Comments by "Diogo Jorge" (@DiogoJ1) on "Lavrov: Russia will not pause military operation in Ukraine for peace talks" video.

  1. Not before ending Putin.
    2
  2. Better to die than to serve Russia.
    1
  3.  @777chicha777  Sure... extremely well. That explains the tens of thousands of dead Russian soldiers.
    1
  4.  @vivekprasad3831  If that happens, hopefully Russia will suffer as much as possible before then.
    1
  5. Invasion isn't self defence.
    1
  6.  @acknodbikes5051  Mostly defensive.
    1
  7. @Grim FPV Well, Russia's military is inferior... so...
    1
  8. @Grim FPV Many civilian buildings were damaged in the process, like hospitals and the like. Western leaders don't go to the capitol of Ukraine openly, they are covered by their secret agencies, otherwise Russia would have them killed.
    1
  9. @Grim FPV That's what they want you to believe. Russia was the one who bombed Humanitarian corridors before. Russia doesn't really care if they are being scrutinized. They will just pass blame to Ukraine and pretend it's not their problem.
    1
  10. @Grim FPV Why would Ukraine supposedly shell their own people? No they wouln't. By stopping their own civilians, they would be hurting themselves, and makes no sense, since there were plenty of man who came back to fight for Ukraine, killing them before they could escape would mean less manpower. Russia on the other hand, would stand to gain from blaming it on Ukraine.
    1
  11. @Grim FPV Russia is already blamed for it. So they lose nothing by keeping it up. Also, we should stop pretending that Russia's army is 100% perfectly disciplined and will never commit war crimes under no circustances. All it takes is a single soldier to feel like venting on civilians for hell break loose. Sometimes not even that, if they are paranoic enough they might start killing and assume everyone is a potential enemy.
    1
  12. @Grim FPV Just like how Russia's propaganda that Ukraine is deliberately targeting their own civilians? That's all very nice, but it would have been better if they didn't invade at all. The same could be said about Ukraine's strategy. Wasting resources to hurt their own people wouldn't allow Ukraine to resist for this long.
    1
  13. @Grim FPV Against Donbass, which is a separatist group. Pretty much their an unofficial country. Ukraine have no reason to attack people on the western side.
    1
  14. @Grim FPV And nobody is asking about USA would do. Either way, Russia stands to gain by keeping some infrastructure intact, as they can exploit those as they take over Ukraine. At this point, even if Ukraine turns out to have plenty of skeletons in their closet, Russia is still the most dangerous of the nations. Russia's actions also made Finland and Sweden consider join NATO, so Putin pretty much shoot himself in the foot.
    1
  15. @Grim FPV As long it's NATO personnel that's fine. Since NATO is composed of many nations, not just USA.
    1
  16.  @starman2671  False hopes? What should they hope for then? Because rolling over and die is nothing to hope for. They should fight to the last until Russia leaves or everyone dies.
    1
  17.  @starman2671  It's not dumb. Death is preferable to defeat, least they become tormented by the Russians even further. The people of Ukraine should keep on fightning until Russia leaves. That's their only hope for Ukraine. Instead you get cowardly genes, of pathetic spoiled children who are too afraid of blood to stand for themselves. Ukraine has no future if Russia wins.
    1
  18. That's probably because it's not in his intentions to make Zelensky look good. Bias and all that.
    1
  19. He thinks the same way about Russia.
    1