3395. Because they are
    1
  3396. If it’s your home at risk, you just going to sit around and do nothing?
    1
  3397. We’ll get ready to make $14! 😂
    1
  3398. Huh?
    1
  3399. Best SAW in Arma 3- change my mind
    1
  3400. Yep. And it was fucking hilarious to watch fail😅
    1
  3401. Finland wasn’t backed by 30 countries nor did it have 700,000 troops at its disposal
    1
  3402.  @Annokh  i guess the amount of territory going form Russian controlled back to Ukrainian control in the last 6 months wasn’t enough proof for you?
    1
  3403.  @dedster3164 see now that really sounds like an invasion to me pal
    1
  3404. “Civilized army”? What a joke! Civilized people don’t go to war to begin with!
    1
  3405. I hope the Ukrainian partisans melt into the countryside make Putin’s army pay. Fight on Ukraine!
    1
  3406.  Devil May Cry 😈 Ukraine is not yet lost. And even if the cities fall, they’ll fight on as partisans. Make Putin’s army suffer like the Nazis did nearly a century ago Ukraine!
    1
  3407.  @georgewashington1988  ah yes, because Biden is the one invading Ukraine right? What BS.
    1
  3408. This is horrible.
    1
  3409. Go home ruskies.
    1
  3410. Yet, there still holding the line, and not even 4 months ago retook 8000km of terrain back form the Russians, and the only major city to be captured by the Russians this war.
    1
  3411. So what’s a better one?
    1
  3412. laughs in American military budget and stockpiles
    1
  3413. Only in the drunken dreams of Vatniks online
    1
  3414. Cool. Now never bit-ch again about how the Russians crushed your rebellion in ‘53 again.
    1
  3415. So why did Russia do nothing but run away a for 4 months?
    1
  3416. For their homes.
    1
  3417. Tell that to the Vietnamese. We thought that same thing back in the 60s
    1
  3418.  @hugejackedman7423  I wish I could man. But I can’t.
    1
  3419.  @hugejackedman7423  well i was. Then I saw the “peaceful and law abiding” right wing become the same thugs they blamed the left as being. So I said “screw it”, and let me tell you, staying out of politics has been great. I’m so less stressed out lately.
    1
  3420. The one that’s still fighting, being resupplies monthly, and recently took back more of its land? That’s a collapse to you???
    1
  3421. Not before Russia. It happened once, it can happen again,
    1
  3422. I’d give it 6 months until we see T-34s rolling out.
    1
  3423. It’s a good thing Ukraine is taking them back then.
    1
  3424. B U L L S H I T
    1
  3425. ….aliens?….
    1
  3426. Are you kidding? Watching Russians get fucked and stacked like cardwood is the best use of my tax money I’ve ever seen!👍🇺🇸
    1
  3427. You can’t be 6ft under fast enough boomer.
    1
  3428. That’s most counties my guy.
    1
  3429. They shouldn’t have invaded South Korea then.
    1
  3430. The hell you can’t. Unlike iraq and Libya, North Korea was actually an aggressor when they invaded South Korea.
    1
  3431. It’s almost like North Korea was invading the south or something…..
    1
  3432. The south didn’t invade the north, now did it?
    1
  3433. They were a threat till about the 90s. Western military tech just greatly out paced there military abilities. That, and without Soviet help, most of the NK military has fallen into disrepair and is under supplied. It’s air force in particular.
    1
  3434.  @anthonyf616  and you think they’ll vote trump this year instead?🤡
    1
  3435. No, they just don’t think it’s worth arguing with people who think a vaccine is the mark of the beast, a disease gets spread by 5G wifi, an election was “stolen” and think the law doesn’t apply to them, because they don’t think their a 14th amendment citizen…. Probably because the right doesn’t live in reality anymore.
    1
  3436. No, because that’s an oxymoron.
    1
  3437.  @rezaulkarimkhan979  what? Too scared your women might ask for equal rights you need a whole police force just to crack down on them? 🤡 or just human rights for that matter?
    1
  3438. At least we’re not afraid of our women enough to need a “morality police” to keep our masculinity 😂
    1
  3439. Ya because trump actually attacked Iranian assets, and almost got us dragged into the Syrian civil war directly with at stupid tomahawk strike he ordered. You do remember that too right?
    1
  3440. Would India even get involved?
    1
  3441. No, trump would have gotten us involved directly within the first month of the war.
    1
  3442. Yep. This so going to fail faster then Google Glass
    1
  3443. Clockwork orange
    1
  3444. Ya ok buddy. They’ve been “collapsing” since 2015 at least, yet here we are, still taking about there coming “collapse” 🙄
    1
  3445.  @Morn56976  well they made Finland join NATO by invading a neutral nation like Ukraine. So your argument is false right off the bat.
    1
  3446. Lol, how😂
    1
  3447. By whom? 😂🤡
    1
  3448. Because they don’t want to be invaded like Ukraine has, so they joined NATO as soon as possible.
    1
  3449.  @deepfakeguy468  cope harder buddy. Your Ruskie cannon fodder are running scared now. And only more lend lease will arrive from now on.
    1
  3450.  @davidcrandall4958  cope harder buddy, the Vatniks are running scared. Ukraine just rolled back all of Russia early summer gains in 3 days
    1
  3451. Hey you can try. The American civilian population will Meet you with a rifle behind every bush and tree.
    1
  3452. And who’s going to spring this “trap”? The Russians left tons of there gear and vehicles behind, and seeing how no mobile reserves have shown up, I’m going to say they don’t have a force ready to do much of anything, let alone “spring a trap”.
    1
  3453. They said the same thing about Moskava, the defence of Kyiv, snake island, Hostemel….. Seems to be a lot of “temporary victories” are adding up now.
    1
  3454. escape from Kharkiv , if you will….
    1
  3455. Now they take back the rest of it
    1
  3456.  @madedits2228  how are they lying? There showing us that’s it’s a worthwhile investment with this victory.
    1
  3457. And? That’s even better!
    1
  3458. Yannick Fuhrmann - first off, what would make it blow up? Chernobyl was caused by poor soviet engineering and politicians trying to play the blame game. Fukushima was caused by a earthquake + tsunami. Now if I recall, Germany has some of the best engineers in the world and I can safely assume it has never had a tsunami.
    1
  3459. Hey Germany, missing those nuclear reactors yet? All that near-limitless energy would have avoided this mess.
    1
  3460. 9 months later buddy. Still waiting vatnik
    1
  3461. Ok 1) napalm isn’t all that effective of the aircraft has to dodge AA, SAM and MANPAD fire to hit it. (Almost napalm munitions are “dumb” bombs) 2) yes…. nuke the USA that totally won’t lead to the apocalypse. You are aware the United States has nukes too right?
    1
  3462. Except from Kyiv, Kharkiv, snake island, Chernihiv, Sumy, Izyum Kherson, Lyman and the rest….
    1
  3463. Are you kidding? Between Chinese carriers and stealth fighters, and Russias fancy “armata” tanks and “S-400” missiles they rant on about, I’d say they LOVE to boast about there gear just as much,
    1
  3464. To upkeep our Nuclear deterrence triad?
    1
  3465. They can barley deal with Soviet left overs their enemies are flying. Good luck taking this baby down.
    1
  3466. Literally ANYONE could have told you that.
    1
  3467. I mean, someone has to fund the construction of said robots first….
    1
  3468. He truly is the worlds best comedian. He made all of Russia into a joke : )
    1
  3469. Screw that. I hope we support Moldova taking back tranistria
    1
  3470. Cope harder. NATO has only gotten stronger
    1
  3471. Ya. They’ll come through Putin’s A@@
    1
  3472. NATO isn’t going to step foot anywhere, it’s not even fighting. But from what I hear, the Ukrainians should be in the city itself with in the next 72 hours.
    1
  3473. Because you also want to see NATO finally enter the war and crush Russias forces in Ukraine?
    1
  3474. Nuclear weapons will not bring victory for Russia. It will only drag it into a much larger war. Once the nuclear Genie is out of the bottle, there’s no putting it back in.
    1
  3475. With his guys only a mile on the other-side of the river?
    1
  3476. Possibly, but they can patch the damn up with a river barge if they had too.
    1
  3477. The Russians can leave Ukraine anytime if they don’t like it
    1
  3478. There’s no US or British soliders in Ukraine.
    1
  3479. I say, Russia doesn’t have the balls.
    1
  3480. Cope harder tankie
    1
  3481. Like what?
    1
  3482. For the Russians, sure.
    1
  3483. No, now they arnt fighting with one arm tied behind their back.
    1
  3484. Russia has been using all it has up to this point. So what changes?
    1
  3485. Hey, least they get paid. Unlike the LPR, DPR, and Chechen cannon fodder.
    1
  3486. Bring it on Putin. We’re not afraid of you anymore.
    1
  3487. And then get routed from Kherson, because it won’t stop the Ukrainians
    1
  3488. With what forces?
    1
  3489. My brother in christ, if they were fighting NATO, this war would be over in a month, after all the failures we’ve seen from the Russians.
    1
  3490. No, we’ll just send more Air defense and anti-drone weapons over. We already got them prepared for winter conditions too.
    1
  3491. He’s choosing to fight, because Russia has shown its self not to be trustworthy and their actions at Butcha and Izyum have shown the Ukrainians what surrender will bring to them.
    1
  3492. Why? He’s bring them victory l, while Russians are only bring them death.
    1
  3493.  @automotivegarcia1  which is all the more reason to give the Ukrainians more air defense to minimize the damages of these attacks, as well as give them longer ranges weapons to hit Russian power plants in retaliation. If we weaken Russia enough with this war, we can finally put some of that bloated defense budget money back into our own country.
    1
  3494. If they had an unlimited supply of missiles, they wouldn’t be buying drones and missiles from Iran right now. And we have plenty more weapons and money go give the Ukrainians
    1
  3495. As many as needed to drive the Russians out. Only victory brings lasting peace.
    1
  3496. Ya no. Ukrianes war effort is driven by western support, not domestic ones. This kind of attack is just going to make the Ukrainians want to fight more, seeing that it’s their homes at stake. If you wanted to cut Ukraine supply of weapons and ammo, you would have to attack American factories to do it
    1
  3497. But some how capturing a bombed out wasteland with no people left in it after 10 months of throwing bodies at it was somehow a better victory for Russia?
    1
  3498. The Russians reap what they sow. They don’t like getting bombed, then they should leave Ukraine.
    1
  3499.  @BH-vh3iu  No definitely cringe. Because it didnt end the war like they hyped it up despite all the losses
    1
  3500. After months of monumentally failing, Russia managed to take a bombed out wasteland formally known as “Bakmut” with a population less then a few dozen by the end of the battle, and entire Russian fan-base creamed their pants. Absolute cringe.
    1
  3501.  @igosannuffin7565  ISW and Rybar both confirmed Ukrainian troops entering Verbove as of yesterday, which would mean they’ve crossed the Surovikin line. Russian telegram channels are saying the Russians are starting to move personnel and equipment from Tokmak, while RT reported VDV units being send in to the area to try and plug the hole the Ukrainians made.
    1
  3502. And now the Russians are evacuating Tokmak and the Ukrainians crossed the Surovikin line this morning at Verbove…..
    1
  3503. The US isn’t really being hit by the sanctions. And none the less, I still support our lend lease effort to Ukraine
    1
  3504. You what else is useless in the winter? The Russian army. Because General winter loves the Ukrainians too.
    1
  3505. No more appeasement.
    1
  3506.  @ej3358  and what exactly do they think is going to happen when they use nukes against the second largest nuclear Arsenal on earth? I mean, they have, at best 40 small yield nuclear bombs, and no hydrogen warheads. Those nukes are really only there to keep Kim in power and keep the US/China from throwing him out; like a criminal threatening the cops with C4 strapped to his chest.
    1
  3507. So long as we got Poland to act as a droping off point we will.
    1
  3508. We nuke him back. And if we don’t escalate further, we talk.
    1
  3509. No, it’s just going to have to accept American fuel and food now.
    1
  3510. No more appeasement. That’s how we go into this mess in the first place. If Putin wants to let the nuclear genie out of the bottle, we will respond in kind.
    1
  3511. About fricken time buddy.
    1
  3512. How? Finland is a independent country and it can join what ever alliance it wants.
    1
  3513. I don’t know Paul, there’s a lot of Indi-film and game makers these days with there crazy ideas. Who knows, maybe the next Spielberg or Kojima is around the corner
    1
  3514. 4:00 hey, are team tries.....
    1
  3515. 2:39- wait, the UK has petitions to have the American president impeached?? He’s not even your leader!! WTF please explain.....
    1
  3516. You know it dawned on me, if Europe becomes majority Muslim, with vary anti- western ideas, what’s going to happen when they get access to Frances nukes, and Europe’s combined military and Economic might?
    1
  3517. Maybe if Russia would stop invading neighboring nations, counties wouldn’t be joing NATO for protection
    1
  3518.  @fazilm1 I’m sorry, what Swedish troops took part in Afghanistan after 9/11? When did Sweden participate in NATO exercises? I’ll wait.
    1
  3519. It wasn’t already?
    1
  3520. Because they need a distraction form their failing war in Ukraine
    1
  3521. And I’m all for it 👍🇺🇸
    1
  3522.  @spoileralert8440  Cool.
    1
  3523. “Civilian military” is a oxymoron. Your either a civilian or your a solider. You can’t be both. There is something suspicious about this.
    1
  3524.  @nmr6988  then you increase the size of the national guard, not make a state sponsored paramilitary unit with no higher oversight other then the governor. What utility does this smaller unit even give when compared to the better national guard?
    1
  3525. Also Louisiana here. Ya, no. There something off about this. Why does Florida need a bigger state guard force first place?
    1
  3526. Ok, why in the world do we need a bigger state guard? What issues does Louisiana face other then hurricanes that would require this?
    1
  3527.  @trigger1030  then your also failure if your education system if you actually think Ukraine or NATO is at fault here.
    1
  3528. NATO didn’t invade Ukraine comrade
    1
  3529. Man, you guys really never get the idea of mural aid and actual international cooperation through your thick skulls do you?
    1
  3530. Or they could get more Shilkas. Maybe some of those old m113 Vulcans too.
    1
  3531. Or you know…the plenty of Shilkas Ukraine has???
    1
  3532. Indeed.
    1
  3533. I mean, the Soviets ended up capturing like 5 of them in the pacific theater.
    1